BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Entrepreneurial Intentions of Turkish Business Students: An Exploration Using Shapero’s Model

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 28, 27 - 47, 01.12.2016

Öz

In today’s globalized economy, the entrepreneurship phenomenon paves the way for economic and social developments. Hence, entrepreneurial activities has become a matter that is greatly sought-after, both in the academic sense and on sectoral basis. At this juncture, the future of entrepreneurial growth relies greatly on business students therefore it’s crucial to understand their intentions, yet such understanding has not been questioned before in a Turkish setting using the Shapero’s model. This paper investigates the entrepreneurial intentions of Turkish business students, and examines the influence of components from Shapero’s model on their intentions to become entrepreneurs. So as to measure these, self-administrated questionnaires were distributed to 103 business students at major universities in Ankara and Istanbul. The findings indicated that, in accordance with global trends, most of the students have an enthusiastic approach towards entrepreneurship

Kaynakça

  • Ajzen, Icek (1991), ‘The Theory Of Planned Behaviour’, Organizational Be- haviour and Human Decisions Processes, 50.2, 179–211.
  • Alan, Jahangir and Hossan, Mohammad Akter (2003), ‘Linking Between Franchising Networks for Entrepreneurship and Economical Develop- ment-Looking For a New Model’, EMNet-Conference on Economics and Management of Franchising Networks (Vienna, Austria), 26-28.
  • Ballı, Erdinç and Ballı, Ayşe İpek Koca (2014), ‘Üniversite öğrencilerinin bireysel değerleri ve girişimcilik eğilimleri’, Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18.1.
  • Burger, Jerry M. (1985), İDesire for control and achievement-related be- haviorsı, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (6), 1520-33.
  • Chlosta, Simone, et al. (2012), ‘Parental role models and the decision to be- come self-employed: The moderating effect of personality’, Small Busi- ness Economics, 38 (1), 121-38.
  • Conner, Mark and Armitage, Christopher J. (1998), ‘Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research’, Jour- nal of applied social psychology, 28, 1429-64.
  • Gelderen, Marco van, et al. (2008), ‘Explaining entrepreneurial intentions by means of the theory of planned behaviour’, Career Development In- ternational, 13 (6), 538-59.
  • Gurbuz, Gulruh and Aykol, Sinem (2008), ‘Entrepreneurial Intentions of Young Educated Public in Turkey’, Journal of Global Strategic Manage- ment, 4 (1), 47-56.
  • Gurel, Eda, Altinay, Levent, and Daniele, Roberto (2010), ‘Tourism stu- dents’ entrepreneurial intentions’, Annals of Tourism Research, 37 (3), 646-69.
  • Izquierdo, Edgar and Buelens, Marc (2011), ‘Competing models of entre- preneurial intentions: the influence of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and attitudes’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 13 (1), 75-91.
  • Kılanç, Burak ‘Her sene 100 bin işletmeci yetişiyor’, <http://basin-arsiv. metu.edu.tr/2013-12-16/107398>, accessed 15/08/2015.
  • Klapper, Rita and Leger-Jarniou, Catherine (2006), ‘Entrepreneurship in- tention among French Grande École and university students: An ap- plication of Shapero’s model’, Industry and Higher Education, 20 (2), 97-100.
  • Koellinger, Philipp, Minniti, Maria, and Schade, Christian (2013), ‘Gender Differences in Entrepreneurial Propensity’, Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, 75 (2), 213-34.
  • Kolvereid, Lars and Moen, Øystein (1997), ‘Entrepreneurship among busi- ness graduates: does a major in entrepreneurship make a difference?’, Journal of European industrial training, 21 (4), 154-60.
  • Kristiansen, Stein and Indarti, Nurul (2004), ‘ Entrepreneurial intention among Indonesian and Norwegian students’, Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12 (1), 55-78.
  • Krueger, Norris F. (1993), ‘The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability’, Entrepre- neurship theory and practice, 18 (1), 5-21.
  • Krueger, Norris F., Reilly, Michael D., and Carsrud, Alan L. (2000), ‘Com- peting models of entrepreneurial intentions’, Journal of Business Ventur- ing 15 (5), 411-32.
  • Lepoutre, Jan, et al. (2010), A new approach to testing the effects of entrepre- neurship education among secondary school pupils (Entrepreneurship, growth and economic development; Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing).
  • McClelland, David. C. (1967), Achieving Society (Simon and Schuster).
  • Naktiyok, Atılhan and Timuroğlu, M. Kürşat (2009), ‘Öğrencilerin moti- vasyonel değerlerinin girişimcilik niyetleri üzerine etkisi ve bir uygu- lama’, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23.3.
  • Ngugi, John Karanja, et al. (2012), ‘Application of Shapero’s Model In Ex- plaining Entrepreneurial Intentions Among University Students In Ke- nya’, International journal of business and social research, 2 (4).
  • Nunnally, Jum (1978), Psychometric methods.
  • Peng, Zhengxia, Lu, Genshu, and Kang, Hui (2013), ‘Entrepreneurial In- tentions and Its Influencing Factors: A Survey of the University Stu- dents in Xi’an China’, Creative Education, 3 (08), 95-100
  • Peterman, Nicole E. and Kennedy, Jessica (2003), ‘Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneur- ship theory and practice, 28 (2), 129-44.
  • S., Muhammad Amsal., M., Dileep Kumar, and Ramalu, Subramaniam Sri (2014), ‘Categorizing and Fixing Variables on Entrepreneurial Inten- tion through Qualitative Research’, Asian Social Science, 10 (19), 45-58.
  • Albert Shapero and Lisa Sokol, ‘The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneur- ship’, Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship, (1982), 72-90
  • Shinnar, Rachel S., Giacomin, Olivier, and Janssen, Frank (2012), ‘Entre- preneurial perceptions and intentions: The role of gender and culture’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36 (3), 465-93.
  • Tabachnick, Barbara G., Fidell, Linda S., and Osterlind, Steven J. (2001), Using multivariate statistics (5th edn.; New York: NY:Haper and Row).
  • Talaş, Emrah, Çelik, Ali Kemal, and Oral, Ibrahim Orkun (2013), ‘The In- fluence of Demographic Factors on Entrepreneurial Intention among Undergraduate Students as a Career Choice: The Case of a Turkish University’, American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3 (12), 22-31.
  • Tkachev, Alexei and Kolvereid, Lars (1999), ‘ Self-employment intentions among Russian students’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11 (3), 269-80.
  • UNCTAD (2015), ‘entrepreneurship and economic development: the empretec showcase’, <http://unctad.org/en/Docs/webiteteb20043_ en.pdf>, accessed 15 August.

