İnceleme Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Zangezur Corridor: In the Context of Türkiye-Azerbaijan Relations Strategic, Economic and Regional Implications

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 144 - 173, 29.04.2025

Öz

The Zangezur Corridor is a strategic project with the potential to significantly
reshape regional geopolitical dynamics by establishing a direct land connection
between Türkiye and Azerbaijan. This study examines the strategic and economic
significance of the Zangezur Corridor within the context of Türkiye-Azerbaijan
relations. Firstly, the corridor’s potential to strengthen bilateral ties between
Türkiye and Azerbaijan and to promote the integration of the Turkic World is
analyzed. Additionally, the study explores the corridor’s impact on the strategic
calculations of regional actors such as Russia, Iran, Armenia, and Georgia.
Furthermore, the corridor’s role in creating new opportunities for trade and
logistics between Türkiye and Azerbaijan, integrating energy transmission lines,
and contributing to economic growth is emphasized. Lastly, the Zangezur Corridor
is expected to accelerate the economic integration of the Turkic World and make
a significant contribution to Eurasian trade.

Kaynakça

  • Abilov, S. (1997). The Discourse “One Nation Two State”: The Position of Turkey in the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. Journal, 51(1), 80.
  • Abilov, S., & Isayev, I. (2015). Azerbaijan-Russian Relations: Azerbaijan's Pursuit of Successful Balanced Foreign Policy. Orta Asya ve Kafkasya Araştırmaları, 9(19), 113.
  • Acer, Y. (2020). The War Crimes of Armenia: International Law and the Military Acts of Armenia in and around Karabakh. İstanbul: SETA.
  • Akay, A. B. (2023). Türkiye–Azerbaycan Economic Relations: Bilateral Revealed Comparative Advantage Perspective. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 7(Özel Sayı), 225–237.
  • Akram, K. T. (2023). Zangezur corridor: A pathway for peace. AZERTAC. https://azertag.az/en/xeber/zangezur_corridor_a_pathway_for_peace-2834743 (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Allison, R. (2004). Strategic Reassertion in Russia's Central Asia Policy. International Affairs, 80(2), 277–293.
  • Anadolu Agency. (2024). Azerbaijan emerges as key player in European energy security. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/natural-gas/azerbaijan-emerges-as-key-player-in-european-energy-security/40765 (Erişim: 18.01.2025).
  • Aracıoğlu, B., & Esmer, S. (2023). The Effects of Zangezur Corridor on Turkey's Eastern Mediterranean Ports Hinterland. Denizcilik Araştırmaları Dergisi: Amfora, 2(4), 1–16.
  • Aras, B., & Fidan, H. (2009). Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination. New Perspectives on Turkey, 40, 193–215.
  • Askerov, A., & Ibadoghlu, G. (2022). The Causes and Consequences of the Second Karabakh War: September 27, 2021–November 10, 2021. In The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict (pp. 245–271). Routledge.
  • Avdaliani, E. (2024). Shifting Dynamics in the Relations Between Georgia and Russia. Caucasus Watch. https://caucasuswatch.de/en/insights/shifting-dynamics-in-the-relations-between-georgia-and-russia.html (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Babayev, A., & Mahmudov, K. (2023). The Provocative Effects of Democratization: Assessing the Relationship Between the Regime Transition in Armenia and the Escalation of the Karabakh Conflict in 2018–2020. Democratization, 30(5), 894–913.
  • Bakhshaliyeva, G. (2021). Emerging Regional Security Complex in the South Caucasus Regional Order in the Post-Karabakh War (Doktora tezi).
  • Bayramova, L. (2023). Economic Integration of South Caucasus Countries: Current Potential and Main Directions. E3S Web of Conferences, 413, 05018. EDP Sciences.
  • Baysal, B. (2025). Evaluating the Advances and Challenges in Turkey’s Defence Industry: A Comparative Analysis. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 1–22.
  • Blank, S. (2022). Armenia must build the Zangezur corridor. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/armenia-must-build-zangezur-corridor-204894 (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Bozhilova, D. (2009). Energy Security and Regional Cooperation in South-East Europe. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 11(3), 293–311.
  • Chavleishvili, G., & Japharidze, E. (2024). Challenges And Prospects For Regional Development Of The South Caucasus. History, Archaeology, Ethnology, (XII), 515–527.
  • Chedia, A. R. (2024). Zangezur Corridor: Economic Potential and Political Constraints. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(1), 194–216.
  • Croissant, M. P. (1998). The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict: Causes and Implications. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  • Çelik, M., & Aslanlı, K. (2024). Geopolitical Analysis of the Shusha Declaration: Constructing Theoretical Framework in the Regional Order Context. Bilig, (111), 55–78.
  • Çelikok, K., & Talih, Ö. (2023). International Transportation Projects and Türkiye from the Perspective of Transportation Economics. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 400–423.
  • Copplecchia, S. (2024). The Zangezur Corridor and the Diverging Interests of Russia, Iran, and Turkey. IARI. https://iari.site/2024/09/26/the-zangezur-corridor-and-the-diverging-interests-of-russia-iran-and-turkey/ (Erişim: 12.01.2025). Dadaşlı, R., & Valiyev, O. (2024). Debating on Transport Corridors of Azerbaijan in the Context of Globalization. Universal Journal of History and Culture, 6(1), 1–20.
