Hizmetkâr Liderliğin Pozitif Örgütsel Davranış Değişkenleri ile İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 0 - 0, 30.06.2016

Sezer C. Günaydın F. Oben Ürü Sanı Özlem Atan Tarlacı Uğur Yozgat

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2000’li yıllardan sonra yazında yer almaya başlayan “iş-aile zenginleşmesi”nin yaşanmasında, güncel liderlik yaklaşımlarından hizmetkâr liderlik tarzının katkısını ortaya çıkarmaktır. Bu çerçevede araştırmada, çalışanların ihtiyaçlarını her şeyin üzerinde gören hizmetkâr liderlik tarzının çalışanların iş-aile zenginleşmesi yaşamasındaki etkileri test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, çalışanlar tarafından algılanan hizmetkâr liderlik tarzının, çalışanların örgütleri ile özdeşleşme düzeyini ve sahip oldukları pozitif psikolojik kaynakları/sermayeyi (öz-değer, öz-yeterlilik, iyimserlik ve psikolojik yılmazlık) arttırdığı ve bu değişkenler aracılığı ile de çalışanların işten aileye ve aileden işe zenginleşme düzeylerini olumlu yönde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışmada, hizmetkâr liderlik tarzının iş-aile zenginleşmesi üzerindeki etkisi ilk defa kapsamlı bir model ile test edilmiş ve gelecek kuramsal ve görgül çalışmalar için yeni model önerileri geliştirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Hizmetkâr Liderlik, İş-Aile Zenginleşmesi, Örgütle Özdeşleşme, Pozitif Psikolojik Kaynaklar (Öz-değer, Öz-yeterlilik, İyimserlik, Psikolojik Yılmazlık)

