Bazı Organik Besin Kaynaklarının Cin Mısırın (Zea mays L. everta) Tane Verimine Etkisi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 60 - 71, 31.03.2018

Haktan Cihangir Abdullah Öktem

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.446383

Cited By: 3

Öz

This study was carried out to determine effect of sixteen different organic nutrition sources to grain yield of popcorn (Zea mays L. everta) in Çermik district of Diyarbakır province of Turkey between 2010 and 2011 years. The research was established according to Randomized Complete Block Designs (RCBD) with 3 replicates and Ant-Cin 98 popcorn variety was used as crop material in the study. Organic nutrition sources were torf, compost, cattle manure, chicken manure, horse manure, sheep manure, pigeon manure, vermicompost, seaweed + cattle manure, compost + humic acid, cattle manure + humic acid, chicken manure + humic acid, horse manure + humic acid, sheep manure + humic acid and torf + humic acid except conventional. In both years, applications affected significantly popcorn yield (P≤0.01). According to average of two years, the highest popcorn grain yields were found at seaweed + cattle manure, horse manure + humic acid and sheep manure + humic acid applications. Grain yields of these applications were 526.54 kg da-1, 516.85 kg da-1 and 497.07 kg da-1, respectively. Seaweed + cattle manure, horse manure + humic acid, sheep manure + humic acid and pigeon manure of applications were caused a 9.47%, 7.45%, 3.34%, 0.52% increase in yield compared with the conventional application, respectively. Also economic analysis was performed in this study. The greatest net profits were obtained from horse manure + humic acid application (2280.64 TL da-1) in 2010 while horse manure (2545.82 TL da-1) application in 2011. According to yield, quality and economic net profit; horse manure, chicken manure, compost, cattle manure, sheep manure and humic acid applications can be used in organic popcorn farming. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Popcorn; Organic manure; Humic acid; Grain yield

