Effectiveness of Agriculture forestry and environment committee in adoption of Sustainable Soil Management Practices ( SSMP) technology in Ramechhap and Dolakha , Nepal

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 27 - 35, 30.01.2017

Rosan Subedi Jay Prakash Dutta Rishi Ram Kattel Ankit Koırala

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.311059

Öz

 

Bu araştırma, AFEC'in SSMP
teknolojisinin benimsenmesindeki rolünü analiz etmek için Nepal'in Ramechap ve
Dolakha ilçelerinde gerçekleştirildi. Toplam 40 örnek, 4 VDC'den, yani
Sindrawati'den ve Chisapani Namdu, Puranogaun'dan rasgele toplanmıştır. 2
VDC'deki bu 4 VDC'nin içinden AFEC kuruldu. Hem nitel hem de niceliksel bilgi
yarı yapılandırılmış anket kullanılarak hanehalkı araştırması, önemli
bilgilendirici görüşme ve odak grup tartışması ile toplanmıştır. Çalışmadan,
katılımcı planlama, kaynak seferberliği ve tarım hizmeti sunumunda bu
komitelerin etkinliğinin son derece önemli olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Çiftçilerin
yerel düzey planlamasına katılımı AFEC'li VDC'de (% 73,3) AFEC'siz VDC'lere (%
43,3) göre anlamlı derecede yüksektir. AFEC'li çiftçiler, AFEC'siz çiftçilere
kıyasla 2.84 endeks değeri ile teknik servis almaya başlamıştır. Ortalama benimseme
düzeyi AFEC'li VDC'lerde (yüzde 43.69 HH), AFEC olmayan VDC'ye (yüzde 11.78)
göre anlamlı derecede yüksektir. Logit regresyon modeline göre HH geliştirme
eğitimi ve AFEC varlığı SSMP teknolojisinin benimsenmesinin belirlenmesinde
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teknoloji Benimseme, Katılım, Hibe, Kaynak Seferberliği

Effectiveness of Agriculture forestry and environment committee in adoption of Sustainable Soil Management Practices ( SSMP) technology in Ramechhap and Dolakha , Nepal

Öz

Abstract

This
research was conducted in Ramechap and Dolakha district of Nepal to analyze the
role of AFEC in SSMP technology adoption. A total of 120 samples were collected
randomly from 4 VDCs i.e Sindrawati, and Chisapani Namdu, Puranogaun. Out of
these 4 VDC in 2 VDC, AFEC was formed. Both qualitative and quantitative
information were collected using semi-structured questionnaire by house hold
survey, key informant interview and focus group discussion. From the study it
was revealed that effectiveness of these committees in participatory
planning, resource mobilization and agriculture service provision was highly
significant. Participation of farmers in local level planning was significantly
higher in VDC with AFEC (73.3 percent) than in VDCs without AFEC (43.3
percent). Farmers with AFEC were getting technical service easily with the index value of 2.84 as compared to
farmers without AFEC. The mean level of adoption was significantly higher in
VDCs with AFEC (43.69 percent HH) than in VDC without AFEC (11.78 percent
HH).  According to Logit regression
model, training education of HH head and presence of AFEC were found to be
statistically significant in determining the adoption of SSMP technology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technology adoption, Participation, VDC block grant, Resource mobilization

Kaynakça

• Abebaw, D. and Belay, K. (2001). Factors influencing adoption of high yielding maize varieties in south western Ethiopia: An application of logit. Quarterly journal of international agriculture, Vol. 40 (2001), No.2.
• Dahal, H. (2010).A Country Report Presentation in the Workshop on Rural Development for High-level Officers of AFACI Members Countries” held on August 7-14, 2010 in Suwon, Republic of Korea.
• Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. 4th ed. United States Military Academy, West Print. 644 p.
• Irz, X., Thirtle, C., Lin, L., Wiggins, S. (2001). Agricultural productivity growth and poverty alleviation. Development Policy Review 19 (4), 449–466.
• Karki, L. B., and Bauer, S. (2004). Technology adoption and household food security. Analysing factors determining technology adoption and impact of project intervention: A case of smallholder peasants in Nepal. Deutscher Trope tag, 5-10. Available at: http://www.tropentag.de/2004/abstracts/full/107.
• MOAD. (2013). Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture 2012/2013. Ministry of Agriculture Development. Agri-Business Promotion and Statistics Division (ABPSD), Kathmandu, Nepal. Available at: http://moad.gov.np/yearbook/ YearBook2013Whole.pdf.
• Shrestha, S.G. (2012). Agriculture Extension Strategies of the Government of Nepal in the Context of Devolution of Agriculture - Mobilization of VAW and ELF through VDC. National Workshop organized by SSMP from 11-12 June 2012 in Hotel Himalaya, Lalitpur Nepal.
• SSMP. (2014). Decentralized agriculture extension program conduction at local level. Sustainable soil management programme. Helvetas, Nepal.
• Thirtle, C., Beyers, L., Ismael, Y., Piesse, J. (2003). Can GM-Technologies Help the Poor? The Impact of Bt. Cotton in Makhathini Flats, Kwazulu-Natal. World Development Vol. 31, No.4. pp:717-732. Elsevier Science Ltd., Great Britain.
• Winters, P., de Janvry, A., Saudolet, E., Stamoulis, K. (1998). The role of agriculture in economic development: visible and invisible surplus transfers. Journal of Development Studies 345, 71–97.