Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-integration Test

Year 2025, Volume: 75 Issue: 1, 17 - 28, 14.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2023-1392709

Abstract

In this study, the validity of the quantity theory of money is tested for the Turkish economy over the period 2006:01-2022:12. For this purpose, the unit root and co-integration tests that do not neglect structural breaks are employed. Findings from the Maki co-integration test reveal that M1, M2, and M3 money supplies are co-integrated with the inflation rate. Then, the breaks from the Maki test are integrated into the DOLS model for the long-run coefficients. According to the DOLS estimator, a 1% increase in M1, M2, and M3 causes an increase in the inflation rate by 0.24, 0.58, and 0.81 percent, respectively, in the long-run. Finally, the causality analysis also verifies the unidirectional relationship from the money supply to the inflation rate. The results indicate that the quantity theory of money is largely valid for the Turkish economy.

JEL Classification : E31 , E51 , C32

References

  • Alper, F. O. (2018). Türkiye’de Bütçe Açığı, Para Arzı ve Enflasyon Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: 1971-2016 Dönemi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 9(4), 799-810. https://www.doi.org/10.20409/berj.2018.139 google scholar
  • Amassoma, D., Sunday, K. & OnYedikachi, E. E. (2018). The Influence of Money Supply on Inflation in Nigeria. Journal of Economics & Management, 31(1), 5-23. https://www.doi.org/10.22367/jem.2018.31.01 google scholar Bağcı, B. (2021). Türkiye'de Para Arzı ve Enflasyon Oranı İlişkisine Yeni Bir Bakış: Kantil-Kantil Regresyon Analizi. The Journal of Financial Researches and Studies, 13(25), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.14784/marufacd.975933 google scholar
  • Bai, J. & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes. Econometrica 66(1), 47-78. https://doi. org/10.2307/2998540 google scholar
  • Cesur, F. (2006). Para Arzı ile Enflasyon İlişkisi ve Türkiye Uygulaması. Trakya University Journal of Social Science, 8(2), 85-104. google scholar
  • Çiçek, M. (2011). Paranın Miktar Teorisi ve Türkiye’de Geçerliliği. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 16(3), 87-115. google scholar
  • Davies, G. (2002). A History of Money: From Ancient Times to the Present Day. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press. google scholar
  • Doan Van, D. (2020). Money Supply and Inflation Impact on Economic Growth. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 12(1), 121-136. https:// www.doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-10-2018-0152 google scholar
  • Ekstedt, H. (2012). Money in Economic Theory. London & New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. google scholar
  • Erdoğan, S. (2023). TürkİYe’de Para Arzı - EnflasYon İlişkisine Yönelik Var - Nedensellik Analizi. Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(Özel SaYı), 222-231. google scholar
  • Eroğlu, Y. & Yeter, F. (2022). Time-VarYing CausalitY between MoneY SupplY Growth and Inflation: New Evidence from TurkeY. Applied Economics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2159007 google scholar
  • Fisher, I. (1911). The Purchasing Power of Money. New York: Macmillan. google scholar
  • Friedman, M. & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. New York & London: Harcourt Inc. google scholar
  • Gabaçlı, N. (2020). Paranın Miktar Teorisi Üzerine Ekonometrik İnceleme: TürkiYe Örneği. Journal of Statistics & Applied Science, 1, 50-62. google scholar
  • Gregory, A. W. & Hansen, B. E. (1996). Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7 google scholar
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2008). Tests for Cointegration with Two Unknown Regime Shifts with An Application to Financial Market Integration. Empirical economics, 35(3), 497-505. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0175-9 google scholar
  • Hicham, A. (2020). Money Supply, Inflation and Economic Growth: Co-Integration and CausalitY AnalYsis. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Oeconomica, 65(2), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2020-0008 google scholar
  • Hume, D. (1895). Essays, Moral, Political and Literary. Edited bY Eugene F. Miller. Indianapolis, IN: LibertY Fund. google scholar
  • Humphrey, T. M. (1997). Fisher and Wicksell on the QuantitY TheorY. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 83(4), 71-91. google scholar
  • İslatince, H. (2017). Para Arzı ve Enflasyon İlişkisi: Türkiye İçin Nedensellik Analizi (1988-2016). Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(3), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.417274 google scholar
  • Jawo, A., Jebou, M. & BaYo, L. F. (2023). The Relationship between Inflation, Exchange Rate, Money Supply and Economic Growth in The Gambia, Technium Social Sciences Journal, 40(1), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v40i1.8267 google scholar
  • Kapetanios, G (2005). Unit-root Testing against the Alternative HYpothesis of up to m Structural Breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis 26(1), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2005.00393.x google scholar
  • Kara, H. (2006). Turkish Experience with Implicit Inflation Targeting. Working Papers No. 0603, Research and MonetarY PolicY Department, Central Bank of the Republic of TurkeY. google scholar
  • Kara, M. & Sağır, M. (2021). Türkiye'de Para Arzı ile Enflasyon Arasındaki Eşbütünleşme İlişkisinin Analizi. ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, 8(19), 23-33. google scholar
  • Karpat Çatalbaş, G. (2007). TürkiYe’de Para Arzı ile EnflasYon Arasındaki İlişkinin Parametrik OlmaYan RegresYon Analizi ile İncelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(3), 197-212. google scholar