Kaynakça

• Acar M, Dok M & Caner Y K (2009). Organik ve geleneksel tarım metodu ile üretilen nohut’un verim, maliyet ve kalite kriterleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. I. GAP Organik Tarım Kongresi, 1720 Kasım 2009, Şanlıurfa, s. 38-46
• Açıkgöz N, İlker E & GokcoL A (2004). Assessment of biological research on the computer. EU, TOTEM, No: 2, İzmir
• Amanullah M M, Alagesan A, Vaiyapuri K, Pazhanivelan S & Sathyamoorthi K (2006). Intercropping and organic manures on the growth and yield of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.). Reseaerch Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 2(5): 183-189
• Amujoyegbe B J, Opabode J T & Olayinka A (2007). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizier on yield and chlorophyll content of maize (Zea mays L.) and Sorghum Bicolour (L.) Moenc. African Journal of Biotechnology 6(16): 1869-1873
• Anaç D & Okur B (1996). Toprak verimliliğinin doğal yollar ile artırılması. Ekolojik (Organik, Biyolojik) Tarım Organizasyon Derneği (ETO), İzmir, s. 37-73 Anonim (2011). Diyarbakır iline ait 2010, 2011 ve uzun yıllar iklim verileri. Diyarbakır Meteoroloji Bölge Müdürlüğü, Diyarbakır
• Ashoka P, Anand S R, Mudalagiriyappa P & Smitha R (2009). Effect of macro and micronutrients with organics on growth, quality, yield and economics of baby corn (Zea mays L.) in tungabhadra command area. Crop Research (Hisar) 37(1-3): 15-18
• Bamire A S & Amujoyegbe B J (2004). Economics of poultry manure utilization in land quality improvement among integrated poultry-maize holder farmers in Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 23(3): 21-37
• Beşirli G, Sönmez İ, Keçeci M & Güçdemir İ H (2009). Organik domates yetiştiriciliğinde yeşil gübreleme ve bazı besin maddelerinin toprak yapısı üzerine etkisi. 1. GAP Organik Tarım Kongresi 17-20 Kasım 2009, Şanlıurfa, s. 583-591
• Cengiz R, Yanıkoğlu S & Sezer M C (2010). Sentetik ve organik gübrelerin mısırda (Zea mays L.) verim ve kaliteye etkisi. (Ed: A A Vural), Organik Tarım Araştırma Sonuçları 2005-2010. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Ankara, s. 213-220
• Delate K & Combardella C (2000). Comparison of organic and conventional crops at the nelly-kinyon long-term agroeciological research. 2000. Iova University. Armstrong Research an Demonstraion Farm Bulletin. 7: 208-210
• Dobbs T L, Leddy M G & Smolik J D (1988). Factor influencing the economic patential for alternative farming systems. Case Analyses in South Dakota. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3: 26-34
• Dordas C A, Lithourgidis A S, Matsi T & Barbayiannis N (2008). Application of liquid cattle manure and inorganic fertilizers affect dry matter, nitrogen accumulation, and partitioning in maize. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 80(3): 283-296
• Efthimiadou A, Bilalis D, Karkanis A & FroudWilliams B (2010). Combined organic/inorganic fertilization enhance soil quality and increased yield, photosynthesis and sustainability of sweet maize crop. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4(9): 722-729
• Gao F, Cao L, Chen G & Shi K (2003). Applied test and study on biological organic fertilizer in glutinous corn. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University-Agricultural Science 21(3): 237-241 Gerzabek M H & Ulah S M (1988). Influence of fulvic and humic acids on the Zn uptake by corn (Zea mays L.) from nutrient solution.
• Mitteilungen der Deutschen Badenkundlichen Gesellschaft 56: 141-146 Gürses M A (2010). Mısır (Zea mays indentata Sturt.) yetiştiriciliğinde değişik yeşil gübre ve çiftlik gübresi uygulamalarının verim ve verim unsurlarına etkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Basılmamış), Adana
• Kan A (2005). Sert mısırda organik ve inorganik gübre dozlarının koçan püskülü verimi ve püsküldeki bitki besin elementi içerikleri üzerine etkileri. Türkiye VI. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 5-9 Eylül 2005, Antalya (Araştırma Sunusu) Cilt I, s. 253-256
• Khan H Z, Malik M A & Saleem M F (2008). Effect of rate and source of organic material on the production potential of spring maize (Zea mays L.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 45(1): 40-43
• Kün E (1997). Tahıllar II (Sıcak iklim tahılları), Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 1452, Ders Kitabı No: 432, Ankara
• Leaungvutivirog C, Sunantapongsuk V, Limtong P, Nakapraves P & Piriyaprin S (2004). Effect of organic fertilizer on soil improvement in Mab Bon, Tha Yang, Satuk and Renu Series for Corn Cultivation in Thailand. Symposium, 14-21 August 2002, No: 57, Paper No: 1899
• Lee Y S & Bartlett R J (1976). Stimulation of plant growth by humic substances. Soil Science Society of American Journal 40: 876-879
• Liu Y T (2003). A positioning study on applying organic fertilizer in maize field on dryland. Journal of Maize Sciences 11(2): 86-88
• Mahesh L C, Kalyanamurthy K N, Ramesha Y M, Yogeeshappa H, Shivakumar K M & Prakash H (2010). Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 6(1): 275-277
• Manju B & Mukerji K G (1994). Efficacy of root litter as a biofertilizer. Biology and Fertility of Soils 18(3): 228-230
• Mitchell C C & Tu S (2005). Long-term evaluation of pultry litter as a source of nitrogen for cotton and corn. Agronomy Journal 97: 399-407
• Morris D R & Lathwell D J (2004). Anaerobically digested dairy manure as fertilizer for maize in acid and alkaline soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 35(11-12): 1757-1771
• Neill M & Robinson K (2001). NMSU testing organic alternative to chemical fertilizers. New Mexica State University Research Bulletins 6: 2194-2195 Öktem A (1997). GAP bölgesinde mısır üretim olanakları. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 1(2): 113-122
• Prasanna K, Halepyati A S, Desai B K & Pujari B T (2007). Effect of integrated nutrient management on the productivity and nutrient uptake by maize (Zea mays L.).
• Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 20(4): 833-834 Resmi gazete (2010). Organik tarımın esasları ve uygulanmasına ilişkin yönetmelik. http://www. resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2010/08/20100818-4.htm/ (Erişim tarihi: 18.08.2010)
• Shafiq-ur-Rehman M A, Bukhsh A H A & Ishaque M (2008). Comparative performance and profitability of two corn hybrids with organic and inorganic fertilizers. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 45(3): 8-12
• Sharif M, Ahmad M, Sarir M S & Khattak R A (2004). Effect of organic and ınorganic fertilizers on the yield and yield components of maize. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering, Veterinary Sciences 20(1): 11-16
• Şahin S, Atay S, Gökalp K, Çolak S, Demirtaş M N, Öztürk B, Yılmaz K U, Fidan Ş & Çelik B (2011). Malatya yöresinde organik kayısı yetiştiriciliği. Organik Tarım Araştırma Sonuçları, T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye, s. 51-56 Şeker C & Ersoy İ (2005). Değişik organik gübreler ve leonarditin toprak özellikleri ve mısır bitkisinin (Zea mays L.) gelişimi üzerine etkileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 19(35): 46-50
• Thakur G D, Bavalgave V G, Waghmare M S, Kesare B J & Khandekar B S (2009). Effect of fertilizer levels on growth and yield of sweet corn. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5(1): 100-102
• Ülger A C (1998). Farklı azot dozu ve sıra üzeri mesafelerinin patlak mısırda (Zea mays everta Sturt.) tane verimi ve bazı tarımsal özelliklere etkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 13(1): 155-164
• Vuruş H C, Çınar S & Akdemir Ş (2000). Çukurova bölgesinde makarnalık buğdayın azotlu gübre kullanımının ekonomik analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 15(1): 85-90
• Wang L H, Shi W D, Yang W Y & Lİ C S (2003). Effect of different ratios of fertilizer application on yield and growth of hybrid maize seeds. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University 25(6): 643-648
• P R & Munro-Warman T R (1993). Do seaweed extracts improve vegetable production? optimization of plant nutrition. Eighth international colloquium for the optimization of plant nutrition, 31 August-8 September 1992,
• Lisbon, Portugal. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993, pp. 403-407
• Yazıcı K & Kaynak L (2001). Deniz yosunlarının organik tarımda kullanılma olanakları. Türkiye 2. Ekolojik Sempozyumu, 14-16 Kasım 2001, Antalya, s. 344-352
• Yurtsever N (1984). Deneysel İstatistik Metotları. Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Genel Yayın No: 121, Ankara