  • Demirkollu, C. (2020). Zengezur Koridoru Ekseninde Değişen İsrail Jeopolitiği. Dördüncü Uluslararası İsrail ve Yahudilik Çalışmaları Konferansı 2020 Bildiri ve Öz Kitabı, M. Mustafa Kulu (Ed.), 135–137. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/journalfile/16701#page=141 (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Desierto, D. (2017). China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiative: Can a Bilaterally Negotiated “Globalization 2.0” Internalize Human Rights, Labor, and Environmental Standards? https://www.ejiltalk.org/chinas-one-belt-one-road-initiative-can-a-bilaterally-negotiated-globalization-2-0-internalize-human-rights-labor-and-environmental-standards/ (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • De Waal, T. (2021). The Nagorny Karabakh Conflict in its Fourth Decade. CEPS Working Document, 2.
  • Dikkaya, M., & Özyakışır, D. (2008). Developing Regional Cooperation Among Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan: Importance of Regional Projects. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 13(1), 93–118.
  • Donnellon-May, G. (2022). Turkey’s Growing Influence in Central Asia. The Diplomat, 13.
  • Du, D. (2024). Türkiye’s Promotion of the Integration of Turkic States: Context, Practice, and Influence. BRIQ Belt and Road Initiative Quarterly, 5(4), 410–428.
  • Dumlu, H., & Şahin, G. (2024). Zengezur Koridoru ve Alternatif Çözümler: Türkiye İçin Riskler, Tehditler ve Fırsatlar. Avrasya İncelemeleri Dergisi, 13(2), 169–194.
  • Eldem, T. (2022). Russia’s War on Ukraine and the Rise of the Middle Corridor as a Third Vector of Eurasian Connectivity. SWP Comment, 2022/C 64, 28 October. https://doi.org/10.18449/2022C64
  • Elibekyan, G., & Hovsepyan, M. (2024). Regional Transportation Routes: How Georgia's Transit Role is Changing in Light of New Realities. JAM News. https://jam-news.net/regional-transportation-routes-how-georgias-transit-role-is-changing-in-light-of-new-realities/ (Erişim: 11.01.2025).
  • Erdei, A., & Erdei-Gally, S. (2023). The Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway and the Zangezur Corridor: Enhancing Regional Connectivity. Azerbaijan in the Era of Change, 133. https://hiia.hu/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/mki_FPR_2023_2_online-2.pdf#page=131 (Erişim: 16.01.2025).
  • Flanagan, S. J. (2013). The Turkey–Russia–Iran Nexus: Eurasian Power Dynamics. The Washington Quarterly, 36(1), 163–178.
  • Gabrielyan, H. (2022). Turkey as a Transport Hub: A Vision Strategy for Integrating Regional Infrastructures and Services. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 1(1), 11–29.
  • Gafarlı, T. (2025). Unlocking the Potential in the South Caucasus: The Zangezur Corridor’s Impact on the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (Middle Corridor). PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 29(2), 148–173.
  • Gawliczek, P., & Iskandarov, K. (2023). The Zangezur Corridor as Part of the Global Transport Route (Against the Backdrop of Power Games in the South Caucasus Region). Security and Defence Quarterly, 41.
  • Ghahriyan, M., Torosyan, V., & Harutyunyan, A. (2024). Azerbaijan’s Power Plays: Analyzing Baku’s Policy Towards Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh After 2020. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 1–30.
  • Golmohammadi, V., & Markedonov, S. M. (2024). How Iran Perceives Turkey’s Rise in the South Caucasus. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(1), 152–175.
  • Görgülü, A. (2012). The Dispute Over Nagorno-Karabakh: A Protracted Conflict. Review of Armenian Studies, 25, 47–66.
  • Grigoryan, K., Khachikyan, S., Avetisyan, A., & Egnatosyan, S. (2024). International North-South Transport Corridor: New Economic and Trade Opportunities for India and Armenia. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 549, p. 06002). EDP Sciences.
  • Gulahmadov, M., & Huseyn, R. (2023a). The Zangazur Corridor as the New Haulage Hub for Integration and Cooperation in South Caucasus. Business & IT, 13(1), 121–128.
  • Gulahmadov, M., & Huseyn, R. (2023b). The Zangazur Corridor as a Stimulator of the Regional Cooperation and Economic Development in Eurasia Region. TURAN: Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi, 15(58), 111–117.
  • Guliyev, F. (2024). Presidential Discourses on Regionalism in Azerbaijan: Turkic Solidarity and the Silk Road. Nationalities Papers, 1–21.
  • Hein, P. (2023). Conflict Areas in the Caucasus and Central Asia. In G. Tüysüzoğlu & A. Özkan (Eds.), Lexington Books, Lanham, MD & London, 468.
  • Hovsepyan, L., & Tonoyan, A. A. (2024). From Alliance to ‘Soft Conquest’: The Anatomy of the Turkish-Azerbaijani Military Alliance Before and After the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 35(4), 622–655.
  • Humbatov, M., & Klimas, E. (2016). Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railroad: Future Opportunities and Prospects. Mykolas Romeris University.