  • KaYa, M. G. & Öz, E. (2016). EnflasYon, Bütçe Açığı ve Para Arzı İlişkisinin TürkiYe Ekonomisi Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: 1980-2014 Dönemi. Journal of Management and Economics, 23(3), 639-651. https://doi.org/10.18657/Yonveek.281800 google scholar
  • Kiganda, E. O. (2014). Relationship between Inflation and MoneY SupplY in KenYa. Journal of Social Economics, 2(2), 63-83. google scholar
  • Klavuz, E. & Altınöz, B. (2020). TürkiYe’de Para Arzı İle EnflasYon Arasındaki İlişki: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı. Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, 5(2), 242-260. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.708223 google scholar
  • Konya, L. (2000). Two Structural Breaks and the Unit Root HYpothesis: New Evidence about Unemployment in Australia. Victoria Univ. Applied Econ. Working Paper, 3/00. https://www.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.290042 google scholar
  • Lee, C. W. & Yu, H. Y. (2021). MoneY Supply, Inflation and Economic Growth in China: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 11(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.47260/jafb/1115 google scholar
  • Long, P. D., Hien, B. Q. & Ngoc, P. T. B. (2024). Money Supply, Inflation and Output: An Empirically Comparative Analysis for Vietnam and China. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 8(2), 294-306. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-03-2021-0040 google scholar
  • Lumsdaine, R. L. & Papell, D. H. (1997). Multiple Trend Breaks and The Unit-Root HYpothesis. Review of economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397556791 google scholar
  • Madurapperuma, W. (2023). MoneY SupplY, Inflation and Economic Growth of Sri Lanka: Co-Integration and CausalitY AnalYsis. Journal of Money and Business, 3(2), 227-236. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JMB-08-2022-0039 google scholar
  • Maki, D. (2012). Tests for Cointegration Allowing for An Unknown Number of Breaks. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2011-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.04.022 google scholar
  • Marcuzzo, M. C. (2017). The “Cambridge” Critique of The Quantity Theory of Money: A note on how quantitative easing vindicates it. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40(2), 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2017.1286939 google scholar
  • Mbongo, J. E., Mutasa, F. & Msigw, R. E. (2014). The Effects of MoneY SupplY on Inflation in Tanzania. Economics, 3(2), 19-26. google scholar
  • Mishkin, F. & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2007). Does inflation targeting make a difference? NBER Working Paper 12876. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.doi.org/10.3386/w12876 google scholar
  • Ofori, C. F., Danquah, B. A. & Zhang, X. (2017). The Impact of MoneY SupplY on Inflation, A Case of Ghana. Imperial Journal of Interdisci-plinary Research, 3(1), 2312-2318. google scholar
  • Özmen, M. & Koçak, F. İ. (2012). EnflasYon, Bütçe Açığı ve Para Arzı İlişkisinin ARDL Yaklaşımı ile Tahmini: TürkiYe Örneği. Journal of Cukurova University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 16(1), 1-19. google scholar
  • PaYa, M. (2007). Para Teorisi ve Para Politikası (4.bs). İstanbul: Filiz Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Peker, H. S. (2011). Türkiye’de Enflasyon ve Enflasyon Hedeflemesi Uygulamasının Değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(22), 487-506. google scholar
  • Rafindadi, A. A. & Usman, O. (2019). Globalization, Energy Use, and Environmental Degradation in South Africa: Startling Empirical Evi-dence from The Maki-Cointegration Test. Journal of Environmental Management, 244, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman. 2019.05.048 google scholar
  • Rousseau, P. L. (2007). Backing, the quantity theory, and the transition to the U.S. dollar, 1723-1850. The American Economics Review, 97(2), 266-270. google scholar
  • Sasongko, G. & Huruta, A. D. (2018) . Monetary Policy and The Causality between Inflation and Money SupplY in Indonesia. Verslas: Teorija ir Praktika / Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2018.09 google scholar
  • Sean, M., Pastpipatkul, P. & BoonYakunakorn, P. (2019). MoneY SupplY, Inflation and Exchange Rate Movement: The Case of Cambodia bY BaYesian VAR Approach. Journal of Management, Economics, and Industrial Organization, 3(1), 63-81. http://doi.org/10.31039/ jomeino.2019.3.1.5 google scholar
  • Simwaka, K., LigoYa, P., Kabango, G. & Chikonda, M. (2012). MoneY SupplY and Inflation in Malawi: An Econometric Investigation. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 4(2), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.5897/JEIF11.138 google scholar
  • Stylianou, T., Nasir, R. & Waqas, M. (2024) The Relationship between Money Supply and Inflation in Pakistan. PLoS ONE 19(3): e0301257. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301257 google scholar
  • Şahin, İ. & Karanfil, M. (2012). TürkiYe Ekonomisinde 1980-2013 Dönemi Para Arzının EnflasYon Üzerindeki Etkisi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 6(4), 97-113. google scholar
  • Titei, A. (2022). The Correlation between Inflation and Money Supply. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 22(1), 460-465. google scholar
  • Zivot, E. & Andrews, D. W. K. (2002). Further Evidence on The Great Crash, The Oil-Price Shock, and The Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of business & economic statistics, 20(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/13915 google scholar
Year 2025, Volume: 75 Issue: 1, 17 - 28, 14.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2023-1392709

