Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS

Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 30.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.1224531

Abstract

Potassium (K) is an essential plant nutrient. Several research studies are available on the basal application of K concerned with yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Conversely, very limited studies are available on the split application of K. During 2018-2019, a field experiment was performed at the Southern Wheat Research Station, Agriculture Research Institute, Tandojam, Pakistan to determine the importance of the right time for K fertilization in wheat. The experiment included 18 plots, each having an area of 12m2 (4m × 3m) involving two cultivars of winter wheat, viz. Benazir and Sindhu, sown in two-factor Randomized Complete Block Design, arranged in a split pattern (main plots = varieties, sub plots = treatments). Three K fertilization levels were tested, i.e. T1 = No K fertilization, T2 = 50 kg K2O ha-1 applied at the time of sowing, T3 = two splits of K, i.e. 25 kg K2O ha-1 applied at sowing and 25 kg K2O ha-1 applied at grain filling stage (top dressing). According to results, the yield components showed a positive enhancement upon split application of K as compared to basal application in terms of significantly higher (p<0.05) number of tillers (10.1 against 8.18), number of grains per plant (548.0 against 374.2), 1000 grain weight (44.7 against 41.9 g), grain yield (4.5 against 4.2 Mg ha-1) and straw yield (8.5 and 8.3 Mg ha-1), and K concentration in grain (0.38 against 0.32%) and straw (0.44 against 0.40%) was recorded for Sindhu and Benazir, respectively. The varietal interaction revealed that Sindhu was significantly different as compared to Benazir. These results advocate that the split application of K is better for obtaining the higher yield of wheat, especially Sindhu.

References

  • [1] Shabala S, Pottosin I. Regulation of potassium transport in plants under hostile conditions: implications for abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Physiol. Plant 2014; 151(3): 257-279.
  • [2] Dhillon JS, Eickhoff EM, Mullen RW, Raun WR. World potassium use efficiency in cereal crops. Agron J. 2019; 111(2): 889-96.
  • [3] Wani JA, Malik MA, Dar MA, Akhter F, Raina SK. Impact of method of application and concentration of potassium on yield of wheat. J. Environ Bio 2014; 1;35(4):623.
  • [4] Van Duivenbooden N, De Wit CT, Van Keulen H. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium relations in five major cereals reviewed in respect to fertilizer recommendations using simulation modelling. Fert res 1995; 44(1): 37-49.
  • [5] Saifullah A, Ranjha M, Yaseen M, Akhtar MF. Response of wheat to potassium fertilization under field conditions. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2002;39(4):269-72.
  • [6] Hossain A, da Silva JA, Bodruzzaman M. Rate and application methods of potassium in light soil for irrigated spring wheat. Songklanakarin J Sci Tech. 2015; 1;37(6)635-642.
  • [7] Sharma S, Duveiller E, Basnet R, Karki CB, Sharma RC. Effect of potash fertilization on Helminthosporium leaf blight severity in wheat, and associated increases in grain yield and kernel weight. Field Crops Res. 2005; 14;93(2-3):142-50.
  • [8] Sweeney DW, Granade GV, Eversmeyer MG, Whitney DA. Phosphorus, potassium, chloride, and fungicide effects on wheat yield and leaf rust severity. J Plant Nutr. 2000; 1;23(9):1267-81.
  • [9] Kolar JS, Grewal HS. Effect of split application of potassium on growth, yield and potassium accumulation by soybean. Fert res. 1994;39(3):217-22.
  • [10] Ali I, Khan AA, Munsif F, He L, Khan A, Ullah S, Saeed W, Iqbal A, Adnan M, Ligeng J. Optimizing rates and application time of potassium fertilizer for improving growth, grain nutrients content and yield of wheat crop. Open Agriculture 2019; 1;4(1):500-8.
  • [11] Römheld V, Kirkby EA. Research on potassium in agriculture: needs and prospects. Plant soil 2010;335(1):155-80.
  • [12] Wang Y, Zhang Z, Liang Y, Han Y, Han Y, Tan J. High potassium application rate increased grain yield of shading-stressed winter wheat by improving photosynthesis and photosynthate translocation. Front Plant Sci 2020; 28;11:134.
  • [13] Liang X, Yu Z. Effect of potassium application stage on photosynthetic characteristics of winter wheat flag leaves and on starch accumulation in wheat grains. Ying Yong Sheng tai xue bao= The J Appl Eco 2004; 1;15(8):1349-52.
  • [14] Yu ZW, Liang XF, Li YQ, Wang X. Effects of potassium application rate and time on the uptake and utilization of nitrogen and potassium by winter wheat. Ying Yong Sheng tai xue bao= The J App Eco 2007; 1;18(1):69-74.
  • [15] Chandio AA, Jiang Y, Joyo MA, Rehman A. Impact of area under cultivation, water availability, credit disbursement, and fertilizer off-take on wheat production in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Environ Bio Sci 2016; 6(10):10-8.
  • [16] Ryan J, Estefan G, Rashid A. Soil and plant analysis laboratory manual. ICARDA; 2001.
  • [17] Mathukia RK, Kapadiya JK, Panara DM. Scheduling of nitrogen and potash application in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Wheat Res 2014;2:171-2.
  • [18] Akhter S, Kotru R, Lone BA, Jan R. Effect of split application of potassium and nitrogen on wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth and yield under temperate Kashmir. Indian J Agron 2017; 62(1):49-53.
  • [19] Kumar P, Pandey SK, Singh BP, Singh SV, Kumar D. Influence of source and time of potassium application on potato growth, yield, economics and crisp quality. Potato Res 2007; 50(1):1-3.
  • [20] Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants Second Edition Academic Press Edition London.
  • [21] Khan AA, TARIQ JAN MU. Impact of various nitrogen and potassium levels and application methods on grain yield and yield attributes of wheat. Sarhad J Agri 2014; 30(1):35-46.
  • [22] Zhao X, Gao S, Lu D, Chen X, Yuan G, Wang H. Grain yield and soil potassium fertility changes arising from different potassium-bearing materials in rice–wheat rotation. Nutr Cycl Agroeco 2022;124(1):117-29.
  • [23] Corrêa CV, Gouveia AM, Lanna ND, Tavares AE, Mendonça VZ, Campos FG, Silva JO, Cardoso AI, Evangelista RM. The split application of potassium influence the production, nutrients extraction, and quality of sweet potatoes. J Plant Nutri 2018; 2;41(16):2048-56.
  • [24] Kang W, Fan M, Ma Z, Shi X, Zheng H. Luxury absorption of potassium by potato plants. American Journal of Potato Research. 2014 Oct;91(5):573-8.

COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS

Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 30.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.1224531

Abstract

Potassium (K) is an essential plant nutrient. Several research studies are available on the basal application of K concerned with yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Conversely, very limited studies are available on the split application of K. During 2018-2019, a field experiment was performed at the Southern Wheat Research Station, Agriculture Research Institute, Tandojam, Pakistan to determine the importance of the right time for K fertilization in wheat. The experiment included 18 plots, each having an area of 12m2 (4m × 3m) involving two cultivars of winter wheat, viz. Benazir and Sindhu, sown in two-factor Randomized Complete Block Design, arranged in a split pattern (main plots = varieties, sub plots = treatments). Three K fertilization levels were tested, i.e. T1 = No K fertilization, T2 = 50 kg K2O ha-1 applied at the time of sowing, T3 = two splits of K, i.e. 25 kg K2O ha-1 applied at sowing and 25 kg K2O ha-1 applied at grain filling stage (top dressing). According to results, the yield components showed a positive enhancement upon split application of K as compared to basal application in terms of significantly higher (p<0.05) number of tillers (10.1 against 8.18), number of grains per plant (548.0 against 374.2), 1000 grain weight (44.7 against 41.9 g), grain yield (4.5 against 4.2 Mg ha-1) and straw yield (8.5 and 8.3 Mg ha-1), and K concentration in grain (0.38 against 0.32%) and straw (0.44 against 0.40%) was recorded for Sindhu and Benazir, respectively. The varietal interaction revealed that Sindhu was significantly different as compared to Benazir. These results advocate that the split application of K is better for obtaining the higher yield of wheat, especially Sindhu.