  • Hwang, W. J., & Song, S. H. (2022). The Extension of Turkish Influence and the Use of Drones. Comparative Strategy, 41(5), 439–458.
  • Ibrahimli, A. (2022). The Analysis of the Second Karabakh War from the Perspective of Just War Theory (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Ibrahimov, R. (2015). Turkish-Azerbaijani Energy Relations: Significant Leverage in the Implementation of the Foreign Policy Interests of Both Countries. Insight Turkey, 17(2), 83–100.
  • Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2021). Characteristic Features of the Second Karabakh War. Social Development and Security, 11(3), 30–40.
  • İskender, B. (2018). One Nation, Two States: Turkey–Azerbaijan Economic Relations and the Rhetoric of Turkic Identity (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Jović-Lazić, A., & Bošković, S. (2024). Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy Positioning Towards Russia and Its Impact on the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War: A Hedging Strategy. The Review of International Affairs, 75, 55–82.
  • Kaleji, V. (2023). Iran and the Role of Transit Corridors in the South Caucasus in the Context of the War Against Ukraine. Caucasus Analytical Digest, (132), 14–20.
  • Kardaş, Ş., & Macit, F. (2015). Turkey–Azerbaijan Relations: The Economic Dimension. Journal of Caspian Affairs, 1(1), 23–46.
  • Karimov, S. (2017). The Role of the EU in Conflict Resolution: The Case Study of Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict (Master's thesis, Avrupa Birliği Enstitüsü).
  • Karimova, N. (2017). Armenian Occupation of Historical Azerbaijani Territories of Nagorno-Karabakh and 7 Surrounding Districts as One of the Still Unsolved Territorial Issues in the South Caucasus in View of Its Long-Frozen Status (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Kavtaradze, E. (2024). Armenia and Azerbaijan in a Geopolitical Battle: Zangezur Corridor. International Scientific Journal: The Caucasus and the World, (29), 124–129.
  • Kazancı, B. A., & Arslan, O. F. (2024). Energy Supply Security and Trade Routes Competition Between European and Asian Countries: The Geoeconomic Importance of Azerbaijan. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(4), 1272–1283.
  • Kılavuz, İ. T. (2024). Türkiye’s Asia Anew Initiative, Connectivity Projects in Eurasia and Türkiye–Mongolia Relations. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 59–70.
  • Kılıç, A. (2023). Facts and Comments. Review of Armenian Studies, (48), 9–62.
  • Kocak, M. (2023). Potential of Organization of Turkic States in the International System. Insight Turkey, 25(4), 115–138. Kocalar, A. C., & Dilaver, H. (2024). The Role of the Nakchivan (Zangezur) Corridor in Transportation and Regional Development and Its International Economic Significance. In Theories and Practices for Sustainable Urban Logistics (pp. 199–214). IGI Global.
  • Kochashvili, I. (2022). Armenia-Azerbaijan War and Implications for Russia (Doctoral dissertation, Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School).
  • Koçer, G. (2022). Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict and Turkey. Conflict Areas in the Caucasus and Central Asia, 1.
  • Kotova, M. (2021). Abkhazia Seeks to Revive Its Rail Link to the Outside World. https://oc-media.org/abkhazia-seeks-to-revive-its-rail-link-to-the-outside-world/ (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Köstem, S. (2019). Geopolitics, Identity and Beyond: Turkey’s Renewed Interest in the Caucasus and Central Asia. In Turkey's Pivot to Eurasia (pp. 111–128). Routledge.
  • Küçük, A. (2023). Critical Constructivism and “Nakhichevan Crisis”: How Türkiye Reconstructed Its National Interest?. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 23(2), 200–210.
  • Labarre, F., & Niculescu, G. (2024). New Security Arrangements for the South Caucasus? https://www.bmlv.gv.at/pdf_pool/publikationen/rssc_sgi_24_9_webversion.pdf (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Leyla, J. (2023). The Assessment of Potential Passenger Transportation Through East Zangezur–Nakhchivan Tourism Route (Doctoral dissertation, Azərbaycan Texniki Universiteti).
  • Mahmudlu, C., & Abilov, S. (2018). The Peace-Making Process in the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: Why Did Iran Fail in Its Mediation Effort?. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 26(1), 33–49.
  • Malashenko, A. (2013). The Fight for Influence: Russia in Central Asia. Brookings Institution Press.
  • Mammadova, N. (2019). Legal Bindingness of Security Council Resolutions: Security Council Resolutions 853 (1993). Baku St. UL Rev., 5, 233.
  • Mankoff, J. (2022). Regional Competition and the Future of Russia-Turkey Relations. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 20.
  • Manukyan, Z. (2024). Russia’s Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus in the Context of Increasing New Regional Competition. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 3(2(8)), 28–41. Meister, S. (2021). Shifting Geopolitical Realities in the South Caucasus. SCEEUS Reports on Human Rights and Security in Eastern Europe, (8).
  • Moghani, A. M., & Tisheyar, M. (2024). The Impact of Georgia’s Geopolitics on Its Regional Position. Journal of Iran and Central Eurasia Studies, 7(1), 59–80.