Abstract

References

  • Alper, F. O. (2018). Türkiye’de Bütçe Açığı, Para Arzı ve Enflasyon Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: 1971-2016 Dönemi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 9(4), 799-810. https://www.doi.org/10.20409/berj.2018.139 google scholar
  • Amassoma, D., Sunday, K. & OnYedikachi, E. E. (2018). The Influence of Money Supply on Inflation in Nigeria. Journal of Economics & Management, 31(1), 5-23. https://www.doi.org/10.22367/jem.2018.31.01 google scholar Bağcı, B. (2021). Türkiye'de Para Arzı ve Enflasyon Oranı İlişkisine Yeni Bir Bakış: Kantil-Kantil Regresyon Analizi. The Journal of Financial Researches and Studies, 13(25), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.14784/marufacd.975933 google scholar
  • Bai, J. & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes. Econometrica 66(1), 47-78. https://doi. org/10.2307/2998540 google scholar
  • Cesur, F. (2006). Para Arzı ile Enflasyon İlişkisi ve Türkiye Uygulaması. Trakya University Journal of Social Science, 8(2), 85-104. google scholar
  • Çiçek, M. (2011). Paranın Miktar Teorisi ve Türkiye’de Geçerliliği. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 16(3), 87-115. google scholar
  • Davies, G. (2002). A History of Money: From Ancient Times to the Present Day. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press. google scholar
  • Doan Van, D. (2020). Money Supply and Inflation Impact on Economic Growth. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 12(1), 121-136. https:// www.doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-10-2018-0152 google scholar
  • Ekstedt, H. (2012). Money in Economic Theory. London & New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. google scholar
  • Erdoğan, S. (2023). TürkİYe’de Para Arzı - EnflasYon İlişkisine Yönelik Var - Nedensellik Analizi. Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(Özel SaYı), 222-231. google scholar
  • Eroğlu, Y. & Yeter, F. (2022). Time-VarYing CausalitY between MoneY SupplY Growth and Inflation: New Evidence from TurkeY. Applied Economics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2159007 google scholar
  • Fisher, I. (1911). The Purchasing Power of Money. New York: Macmillan. google scholar
  • Friedman, M. & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. New York & London: Harcourt Inc. google scholar
  • Gabaçlı, N. (2020). Paranın Miktar Teorisi Üzerine Ekonometrik İnceleme: TürkiYe Örneği. Journal of Statistics & Applied Science, 1, 50-62. google scholar
  • Gregory, A. W. & Hansen, B. E. (1996). Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7 google scholar
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2008). Tests for Cointegration with Two Unknown Regime Shifts with An Application to Financial Market Integration. Empirical economics, 35(3), 497-505. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0175-9 google scholar
  • Hicham, A. (2020). Money Supply, Inflation and Economic Growth: Co-Integration and CausalitY AnalYsis. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Oeconomica, 65(2), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2020-0008 google scholar
  • Hume, D. (1895). Essays, Moral, Political and Literary. Edited bY Eugene F. Miller. Indianapolis, IN: LibertY Fund. google scholar
  • Humphrey, T. M. (1997). Fisher and Wicksell on the QuantitY TheorY. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 83(4), 71-91. google scholar
  • İslatince, H. (2017). Para Arzı ve Enflasyon İlişkisi: Türkiye İçin Nedensellik Analizi (1988-2016). Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(3), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.417274 google scholar
  • Jawo, A., Jebou, M. & BaYo, L. F. (2023). The Relationship between Inflation, Exchange Rate, Money Supply and Economic Growth in The Gambia, Technium Social Sciences Journal, 40(1), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v40i1.8267 google scholar
  • Kapetanios, G (2005). Unit-root Testing against the Alternative HYpothesis of up to m Structural Breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis 26(1), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2005.00393.x google scholar
