MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 327 - 335, 30.06.2017

Ozlen Hic Birol

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.551

Abstract

We attempt to make a comparative evaluation of modern
macroeconomic schools: Monetarism and New Classical School based on the
Classical System that
envisage automatic full employment or natural rate of unemployment (NRU)
equilibrium (AFNE or ANRUE) vs. New Keynesian and PostKeynesian Economics based
on the Keynesian System which gives unemployment equilibrium (UNE) or
non-automatic NRU equilibrium (NANRUE) due to insufficiency of aggregate
demand. In order to determine which school is relevant, first the basic
assumptions of these systems are compared: i) rational vs. adjusted vs.
heterogeneous expectations, ii) existence of perfect competition in all markets
leading to flexibility of prices and wages vs. imperfect competition giving
rise to rigidities, and iii) presence or lack of coordination between markets.
In the final phase of our evaluations the performance of the developed
economies are surveyed to establish whether we meet with AFNE or ANRUE or else
UNE or NANRUE; and whether policy prescriptions devised by respective schools
solve or alleviate the problem at hand when implemented. Our investigations
point out that New Keynesian and Post-Keynesian schools are more relevant
compared to Monetarism and New Classical School. The choice between New Keynesian
and Post-Keynesian Economics, however, is more difficult to make although New
Keynesian Economics seems more widespread than Post-Keynesian Economics.
Objectively, Post-Keynesian assumptions seem more realistic; normatively,
however, New Keynesian stands seems more fit to the present day move towards
globalization.  

Keywords

Modern Macroeconomic Schools, (Neo-)Classical System, Keynesian System, New Keynesian Economics, Post-Keynesian School, Monetarism, New Classical School