  • Mustafayev, B., & Sadıgova, N. (2022). Giving Zangezur to Armenians by the Russians in History and Recent Developments. Electronic Turkish Studies, 17(6).
  • Naghiyev, E. (2023). Foreign Policy of Azerbaijan: Maintaining Relations with the West, Turkey and Russia (Doctoral dissertation, Vilniaus universitetas).
  • Nassibli, N. (1999). Azerbaijan-Iranian Relations: Past and Present. http://dspace.khazar.org/bitstream/20.500.12323/172/3/N.%20Nasibli.pdf (Erişim: 14.01.2025).
  • Neşet, S., Aydin, M., Ergün, A., Giragosian, R., Kakachia, K., & Strand, A. (2023). Changing Geopolitics of the South Caucasus After the Second Karabakh War: Prospect for Regional Cooperation and/or Rivalry. CMI Report.
  • Özsoy, B. (2024). Relations of Azerbaijan with Central Asian Turkic States Within the Framework of the Organisation of Turkic States. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(2), 1000–1013.
  • Öztarsu, M. F. (2011). Military Relations of Turkey and Azerbaijan. Strategic Outlook, 1(2), 70–85.
  • Öztarsu, M. F. (2024). Opinion – Why Armenia and Azerbaijan Diverge on the Zangezur Corridor. https://www.e-ir.info/2024/02/07/opinion-why-armenia-and-azerbaijan-diverge-on-the-zangezur-corridor/ (Erişim: 14.01.2025).
  • Papatolios, N. (2022). Middle Corridor Unable to Absorb Northern Volumes, Opportunities Still There. https://www.railfreight.com/specials/2022/03/18/middle-corridor-unable-to-absorb-northern-volumes-opportunities-still-there/?gdpr=deny/ (Erişim: 16.01.2025).
  • Safiyev, R. (2024). Russia and Azerbaijan: Navigating Geopolitical Shifts. Russian Analytical Digest, 23(310).
  • Shafiyev, F. (2023). Azerbaijan and the Rise of Turkic Unity. Insight Turkey, 25(4), 13–24.
  • Sahakyan, M. D. (2020). Rebuilding Interconnections: Russia, India and the International North-South Transport Corridor. AsiaGlobal Online. https://hal.science/hal-02980041/ (Erişim: 16.01.2025).
  • hahin, A. (2024). Zangezur Corridor: Realities and Perspectives for Nakhchivan's Economy. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4(44). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(44).2024.3137.
  • Seferova, Ç. (2024). The World's Leading Transport and Transit Hub: Azerbaijan–Türkiye–Georgia. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2629–2638.
  • Şenol, C., & Erbilen, S. Ü. (2022). Analysis of the Impact of the Middle Corridor on Türkiye in Terms of Geopolitics and Economy in the OBOR Initiative. Coğrafya Dergisi, (45), 161–180.
  • TRT World. (2022). What is the Zangezur Corridor and Why Does It Matter to Eurasia? https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/what-is-the-zangezur-corridor-and-why-does-it-matter-to-eurasia-58405 (Erişim: 20.01.2025).
  • Valiyeva, F. (2022). Regional Cooperation Initiatives in the South Caucasus After the Second Karabakh War (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Vinokurov, E. Y., Ahunbaev, A., & Zaboev, A. I. (2022). International North–South Transport Corridor: Boosting Russia’s “Pivot to the South” and Trans-Eurasian Connectivity. Russian Journal of Economics, 8(2), 159–173.
  • Volodicheva, N. (2002). The Physical Geography of Northern Eurasia. In The Caucasus. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, 350–376.
  • Weitz, R. (2015). Iran’s Empowerment in Central Asia and the South Caucasus. The Central Asia–Caucasus Analyst. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13293-irans-empowerment-in-central-asia-and-the-south-caucasus.html (Erişim: 20.01.2025).
  • Winrow, G. M. (2016). Azerbaijan and Iran. In Regional Power Rivalries in the New Eurasia (pp. 93–111). Routledge.
  • Yavuz, M. H., & Gunter, M. M. (2022). The Karabakh Conflict Between Armenia and Azerbaijan: Causes & Consequences. Springer Nature.
  • Yepremyan, T. (2022). United States–Iran Relations: Security Implications for Armenia and Beyond. Bulletin of Yerevan University D: International Relations and Political Sciences, 1, 50–79.
  • Yesevi, C. G., & Tıftıkçıgıl, B. Y. (2015). Turkey–Azerbaijan Energy Relations: A Political and Economic Analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(1), 27–44.
  • Yılmaz, S. (2024). Unraveling the Nagorno-Karabakh Conundrum: Deciphering Russia’s Southern Caucasus Strategy. Lectio Socialis, 8(1), 1–16.