  • Kara, H. (2006). Turkish Experience with Implicit Inflation Targeting. Working Papers No. 0603, Research and MonetarY PolicY Department, Central Bank of the Republic of TurkeY. google scholar
  • Kara, M. & Sağır, M. (2021). Türkiye'de Para Arzı ile Enflasyon Arasındaki Eşbütünleşme İlişkisinin Analizi. ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, 8(19), 23-33. google scholar
  • Karpat Çatalbaş, G. (2007). TürkiYe’de Para Arzı ile EnflasYon Arasındaki İlişkinin Parametrik OlmaYan RegresYon Analizi ile İncelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(3), 197-212. google scholar
  • KaYa, M. G. & Öz, E. (2016). EnflasYon, Bütçe Açığı ve Para Arzı İlişkisinin TürkiYe Ekonomisi Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: 1980-2014 Dönemi. Journal of Management and Economics, 23(3), 639-651. https://doi.org/10.18657/Yonveek.281800 google scholar
  • Kiganda, E. O. (2014). Relationship between Inflation and MoneY SupplY in KenYa. Journal of Social Economics, 2(2), 63-83. google scholar
  • Klavuz, E. & Altınöz, B. (2020). TürkiYe’de Para Arzı İle EnflasYon Arasındaki İlişki: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı. Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, 5(2), 242-260. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.708223 google scholar
  • Konya, L. (2000). Two Structural Breaks and the Unit Root HYpothesis: New Evidence about Unemployment in Australia. Victoria Univ. Applied Econ. Working Paper, 3/00. https://www.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.290042 google scholar
  • Lee, C. W. & Yu, H. Y. (2021). MoneY Supply, Inflation and Economic Growth in China: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 11(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.47260/jafb/1115 google scholar
  • Long, P. D., Hien, B. Q. & Ngoc, P. T. B. (2024). Money Supply, Inflation and Output: An Empirically Comparative Analysis for Vietnam and China. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 8(2), 294-306. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-03-2021-0040 google scholar
  • Lumsdaine, R. L. & Papell, D. H. (1997). Multiple Trend Breaks and The Unit-Root HYpothesis. Review of economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397556791 google scholar
  • Madurapperuma, W. (2023). MoneY SupplY, Inflation and Economic Growth of Sri Lanka: Co-Integration and CausalitY AnalYsis. Journal of Money and Business, 3(2), 227-236. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JMB-08-2022-0039 google scholar
  • Maki, D. (2012). Tests for Cointegration Allowing for An Unknown Number of Breaks. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2011-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.04.022 google scholar
  • Marcuzzo, M. C. (2017). The “Cambridge” Critique of The Quantity Theory of Money: A note on how quantitative easing vindicates it. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40(2), 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2017.1286939 google scholar
  • Mbongo, J. E., Mutasa, F. & Msigw, R. E. (2014). The Effects of MoneY SupplY on Inflation in Tanzania. Economics, 3(2), 19-26. google scholar
  • Mishkin, F. & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2007). Does inflation targeting make a difference? NBER Working Paper 12876. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.doi.org/10.3386/w12876 google scholar
  • Ofori, C. F., Danquah, B. A. & Zhang, X. (2017). The Impact of MoneY SupplY on Inflation, A Case of Ghana. Imperial Journal of Interdisci-plinary Research, 3(1), 2312-2318. google scholar
  • Özmen, M. & Koçak, F. İ. (2012). EnflasYon, Bütçe Açığı ve Para Arzı İlişkisinin ARDL Yaklaşımı ile Tahmini: TürkiYe Örneği. Journal of Cukurova University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 16(1), 1-19. google scholar
  • PaYa, M. (2007). Para Teorisi ve Para Politikası (4.bs). İstanbul: Filiz Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Peker, H. S. (2011). Türkiye’de Enflasyon ve Enflasyon Hedeflemesi Uygulamasının Değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(22), 487-506. google scholar
