Lisansüstü Eğitimde Akıllı Cep Telefonu Kullanımının Olumlu Etkileri Üzerine Bir Durum Çalışması

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 609 - 635, 30.06.2018

Erinç Karataş

https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.402975

Cited By: 1

Öz

Tüm toplumlara bakıldığında
akıllı cep telefonları bireylerin birer parçası haline gelmiştir. Bu durum
öğrenciler için de geçerlidir. Eğitim ortamlarında özellikle de ders sırasında
akıllı cihazların kullanımının etkileri üzerine yapılan çalışmalar, araştırmacıların
dikkatini çekmeye başlamıştır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, yüksek lisans
öğrencilerinin eğitim süreçlerinde akıllı cep telefonu kullanımının olumlu
etkilerine yönelik görüşleri nelerdir sorusuna cevap aramaktır. Durum çalışması
Tip 1 olarak desenlenen araştırmada Ankara’nın köklü üniversitelerinden birinin
Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsünde yer alan 10 farklı anabilim dalında yüksek lisans
ve doktora eğitimini alan 29 öğrenci ile çalışılmıştır. Çoğunluğunun günde 4
saatten fazla akıllı cep telefonu kullandığını beyan eden katılımcılardan görüş
formu yoluyla elde edilen görüşlere göre, bu cihazları daha çok derste geçen
konu ya da terimi araştırma, akademik araştırma, ders materyallerini takip
etme, fotoğraf ya da sesli not özelliği ile ders notu alma, akran ve öğretim
elemanı ile iletişim amaçlı kullandıkları gibi, sıkılma nedeniyle ders ile
ilgisi olmayan bildirimlerin ya da saatin kontrolü gibi eylemler için de
kullandıkları belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Akıllı telefon kullanımı, Lisansüstü eğitim, Durum çalışması

A Case Study on the Positive Effects of Smartphone Usage in Postgraduate Education

Öz

Smartphones have become a
part of the individuals in all societies. This is also true for students.
Studies on the effects of the use of smart devices in educational environments,
especially during the course, have begun to attract the attention of
researchers. The aim of this research is to seek answer to the question of the
positive effects of the use of smartphones in the education processes of
graduate students. In the case study, which was designed as a Type 1 study, 29
students who received masters and PhD training in 10 different departments in
the Educational Sciences Institute of one of Ankara's established universities
were involved. According to the opinions obtained through the feedback form
from participants who declared that most of them use a smartphone for more than
4 hours a day, it was determined that they used these devices for searching the
subject or the term of the course, academic research, following course
materials, taking notes via photographs or voice notes, communicating with
peers and instructors, and so on.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Smartphone usage, Postgraduate education, Case study

