MARC: Mining Association Rules from datasets by using Clustering models

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 89 - 93, 31.07.2021

Shadi Al Shehabı Abdullatif Baba

Abstract

Association rules are useful to discover relationships, which are mostly hidden, between the different items in large datasets. Symbolic models are the principal tools to extract association rules. This basic technique is time-consuming, and it generates a big number of associated rules. To overcome this drawback, we suggest a new method, called MARC, to extract the more important association rules of two important levels: Type I, and Type II. This approach relies on multi topographic unsupervised neural network model as well as clustering quality measures that evaluate the success of a given numerical classification model to behave as a natural symbolic model.

Keywords

Association Rules, Unsupervised Learning, Multi-SOM Model, Symbolic Model, Clustering Model, Numerical Dataset

References

• U. M. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P. Smyth, and R. Uthurusamy, “Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining,” 1996.
• D. T. Larose and D. T. Larose, Data mining methods and models, vol. 2. Wiley Online Library, 2006.
• S. Al Shehabi and J.-C. Lamirel, “Knowledge extraction from unsupervised multi-topographic neural network models,” in International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 2005, pp. 479–484.
• K.-C. Lin, I.-E. Liao, and Z.-S. Chen, “An improved frequent patterngrowth method formining association rules,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5154–5161, 2011.
• B. Liu, W. Hsu, and Y. Ma, “Miningassociation rules with multipleminimum supports,” in Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 1999, pp. 337–341.
• Y.-H. Hu and Y.-L. Chen, “Miningassociation rules with multiple minimum supports: anew mining algorithm and a support tuning mechanism,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2006.
• C.-W. Lin, T.-P. Hong, and W.-H. Lu, “An effective tree structure for mining high utility itemsets,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 7419–7424, 2011.
• C. K.-S. Leung, L. V. S. Lakshmanan, and R. T. Ng, “Exploiting succinct constraints using FP-trees,” ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2002.
• W.-Y. Lin, K.-W. Huang, and C.-A. Wu, “MCFPTree: An FP-tree-based algorithm for multi-constraint patterns discovery,” Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 231–246, 2010.
• J.-L. Koh and S.-F. Shieh, “An efficient approach for maintaining association rules based on adjusting FP-tree structures,” in International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 2004, pp. 417–424.
• S. K. Tanbeer, C. F. Ahmed, B.-S. Jeong, and Y.-K. Lee, “Efficient single-pass frequent pattern mining using a prefix-tree,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 179, no. 5, pp. 559–583, 2009.
• Y. Lan, D. Janssens, G. Chen, and G. Wets, “Improving associative classification by incorporating novel interestingness measures,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 184–192, 2006.
• R. Malhas and Z. Al Aghbari, “Interestingness filtering engine: Mining Bayesian networks for interesting patterns,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 5137–5145, 2009.
• B. Vo and B. Le, “Interestingness measures for association rules: Combination between lattice and hash tables,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 11630–11640, 2011.
• I. N. M. Shaharanee, F. Hadzic, and T. S. Dillon, “Interestingness measures for association rules based on statistical validity,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 386–392, 2011.
• Y. Zhao, C. Zhang, and S. Zhang, “Discovering interesting association rules by clustering,” in Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2004, pp. 1055–1061.
• I. Lee, G. Cai, and K. Lee, “Mining points-of-interest association rules from geo-tagged photos,” in 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2013, pp. 1580–1588.
• E.-H. Han, G. Karypis, V. Kumar, and B. Mobasher, “Clustering Based On Association Rule Hypergraphs.,” in DMKD, 1997, p. 0.
• M. J. Zaki, S. Parthasarathy, M. Ogihara, and W. Li, “New Algorithms for Fast Discovery of Association Rules, 3rd Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.” AAAI Press, 1997.
• B. Lent, A. Swami, and J. Widom, “Clustering association rules,” in Proceedings 13th International Conference on Data Engineering, 1997, pp. 220–231.
• E. V. Altay and B. Alatas, “Intelligent optimization algorithms for the problem of mining numerical association rules,” Phys. A Stat. Mech. its Appl., vol. 540, p. 123142, 2020.
• B. Imane, B. Abdelmajid, T. A. Mohammed, and T. A. Youssef, “Data mining approach based on clustering and association rules applicable to different fields,” in 2018 International Conference on Electronics, Control, Optimization and Computer Science (ICECOCS), 2018, pp. 1–5.
• X. Polanco, C. François, and J.-C. Lamirel, “Using artificial neural networks for mapping of scienceand technology: A multi-self-organizing-maps approach,” Scientometrics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 267–292, 2001.
• P.-N. Tan, M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar, “Introduction to data mining. ed,” Addison-Wesley Longman Publ. Co., Inc., 2005.
• R. Agrawal and R. Srikant, “Fast algorithms for mining association rules,” in Proc. 20th int. conf. very large data bases, VLDB, 1994, vol. 1215, pp. 487–499.
• J. Han, J. Pei, Y. Yin, and R. Mao, “Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation: A frequent-pattern tree approach,” Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 53–87, 2004.
• J.-C. Lamirel, C. Francois, S. Al Shehabi, and M. Hoffmann, “New classification quality estimators for analysis of documentary information: application to patent analysis and web mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 445–562, 2004.