Zengezur Koridoru: Türkiye-Azerbaycan İlişkileri Bağlamında Stratejik, Ekonomik ve Bölgesel Çıkarımlar

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 144 - 173, 29.04.2025

Öz

Zengezur Koridoru projesi, Türkiye ile Azerbaycan arasında doğrudan kara
bağlantısı sağlayarak bölgesel jeopolitik dengeleri önemli ölçüde değiştirme
potansiyeline sahip stratejik bir projedir. Bu makale, Zengezur Koridoru’nun
Türkiye-Azerbaycan ilişkileri bağlamında stratejik ve ekonomik önemini ele
almaktadır. Öncelikle, koridorun Türkiye ile Azerbaycan arasındaki ikili ilişkileri
güçlendirme ve Türk Dünyası’nın entegrasyonunu teşvik etme potansiyeli
incelenmektedir. Ayrıca, koridorun Rusya, İran, Ermenistan ve Gürcistan gibi
bölgesel aktörlerin stratejik hesapları üzerindeki etkisi analiz edilmektedir. Bunun
yanı sıra, koridorun Türkiye ile Azerbaycan arasında ticaret ve lojistik alanında
yeni fırsatlar yaratması, enerji nakil hatlarının entegrasyonu ve ekonomik
büyümeye katkısı vurgulanmaktadır. Son olarak, Zengezur Koridoru’nun Türk
Dünyası’nın ekonomik entegrasyonunu hızlandırarak Avrasya ticaretine önemli
katkılar sağlayacağı ifade edilmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Abilov, S. (1997). The Discourse “One Nation Two State”: The Position of Turkey in the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. Journal, 51(1), 80.
  • Abilov, S., & Isayev, I. (2015). Azerbaijan-Russian Relations: Azerbaijan's Pursuit of Successful Balanced Foreign Policy. Orta Asya ve Kafkasya Araştırmaları, 9(19), 113.
  • Acer, Y. (2020). The War Crimes of Armenia: International Law and the Military Acts of Armenia in and around Karabakh. İstanbul: SETA.
  • Akay, A. B. (2023). Türkiye–Azerbaycan Economic Relations: Bilateral Revealed Comparative Advantage Perspective. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 7(Özel Sayı), 225–237.
  • Akram, K. T. (2023). Zangezur corridor: A pathway for peace. AZERTAC. https://azertag.az/en/xeber/zangezur_corridor_a_pathway_for_peace-2834743 (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Allison, R. (2004). Strategic Reassertion in Russia's Central Asia Policy. International Affairs, 80(2), 277–293.
  • Anadolu Agency. (2024). Azerbaijan emerges as key player in European energy security. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/natural-gas/azerbaijan-emerges-as-key-player-in-european-energy-security/40765 (Erişim: 18.01.2025).
  • Aracıoğlu, B., & Esmer, S. (2023). The Effects of Zangezur Corridor on Turkey's Eastern Mediterranean Ports Hinterland. Denizcilik Araştırmaları Dergisi: Amfora, 2(4), 1–16.
  • Aras, B., & Fidan, H. (2009). Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination. New Perspectives on Turkey, 40, 193–215.
  • Askerov, A., & Ibadoghlu, G. (2022). The Causes and Consequences of the Second Karabakh War: September 27, 2021–November 10, 2021. In The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict (pp. 245–271). Routledge.
  • Avdaliani, E. (2024). Shifting Dynamics in the Relations Between Georgia and Russia. Caucasus Watch. https://caucasuswatch.de/en/insights/shifting-dynamics-in-the-relations-between-georgia-and-russia.html (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Babayev, A., & Mahmudov, K. (2023). The Provocative Effects of Democratization: Assessing the Relationship Between the Regime Transition in Armenia and the Escalation of the Karabakh Conflict in 2018–2020. Democratization, 30(5), 894–913.
  • Bakhshaliyeva, G. (2021). Emerging Regional Security Complex in the South Caucasus Regional Order in the Post-Karabakh War (Doktora tezi).
  • Bayramova, L. (2023). Economic Integration of South Caucasus Countries: Current Potential and Main Directions. E3S Web of Conferences, 413, 05018. EDP Sciences.
  • Baysal, B. (2025). Evaluating the Advances and Challenges in Turkey’s Defence Industry: A Comparative Analysis. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 1–22.
  • Blank, S. (2022). Armenia must build the Zangezur corridor. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/armenia-must-build-zangezur-corridor-204894 (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Bozhilova, D. (2009). Energy Security and Regional Cooperation in South-East Europe. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 11(3), 293–311.
  • Chavleishvili, G., & Japharidze, E. (2024). Challenges And Prospects For Regional Development Of The South Caucasus. History, Archaeology, Ethnology, (XII), 515–527.
  • Chedia, A. R. (2024). Zangezur Corridor: Economic Potential and Political Constraints. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(1), 194–216.
  • Croissant, M. P. (1998). The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict: Causes and Implications. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  • Çelik, M., & Aslanlı, K. (2024). Geopolitical Analysis of the Shusha Declaration: Constructing Theoretical Framework in the Regional Order Context. Bilig, (111), 55–78.
  • Çelikok, K., & Talih, Ö. (2023). International Transportation Projects and Türkiye from the Perspective of Transportation Economics. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 400–423.
  • Copplecchia, S. (2024). The Zangezur Corridor and the Diverging Interests of Russia, Iran, and Turkey. IARI. https://iari.site/2024/09/26/the-zangezur-corridor-and-the-diverging-interests-of-russia-iran-and-turkey/ (Erişim: 12.01.2025). Dadaşlı, R., & Valiyev, O. (2024). Debating on Transport Corridors of Azerbaijan in the Context of Globalization. Universal Journal of History and Culture, 6(1), 1–20.