Kaynakça

• Abramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Lessmann, S. (2017). To Phub or not to Phub: Understanding Off-Task Smartphone Usage and its Consequences in the Academic. Twenty-Fifth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, 2017
• Aljomaa, S. S., Al.Qudah, M. F., Albursan, I. S., Bakhiet, S. F., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2016). Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 155e164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.chb.2016.03.041.
• Alarabiat, A., & Al-Mohammad, S. (2015). The potential for Facebook application in undergraduate learning: A study of Jordanian students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 10, 81-103. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/2283
• Al Hamdani, D. S. (2014). A constructivist approach to a mobile learning environment. International Journal of Computer Applications, 93(4), 41-46.
• Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Shahrill, M., Wicaksono, D. K., & Huda, M. (2017). Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 1-17.
• Au, M., Lam, J., & Chan, R. (2015). Social media education: Barriers and critical issues. In Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology, 199–205. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• Baker, W. M., Lusk, E. J., & Neuhauser, K. L. (2012). On the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the classroom: Evidence from a survey of faculty and students. Journal of Education for Business, 87(5), 275-289. doi:10.1080/08832323.2011.622814
• Bolkan S. & Griffin, D.J. (2017). Students’ use of cell phones in class for off-task behaviors: the indirect impact of instructors’ teaching behaviors through boredom and students’ attitudes, Communication Education, 66(3), 313-329, DOI:10.1080/03634523.2016.1241888 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1241888)
• Bolliger, D. U., & Shepherd, C. E. (2016). Instructor and adult learner perceptions of the use of Internet‐enabled devices in residential outdoor education programs. British Journal of Educational Technology.
• Bull, G., & Thompson, A. (2004). Establishing a framework for digital images in the school curriculum. Leading and Learning with Technology, 31(8), 14-17.
• Burton, A. (2015). Lecturers’ experiences of using wikis to support student group work. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 2(2).
• Cambridge Dictionary Online, (2017) Phub Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ dictionary/english/phub
• Chen, S., & Tzeng, J. (2010). College female and male heavy internet users' profiles of practices and their academic grades and psychosocial adjustment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 257–262.
• Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34-42.Corbeil, R. C., & Valdes-Corbeil, M. E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? Educause Review. Retrievedfrom http://er.educause.edu/articles/2007/1/are-you-ready-for-mobile-learning
• Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications Inc.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow The psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper, Perennial
• Dahlstrom, E. (2012). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, (Research Report), 2012. Educause) (Louisville, CO: ECAR).
• Dahlstrom, E., & Bichsel, J. (2014). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, (Research Report), 2014. Educause (Louisville, CO: ECAR).
• Dietz, S. & Henrich, C. (2014). Texting as a distraction to learning in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 163-167.
• Duncan, D., Hoekstra, A., & Wilcox, B. (2012). Digital devices, distraction, and student Performance: Does in-class cell phone use reduce learning? Astronomy Education Review, 11, 010108-1, 10.3847.
• Echeverria, A., Nussbaum, M., Calderón, J. F., Bravo, C., Infante, C.Vȧsquez, A. (2011). Face-to-face collaborative learning supported by mobile phones. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 351–363. doi:10.1080/10494820903232943
• Felisoni, D. D., & Godoi, A. S. (2018). Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Computers & Education, 117, 175-187.
• García-Ormaechea, I., González, I., Duplá, M., Andres, E., & Pueyo, V. (2014). Validation of the preverbal visual assessment (PreViAs) questionnaire. Early human development, 90(10), 635–638.
• Hartnell-Young, E., & Vetere, F. (2008). A means of personalizing learning: Incorporating old and new literacies in the curriculum with mobile phones. Curriculum Journal, 19(4), 283-292.
• Hawi, N. S., & Samaha, M. (2016). To excel or not to excel: Strong evidence on the adverse effect of smartphone addiction on academic performance. Computers & Education, 98, 81-89.
• Hwang, Ha S., Son, S. H., & Choi, Y. J. (2011). Exploring factors affecting smartphone addiction - characteristics of users and functional attributes. Korean Association for Broadcasting, 25(2), 277-313
• Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 275-280.
• Johnston, K. A. (2016). The use, impact, and unintended consequences of mobile web-enabled devices in university classrooms. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 13, 25-46. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3464
• Johnston, K. A., Chen, M-M, & Hauman, M. (2013). Changes in use, perception and attitude of Facebook and Twitter. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation (EJISE), 16(3), 200-210