  • Rafindadi, A. A. & Usman, O. (2019). Globalization, Energy Use, and Environmental Degradation in South Africa: Startling Empirical Evi-dence from The Maki-Cointegration Test. Journal of Environmental Management, 244, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman. 2019.05.048 google scholar
  • Rousseau, P. L. (2007). Backing, the quantity theory, and the transition to the U.S. dollar, 1723-1850. The American Economics Review, 97(2), 266-270. google scholar
  • Sasongko, G. & Huruta, A. D. (2018) . Monetary Policy and The Causality between Inflation and Money SupplY in Indonesia. Verslas: Teorija ir Praktika / Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2018.09 google scholar
  • Sean, M., Pastpipatkul, P. & BoonYakunakorn, P. (2019). MoneY SupplY, Inflation and Exchange Rate Movement: The Case of Cambodia bY BaYesian VAR Approach. Journal of Management, Economics, and Industrial Organization, 3(1), 63-81. http://doi.org/10.31039/ jomeino.2019.3.1.5 google scholar
  • Simwaka, K., LigoYa, P., Kabango, G. & Chikonda, M. (2012). MoneY SupplY and Inflation in Malawi: An Econometric Investigation. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 4(2), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.5897/JEIF11.138 google scholar
  • Stylianou, T., Nasir, R. & Waqas, M. (2024) The Relationship between Money Supply and Inflation in Pakistan. PLoS ONE 19(3): e0301257. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301257 google scholar
  • Şahin, İ. & Karanfil, M. (2012). TürkiYe Ekonomisinde 1980-2013 Dönemi Para Arzının EnflasYon Üzerindeki Etkisi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 6(4), 97-113. google scholar
  • Titei, A. (2022). The Correlation between Inflation and Money Supply. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 22(1), 460-465. google scholar
  • Zivot, E. & Andrews, D. W. K. (2002). Further Evidence on The Great Crash, The Oil-Price Shock, and The Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of business & economic statistics, 20(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/13915 google scholar
There are 49 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Economic Theory (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mustafa Orhan Özer 0000-0002-3222-9913

Publication Date July 14, 2025
Submission Date November 18, 2023
Acceptance Date December 13, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 75 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özer, M. O. (2025). Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-integration Test. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 75(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2023-1392709
AMA Özer MO. Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-integration Test. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi. July 2025;75(1):17-28. doi:10.26650/ISTJECON2023-1392709
Chicago Özer, Mustafa Orhan. “Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-Integration Test”. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi 75, no. 1 (July 2025): 17-28. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2023-1392709.
EndNote Özer MO (July 1, 2025) Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-integration Test. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi 75 1 17–28.
IEEE M. O. Özer, “Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-integration Test”, İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 2025, doi: 10.26650/ISTJECON2023-1392709.
ISNAD Özer, Mustafa Orhan. “Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-Integration Test”. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi 75/1 (July 2025), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2023-1392709.
JAMA Özer MO. Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-integration Test. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi. 2025;75:17–28.
MLA Özer, Mustafa Orhan. “Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-Integration Test”. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, vol. 75, no. 1, 2025, pp. 17-28, doi:10.26650/ISTJECON2023-1392709.
Vancouver Özer MO. Testing the Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy: Evidence from the Maki Co-integration Test. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi. 2025;75(1):17-28.