Türk İşletme Öğrencilerinin Girişimcilik Niyetleri: Shapero’nun Modeli Kullanılarak Yapılan Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 28, 27 - 47, 01.12.2016

Öz

Günümüz küresel ekonomisinde, girişimcilik olgusu ekonomik ve sosyal kalkınmanın önünü açmaktadır. Bu sebeple, girişimcilik faaliyetleri hem akademik bağlamda hem de sektörel düzeyde oldukça rağbet gören bir konu haline gelmiştir. Bu noktada, girişimciliğe dayalı büyümenin geleceği, geniş ölçüde, işletme öğrencilerine bağlı olmakla birlikte bu öğrencilerin girişimcilik niyetlerini anlayabilmek kritik önem taşımaktadır fakat Türk öğrencilerin bu niyetleri daha önce Türkiye özelinde ve Shapero’nun Modeli kullanılarak sorgulanmamıştır. Bu makalede, Türk işletme öğrencilerinin girişimcilik niyetleri ve Shapero’nun Modeli’ndeki ögelerin bu niyetler üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmıştır. Bu niyetlerin ölçümlenebilmesi için Ankara ve İstanbul’daki başlıca üniversitelerde öğretim gören 103 işletme öğrencisine uygulanan anket sonucunda elde edilen veriler, küresel yönelimler paralelinde, öğrencilerin çoğunun girişimciliğe karşı hevesli bir yaklaşımları olduğunu göstermiştir

