A Critical Assesment of Spinoza’s Theory of Affect: Affects, Beliefs, and Human Freedom

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 251 - 272, 21.07.2018

Ahmet Aktaş

https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.446507

Öz

Affects are intentional
structures of beliefs and desires. Many philosophers have plausibly
argued that Spinoza’s theory of ideas is a kind of theory of belief by
this time yet this claim has rarely been taken into account when it
comes to Spinoza’s theory of affects, which is a part of his theory of
ideas. This paper shows that if this point is taken seriously when
regarding Spinoza’s theory of affects we reach significant results about
the fifth part of Ethics. To confirm this, I shall strive to show that
all affects depend on some beliefs by analyzing Spinoza’s theory of
affects regarding his theory of ideas, and in particular an affirmation
which an idea naturally involves. From this revelation, we will be able
to see that Spinoza’s theory of affects appeared in third and fourth
part of Ethics is inconsistent with the fifth part of Ethics in so far
as three therapy methods given at the beginning of the fifth part of
Ethics are considered. Additionally, and suitably to this assertion, I
will also show that arguments by which soundness of these therapy
methods are guaranteed seem logically invalid. Finally, I will try to
revise Spinoza’s therapy methods by taking all errors and core ideas in
Spinoza’s theory of affects into consideration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Spinoza, affect, idea, affirmation, desire, belief, affection, freedom

Kaynakça

• Atbakan, U. (2017). Nietzsche'nin Spinoza'ya Yönelik Eleştirisi: 'Güç İstemi' Contra 'Conatus'. Kutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları, 34, 61-76.
• Baker, U. (1997). Spinoza: Hayatın Geometrisi. Virgül, 1, 61-63.
• Bennett, J. (2010) Benedict Spinoza. Ethics Demostrated in Geometrical Order. http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdfs/spinoza1665.pdf (Çevrimiçi: 29.10.2010)
• Bennett, J. F. (1984). A Study of Spinoza's Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
• Clarke, D. M. (2006). Descartes: A Biography. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Curley, E. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Davidson, D. (2000) Spinoza’s Causal Theory of Affects. Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist. (Ed. Y. Yovel). New York: Little Room Press, 95-113.
• Descartes, R. (1994). Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol 1.. (Trans. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, M. Murdoch). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Frijda, N. H.(2000). Spinoza and Current Theory of Emotion. Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist. (Ed. Y. Yovel). New York: Little Room Press, 235-264.
• Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How Mental Systems Believe, American Psychologist, 42 (2), 107-119.
• Green O. H. (1992) The Belief-Desire Theory of Emotions. Green, O. H. The Emotions. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Hampshire, S. (2005). Spinoza and Spinozism. New York: Oxford University Press.
• James, S. (1997). Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Jarrett, C. (2000). Teleology and Spinoza’s Doctrine of Final Causes. Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist. (Ed. Y. Yovel). New York: Little Room Press, 3-23.
• Kisner, M. (2008). Spinoza's Virtuous Passions. The Review of Metaphysics, 61 (4), 759-783.
• Kisner, M. (2011), Spinoza on Human Freedom : Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lavaert, S. & Scrödes, W. (2017). The Dutch Legacy: Radical Thinkers of the 17. Century and the Enlightenment. Boston: Brill.
• Lenman, J. (1996). Belief, Desire and Motivation: An Essay in Quasi-Hydraulics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 33 (3), 291-301.
• Lenz M. (2013). Ideas as Thick Beliefs: Spinoza on the Normativity of Ideas. Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy. (Eds. M. Lenz & A. Waldow). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Lenz, M. (2012). Intentionality without Objectivity? Spinoza’s Theory of Intentionality. Intentionality. Ed. A. Salice. Munchen: Philosophia Verlag, 29–58.
• Lin, M. (2009) The Power of Reason in Spinoza. (Ed. O. Koistinen) The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lord, B. (2010). Spinoza’s Ethics. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
• Marshall, C. (2012). Destroying Passions with Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85 (1), 139-160.
• Marshall, E. (2013) The Spiritual Automaton: Spinoza's Science of the Mind, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Marshall, E. (2014). Man is a God to Man: How Human Beings Can Be Adequate Causes. Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. (Eds. M. Kisner & A. Youpa). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Matson, W. I. (1994). Spinoza on Beliefs. Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind. (Eds. Y. Yovel & G. Segal). Leiden: E. J. Brill.
• Proust, M. (2017). Çiçek Açmış Genç Kızların Gölgesinde (çev. R. Hakmen). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
• Reijen, M. V. (2011). Spinoza’nın Psikoloji Felsefesi: Ruh Hazır, Ten Güçlü Olmasa. Spinoza Günleri 2. (Ed. C. B. Akal & R. Ergün). İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Reisenzein, R. (2009a). Emotions as Metarepresentational States of Mind: Naturalizing the Belief-Desire Theory of Emotion. Cognitive Systems Research, 10 (1), 6-20.
• Reisenzein, R. (2009b). Emotional Experience in the Computational Belief-Desire Theory of Mind. Emotion Review, 1 (3), 214-222.
• Rocca, M. D. (1996). Representation and Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Rocca, M. D. (2003). The Power of an Idea: Spinoza's Critique of Pure Will. Noûs, 37 (2), 200-231.
• Sandler, R. (2005), Intuitus and Ratio in Spinoza's Ethical Thought. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 13, 73-90.
• Soyarslan, S. (2014). From Ordinary Life to Blessedness: The Power of Intuitive Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics. Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory.. (Eds. M. Kisner & A. Youpa). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Spinoza, B. (1966) The Correspondance of Spinoza. (Trans. A. Wolf). New York: Russell & Russell.
• Spinoza, B. (1985). The Collected Works of Spinoza. (Trans. & ed. E. Curley). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Spinoza, B. (2002). Complete Works of Spinoza. (Ed. M. Morgan, trans. S. Shirley). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
• Spinoza, B. (2004). A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Work. (Trans. & ed. E. Curley). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Spinoza, B. (2014). Ethica (çev. Ç. Dürüşken). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
• Spinoza, B. (2014). Ethica. (Ç. Dürüşken, Çev.) İstanbul: Alfa Basın Yayım.
• Spinoza, B. (2014). Mektuplar (çev. E. Ayhan). Ankara: Dost K.tabevi.
• Spinoza. B. (2009). Törebilim (çev. A. Yardımlı). İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
• Steinberg, D. (2005). Belief, Affirmation, and the Doctrin of Conatus in Spinoza. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43, 147-158.
• Tóth, O. I (2016). Inherence of False Beliefs in Spinoza’s Ethics, Society and Politics, 20, 74-94.