Mısır Bitkisinin Demir İçeriği ve Veriminin Farklı Dozlarda Atık Su Çamuru Uygulamasına Tepkisi Üzerine Bir Ön Çalışma

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 63 - 70, 24.05.2019

Bülent Yağmur Bülent Okur Ekrem Özlü Nur Okur

https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.568837

Öz

ÖZ:
Arıtma çamurlarının tehlikeli ağır metaller ve toksik maddeler içermemesi
durumunda, topraklarda kullanılabilirliği mümkündür. Bu ön çalışmada mısır
bitkisine arıtma çamuru ile birlikte uygulanan demirli gübrelemenin bu bitkinin
verim ve bitki besin elementi içeriği üzerine olan etkisi belirlenmeye
çalışılmıştır. Araştırma saksı denemesi olarak 3 tekrarlamalı olarak tesadüf
parselleri deneme desenine göre yürütülmüş ve saksılarda C-955 silajlık hibrit
mısır çeşidi yetiştirilmiştir. Denemede saksılara temel gübreleme sabit dozda
200 mg kg^–1 N, 100 mg kg^–1 P ve 150 mg kg^–1 K
olarak uygulanmıştır. Deneme konuları olarak; (K) % 100 toprak, (T1) 5 mg kg^–1
Fe (arıtma çamuru demiri) + 10 mg kg^–1 Fe (FeSO₄.7H₂O),
(T2) 10 mg kg^–1 Fe (arıtma çamuru demiri) + 5 mg kg^–1 Fe
(FeSO₄.7H₂O), (T3) 15 mg kg^–1 Fe (arıtma
çamuru demiri) ve (T4) 15 mg kg^–1 Fe (FeSO₄.7H₂O)  belirlenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda arıtma
çamuru ve arıtma çamuru demir kombinasyonları kontrole oranla mısır bitkisinin
yaş ağırlığı, kuru ağırlığı, bitki boyu, yaprak sayısı ve bitkinin N,  K, 
Fe,  Zn ve Cu içeriğini arttırdığı
belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca bitkinin demir ihtiyacını karşılamak için arıtma
çamurundaki 15 mg kg^–1 Fe uygulamasının yeterli olacağı sonucuna
varılmıştır. Bununla beraber, bu çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar bu deneme
toprağı ve arıtma çamuru için geçerlidir ve toprak ve iklim gibi farklı
koşullar altında değişebileceğinden konuda geniş kapsamlı çalışmalar
yapılmalıdır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mısır, demir, arıtma çamuru, verim.

A Preliminary Study on Response of Iron Content and Yield of Corn to Different Rates of Sewage Sludge

Öz

preliminary
study was carried out in order to investigate the effects of application of
treated sludge and Fe fertilizer on the yield and Fe content of maize. The
trial was conducted in randomized plots design with three replications as pot experiment
and C-955 hybrid maize was grown for silage. As basic fertilization, 200 mg kg^-1
N, 100 mg kg^-1 P and 150 mg kg^-1 K were applied to
all of the pots. Treatments were (C) control, (T1) 5 mg kg^-1Fe (Fe
in sludge) + 10 mg kg^-1Fe (FeSO₄,7H₂O), (T2)
10 mg kg^-1 Fe (Fe in sludge) + 5 mg kg^-1 Fe (FeSO₄,7H₂O),
(T3) 15 mg kg^-1 Fe (Fe in sludge) and (T4) 15 mg kg^-1 Fe
(FeSO₄,7H₂O). Applications of sludge and Fe increased wet
weight, dry weight, plant height, leaf number and the content of N, K, Fe, Zn
and Cu of maize plant. It was concluded that application of 15 mg kg^-1
Fe in sludge is sufficient for Fe need of maize. However, the obtained results
from this study were valid only for this study soil and sewage sludge and
should be used without generalization as they can vary under different
conditions such as soil and climate. Therefore, further researches are needed
on this field.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maize, iron, treated sludge, yield.