  • Demirkollu, C. (2020). Zengezur Koridoru Ekseninde Değişen İsrail Jeopolitiği. Dördüncü Uluslararası İsrail ve Yahudilik Çalışmaları Konferansı 2020 Bildiri ve Öz Kitabı, M. Mustafa Kulu (Ed.), 135–137. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/journalfile/16701#page=141 (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Desierto, D. (2017). China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiative: Can a Bilaterally Negotiated “Globalization 2.0” Internalize Human Rights, Labor, and Environmental Standards? https://www.ejiltalk.org/chinas-one-belt-one-road-initiative-can-a-bilaterally-negotiated-globalization-2-0-internalize-human-rights-labor-and-environmental-standards/ (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • De Waal, T. (2021). The Nagorny Karabakh Conflict in its Fourth Decade. CEPS Working Document, 2.
  • Dikkaya, M., & Özyakışır, D. (2008). Developing Regional Cooperation Among Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan: Importance of Regional Projects. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 13(1), 93–118.
  • Donnellon-May, G. (2022). Turkey’s Growing Influence in Central Asia. The Diplomat, 13.
  • Du, D. (2024). Türkiye’s Promotion of the Integration of Turkic States: Context, Practice, and Influence. BRIQ Belt and Road Initiative Quarterly, 5(4), 410–428.
  • Dumlu, H., & Şahin, G. (2024). Zengezur Koridoru ve Alternatif Çözümler: Türkiye İçin Riskler, Tehditler ve Fırsatlar. Avrasya İncelemeleri Dergisi, 13(2), 169–194.
  • Eldem, T. (2022). Russia’s War on Ukraine and the Rise of the Middle Corridor as a Third Vector of Eurasian Connectivity. SWP Comment, 2022/C 64, 28 October. https://doi.org/10.18449/2022C64
  • Elibekyan, G., & Hovsepyan, M. (2024). Regional Transportation Routes: How Georgia's Transit Role is Changing in Light of New Realities. JAM News. https://jam-news.net/regional-transportation-routes-how-georgias-transit-role-is-changing-in-light-of-new-realities/ (Erişim: 11.01.2025).
  • Erdei, A., & Erdei-Gally, S. (2023). The Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway and the Zangezur Corridor: Enhancing Regional Connectivity. Azerbaijan in the Era of Change, 133. https://hiia.hu/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/mki_FPR_2023_2_online-2.pdf#page=131 (Erişim: 16.01.2025).
  • Flanagan, S. J. (2013). The Turkey–Russia–Iran Nexus: Eurasian Power Dynamics. The Washington Quarterly, 36(1), 163–178.
  • Gabrielyan, H. (2022). Turkey as a Transport Hub: A Vision Strategy for Integrating Regional Infrastructures and Services. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 1(1), 11–29.
  • Gafarlı, T. (2025). Unlocking the Potential in the South Caucasus: The Zangezur Corridor’s Impact on the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (Middle Corridor). PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 29(2), 148–173.
  • Gawliczek, P., & Iskandarov, K. (2023). The Zangezur Corridor as Part of the Global Transport Route (Against the Backdrop of Power Games in the South Caucasus Region). Security and Defence Quarterly, 41.
  • Ghahriyan, M., Torosyan, V., & Harutyunyan, A. (2024). Azerbaijan’s Power Plays: Analyzing Baku’s Policy Towards Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh After 2020. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 1–30.
  • Golmohammadi, V., & Markedonov, S. M. (2024). How Iran Perceives Turkey’s Rise in the South Caucasus. Russia in Global Affairs, 22(1), 152–175.
  • Görgülü, A. (2012). The Dispute Over Nagorno-Karabakh: A Protracted Conflict. Review of Armenian Studies, 25, 47–66.
  • Grigoryan, K., Khachikyan, S., Avetisyan, A., & Egnatosyan, S. (2024). International North-South Transport Corridor: New Economic and Trade Opportunities for India and Armenia. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 549, p. 06002). EDP Sciences.
  • Gulahmadov, M., & Huseyn, R. (2023a). The Zangazur Corridor as the New Haulage Hub for Integration and Cooperation in South Caucasus. Business & IT, 13(1), 121–128.
  • Gulahmadov, M., & Huseyn, R. (2023b). The Zangazur Corridor as a Stimulator of the Regional Cooperation and Economic Development in Eurasia Region. TURAN: Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi, 15(58), 111–117.
  • Guliyev, F. (2024). Presidential Discourses on Regionalism in Azerbaijan: Turkic Solidarity and the Silk Road. Nationalities Papers, 1–21.
  • Hein, P. (2023). Conflict Areas in the Caucasus and Central Asia. In G. Tüysüzoğlu & A. Özkan (Eds.), Lexington Books, Lanham, MD & London, 468.
  • Hovsepyan, L., & Tonoyan, A. A. (2024). From Alliance to ‘Soft Conquest’: The Anatomy of the Turkish-Azerbaijani Military Alliance Before and After the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 35(4), 622–655.
  • Humbatov, M., & Klimas, E. (2016). Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railroad: Future Opportunities and Prospects. Mykolas Romeris University.