• Judd, T. (2014). Making sense of multitasking: the role of Facebook. Computers & Education, 70, 194-202.
• Junco, R. (2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2236-2243.
• Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2011). Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers & Education, 56(2), 370-378.
• Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Emery, L., Zajac, H., & Thulborn, K. R. (2001). Interdependence of nonoverlapping cortical systems in dual cognitive tasks. NeuroImage, 14(2), 417-426.
• Karpinski, A. C., Kirschner, P. A., Ozer, I., Mellott, J. A., & Ochwo, P. (2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1182-1192.
• Kim, I., Jung, G., Jung, H., Ko, M., & Lee, U. (2017). Let’s FOCUS: Mitigating Mobile Phone Use in College Classrooms. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(3), 63.
• Kim, A. Y., Tak, H. Y., & Lee, C. H. (2010). The development and validation of a learning flow scale for adults. Educational Psychology Research, 24(1), 39-59
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Mobile usability in educational contexts: What have we learnt? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2).
• Kuznekoff, J. H., Munz, S., & Titsworth, S. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, Twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education, 64(3), 344-365.
• Kwon, M., Lee, J.-Y., Won, W.-Y., Park, J.-W., Min, J.-A., Hahn, C., et al. (2013). Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PloS One,8(2),
• Lee, J., Cho, B., Kim, Y., & Noh, J. (2015). Smartphone addiction in university students and its implication for learning. In Emerging issues in smart learning (pp. 297-305). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 343-350.
• Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project, 20.Macmillan Dictionary Online, (2017) Phubbing Macmillan Publishers Limited, United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://macmillandictionary.com/buzzword/entries/phubbing.html
• Markett, C., Sanchez, I. A., Weber, S., & Tangney, B. (2006). Using short message service to encourage interactivity in the classroom. Computers and Education, 46, 280-293.
• Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184
• McCoy, B. (2013). Digital distractions in the classroom: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-classroom related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 4(4), 5-14.
• Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2005). Protecting youth online: Family use of filtering and blocking software. Child abuse & neglect, 29(7), 753-765.
• Muñoz, C. F., & García, F. G. (2016). The use of mobile phones as tools for access and knowledge exchange by students in Spain when studying: Access to leisure, persuasive and regulated schooling contents; key factors to take into consideration to plan targeted advertising campaigns. Prisma Social, (1), 190-208.
• Nakamura, H., Hanamitsu, N., & Minamizawa, K. (2015). A (touch) ment: a smartphone extension for instantly sharing visual and tactile experience. In Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference, 223–224. ACM.
• O'Bannon, B., Dunn, K., & Park, Y. (2017, March). Validation of Mobile Phone Use in the Classroom Survey. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1033-1041). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
• Olmstead, K. (2017). A third of Americans live in a household with three or more smartphones [monograph on the Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
• Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587.
• Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teachers-and-technology
• Roodt, S., de Villiers, C., Johnston, K., Ophoff, J., & Peier, D. (2014). YouTube as an academic tool for ICT lecturers. Proceedings of the e-Skills for Knowledge Production and Innovation Conference 2014.
• Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948e958.
• Ruggiero, D., & Mong, C. J. (2015). The teacher technology integration experience: Practice and reflection in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 161-178.
• Smith, A., McGeeney, K., Duggan, M., Rainie, L. & Keeter, S. (2015). US smartphone use in 2015. Pew research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/03/PI_Smartphones_0401151.pdf.
• Tesch, F., Coelho, D., & Drozdenko, R. (2011). We have met the enemy and he is us: Relative potencies of classroom distractions. Business Education Innovation Journal, 3(2), 13-19.
• Tindell, D. R., & Bohlander, R. W. (2012). The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: a survey of college students. College Teaching, 60(1), 1-9.
• Thomas, K., & Orthober, C. (2011). Using text-messaging in the secondary classroom. American Secondary Education, 39(2), 55-76.
• Thomas, K., O’Bannon, B. W, & Britt, V. G. (2014). Standing in the schoolhouse door: Teacher perceptions of mobile phones in the classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 373-395.
• TÜİK, (2017) Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ VeriBilgi.do?alt_id=1062
• Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x.
• Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multitasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58, 365–374.
• Yoon, J. Y., Moon, J. S., Kim, M. J., Kim, Y. J., Kim, H. A., Heo, B. R., Kim, J. E., Hong, H. J. (2011). Smartphone addiction and health problem on university students. Journal of Korean Association for Crisis and Emergency Management, 3(2), 92-104.