Kaynakça

  • Ajzen, Icek (1991), ‘The Theory Of Planned Behaviour’, Organizational Be- haviour and Human Decisions Processes, 50.2, 179–211.
  • Alan, Jahangir and Hossan, Mohammad Akter (2003), ‘Linking Between Franchising Networks for Entrepreneurship and Economical Develop- ment-Looking For a New Model’, EMNet-Conference on Economics and Management of Franchising Networks (Vienna, Austria), 26-28.
  • Ballı, Erdinç and Ballı, Ayşe İpek Koca (2014), ‘Üniversite öğrencilerinin bireysel değerleri ve girişimcilik eğilimleri’, Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18.1.
  • Burger, Jerry M. (1985), İDesire for control and achievement-related be- haviorsı, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (6), 1520-33.
  • Chlosta, Simone, et al. (2012), ‘Parental role models and the decision to be- come self-employed: The moderating effect of personality’, Small Busi- ness Economics, 38 (1), 121-38.
  • Conner, Mark and Armitage, Christopher J. (1998), ‘Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research’, Jour- nal of applied social psychology, 28, 1429-64.
  • Gelderen, Marco van, et al. (2008), ‘Explaining entrepreneurial intentions by means of the theory of planned behaviour’, Career Development In- ternational, 13 (6), 538-59.
  • Gurbuz, Gulruh and Aykol, Sinem (2008), ‘Entrepreneurial Intentions of Young Educated Public in Turkey’, Journal of Global Strategic Manage- ment, 4 (1), 47-56.
  • Gurel, Eda, Altinay, Levent, and Daniele, Roberto (2010), ‘Tourism stu- dents’ entrepreneurial intentions’, Annals of Tourism Research, 37 (3), 646-69.
  • Izquierdo, Edgar and Buelens, Marc (2011), ‘Competing models of entre- preneurial intentions: the influence of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and attitudes’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 13 (1), 75-91.
  • Kılanç, Burak ‘Her sene 100 bin işletmeci yetişiyor’, <http://basin-arsiv. metu.edu.tr/2013-12-16/107398>, accessed 15/08/2015.
  • Klapper, Rita and Leger-Jarniou, Catherine (2006), ‘Entrepreneurship in- tention among French Grande École and university students: An ap- plication of Shapero’s model’, Industry and Higher Education, 20 (2), 97-100.
  • Koellinger, Philipp, Minniti, Maria, and Schade, Christian (2013), ‘Gender Differences in Entrepreneurial Propensity’, Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, 75 (2), 213-34.
  • Kolvereid, Lars and Moen, Øystein (1997), ‘Entrepreneurship among busi- ness graduates: does a major in entrepreneurship make a difference?’, Journal of European industrial training, 21 (4), 154-60.
  • Kristiansen, Stein and Indarti, Nurul (2004), ‘ Entrepreneurial intention among Indonesian and Norwegian students’, Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12 (1), 55-78.
  • Krueger, Norris F. (1993), ‘The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability’, Entrepre- neurship theory and practice, 18 (1), 5-21.
  • Krueger, Norris F., Reilly, Michael D., and Carsrud, Alan L. (2000), ‘Com- peting models of entrepreneurial intentions’, Journal of Business Ventur- ing 15 (5), 411-32.
  • Lepoutre, Jan, et al. (2010), A new approach to testing the effects of entrepre- neurship education among secondary school pupils (Entrepreneurship, growth and economic development; Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing).
  • McClelland, David. C. (1967), Achieving Society (Simon and Schuster).
  • Naktiyok, Atılhan and Timuroğlu, M. Kürşat (2009), ‘Öğrencilerin moti- vasyonel değerlerinin girişimcilik niyetleri üzerine etkisi ve bir uygu- lama’, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23.3.
  • Ngugi, John Karanja, et al. (2012), ‘Application of Shapero’s Model In Ex- plaining Entrepreneurial Intentions Among University Students In Ke- nya’, International journal of business and social research, 2 (4).
  • Nunnally, Jum (1978), Psychometric methods.
  • Peng, Zhengxia, Lu, Genshu, and Kang, Hui (2013), ‘Entrepreneurial In- tentions and Its Influencing Factors: A Survey of the University Stu- dents in Xi’an China’, Creative Education, 3 (08), 95-100
  • Peterman, Nicole E. and Kennedy, Jessica (2003), ‘Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneur- ship theory and practice, 28 (2), 129-44.
  • S., Muhammad Amsal., M., Dileep Kumar, and Ramalu, Subramaniam Sri (2014), ‘Categorizing and Fixing Variables on Entrepreneurial Inten- tion through Qualitative Research’, Asian Social Science, 10 (19), 45-58.
  • Albert Shapero and Lisa Sokol, ‘The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneur- ship’, Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship, (1982), 72-90
  • Shinnar, Rachel S., Giacomin, Olivier, and Janssen, Frank (2012), ‘Entre- preneurial perceptions and intentions: The role of gender and culture’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36 (3), 465-93.
  • Tabachnick, Barbara G., Fidell, Linda S., and Osterlind, Steven J. (2001), Using multivariate statistics (5th edn.; New York: NY:Haper and Row).
  • Talaş, Emrah, Çelik, Ali Kemal, and Oral, Ibrahim Orkun (2013), ‘The In- fluence of Demographic Factors on Entrepreneurial Intention among Undergraduate Students as a Career Choice: The Case of a Turkish University’, American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3 (12), 22-31.
  • Tkachev, Alexei and Kolvereid, Lars (1999), ‘ Self-employment intentions among Russian students’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11 (3), 269-80.
  • UNCTAD (2015), ‘entrepreneurship and economic development: the empretec showcase’, <http://unctad.org/en/Docs/webiteteb20043_ en.pdf>, accessed 15 August.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA36ZU75MR
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Boratay Uysal Bu kişi benim

