“Safety Science” Dergisinde 2006-2010 Yılları Arasında Yayınlanan Makalelerin İçerik Analizi

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 121 - 139, 01.03.2013

Ali Yasin Kaya Remzi Fışkın Selçuk Nas

Öz

This study presents the results of the content analysis of articlespublished in the Safety Science Journal for five-year period from 2006 to2010. The research contains 577 articles. The content analysis aims toprovide necessary indicators for readers, followers and contributors ofrelevant discipline and a glimpse of lots of articles. This study involves invary data types such as topic type, obtaining type of data, research type ofarticle, author features, number of sources, number of articles according tocountry which are published in the Safety Science Journal.The most controversial and current subjects about safety arediscovered by this study in order to contribute lecturers and researchersinterested in safety discipline. At the end of the study, it will be answered thequestions which are “what are the main topics of the most frequently studiedin the field of safety?”, “which countries have most of articles published,“which institutions have most of articles published” and “which authorshave most of articles published in “safety science” journal with using themethod of frequency analysis. As a result of assessments, these results haveemerged, the most used are safety (50), safety climate (34) andsafety culture (33). The Netherlands is the first country in which publishedarticles with 58 articles and Delft University of Technology is first institutionin which published articles with 24 articles.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Safety Science journal, content analysis, safety.

“Safety Science” Dergisinde 2006-2010 Yılları Arasında Yayınlanan Makalelerin İçerik Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışma, Emniyet Bilimi “Safety Science” dergisinde 2006-2010yılları arasında yayınlanan 577 adet makaleden belirli kategoriler altındatoplanan verilerin içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmesini kapsamaktadır. Buaraştırmada makaleler, makalenin konusu, verilerin toplanma yöntemleri,araştırma türü, yazar özellikleri, yayınlanan makalelerin ülkelere göredağılımı gibi kategoriler altında incelenmiştir. İçerik analizi; okuyuculara,yazarlara ve ilgili disiplin alanında çalışanlara gerekli göstergelere ulaşmayıve birçok makaleye bir anda göz atma imkânını sağlayan bir yöntemdir.Emniyet bilimi ile ilgilenen akademisyen ve araştırmacılara katkısağlamak amacıyla, emniyet kavramı hakkında en tartışmalı ve güncelkonular, bu çalışma ile birlikte ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Bu çalışmada hedef;emniyet biliminde üzerinde en çok tartışılan ve incelenen konuların nelerolduğu, makalelere destek veren ülke ve kurumların kimler olduğu, SafetyScience dergisinde yayınlanan makalelere en çok katkı sağlayan yazarlarınkimler olduğu ile ilgili sorulara yanıt aranmaktadır. Değerlendirmelerneticesinde, en çok kullanılan in emniyet (50), emniyetiklimi (34) ve emniyet kültürü (33) olduğu ortaya çıkarılmıştır. En çokmakalenin yayınlandığı ülke 58 makale ile Hollanda ve en çok yayın yapankuruluş 24 makale ile Delft University of Technology’dir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Safety Science dergisi, içerik analizi, emniyet

