Developments and Applications in Enzyme Activated Membrane Reactors

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 26 - 41, 27.06.2019

Nadir Dizge , Ruken Esra Demirdogen Kasım Ocakoglu

Öz

Enzyme
immobilization has been significant in applying polymer membranes to prevent
biofouling or to create catalytic reactions. So far, several modification
methods have been employed for modifying surface of membranes. Among these
methods, enzyme immobilization on polymeric membranes have gained much
attention. Enzymes can be immobilized either via physical or chemical methods. This review summarizes the recent
literature on modification of polymer membranes using various immobilization techniques.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polymeric membranes, enzyme activated membranes, enzyme immobilization, membrane reactor

Kaynakça

• Marcano J.G.S. & Tsotsis T.T. 2004 Catalytic membranes and membrane reactors, Online ISBN:9783527601981, Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH.
• Asatekin A., Kang S., Elimelech M., & Mayes A.M. 2007 Anti-fouling ultrafiltration membranes containing polyacrylonitrile-graft-poly(ethylene oxide) comb copolymer additives, Journal of Membrane Science 298, 136–146.
• Uragami T., Chakraborty S., Piemonte V., & Paola L.D. 2013 Biocatalytic membrane reactors: principles, preparation and biotechnological, pharmaceutical and medical applications, Handbook of membrane reactors.
• Al-Amoudi A. & Lovitt R.W. 2007 Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency, Journal of Membrane Science, 303, 4–28.
• Shirazi S., Lin C. & Chen D. 2010 Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes – a critical review, Desalination, 250, 236–248.Pena N., Gallego S., del Vigo F. & Chesters S.P. 2012 Evaluating impact of fouling on reverse osmosis membranes performance, Desalination, Water Treatment, First, 1–11.
• F.Afani au[Gabriele Iorio, G. Greco Jr., M. Cantarella, M.H. Remy. & V. Scardi. 1979 Kinetic behaviour of immobilized enzyme membrane reactors, Chemical Engineering Science, 34(10), 1213-1219.
• Agustian J., Kamaruddin A.H. & Bhatia S. 2011 Enzymatic membrane reactors: the determining factors in two separate phase operations, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 86, 1032–1048.
• Gao F., Tang X., Yi H., Zhao S., Li C., Li J., Shi Y. & Meng X. 2017 A Review on selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 over Mn–based catalysts at low temperatures: Catalysts, mechanisms, kinetics and DFT calculations, Catalysts, 7, 199-231.
• Mäntsälä, P. & Niemi J. 2009 Enzymes: The Biological Catalysts of Life, Physiology and Maintenances; 2, 1-9.
• Piacentini E., Yan M. & Giorno L. 2017 Development of enzyme-loaded PVA microspheres by membrane emulsification, Journal of Membrane Science, 524, 79-86.Sheldon R.A. & van Pelt S. 2013 Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: why, what and how. Chemical Society Reviews, 42, 6223-6235.
• Matson S.L. & Quinn J.A. 1992 Membrane reactors. In: Ho W.S.W., Sirkar K.K. (eds) Membrane Handbook. Springer, Boston, MA.
• Sirkar K.K., Purushottam V., Shanbhag A. & Kovvali S. 1999 Membrane in a reactor:  A functional perspective, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 38(10), 3715–3737.
• Amounas M., Innocent C., Cosnier S. & Seta P. 2000 A membrane based reactor with an enzyme immobilized by an avidin–biotin molecular recognition in a polymer matrix. Journal of Membrane Science, 176, 169-176.
• Talbert J.N. & Goddard J.M. 2012 Enzymes on material surfaces, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 93, 8–19.
• Mateo C., Palomo J.M., Fernandez-Lorente G., Guisan J.M. & Fernandez Lafuente R. 2007 Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques, Enzyme Microbiology Technology, 40, 1451–1463.
• P. Wang, H.F. Jia. & G.Y. Zhu. Catalytic behaviours of enzymes attached to nanoparticles: the effect of particle mobility, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 84 (2003) 406–414.Ansari S.A. & Q. Husain. 2012 Potential applications of enzymes immobilized on/in nano materials: a review, Biotechnology Advances, 30, 512–523.
• Lu J. & Toy P.H. 2009 Organic polymer supports for synthesis and for reagent and catalyst immobilization, Chem. Rev. 109, 815–838.
• Atia K.S. 2003 Characterization and application of immobilized lipase enzyme on different radiation grafted polymeric films: Assessment of the immobilization process using spectroscopic analysis, J Appl. Pol. Sci. 90(1), 155-167.
• Mohamad N.R., Marzuki N.H.C., Buang N.A., Huyop F. & Wahab R.A. 2015 An overview of technologies for immobilization of enzymes and surface analysis techniques for immobilized enzymes. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 29(2), 205–220.
• Datta S., Christena L.R. & Rajaram Y.R.S. 2013 Enzyme immobilization: an overview on techniques and support materials. 3 Biotech. 3(1), 1–9.
• B.M. Brena. & F. Batista-Viera. 2006 Enzyme immobilization literature survey from methods in biotechnology: Immobilization of enzymes and cells, Second Edition Edited by: J. M. Guisan © Humana Press Inc. Totowa, NJ.
• Fan J., Luo J., & Wan Y. 2017 Aquatic micro-pollutants removal with a biocatalytic membrane prepared by metal chelating affinity membrane chromatography. Chem. Eng. J. 327, 1011–1020.
• Chaplin M.F. & Bucke C. Enzyme technology. Edition, illustrated. Publisher, CUP Archive, 1990. ISBN, 0521348846, 9780521348843. Length, 264 pages.
• Giorno L., Zhang J. & Drioli E. 2006 Study of mass transfer performance of naproxen acid and ester through a multiphase enzyme-loaded membrane system, Journal of Membrane Science, 276(1-2), 59-67.
• Xu F., Wang W.H., Tan Y.J. & Bruening M.L. 2010 Facile trypsin immobilization in polymeric membranes for rapid, efficient protein digestion, Anal. Chem. 82, 10045–10051.
• Bohdziewicz J. 1998 Biodegradation of phenol by enzymes from Pseudomonas sp. immobilized onto ultrafiltration membranes, Process Biochemistry, 33(8), 811-818.
• Gupta S., Kumar Y., Singh K. & Bhattacharya A. 2010 Lipase immobilized on poly (vinyl alcohol) modified polysulfone membrane: application in hydrolytic activities for olive oil, Polymer Bulletin, 64, 141–158.
• Gülec H.A. 2013 Immobilization of β-galactosidase from Kluyveromyces lactis onto polymeric membrane surfaces: Effect of surface characteristics, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 104, 83– 90.
• Hilal N., Kochkodan V., Nigmatullin R., Goncharuk V. & Al-Khatib L. 2006 Lipase-immobilized biocatalytic membranes for enzymatic esterification: Comparison of various approaches to membrane preparation. Journal of Membrane Science, 268, 198–207.
• Vitola G., Mazzei R., Fontananova E., Porzio E., Manco G., Gaeta S.N. & Giorno L. 2016 Polymeric biocatalytic membranes with immobilized thermostable Phosphotriesterase, Journal of Membrane Science, 516, 144–151.
• Gebreyohannes A.Y., Giorno L., Vankelecom I.F.J., Verbiest T. & Aimar P. 2017 Effect of operational parameters on the performance of a magnetic responsive biocatalytic membrane reactor, Chemical Engineering Journal, 308, 853-862.
• Laurenti E. & dos Santos Vianna Jr A. 2015 Enzymatic microreactors in biocatalysis: history, features, and future perspectives, Biocatalysis, 1, 148–165.