Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi

Year 2012, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 611 - 628, 26.06.2012

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim fen bilgisi ve din kültürü ve ahlak bilgisi öğretmenliği bölümü öğretmen adaylarının bilim insanı imajlarının bazı değişkenlere göre incelemektir. Survey yaklaşımının kullanıldığı çalışmanın örneklemi toplam yüz on bir öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak Song ve Kim (1999) tarafından geliştirilen ve dört alt bölümden oluşan “ bilim insanı çizim ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen nitel ve nicel veriler cinsiyet ve bölüm farkına göre karşılaştırma yapmak amacıyla ölçeğin her bir alt bölümü için ayrı ayrı frekans ve yüzde değerleri hesaplanarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları öğretmen adaylarının zihinsel bilim insanı imajlarıyla ilgili olarak pozitif algılara sahip olduklarını, bilim insanının gözlüklü, laboratuar önlüklü, dağınık saçlı olarak algılandığını, önemli bir kısmının ise bilim insanını bakımlı olarak düşündüklerini göstermektedir. Ayrıca bulgular, öğretmen adaylarının bilim insanını erkek ve 30-50 yaş arasında, laboratuarda ya da çalışma odasında çalışan, deney yapan, düşünen kişiler olarak düşündüğü, ve cam kaplar, deney tüpleri, masa ve ocak gibi objeleri kullanıyor olarak algılandıklarını ortaya koymuştur. Öğretmen adaylarının yaptıkları bilimsel çalışmalar ve insanlığa yaptıkları önemli katkıları gerekçe göstererek, bilim insanı örneği olarak en çok Einstein, Edison ve İbn-i Sina gibi erkek bilim insanlarını düşündükleri ve bilim insanı imajlarının temel kaynağı olarak bilim insanlarının yaşam öyküleri, müze ve laboratuar gezileri, filmler, gazeteler, internet ve ders kitaplarını gördükleri de diğer bulgular arasındadır

References

  • Barman, C. (1997). Students’ Views of Scientist and Science: Results from A National Study. Science and Children, 35, 18-23.
  • Buldu, M. (2006). Young Children’s Perceptions Of Scientists: A Preliminary Study. Educational Research. 48(1), 121-132.
  • Burton, G.M. & Huber, R.A. (1995). What Do Children Think Scientist Look Like? School Science and Mathematiccs, 95 (7), 371-376.
  • Chambers, D.W. (1983). Stereotypic Images of the Scientist: The Draw A Scientist Test. Science Education, 67 (2), 255-265.
  • Cobern W. W., Gibson, A.T. & Underwood, S. A. (1999). Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive Study of 16 Ninth Graders’ Everyday Thinking. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 36(5), 541-564.
  • Finson , K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Crammond, R. L. (1995). Development of a field-test checklist for the draw a scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195-205.
  • Finson, K. D., Riggs, I. M. & Jesunatahadas, J. (1999). The relationship of science teaching self efficacy and outcome expectancy to the Draw-A-Science-Teacher Teaching Checklist. Paper Presented at the Annual International Conference of The Association of Educators of Teachers of Science, Austin, TX.
  • Finson, D. K. (2002). Drawing A Scientist: What We Do and Do Not Know After Fifty Years of Drawings. School Science And Mathematics. 102 (7), 335–345.
  • Fort, D.C.& Vanny, H.L. (1989). How Students See Scientists: Mostly Male, Mostly White, and Mostly Benevolent. Science and Children, 26 (8), 8-13.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The İnterpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gonsoulin, W. B. (2001). How Do Middle School Students Depict Science And Scientist. Mississippi State University, Curriculum and Instruction, Doctoral Thesis, UMI Number: 3005589.
  • Hammrich, P. (1997). Yes daughter you can: Empowering parents is the first step toward improving females’ achievement in science. Science and Children, 34(4), 21-24.
  • Kahle, J. B. (1989). Images Of Scientists: Gender Issues In Science Classrooms. The Key Centre For School Science And Mathematics. 4, 1-9.
  • Kaya, O.N., Doğan, A. ve Öcal, E. (2008). Turkish elementary school students' images of scientists. Eurasıan Journal Of Educatıonal Research, 8(32), 83-100.
  • Kelly, A. (1987) Why girls don’ t do science. In A. Kelly (ed.), Science for Girls (Milton Keynes: Open University Press), 12–17.
  • Koren, P. & Bar, V. (2009). Pupils' Image of 'the Scientist' among Two Communities in Israel: A comparative study. International Journal Of Science Education, 31(18), 2485-2509.
  • Korkmaz, H. ve Kavak, G. (2010). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Bilime ve Bilim İnsanına Yönelik İmajları. İlköğretim Online, 9(3), 1055-1079.[Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
  • Mcmillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2004). Research in Education, New York: Longman.
  • Mead, M. & Metreaux, R. (1957). The Image of Science Among High School Students. Science, 126, 384–390.
  • Newton, D. P. & Newton, L. D. (1992). Young Children’s Perceptions Of Science And The Scientist. International Journal Of Science Education. 14 (3), 331–348.
  • Odell, M.R.I., Hewett, P., Bowan, J.& Boone, W.J. (1993). Stereotypical Images of Scientist: A Cross- Age Study. Paper Presented at the 41st Annual National Meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, Kansas City, MO.
  • Rennie, L. J. (1986). The Image of a Scientist: Perceptions of Preservice Teacher, Unpublished paper, University of Western Australia.
  • Schibeci, R. A. (1986). Image Of Science And Scientists And Science Education. Science Education. 70 (2),139-149.
  • Schibeci, R.A & Sorensen, I. (1983) “Elementary school children’s perception of scientists”. School Science and Mathematics, 83.(1), pp 14-20.
  • She, H.C. (1995). Elementary and Middle School Students' Image of Science and Scientists Related to Current Science Textbooks in Taiwan. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4),283-294.
  • Sjoberg, S. (1993). Gender equality in science classrooms. In Fraser, J. B. (ed.), Research Implications for Science and Mathematics Teachers, Vol. 1. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.
  • Song, J. (1993) Teachers’ images of scientists and their respected scientists. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education (JKARSE), 13, 48–55 (written in Korean with English abstract).
  • Song, J. & Kim, K.S. (1999). How Korean Students See Scientists: The Image of The Scientist. International Journal Of Science Education, 21(9), 957–977
  • Toğrol Yontar, A. (2000). Öğrencilerin Bilim İnsanı ile İlgili İmgeleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 25(118), 49-57.
  • Türkmen, H. (2008). Turkish Primary Students’ Perceptions about Scientist and What Factors Affecting the Image of the Scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 55-61.