Semra Güney Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Aralık 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 28

Kaynak Göster

APA Uysal, B., & Güney, S. (2016). Türk İşletme Öğrencilerinin Girişimcilik Niyetleri: Shapero’nun Modeli Kullanılarak Yapılan Bir Araştırma. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(28), 27-47.

Sayın Araştırmacı;

Yönetim Bilimleri Dergimiz Mart 2024 sayısı için öngörülen kontenjanın dolması nedeniyle gönderilecek yeni makaleler Mart sayısı kapsamına alınmayacaktır. 2024'te yayınlanacak olan diğer sayılar için makale kabulümüz devam etmektedir. Bu hususa dikkat ederek yeni makale gönderimi yapmanızı rica ederiz.

Yönetim Bilimler Dergisi Özel Sayı Çağrısı
Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 2024 yılının Eylül ayında “Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijitalleşmenin Sosyal Bilimlerde Yansımaları” başlıklı bir özel sayı yayınlayacaktır.
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Biga İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi tarafından 5-6 Temmuz 2024 tarihlerinde çevrimiçi olarak düzenlenecek olan 4. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Konferansı’nda sunum gerçekleştiren yazarların dergi için ücret yatırmasına gerek olmayıp, dekont yerine Konferans Katılım Belgesini sisteme yüklemeleri yeterli olacaktır.
Gönderilen makalelerin derginin yazım kurallarına uygun olması ve DergiPark sistemi üzerinden sisteme yüklenmesi gerekmektedir. Özel sayı ana başlığı ile ilgisiz makaleler değerlendirmeye alınmayacaktır. Makalelerin Özel Sayı seçilerek sisteme yüklenmesi gerekmektedir. Özel sayı için gönderilmemiş makalelerin bu sayıya eklenmesi mümkün olmayacaktır.
Özel Sayı Çalışma Takvimi
Gönderim Başlangıcı: 15 Nisan 2024
Son Gönderim Tarihi: 15 Temmuz 2024
Özel Sayı Yayınlanma Tarihi: Eylül 2024

Dergimize göndereceğiniz çalışmalar linkte yer alan taslak dikkate alınarak hazırlanmalıdır. Çalışmanızı aktaracağınız taslak dergi yazım kurallarına göre düzenlenmiştir. Bu yüzden biçimlendirmeyi ve ana başlıkları değiştirmeden çalışmanızı bu taslağa aktarmanız gerekmektedir.
İngilizce Makale Şablonu için tıklayınız...

Saygılarımızla,