Kaynakça

• Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S. ve Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences Associated with Work-Family Conflict: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2): 278-308.
• Aslan, Ş. ve Özata, M. (2010). Sağlık Çalışanlarında Hizmete Yönelik Liderlik (Hizmetkâr Liderlik) ve Page-Wong ile Patterson Ölçeklerinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Araştırması, 18. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 586-596.
• Avolio, B. J ., Walumbwa, F. O . ve Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60: 421–449.
• Barbuto, J. E., Jr. ve Wheeler, D. W. (2002). Becoming a Servant Leader: Do You Have What It Takes? Nebguide G02-1481. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, Nebraska Cooperative Extension.
• Barbuto, J. E., Jr. ve Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale Development and Construct Clarification of Servant Leadership, Group & Organization Management, 31(3): 1-27.
• Bargava, S. ve Baral, R.( 2009). Antecedents and Consequences of Work-Family Enrichment among Indian Managers. National Academy of Psychology, Psychological Studies, 54: 213-225.
• Barnett, R. C. ve Baruch, G. K. (1986). Role Quality, Multiple Role İnvolvement, and Psychological Well-Being in Midlife Women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3): 578-585.
• Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.
• Bass, M. B. (2000). The Future of Leadership in Learning Organizations, Journal of Leadership & Organization Studies, 7(3): 18-40.
• Block, J. and Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and Ego-Resiliency: Conceptual and Empirical Connections And Separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 349–61.
• Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, M. K., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure of Work–Family Conflict, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2): 249-276.
• Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, M. K., Wayne, J. H. ve Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the Positive Side of the Work-Family İnterface: Development and Validation of a Work-Family Enrichment Scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1): 131-164.
• Dennis, R.S. ve Bocarnea, M. (2005). Development of the Servant Leadership Assessment Instrument, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(7/8): 600-615.
• Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and Procedural Justice Climate as Antecedents of Unit-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Personnel Psychology, 57: 61–94.
• Farlıng, L. M., Stone, G. A. ve Winston, E. B. (1999). Servant Leadership: Setting the Stage for Empirical Research, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 6(1/2): 49-72.
• Graham, J.W. (1991). Servant-Leadership in Organizations: Inspirational and Moral, Leadership Quarterly, 2: 105-119.
• Graham, J.W. (1991). An Essay on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 4: 249-270.
• Greenhaus, J. H. ve Powell, G. N. (2006). When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 72-92.
• Greenleaf, R.K. (1970). Center for Servant Leadership, “What is Servant Leadership?”, http://www.greenleaf.org/whatissl/ (25.10.2010).
• Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness, New York: Paulist Press.
• Greenleaf, R.K. (2002). Servant Leadership: A Journay into the Legitimate Power and Greatness, 25th Aniversary Edition, New York: Paulist Press.
• Hanson, G. C., Hammer, L. B., & Colton, C. L. (2006). Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Work-Family Positive Spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3): 249-265.
• Humphreys, H. J. (2005). Contextual Implications for Transformational and Servant Leadership: A Historical Investigation, Management Decisions, 43(10): 1410-1431.
• Joseph, E. E. ve Winston, E. B. (2005). A Correlation of Servant Leadership, Leader Trust and Organizational Trust, Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 26(1): 6-22.
• Judge, T.A., Erez, A., Bono, J.E. ve Thoresen, C.J.(2003).The Core Self Evaluation Scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56: 303-331.
• Kesken, J ve Ayyıldız, A. (2008). Liderlik Yaklaşımlarında Yeni Perspektifler: Pozitif ve Otantik Liderlik, Ege Akademik Bakış, 8(2): 729-754.
• Koçel, T. (2010). İşletme Yöneticiliği, Genişletilmiş 12. Baskı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Liden, C.R., Wayne, J.S., Zhao, H. ve Henderson, D. (2008). Servant Leadership: Development of a Multidimensional Measure and Multi-Level Assessment, The Leadership Quarterly, 19: 161-177.
• Luthans, F., C.M. Youssef ve B.J. Avolio (2007), Positive Pscyhological Capital: Beyond Human and Social Capital, Business Horizons, January-February: 45-50.
• Mael, F. ve Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational İdentification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13: 103–123.
• Mayer, D. M., Bardes, M. ve Piccolo, R. F. (2008). Do Servant-Leaders Help Satisfy Follower Needs? An Organizational Justice Perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17: 180–197.
• Page, D. ve Wong, T.P. (2000). A conceptual framework for Measuring Servant Leadership. In Adjibolossoo, s.(Ed.), The Human Factor In Shaping the Course of History and Development, University Press of America, Lanham, MD.
• Patterson, K.A. (2003). Servant Leadership: A Theoratical Model. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Regent University.
• Pratt, M. G. (1998). To Be or Not To Be: Central Questions in Organizational İdentifi Cation. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversations (171–207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4: 219-247.
• Schwarzer, R. ve Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (s. 35-37). Windsor, United Kingdom: NFER-NELSON.
• Sendjaya, S. ve Cooper, B. (2010). Servant Leadership Behaviour Scale: A Hierarchical Model and Test of Construct Validity, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, (In Press).
• Sendjaya, S. ve Sarros, C. J. (2002). Servant Leadership: Its Origin, Development and Application in Organizations, Journal of Leadership & Organization Studies, 9(2): 57-64.
• Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J.C. ve Santora, J.C. (2008). Defining and Measuring Servant Leadership Behavior in Organizations, Journal of Management Studies, 45(2): 402-424.
• Smith, N. B., Montagno, V. R. ve Kuzmenko, N. T. (2004). Transformational and Servant Leadership: Content and Contextual Comparisons, Journal of Leadership & Organization Studies, 10(4): 80-92.
• Spears, L.C. (2004). Practicing Servant Leadership, Fall, 7-11.
• Spears, L. (1996). Reflections on Robert K. Greenleaf and Servant Leadership, Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 17(7): 33-35.
• Spears, L.C. ve Lawrence, M. (2002). Focus on Leadership: Servant Leadership for the 21st Century. New York: John Wiley &Sons.
• Stone, A. G., Russell, R. F. ve Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus Servant Leadership: A Difference İn Leader Focus. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25: 349–361.
• Ürü Sanı, F.O., Çalışkan, S.C., Atan, Ö. ve Yozgat, U. (2013). Öğretim Üyelerinin Hizmetkâr Liderlik Davranışları Öncülleri ve Ardılları Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Ege Akademik Bakış, 13(1): 63-82.
• Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Management, 37: 1228–1261.
• Vondey, M. (2010). The Relationships among Servant Leadership, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Person-Organization Fit, and Organizational Identification, International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(1), 3-27.
• Washıngton, R. R. Sutton, D. C. ve Feild, S. H. (2006). Individual Differences in Servant Leadership: The Roles of Values and Personality, Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 27(8): 700-716.
• West, G. R. B., Bocârnea, M. ve Marañon, D. (2009). Servant-Leadership as a Predictor of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment with the Moderating Effects of Organizational Support and Role Clarity among Filipino Engineering, Manufacturing and Technology Workers. International Journal of Servant-Leadership, 5: 129–162.
• Zhang, H., Kwan, H.K., Evereet, A.M. ve Jian, Z. (2012). Servant Leadership, Organizational Identification and Work-to-Family Enrichment: The Moderating Role of Work Climate for Sharing Family Concerns. Human Resource Management, 51(5): 747–767.