Investigation of Prospective Teachers\' Image of Scientist with Respect to Some Variables

Year 2012, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 611 - 628, 26.06.2012

Abstract

In this study it was aimed to investigate primary science, religion culture and moral knowledge teacher
candidates’ image of the scientist with respect to some variables. As research approach, survey method was used. The sample
consisted of one hundred and eleven primary science, religion culture and moral knowledge teacher candidates. As the data
collection tool, a validated Turkish version of “a scientist drawing scale” with four sub dimensions originally developed by
Song and Kim (1999) was used. The qualitative and quantitative data was separately analyzed by calculating frequency and
percentages for each sub dimension of the scale, and compared statistically to explore the possible image distinctions
according to the variables like gender and enrolled department. The findings showed that teacher candidates hold positive
perceptions of cognitive images of the scientist and that scientists are thought to have eye-glasses, blowsy hair, and a lab
coat. Moreover, it was found that most of them conceived the scientist as someone presentable. The same findings suggested
that teacher candidates supposed scientists as a male aged between 30-50, busy working in a lab or his office, doing
experiments and thinking. In addition, in teacher candidates’ responses, scientists were pictured using objects such as glasses,
experiment tubes, a table and Bunsen. Findings also showed that the dominant scientist examples in their minds are male
ones like Einstein, Edison, and Ibn-i Sina and that the substantial sources of their images are scientist biographies, muse and
laboratory expeditions, movies, journals, internet and textbooks.