  • Hwang, W. J., & Song, S. H. (2022). The Extension of Turkish Influence and the Use of Drones. Comparative Strategy, 41(5), 439–458.
  • Ibrahimli, A. (2022). The Analysis of the Second Karabakh War from the Perspective of Just War Theory (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Ibrahimov, R. (2015). Turkish-Azerbaijani Energy Relations: Significant Leverage in the Implementation of the Foreign Policy Interests of Both Countries. Insight Turkey, 17(2), 83–100.
  • Iskandarov, K., & Gawliczek, P. (2021). Characteristic Features of the Second Karabakh War. Social Development and Security, 11(3), 30–40.
  • İskender, B. (2018). One Nation, Two States: Turkey–Azerbaijan Economic Relations and the Rhetoric of Turkic Identity (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Jović-Lazić, A., & Bošković, S. (2024). Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy Positioning Towards Russia and Its Impact on the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War: A Hedging Strategy. The Review of International Affairs, 75, 55–82.
  • Kaleji, V. (2023). Iran and the Role of Transit Corridors in the South Caucasus in the Context of the War Against Ukraine. Caucasus Analytical Digest, (132), 14–20.
  • Kardaş, Ş., & Macit, F. (2015). Turkey–Azerbaijan Relations: The Economic Dimension. Journal of Caspian Affairs, 1(1), 23–46.
  • Karimov, S. (2017). The Role of the EU in Conflict Resolution: The Case Study of Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict (Master's thesis, Avrupa Birliği Enstitüsü).
  • Karimova, N. (2017). Armenian Occupation of Historical Azerbaijani Territories of Nagorno-Karabakh and 7 Surrounding Districts as One of the Still Unsolved Territorial Issues in the South Caucasus in View of Its Long-Frozen Status (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Kavtaradze, E. (2024). Armenia and Azerbaijan in a Geopolitical Battle: Zangezur Corridor. International Scientific Journal: The Caucasus and the World, (29), 124–129.
  • Kazancı, B. A., & Arslan, O. F. (2024). Energy Supply Security and Trade Routes Competition Between European and Asian Countries: The Geoeconomic Importance of Azerbaijan. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(4), 1272–1283.
  • Kılavuz, İ. T. (2024). Türkiye’s Asia Anew Initiative, Connectivity Projects in Eurasia and Türkiye–Mongolia Relations. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 59–70.
  • Kılıç, A. (2023). Facts and Comments. Review of Armenian Studies, (48), 9–62.
  • Kocak, M. (2023). Potential of Organization of Turkic States in the International System. Insight Turkey, 25(4), 115–138. Kocalar, A. C., & Dilaver, H. (2024). The Role of the Nakchivan (Zangezur) Corridor in Transportation and Regional Development and Its International Economic Significance. In Theories and Practices for Sustainable Urban Logistics (pp. 199–214). IGI Global.
  • Kochashvili, I. (2022). Armenia-Azerbaijan War and Implications for Russia (Doctoral dissertation, Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School).
  • Koçer, G. (2022). Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict and Turkey. Conflict Areas in the Caucasus and Central Asia, 1.
  • Kotova, M. (2021). Abkhazia Seeks to Revive Its Rail Link to the Outside World. https://oc-media.org/abkhazia-seeks-to-revive-its-rail-link-to-the-outside-world/ (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Köstem, S. (2019). Geopolitics, Identity and Beyond: Turkey’s Renewed Interest in the Caucasus and Central Asia. In Turkey's Pivot to Eurasia (pp. 111–128). Routledge.
  • Küçük, A. (2023). Critical Constructivism and “Nakhichevan Crisis”: How Türkiye Reconstructed Its National Interest?. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 23(2), 200–210.
  • Labarre, F., & Niculescu, G. (2024). New Security Arrangements for the South Caucasus? https://www.bmlv.gv.at/pdf_pool/publikationen/rssc_sgi_24_9_webversion.pdf (Erişim: 12.01.2025).
  • Leyla, J. (2023). The Assessment of Potential Passenger Transportation Through East Zangezur–Nakhchivan Tourism Route (Doctoral dissertation, Azərbaycan Texniki Universiteti).
  • Mahmudlu, C., & Abilov, S. (2018). The Peace-Making Process in the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: Why Did Iran Fail in Its Mediation Effort?. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 26(1), 33–49.
  • Malashenko, A. (2013). The Fight for Influence: Russia in Central Asia. Brookings Institution Press.
  • Mammadova, N. (2019). Legal Bindingness of Security Council Resolutions: Security Council Resolutions 853 (1993). Baku St. UL Rev., 5, 233.
  • Mankoff, J. (2022). Regional Competition and the Future of Russia-Turkey Relations. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 20.
  • Manukyan, Z. (2024). Russia’s Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus in the Context of Increasing New Regional Competition. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 3(2(8)), 28–41. Meister, S. (2021). Shifting Geopolitical Realities in the South Caucasus. SCEEUS Reports on Human Rights and Security in Eastern Europe, (8).
  • Moghani, A. M., & Tisheyar, M. (2024). The Impact of Georgia’s Geopolitics on Its Regional Position. Journal of Iran and Central Eurasia Studies, 7(1), 59–80.