References

  • [1] Shabala S, Pottosin I. Regulation of potassium transport in plants under hostile conditions: implications for abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Physiol. Plant 2014; 151(3): 257-279.
  • [2] Dhillon JS, Eickhoff EM, Mullen RW, Raun WR. World potassium use efficiency in cereal crops. Agron J. 2019; 111(2): 889-96.
  • [3] Wani JA, Malik MA, Dar MA, Akhter F, Raina SK. Impact of method of application and concentration of potassium on yield of wheat. J. Environ Bio 2014; 1;35(4):623.
  • [4] Van Duivenbooden N, De Wit CT, Van Keulen H. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium relations in five major cereals reviewed in respect to fertilizer recommendations using simulation modelling. Fert res 1995; 44(1): 37-49.
  • [5] Saifullah A, Ranjha M, Yaseen M, Akhtar MF. Response of wheat to potassium fertilization under field conditions. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2002;39(4):269-72.
  • [6] Hossain A, da Silva JA, Bodruzzaman M. Rate and application methods of potassium in light soil for irrigated spring wheat. Songklanakarin J Sci Tech. 2015; 1;37(6)635-642.
  • [7] Sharma S, Duveiller E, Basnet R, Karki CB, Sharma RC. Effect of potash fertilization on Helminthosporium leaf blight severity in wheat, and associated increases in grain yield and kernel weight. Field Crops Res. 2005; 14;93(2-3):142-50.
  • [8] Sweeney DW, Granade GV, Eversmeyer MG, Whitney DA. Phosphorus, potassium, chloride, and fungicide effects on wheat yield and leaf rust severity. J Plant Nutr. 2000; 1;23(9):1267-81.
  • [9] Kolar JS, Grewal HS. Effect of split application of potassium on growth, yield and potassium accumulation by soybean. Fert res. 1994;39(3):217-22.
  • [10] Ali I, Khan AA, Munsif F, He L, Khan A, Ullah S, Saeed W, Iqbal A, Adnan M, Ligeng J. Optimizing rates and application time of potassium fertilizer for improving growth, grain nutrients content and yield of wheat crop. Open Agriculture 2019; 1;4(1):500-8.
  • [11] Römheld V, Kirkby EA. Research on potassium in agriculture: needs and prospects. Plant soil 2010;335(1):155-80.
  • [12] Wang Y, Zhang Z, Liang Y, Han Y, Han Y, Tan J. High potassium application rate increased grain yield of shading-stressed winter wheat by improving photosynthesis and photosynthate translocation. Front Plant Sci 2020; 28;11:134.
  • [13] Liang X, Yu Z. Effect of potassium application stage on photosynthetic characteristics of winter wheat flag leaves and on starch accumulation in wheat grains. Ying Yong Sheng tai xue bao= The J Appl Eco 2004; 1;15(8):1349-52.
  • [14] Yu ZW, Liang XF, Li YQ, Wang X. Effects of potassium application rate and time on the uptake and utilization of nitrogen and potassium by winter wheat. Ying Yong Sheng tai xue bao= The J App Eco 2007; 1;18(1):69-74.
  • [15] Chandio AA, Jiang Y, Joyo MA, Rehman A. Impact of area under cultivation, water availability, credit disbursement, and fertilizer off-take on wheat production in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Environ Bio Sci 2016; 6(10):10-8.
  • [16] Ryan J, Estefan G, Rashid A. Soil and plant analysis laboratory manual. ICARDA; 2001.
  • [17] Mathukia RK, Kapadiya JK, Panara DM. Scheduling of nitrogen and potash application in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Wheat Res 2014;2:171-2.
  • [18] Akhter S, Kotru R, Lone BA, Jan R. Effect of split application of potassium and nitrogen on wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth and yield under temperate Kashmir. Indian J Agron 2017; 62(1):49-53.
  • [19] Kumar P, Pandey SK, Singh BP, Singh SV, Kumar D. Influence of source and time of potassium application on potato growth, yield, economics and crisp quality. Potato Res 2007; 50(1):1-3.
  • [20] Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants Second Edition Academic Press Edition London.
  • [21] Khan AA, TARIQ JAN MU. Impact of various nitrogen and potassium levels and application methods on grain yield and yield attributes of wheat. Sarhad J Agri 2014; 30(1):35-46.
  • [22] Zhao X, Gao S, Lu D, Chen X, Yuan G, Wang H. Grain yield and soil potassium fertility changes arising from different potassium-bearing materials in rice–wheat rotation. Nutr Cycl Agroeco 2022;124(1):117-29.
  • [23] Corrêa CV, Gouveia AM, Lanna ND, Tavares AE, Mendonça VZ, Campos FG, Silva JO, Cardoso AI, Evangelista RM. The split application of potassium influence the production, nutrients extraction, and quality of sweet potatoes. J Plant Nutri 2018; 2;41(16):2048-56.
  • [24] Kang W, Fan M, Ma Z, Shi X, Zheng H. Luxury absorption of potassium by potato plants. American Journal of Potato Research. 2014 Oct;91(5):573-8.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Dr. Saima Kalsoom Babar 0000-0002-5600-6503

Tarique Ali Jatoi 0000-0002-0199-839X

Zia-ul-hassan Shah 0000-0002-0199-839X

Publication Date January 30, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Babar, D. S. K., Jatoi, T. A., & Shah, Z.-u.-h. (2024). COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji, 13(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.1224531
AMA Babar DSK, Jatoi TA, Shah Zuh. COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji. January 2024;13(1):1-7. doi:10.18036/estubtdc.1224531
Chicago Babar, Dr. Saima Kalsoom, Tarique Ali Jatoi, and Zia-ul-hassan Shah. “COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS”. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji 13, no. 1 (January 2024): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.1224531.
EndNote Babar DSK, Jatoi TA, Shah Z-u-h (January 1, 2024) COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji 13 1 1–7.
IEEE D. S. K. Babar, T. A. Jatoi, and Z.-u.-h. Shah, “COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS”, Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2024, doi: 10.18036/estubtdc.1224531.
ISNAD Babar, Dr. Saima Kalsoom et al. “COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS”. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji 13/1 (January 2024), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.1224531.
JAMA Babar DSK, Jatoi TA, Shah Z-u-h. COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji. 2024;13:1–7.
MLA Babar, Dr. Saima Kalsoom et al. “COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS”. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji, vol. 13, no. 1, 2024, pp. 1-7, doi:10.18036/estubtdc.1224531.
Vancouver Babar DSK, Jatoi TA, Shah Z-u-h. COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF TWO WHEAT VARIETIES TO BASAL AND SPLIT POTASSIUM NUTRITION UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji. 2024;13(1):1-7.