References

  • Barman, C. (1997). Students’ Views of Scientist and Science: Results from A National Study. Science and Children, 35, 18-23.
  • Buldu, M. (2006). Young Children’s Perceptions Of Scientists: A Preliminary Study. Educational Research. 48(1), 121-132.
  • Burton, G.M. & Huber, R.A. (1995). What Do Children Think Scientist Look Like? School Science and Mathematiccs, 95 (7), 371-376.
  • Chambers, D.W. (1983). Stereotypic Images of the Scientist: The Draw A Scientist Test. Science Education, 67 (2), 255-265.
  • Cobern W. W., Gibson, A.T. & Underwood, S. A. (1999). Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive Study of 16 Ninth Graders’ Everyday Thinking. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 36(5), 541-564.
  • Finson , K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Crammond, R. L. (1995). Development of a field-test checklist for the draw a scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195-205.
  • Finson, K. D., Riggs, I. M. & Jesunatahadas, J. (1999). The relationship of science teaching self efficacy and outcome expectancy to the Draw-A-Science-Teacher Teaching Checklist. Paper Presented at the Annual International Conference of The Association of Educators of Teachers of Science, Austin, TX.
  • Finson, D. K. (2002). Drawing A Scientist: What We Do and Do Not Know After Fifty Years of Drawings. School Science And Mathematics. 102 (7), 335–345.
  • Fort, D.C.& Vanny, H.L. (1989). How Students See Scientists: Mostly Male, Mostly White, and Mostly Benevolent. Science and Children, 26 (8), 8-13.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The İnterpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gonsoulin, W. B. (2001). How Do Middle School Students Depict Science And Scientist. Mississippi State University, Curriculum and Instruction, Doctoral Thesis, UMI Number: 3005589.
  • Hammrich, P. (1997). Yes daughter you can: Empowering parents is the first step toward improving females’ achievement in science. Science and Children, 34(4), 21-24.
  • Kahle, J. B. (1989). Images Of Scientists: Gender Issues In Science Classrooms. The Key Centre For School Science And Mathematics. 4, 1-9.
  • Kaya, O.N., Doğan, A. ve Öcal, E. (2008). Turkish elementary school students' images of scientists. Eurasıan Journal Of Educatıonal Research, 8(32), 83-100.
  • Kelly, A. (1987) Why girls don’ t do science. In A. Kelly (ed.), Science for Girls (Milton Keynes: Open University Press), 12–17.
  • Koren, P. & Bar, V. (2009). Pupils' Image of 'the Scientist' among Two Communities in Israel: A comparative study. International Journal Of Science Education, 31(18), 2485-2509.
  • Korkmaz, H. ve Kavak, G. (2010). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Bilime ve Bilim İnsanına Yönelik İmajları. İlköğretim Online, 9(3), 1055-1079.[Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
  • Mcmillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2004). Research in Education, New York: Longman.
  • Mead, M. & Metreaux, R. (1957). The Image of Science Among High School Students. Science, 126, 384–390.
  • Newton, D. P. & Newton, L. D. (1992). Young Children’s Perceptions Of Science And The Scientist. International Journal Of Science Education. 14 (3), 331–348.
  • Odell, M.R.I., Hewett, P., Bowan, J.& Boone, W.J. (1993). Stereotypical Images of Scientist: A Cross- Age Study. Paper Presented at the 41st Annual National Meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, Kansas City, MO.
  • Rennie, L. J. (1986). The Image of a Scientist: Perceptions of Preservice Teacher, Unpublished paper, University of Western Australia.
  • Schibeci, R. A. (1986). Image Of Science And Scientists And Science Education. Science Education. 70 (2),139-149.
  • Schibeci, R.A & Sorensen, I. (1983) “Elementary school children’s perception of scientists”. School Science and Mathematics, 83.(1), pp 14-20.
  • She, H.C. (1995). Elementary and Middle School Students' Image of Science and Scientists Related to Current Science Textbooks in Taiwan. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4),283-294.
  • Sjoberg, S. (1993). Gender equality in science classrooms. In Fraser, J. B. (ed.), Research Implications for Science and Mathematics Teachers, Vol. 1. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.
  • Song, J. (1993) Teachers’ images of scientists and their respected scientists. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education (JKARSE), 13, 48–55 (written in Korean with English abstract).
  • Song, J. & Kim, K.S. (1999). How Korean Students See Scientists: The Image of The Scientist. International Journal Of Science Education, 21(9), 957–977
  • Toğrol Yontar, A. (2000). Öğrencilerin Bilim İnsanı ile İlgili İmgeleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 25(118), 49-57.
  • Türkmen, H. (2008). Turkish Primary Students’ Perceptions about Scientist and What Factors Affecting the Image of the Scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 55-61.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Fatma Ağgül Yalçın

Publication Date June 26, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012 Volume: 11 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Ağgül Yalçın, F. (2012). Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 11(3), 611-628.
AMA Ağgül Yalçın F. Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. EEO. September 2012;11(3):611-628.
Chicago Ağgül Yalçın, Fatma. “Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi”. İlköğretim Online 11, no. 3 (September 2012): 611-28.
EndNote Ağgül Yalçın F (September 1, 2012) Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. İlköğretim Online 11 3 611–628.
IEEE F. Ağgül Yalçın, “Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi”, EEO, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 611–628, 2012.
ISNAD Ağgül Yalçın, Fatma. “Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi”. İlköğretim Online 11/3 (September 2012), 611-628.
JAMA Ağgül Yalçın F. Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. EEO. 2012;11:611–628.
MLA Ağgül Yalçın, Fatma. “Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi”. İlköğretim Online, vol. 11, no. 3, 2012, pp. 611-28.
Vancouver Ağgül Yalçın F. Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim İnsanı İmajlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. EEO. 2012;11(3):611-28.