Kaynakça

• ALTUNIŞIK, R. , RECAİ, C., BAYRAKTAROĞLU, S., YILDIRIM, E. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamaları. Adapazarı: Sakarya Kitabevi.
• ARREDONDO, P., ROSEN, D.C., RICE, T., PEREZ, P., GAMERO, Z. G. T. (2005). Multicultural Counseling: A 10-Year Content Analysis of the Journal of Counseling & Development from 1990 to 2001, Journal of Counseling & Development, Vol.83, No.2, pp.15516
• BİLGİN, N. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde İçerik Analizi Teknikler ve Örnek Çalışmalar, Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• BLANCHER , A.T., BUBOLTZ JR, W.C., SOPER, B. (2010). Content Analysis of the Journal of Counseling & Development: Volumes 74 to 84, Journal of Counseling & Development, Vol.88, No.2, pp. 139-145.
• BLISS, S. L. (2008). Articles Published in Four School Psychology Journals from 2000 to 2005: An Analysis of Experimental/Intervention Research, Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 45, No.6, pp. 483-498.
• BLOWERS, G., CHEUNG, B.T., RU, H. (2009). Emulation vs. Indigenization in the Reception of Western Psychology in Republican China: An Analysis of the Content of Chinese Psychology Journals from 1922 to 1937, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol.45, No.1, pp. 21-33.
• BROWN, C. (2007). The Role of Web-Based Information in the Scholarly Communication of Chemists: Citation and Content Analyses of American Chemical Society Journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol.58, Vol.13, pp. 2055-2065.
• CAVANAGH, S. (1997). Content Analysis: Concept, Methods and Application, Nurse Researcher, Vol. 4, pp.5-16.
• CAVAS, B., CAVAS, P., OZDEM, Y., RANNIKMAE, M., ERTEPINAR, H. (2012). Research Trends in Science Education from the Perspective of Journal of Baltic Science Education: A Content Analysis from 2002 to 2011, Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol.11, No.1, pp. 94-102.
• CLARK, J.P., FELDBERG, G.D., ROCHON, P.A. (2002). Representation of Women’s Health in General Medical Versus Women’s Health Specialty Journals: A Content Analysis, BMC Women’s Healths.
• DAVIS, D. B. P., LIGIERO, D.P., LIANG, C., CODRINGTON, J. (2001). Fifteen Years of the Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development: A Content Analysis, Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, Vol. 29, No.4, pp. 226-238.
• DENKTAŞ ŞAKAR, G. D. (2011). Pazarlama Araştırmalarında Çeşitleme (Triangulation) Yaklaşımı Kullanımı. 16. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi, 22-25 Kasım 2011. İstanbul.
• DÖNMEZ, A., AĞYAR, E., ERSOY, A. (2009). Uluslararası Dört Muhasebe Eğitimi Dergisi Üzerine Bir Literatür Taraması ve Analizi, Muhasebe Öğretim Üyeleri Bilim ve Dayanışma Vakfı Dergisi, Sayı.10, No.1, ss. 25-48.
• ELO, S., KYNGAS, H. (2008). The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol.62, No.1, pp.107–115.
• ENGLISH, M.L., D’SOUZA, M.O., CHARTRAND, L. (2005). Analysis of Contents, Contributors and Research Directions from 1993 to 2002: Mapping Publication Routes in The Journal, Religious Education, Vol. 100, No.1, pp.6-19.
• FIŞKIN, R., NAS, S. (2013). A Content Analysis of the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation from 2007 to 2012, TransNav Journal, Vol. 7, No.1, pp.145-149.
• HADDOCK, S. A. (2002). A Content Analysis of Articles Pertaining to Therapeutic Considerations for Dual-Income Couples from 1979 to1999, The American Journal of Family Therapy, Vol.30, No.2, pp. 141-15
• HARWOOD, T.G., Gary, T. (2003). An Overview of Content Analysis, The Marketing Review, Vol.3, No.4, pp. 479-498.
• HOWARD, G.S., COLE, D.A., MAXWELL, S.E. (1987). Research Productivity in Psychology Based on Publication in the Journals of the American Psychological Association, American Psychologist, Vol.42, pp. 975–986.
• HSU , Y.C., HO, H.N.J., TSAI, C.C., HWANG, G.J., CHU, H.C., WANG, C.Y., CHEN, N.S. (2012). Research Trends in Technologybased Learning: A content Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals from 2000 to 2009, Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 15, No.2, pp. 354–370.
• JENSEN, B.E., CONSIDINE, W.J. (2007). The MPEES Journal: 1997–2006, Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, Vol. 11, No.4, pp. 197-207.
• JOEL, S. (2008). Gana Kütüphanesi Dergisi Üzerine Bibliyometrik Analiz Çalışması, African Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol. 18, No.1, pp. 67-76.
• LATCHEM, C. (2006). A Content Analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology from 2000 to 2001, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37, No.4, pp. 503-511.
• MINGHUI, P. (2009). Directions in Taiwan’s Historical Study an Analysis of History Journal Articles from 1945 to 2000, Chinese Studies in History, Vol. 42, No.4, pp. 78-119.
• MULENGA, D., AL-HARTHI, A.S., CARR-CHELLMAN, D. (2006). Comparative and International Adult Education: A Content Analysis of Some Major Adult Education Journals from 1990 to 2004, International Council for Adult Education, Vol. 39, No.1, pp. 77-89.
• PARKER, M.R., JORDAN, K.R., KIRK, E.R., ASPIRANTI, K.B., BAIN, S.K. (2010). Publications in Four Gifted Education Journals From 2001 to 2006: An Analysis of Article Types and Authorship Characteristics, Investigative Approaches in the Field, Vol.32, No.3, pp. 207-216.
• SEKARAN, U., BOUGIE, R. (2010). Research Methods for Business A Skill Building Approach, Fifth Edition, West Susex: A John Wilwy and Sons, Ltd, Publication.
• SHI, D., LI, Y. (2009). Directions in Management Research: An Analysis of the Best Articles in Academy of Management Journal 2009, International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 26 Aralık - 27 Aralık 2009, Xi'an, China.
• TAVŞANCIL, E., ASLAN, E.A. (2001). Sözel, Yazılı ve Diğer Materyaller İçin İçerik Analizi ve Uygulama Örnekleri, Ankara: Epsilon Yayınları.
• TSAI, C.C., WEN, M. L. (2005). Research and Trends in Science Education from 1998 to 2002: A Content Analysis of Publication in Selected Journals, International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 27, No.1, pp. 3-14.
• WILLIAMS, M.E., BUBOLTZ, W.C. (1999). Content Analysis of the Journal of Counseling & Development: Volumes 67 to 74, Journal of Counseling & Development, Vol.77, No.3, pp. 344-349.
• YALÇIN, N., BİLİCAN, S., KEZER, F. YALÇIN, Ö. (2009). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi’nde Yayınlanan Makalelerin Niteliği: İçerik Analizi, The First International Congress Educational Research Kongre Kitapçığı, Mayıs 1-3, 2009 Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Çanakkale.
• YILDIRIM, A., ŞİMŞEK, H. (2000). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• YOZGAT, U., KARTALTEPE, N. (2009). “Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongre Kitaplarında Yer Alan Bildirilerin Bibliyometrik Profili: Örgüt Teorisi ve Örgütsel Davranış Bildirileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma” Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Nisan 2009, Sayı: 4, No.1, ss.149 ‐16