Kaynakça

• Al-Nahidh, S. 1991. Effect of frequency of irrigation on sewage sludge-amended soil and corn nutrition. Arid Soil Res. Rehabil. 5 (2): 137-146.
• Allison, L. E., and C. D. Moodie. 1965. Carbonate. pp. 1379-1396. In: C. A. Black, D. D. Evans, J. L. White, L. E. Ensminger, and F. E. Clark (Eds.) Methods of Soil Analaysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. No. 9 in the Series Agronomy. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. U.S.A.
• Arcak, S., C. Turkmen, A. Karaca, and E. Erdogan. 2000. A Study on potential agricultural use of sewage sludge of Ankara wastewater treatment plant, Proc. of Int. Symp. on Desertification. 13-17 June 2000. Konya. s. 345-349.
• Bellamy, K. L., C. Chong, and R. A. Cline. 1995. Paper sludge utilization in agriculture and container nursery culture. J Environ Qual. 24 (6): 1074-1082.
• Bremner, J. M. 1965. Total Nitrogen. p. 1149-1178. In: C.A. Black (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part-2. American Society of Agronomy Inc, Publisher Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
• Black, C. A. 1965. Method of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Inc, Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Bouyoucos, G. J. 1962. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of the soils. Agron J. 54: 419-434.
• Christie, P. D., D. L. Easson, and J. R. Picton. 2001. Agronomic value of alkaline-stabilized sewage biosolids for spring barley. Agron J. 93 (1): 144-151.
• Cimrin, K. M., M. A. Bozkurt ve I. Erdal. 2000. Kentsel arıtma çamurunun tarımda fosfor kaynağı olarak kullanılması, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 10 (1): 85-90.
• Cimrin, K. M., S. Karaca ve M. A. Bozkurt. 2001. Mısır bitkisinin gelişimi ve beslenmesi üzerine humik asit ve N P K uygulamalarının etkisi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 7 (2): 95-100.
• El Dawwey, G. M. 1993. Effectiveness of sewage sludges and basic slag wheat plants grown in sandy calcareous and loamy soils, Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24: 171-184.
• El-Naim, M. A., M. El-Housseini and M.H Naeem. 2005. Safety use of sewage sludge as soil conditioner. J. Envıron. Scı. Heal. A. 39 (2): 435-444.
• Espinosa, A. P., J. Moreno-Caselles, R. Moral, M. D. Perez-Murcia, and I. Gomez. 2000. Effects of sewage sludge application on salinity and physico-chemical properties of a calcareous soil, Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 45 (1): 51-56.
• Galdos, M. V., I. C. De Maria, and O. A. Camargo. 2004. Soil chemical properties and maize production in a sewage sludge-amended soil. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo. 28 (3): 569-577.
• Garcia, M.D., R. Rodriguez, C.Cruzl and F.Lorenzo.2007. Seasonal and time variability of heavy metal content and of its chemical forms in sewage sludge from different wastewater treatment plants. Sci. Total Environ. 382 (1): 82-92.
• Giannakis, G.V., N.N. Kourgialas, V.Paranychianakis, N.P.Nikolaidis and N. Kalogerakis. 2014. Effects of Municipal Solid Waste Compost on Soil Properties and Vegetables Growth. Compost Sci. Util. 22 (3): 116-131.
• Junio, Z., R. Geraldo, R. A.Sampaio, and G. B. Santos. 2011, Heavy metals concentrations in maize fertilized with phosphate rock and sewage sludge compost. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agr. Amb. 15 (10): 1082-1088.
• Kacar, B. 1984. Bitki Besleme Uygulama Kılavuzu, Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No. 900, Uygulama Kılavuzu No. 214, Ankara.
• Khan, K. D., and B. Frankland. 1983. Chemical forms of Cd and Pb in some contaminated soils, Environ. Pollut. 6: 15-31.
• Knudsen, D., G. A. Peterson, and P. F. Pratt. 1982. Lithium, sodium and potassium. p. 225-246. In: A. L. Page et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
• Lambert, D., and T. Weidensaul. 1991. Element uptake by mycorrhizal soybean from sewage-sludge-treated soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:393-398.
• Lindsay, W. L., and W. A. Norvell. 1978 . Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42: 421-428.
• Lombi, E., and M. H. Gerzabek. 1998. Determination of mobile heavy metal fraction in soil: Results of a pot experiment with sewage sludge. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 29: 2545-2556.
• Macedo, F. G., W. J. Mello, L. C. S. Merlino, M. H. Ribeiro, M. A. Camacho, and G. M. P. Melo. 2012. Agronomic Traits of Corn Fertilized with Sewage Sludge. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 43: 1790-1799.
• Mays, D. A. and P. Giordano. 1988 . Benefits from land application of municipal sewage sludge, Tennessee Valley Authority, National Fertilizer Development Center, 49 p. USA.
• Menelik, G., R. B. Reneau Jr., D. C. Martens, and T. W. Simpson. 1991 . Yield and elemental composition of wheat grain as influenced by source and rate of nitrogen. Journal of plant nutrition 14: 205-217.
• Michael, K., A. McClintock, and A. Samuel. 1995. The availability of phosphorus in municipal wastewater sludge as a function of the phosphorus removal process and sludge treatment method. Water Environ. Res. 67 (3): 282-289.
• Olsen, S. R., and E. L. Sommers. 1982. Phosphorus soluble in sodium bicarbonate. p. 404-460. In: A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney (Eds), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.
• Pagliai, M., and G. Guidi. 1980. Porosity and pore size distribution in a field test following sludge and compost application, pp. 545-552. In: P. L’Hermite, H. Ott (Eds). Characterization, Treatment and Use of Sewage Sludge, Springer.
• Pinamonti, F., G. Stringari, F. Gasperi, and G. Zorzi. 1997. The use of compost: its effects on heavy metal levels in soil and plants. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 21: 129-143.
• Qasim, M., N. Javed, and M. Subhan. 2001. Effect of sewage sludge on the growth of maize crop. J. Biol. Sci. 1 (2): 52-54.
• Rao, C. R. 1973. Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. Sec. Ed., New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Reed, B., P. Carriere, and M. Matsumoto. 1991. Applying sludge on agricultural land. Bio Cycle, 37: 57-60.
• Richard, L. 1969. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agricultural handbook. United States Salinity Laboratory Staff, United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 60, Washington.
• Warman, P., and W. Termeer. 2005 . Evaluation of sewage sludge, septic waste and sludge compost applications to corn and forage: Ca, Mg, S, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn and B content of crops and soils. Bioresource Technology 96: 1029-1038.