References

• ACKLEY, Hugh Gardner: Macroeconomic Theory. Macmillan Co., 1963.
• AKERLOF, George: “Gift Exchange and Efficiency Wage Theory: Four Views,” AER, No. 74, May 1984.
• _____, and YELLEN, Janet L.: “A Near-Rational Model of the Business Cycles with Wage and Price Inertia,” QJE, No. 100 supplement, 1985.
• ANDO, Albert F., KENNICKELL, Arthur: “Failure of Keynesian Economics and ‘Direct’ Effects of Money Supply: A Fact or a Fiction,” University of Pennsylvania, mimeo, 1985.
• ARESTIS, Phillip: The Post-Keynesian Approach to Economics: An Alternative Analysis of Economic Theory and Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1994.
• BALL, Laurence B., and COCCHETTI, Stephen, G.: “Imperfect Information and Staggered Price Setting,” AER, Dec. 1988.
• BARRO, Robert J.: Money Expectations and Business Cycles: Essays in Macroeconomics. Academic Press, 1981.
• _____, and KING, Robert G.: “Time-Separable Preferences and Inter-Temporal Substitution Models of Business Cycles,” QJE, Nov. 1984.
• BLANCHARD, Oliver J.: “Price Asynchronization and Price Level Inertia,” Inflation, Debt, and Indexation. Ed. by Rudiger Dornbush, Mario Henrique Simonsen, The MIT Press, 1983.
• _____, and KIYOTAKI, Nobuhiro: “Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand,” AER, Vol. 77, No. 4, Sept. 1987.
• BLAUG, Marc: Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
• BLINDER, Alan S.: “The Fall and Rise of Keynesian Economics,” Economic Record, Vol. 64, No. 187, Dec. 1988.
• BRANSON, William H.: Macroeconomic Theory and Policy. Harper and Row, 1989.
• CODDINGTON, Alan: “Keynesian Economics: The Search for First Principles,” JEL, Dec. 1976.
• DAVIDSON, Paul: Controversies in Post-Keynesian Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1991.
• _____: Post-Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory: A Foundation for Successful Economic Policies for the 21st. Century. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1994.
• DUNN, Stephen P.: “Wither Post Keynesianism,” JPKE, Vol. 22, No. 3, Spring 2000.
• FISCHER, Stanley: “Long-term Contracts, Rational Expectations and the Optimal Money Supply Rule,” JPE, Vol. 85, No. 1, Feb. 1977.
• FRIEDMAN, Milton: “Inflation and Unemployment: New Dimension in Politics,” JEL, June 1977.
• _____: “Quantity Theory: A Restatement,” Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. Ed. by Milton Friedman, University of Chicago Press, 1956.
• _____, and MEISELMAN, David: “The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and the Investment Multiplier in the United States, 1897-1958,” Commission on Money and Credit, 1959.
• _____, and SCHWARTZ Anna: The Great Contraction. Princeton University Press, 1965.
• FROYEN, Richard T.: Macroeconomics. Macmillan Co., 1990.
• GORDON, Robert J.: “Can Inflation of the 1970s Be Explained,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1977.
• _____: “Understanding Inflation in the 1980s,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1985.
• _____: “What is New Keynesian Economics,” JEL, Vol. XXVIII, Sept. 1990.
• HOLT, Richard: “Looking Ahead: The Future of Post-Keynesian Economics,” www.cfs.colorado.edu.
• KATZ, Lawrence: “Efficiency Wage Theories: A Partial Evaluation,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1986.
• KLAMER, Arjo: The New Classical Macroeconomics, Conversations with the New Classical Economists and their Opponents. Harvester Press, 1984.
• KLEIN, Lawrence Robert: The Keynesian Revolution. McMillan, 1961.
• LEIJONHUFVUD, Axel: On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes: A Study in Monetary Policy. Oxford University Press Inc., 1973.
• LINDBECK, Assar, SNOWER, Dennis: “Wage Setting, Unemployment and Insider-Outsider Relations,” AER, No. 76, May 1986.
• LIPSEY, Richard G.: “The Relationship between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957: A Further Analysis,” Economica, No. 27, Feb. 1960.
• LOWELL, Michael E.: “Tests of Rational Expectations Hypothesis,” AER, March 1986.
• LUCAS, Robert E.: “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique,” Ed. by Brunner, Meltzer, The Phillips Curve and the Labor Markets, CarnegieRochester Conference Series on Public Policy, No. 1, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1976.
• _____: Models of Business Cycles. Blackwell, 1987.
• _____: “Price Expectations and the Phillips Curve,” AER, June 1970.
• _____, RAPPING, Leonard A.: “Real Wages, Employment and Inflation,” JPE, Sept. 1969.
• _____, and SARGENT, Thomas: “After Keynesian Macroeconomics,” After the Phillips Curve: Persistence of High Inflation and High Unemployment, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series, No. 19, 1978.
• MANKIW, N. Gregory: “A Quick Refresher Course in Macroeconomics,” JEL, Vol. XXVIII, Dec. 1990.
• _____: “Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly,” QJE, Vol. 100, No. 2, May 1985.
• _____, and ROMER, David: New Keynesian Economics, Volume 1. The MIT Press, 1995.
• _____, and _____: New Keynesian Economics, Volume 2. The MIT Press, 1995.
• MUTH, John F.: “Optional Properties of Exponentially Weighted Forecasts,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, No. 55, 1960.
• _____: “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements,” Econometrica, July 1961.
• PHILLIPS, Albon William H.: “The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 18611957,” Economica, No. 25, Nov. 1958.
• ROTEMBERG, Julio J.: “Interpreting Some Statistical Failures of Some Rational Expectations Macroeconomic Models,” AER, No. 74, 1984.
• STIGLITZ, Joseph E., and WEISS, Andrew: “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information,” AER, June 1981.
• TAYLOR, John B.: “Aggregate Dynamics and Staggered Contracts,” JPE, Vol. 88, No. 1, Feb. 1980.
• WEISS, Andrew: Efficiency Wages: Model of Unemployment, Layoffs and Wage Dispersion. Princeton University Press, 1990.
• YELLEN, Janet E.: “Efficiency Wage Models of Unemployment,” AER, No. 74, May 1984.