Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Family Empowerment Scale for Caregivers of Adults with Mental Health Issues (FES-AMT)

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 348 - 357, 31.12.2021

Hatice Durmaz Esra Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.19127/mbsjohs.959567

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to adapt the Family Empowerment Scale for family caregivers of adults with mental health issues to the Turkish context.
Methods: The study data is collected from 1 January 2019 to 15 April 2020. The FES was originally developed by Koren et al.and, Kageyama et al. adapted it to assess the empowerment of family caregivers of adults with mental health issues, and they tested its validity and reliability. The study sample comprised 223 caregivers whose families of patients staying at the psychiatry clinic of a research and training hospital and those who had applied to the polyclinic. The scale has 34 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. The scoring was subjected to a two-phase cluster analysis to obtain detailed information about the caregiver’s empowerment.
Results: Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to examine the goodness of fit and construct validity of the structure, which was determined to consist of 3 factors by explanatory factor analysis. Factor loading range from 0.722 (item 20) to 0.008 (item 22). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Kaiser - Meyer - Olkin sampling adequacy value was determined as 0.894. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of internal consistency was .908. The scale has three subscales: Family, Service System, and Community/Political. The total variance explained by the scale was 47.78%. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the whole scale was .927.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Family Empowerment Scale for caregivers of adults with mental health issues (FES-AMT) is a valid and reliable measurement tool. This scale can be used to evaluate patient relatives in the clinical practice of nurses.

Keywords

Family, Empowerment, Turkish, Validity, caregiver

References

• 1. Segers EW, van den Hoogen A, van Eerden IC, Hafsteinsdóttir T, Ketelaar M. Perspectives of parents and nurses on the content validity of the Family Empowerment Scale for parents of children with a chronic condition: A mixed‐methods study. Child: care, health and development. 2019;45(1):111-20.
• 2. Koren PE, DeChillo N, Friesen BJ. Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: a brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation psychology. 1992;37(4):305.
• 3. Chiocchi J, Lamph G, Slevin P, Fisher-Smith D, Sampson M. Can a carer (peer) led psychoeducation programme improve mental health carers well-being, reduce burden and enrich empowerment: a service evaluation study. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice. 2019;14(2):131-40. 4. Hayslip Jr B, Smith GC, Montoro-Rodriguez J, Streider FH, Merchant W. The utility of the family empowerment scale with custodial grandmothers. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2017;36(3):320-50.
• 5. Vuorenmaa M, Halme N, Åstedt‐Kurki P, Kaunonen M, Perälä ML. The validity and reliability of the F innish F amily E mpowerment S cale (FES): a survey of parents with small children. Child: care, health and development. 2014;40(4):597-606.
• 6. Kim J, Bryan J. A first step to a conceptual framework of parent empowerment: Exploring relationships between parent empowerment and academic performance in a national sample. Journal of Counseling & Development. 2017;95(2):168-79.
• 7. Kageyama M, Nakamura Y, Kobayashi S, Yokoyama K. Validity and reliability of the Family Empowerment Scale for caregivers of adults with mental health issues. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing. 2016;23(8):521-31.
• 8. Zolmajd Z. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the family empowerment scale. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2018;24(2):216-29.
• 9. Florian V, Elad D. The Impact of Mothers' Sense of Empowerment oh the Metabolic Control of Their Children With Juvenile Diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 1998;23(4):239-47.
• 10. Van Eerden I. Evaluating content validity of the Dutch translation of the Family Empowerment Scale in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit using mixed methods 2017.
• 11. Yalcin K. SPSS and AMOS Applied Statistical Analysis. Ankara: Nobel Publisher; 2016.
• 12. Harrington D. Confirmatory factor analysis: Oxford university press; 2009.