TÜRKİYE İLE EGE ADALARI ARASINDAKİ TİCARETİN ANALİZİ: DEĞERLENDİRİLMEYİ BEKLEYEN FIRSATLAR

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 109 - 126, 24.06.2018

Onur Akdaş , İlke Sezin Ayaz Didem Özer Çaylan

https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.428189

Cited By: 3

Öz

Ege
Adaları ve Türkiye sıkı tarihî ve coğrafi bağlara sahiptir. Bu bağlar, sosyal, kültürel
ve ticari etkileşimi kaçınılmaz kılar. Ege Adaları ve Türkiye arasındaki
ticaret büyük potansiyele sahiptir. Ancak, Ege Adaları'ndan gelen yüksek talebe
rağmen, istatistiklerden de anlaşıldığı üzere yeterli ticaret etkileşimi henüz
kurulmamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ege Adaları ile Türkiye arasındaki ticaret
potansiyelini analiz etmek ve ticaret engellerini ortaya koymaktır. Belirtilen
amaca ulaşmak için ticaret istatistikleri çeşitli kaynaklardan derlenmiş ve
profesyonellerle görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre ticari
engeller; ticaret limanlarındaki altyapı ve operasyonlara, limanlardaki az
gelişmişliğe, ticaret ve ulaşımda yer alan işletmeler arasında işbirliğine
dayalı bir kültür birliğinin olmamasına dayanmaktadır. Bu bulgular literatürce
de desteklenmektedir. İlgili sorunlar için önerilen çözümler öneriler başlığı
altında listelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ege Adaları , Türkiye , ticaret , ticaret engeller

ANALYSING THE TRADE BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE AEGEAN ISLANDS: THE HIDDEN OPPORTUNITIES

Öz

Aegean
Islands and Turkey have strict historical and geographical ties. These ties
make social, cultural and commercial interaction inevitable. The trade between
Aegean Islands and Turkey has great potential. Despite high demands from the
Aegean Islands, according to the relevant statistics no sufficient trade
interaction has been established.  The
aim of this paper is to analyze the trade potential and reveal the barriers of
trade between Aegean Islands and Turkey. To reach this aim, trade statistics
have been compiled from various sources and interviews have been carried out
with the relevant professionals. The findings supported by the related
literature indicate that as trade barriers range from infrastructural and
procedural process at port and port-centric areas, and underdevelopment of
small-sized ports, to lack of a collaborative culture among the various service
providers involved in the trade and transportation interactions. The solutions
proposed for the related problems are listed in the recommendation section of
this study.Aegean
Islands and Turkey have strict historical and geographical ties. These ties
make social, cultural and commercial interaction inevitable. The trade between
Aegean Islands and Turkey has great potential. Despite high demands from the
Aegean Islands, according to the relevant statistics no sufficient trade
interaction has been established.  The
aim of this paper is to analyze the trade potential and reveal the barriers of
trade between Aegean Islands and Turkey. To reach this aim, trade statistics
have been compiled from various sources and interviews have been carried out
with the relevant professionals. The findings supported by the related
literature indicate that as trade barriers range from infrastructural and
procedural process at port and port-centric areas, and underdevelopment of
small-sized ports, to lack of a collaborative culture among the various service
providers involved in the trade and transportation interactions. The solutions
proposed for the related problems are listed in the recommendation section of
this study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aegean Islands , Turkey , trade , trade barriers

Kaynakça

• Bastian, J. (2004). “Knowing your way in the Balkans: Greek foreign direct investment in Southeast Europe”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 4:3, 458-490.
• Beškovnik, B. (2006). Importance of short sea shipping and sea motorways in the European and Slovenian transport policy. Pomorstvo, 20(1), 23-35.
• Chatzoudes, D., Karasawoglou, A., Dimitriades, E., NikoΙaidis, M. (2009). Greek Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey: an empirical survey. International Journal of Business Policy and Economic. Vol.2, No. 1, 69-85.
• Clark, X., Dollar, D. and Micco, A. (2004). Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, and bilateral trade. Journal of development economics, 75(2), 417-450.
• DTO, (2017), Deniz Ticareti Dergisi Rakamlarla Denizcilik Sektörü ve İstatistikler Eki, Şubat Sayısı. EC (European Commission) (1999). The development of short sea shipping in europe: a dynamic alternative in a sustainable transport chain. Second two-yearly Progress Report, Brussels.
• Gertwagen, R. (2014). Venice’s policy towards the Ionian and Aegean islands, c. 1204–1423. International Journal of Maritime History, 26(3), 529-548.
• Karayılanoğlu, P. (2017). İzmir Ticaret Odası Yunanistan Ülke Raporu.
• Medda, F. and Trujillo, L. (2010). Short-sea shipping: an analysis of its determinants. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(3), 285–303.
• Özer, D., Nikitakos, N., Cerit, A. G., Oral, E. Z. and Stratakos, E. G. (2011). Analysis of the short sea shipping potential between Turkey and the Greek islands. Journal of Transport and Shipping, 3, 47-68.
• Polónia, A. (2016). The sea and its impact on a maritime community: Vila do Conde, Portugal, 1500–1640. International Journal of Maritime History, 18(1), 199-222.
• Radelet, S. and Sachs, J. (1998). Shipping costs, manufactured exports, and economic growth. In: Annual Meeting of the American Economics Association January 3-5, Chicago.
• Sherratt, S. and Sherratt, A. (1993). The growth of Mediterranean economy in the early first millennium BC. World Archaeology, 24(3), 361-378.
• Suárez-Alemán, A. (2016). Short sea shipping in today’s Europe: A critical review of maritime transport policy. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 18(3), 331-351.
• Venkatesh, V. G., Zhang, A., Luthra, S., Dubey, R., Subramanian, N., and Mangla, S. (2017). Barriers to coastal shipping development: An Indian perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 362-378.
• Internet References:
• Deniz Nakliyecileri Derneği (2017), İzmir Deniz Nakliyecileri Derneği Official Web Site, http://www.izmdeniznakliyecileridernegi.com, Access Date: 21.08.2017.
• Hellenic Statistical Authority. (2017). Statistics. http://www.statistics.gr/en/statistics/-/publication/SMA06/-, Access Date: 12.08.2017.
• Ministry of Economy (2018), Ministry of Economy Official Web Site, https://www.ekonomi.gov.tr/portal/faces/home/disIliskiler/ulkeler/ulke-detay/Yunanistan, Access Date: 11.05.2018.
• Ministry of Transport Maritime Affairs and Communication (2018), Official Web Site, http://www.udhb.gov.tr/images/istatistik/2003-2016.pdf, Access Date: 10.05.2018
• TÜİK (2018). Turkish Statistical Institute Official Web Site. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=621, Access Date: 11.05.2018.
• Ulusoy Çeşme Port (2018), Ulusoy Çeşme Port Official Web Site, http://www.ulusoycesmeport.com/profil.html, Access Date: 11.05.2018