  • Mustafayev, B., & Sadıgova, N. (2022). Giving Zangezur to Armenians by the Russians in History and Recent Developments. Electronic Turkish Studies, 17(6).
  • Naghiyev, E. (2023). Foreign Policy of Azerbaijan: Maintaining Relations with the West, Turkey and Russia (Doctoral dissertation, Vilniaus universitetas).
  • Nassibli, N. (1999). Azerbaijan-Iranian Relations: Past and Present. http://dspace.khazar.org/bitstream/20.500.12323/172/3/N.%20Nasibli.pdf (Erişim: 14.01.2025).
  • Neşet, S., Aydin, M., Ergün, A., Giragosian, R., Kakachia, K., & Strand, A. (2023). Changing Geopolitics of the South Caucasus After the Second Karabakh War: Prospect for Regional Cooperation and/or Rivalry. CMI Report.
  • Özsoy, B. (2024). Relations of Azerbaijan with Central Asian Turkic States Within the Framework of the Organisation of Turkic States. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(2), 1000–1013.
  • Öztarsu, M. F. (2011). Military Relations of Turkey and Azerbaijan. Strategic Outlook, 1(2), 70–85.
  • Öztarsu, M. F. (2024). Opinion – Why Armenia and Azerbaijan Diverge on the Zangezur Corridor. https://www.e-ir.info/2024/02/07/opinion-why-armenia-and-azerbaijan-diverge-on-the-zangezur-corridor/ (Erişim: 14.01.2025).
  • Papatolios, N. (2022). Middle Corridor Unable to Absorb Northern Volumes, Opportunities Still There. https://www.railfreight.com/specials/2022/03/18/middle-corridor-unable-to-absorb-northern-volumes-opportunities-still-there/?gdpr=deny/ (Erişim: 16.01.2025).
  • Safiyev, R. (2024). Russia and Azerbaijan: Navigating Geopolitical Shifts. Russian Analytical Digest, 23(310).
  • Shafiyev, F. (2023). Azerbaijan and the Rise of Turkic Unity. Insight Turkey, 25(4), 13–24.
  • Sahakyan, M. D. (2020). Rebuilding Interconnections: Russia, India and the International North-South Transport Corridor. AsiaGlobal Online. https://hal.science/hal-02980041/ (Erişim: 16.01.2025).
  • hahin, A. (2024). Zangezur Corridor: Realities and Perspectives for Nakhchivan's Economy. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4(44). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(44).2024.3137.
  • Seferova, Ç. (2024). The World's Leading Transport and Transit Hub: Azerbaijan–Türkiye–Georgia. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2629–2638.
  • Şenol, C., & Erbilen, S. Ü. (2022). Analysis of the Impact of the Middle Corridor on Türkiye in Terms of Geopolitics and Economy in the OBOR Initiative. Coğrafya Dergisi, (45), 161–180.
  • TRT World. (2022). What is the Zangezur Corridor and Why Does It Matter to Eurasia? https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/what-is-the-zangezur-corridor-and-why-does-it-matter-to-eurasia-58405 (Erişim: 20.01.2025).
  • Valiyeva, F. (2022). Regional Cooperation Initiatives in the South Caucasus After the Second Karabakh War (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Vinokurov, E. Y., Ahunbaev, A., & Zaboev, A. I. (2022). International North–South Transport Corridor: Boosting Russia’s “Pivot to the South” and Trans-Eurasian Connectivity. Russian Journal of Economics, 8(2), 159–173.
  • Volodicheva, N. (2002). The Physical Geography of Northern Eurasia. In The Caucasus. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, 350–376.
  • Weitz, R. (2015). Iran’s Empowerment in Central Asia and the South Caucasus. The Central Asia–Caucasus Analyst. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13293-irans-empowerment-in-central-asia-and-the-south-caucasus.html (Erişim: 20.01.2025).
  • Winrow, G. M. (2016). Azerbaijan and Iran. In Regional Power Rivalries in the New Eurasia (pp. 93–111). Routledge.
  • Yavuz, M. H., & Gunter, M. M. (2022). The Karabakh Conflict Between Armenia and Azerbaijan: Causes & Consequences. Springer Nature.
  • Yepremyan, T. (2022). United States–Iran Relations: Security Implications for Armenia and Beyond. Bulletin of Yerevan University D: International Relations and Political Sciences, 1, 50–79.
  • Yesevi, C. G., & Tıftıkçıgıl, B. Y. (2015). Turkey–Azerbaijan Energy Relations: A Political and Economic Analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(1), 27–44.
  • Yılmaz, S. (2024). Unraveling the Nagorno-Karabakh Conundrum: Deciphering Russia’s Southern Caucasus Strategy. Lectio Socialis, 8(1), 1–16.
Toplam 99 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Bölgesel Çalışmalar, Türk Dünyası Çalışmaları
Bölüm Makale
Yazarlar

Doğan Şafak Polat

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Nisan 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 9 Ocak 2025
Kabul Tarihi 16 Şubat 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Polat, D. Ş. (2025). Zengezur Koridoru: Türkiye-Azerbaycan İlişkileri Bağlamında Stratejik, Ekonomik ve Bölgesel Çıkarımlar. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi Siyasal, Sosyal Ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1), 144-173.