EVALUATION OF RESEARCH SUBJECT OF DOCTORAL THESES ABOUT TOURISM IN TURKEY WITH SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS

Yıl 2013, Sayı: 15, 205 - 232, 31.12.2013

Hilmi Rafet Yüncü Deniz Karagöz Hilmi Rafet Yüncü

https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.666

Cited By: 9

Öz

Graduate studies an academic prestige for a field. Perhaps of special interest to the scholarly community, is the growing interest of studying tourism at the doctoral level, as indicated by the small but growing number of doctoral dissertations focusing on tourism. This is certainly a promising development which requires attention. Research subjects of dissertation between universities are important knowledge fields about forms of knowledge networks structures in a scientific community and flow of knowledge traffic. The study provides an analysis of all tourism dissertations submitted and accepted for higher degrees by all participating Australian universities, institutes, and colleges in 1991-2010. The aims of this study revealed to tourism dissertation knowledge network structure and subjects of dissertation in periodical manner. The data was collected from National Dissertation Database of YOK between years of 1991-2010. Social Network Analysis is used to define network structure and to examine links between structures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tourism, dissertitations, social network analysis, universities, research subjects.

SOSYAL AĞ ANALİZİ İLE TURİZM ALANINDA YAZILMIŞ DOKTORA TEZLERİNİN ARAŞTIRMA KONULARININ İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Doktora tez çalışmaları bir alanın akademik anlamda ilerlemesinde önemli bir araç olarak görülmektedir. Turizm alanında yazılmış doktora tezlerinin incelenmesi, turizmde akademik alanın hangi ölçüde geliştiğinin ve hangi noktalarda ilerlediğinin görülmesi açısından önem taşımaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, 1991-2010 yılları arasında Türkiye’de üretilen doktora tezlerinde ele alınan araştırma konularının incelenerek turizm bilgi ağ yapısının ortaya çıkarılması ve yıllar içerisindeki değişiminin incelenmesidir. Veriler Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu Tez Merkezi’nde sisteme girilmiş tezlerden elde edilmiştir. Çalışmada verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve sosyal ağ analizi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda turizm alanında üretilen tezlerde ele alınan araştırma konuları çerçevesinde disiplinler arası bir yaklaşımdan ziyade daha merkezi, kapalı ve durağan bir bilgi sisteminin oluştuğu belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada ayrıca doktora tezlerinin üretildiği üniversiteler, üretim yılları ve araştırma konuları arasındaki ilişkilere ilişkin bulgulara ve değerlendirmelere yer verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turizm, doktora tezleri, sosyal ağ analizi, üniversiteler, araştırma konuları.

Kaynakça

• Afifi, H. G. (2009). “Tourism as the Subject of Doctoral Theses in Egypt, 1975-2008”. Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research. Vol: 20:(2), ss. 387-400.
• Bachus, D. (1981). “Dissertations on Travel, Recreation and Leisure”. Journal of Travel Research. Vol:20 (1). Ss:9-21.
• Bao, J. (2002). “Tourism Geography as The Subject Of Doctoral Dissertations in China, 1989-2000.” Tourism Geographies, 4(2): 148-152.
• Borgatti, S. P. Everett, M. G. ve Freeman, L. C. (2002). “Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis.” Cambridge, Mass: Analytic Technologies. Borgatti, S.P. ve Everett, M.G.(1997). “Network Analysis of 2-Mode Data”. Social Networks 19: 243–269.
• Botterill, D., Haven, C. ve Gale, T. (2002). “A Survey of Doctoral Theses Accepted By Universities in The UK and Ireland For Studies Related to Tourism, 1990–1999.” Tourist Studies. 2(3): 283-311.
• Bushell, R., Prosser, G. M., Faulkner, H. W. ve Jafari, J. (2001). “Tourism Research in Australia.” Journal of Travel Research, 39(3): 323-326.
• Cricthon, K. (1978). “Dissertations on Travel, Recreation and Leisure.” Journal of Travel Research, 17(1): 14-22.
• Dale, C. ve Robinson, N. (2001) "The Theming of Tourism Education: a Three-Domain Approach." International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(1): 30–35.
• Durland, M. M., Fredericks, K. A. (2006). Introduction to Social Network Analysis, New Directions for Evaluation, 107: 5-13.
• Everett, M. ve Borgatti, S. P. (2005). “Ego Network Betweenness.” Social Networks, 27: 31Everton, S. F. (2013). Disrupting Dark Networks (Structural Analysis in Social Sciences). Cambridge University Press.
• Gürsakal, N. (2009). “Sosyal Ağ Analizi”. Dora Yayıncılık.
• Hall, C. M. (1991). “Tourism as the Subject of Post-graduate Dissertations in Australia.” Annals of Tourism Research, 18(3): 520-523.
• Huang, S. S. (2011). “Tourism as The Subject of China’s Doctoral Dissertations.” Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1): 316–319.
• Jafari, J. ve Aaser, D. (1988). “Tourism as the Subject of Doctoral Dissertations.” Annals of Tourism Research, 15(4): 407-429.
• Jogaratnam, G., Chon, K., McCleary, K., Mena, M. ve Yoo, J. (2005). “An Analysis of Institutional Contributors to Three Major Academic Tourism Journals: 1992– 200” Tourism Management, 26(5): 641–648.
• Kozak N. (1998). “The Development of Tourism and Hospitality Research in Turkey: An Examination of Bibliographic Inputs of Dissertations Written Between 1952– 1995”. Anatolia, 9(2): 117-121.
• Kozak, N., Kozak Akoğlan, M. ve Kozak M. (2010). Genel Turizm. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Laing, J.H. ve Weiler, B. (2008). “Postgraduate Tourism Research in Australia: A Trend Analysis 1969-2005.” Procceding in CAUTHE Conference. http://www.griffith.edu.au/conference/cauthe2008/refereed-papers/RP028. pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 13 Ekim 2012).
• Leung, X.Y., Xu, L. ve Bai, B. (2011). “A Social Network Analysis of Doctoral Dissertations from 1999 to 2009.” 16th Graduate Students Research Conference, http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 1067&context=gradconf_hospitality
• Meyer-Arendt, K. J. (2000). “Commentary: Tourism Geography as The Subject of North American Doctoral Dissertations and Master’s Theses, 1951–98.” Tourism Geographies, 2(2): 140–156.
• Meyer-Arendt, K. ve Justice, C. (2002). “Tourism as the Subject of North American Doctoral Dissertations, 1987-2000.” Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4): 117111
• Olalı, H.(1984). “Türkiye’de Turizm Eğitiminin Yapısı ve Sorunları.” Turizm Eğitim Kongresi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Pizam, A. ve Chacko, E. M. (1982). “Tourism and Hospitality Related Dissertations, 1976-1980.” Annals of Tourism Research, 9(4): 587-562.
• Scott J. (2000). “Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.” Sage Publications
• Wasserman, S. ve Galaskiewicz, J.(1994). “Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.” SEGA.
• Xiao, H., ve Smith, S. (2006). “The Making of Tourism Research.” Annals of Tourism Research, 33, 490-507.
• Ying, T. ve Xiao, H. (2011). “Subjects Knowledge Linkage: A Social Network Analysis of Tourism Dissertation.” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 36(4): 4504