STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS TECHNOLOGY IN THE CONTEXT OF FINNISH, SLOVENIAN, ESTONIAN AND ICELANDIC TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION

Yıl 2017, Sayı: 1, 256 - 261, 09.11.2017

Ossi Autio Janez Jamsek Mart Soobik Brynjar Olafsson

Öz

The
research is based on a comparative study of craft and technology education
curriculums and students’ attitudes towards craft and technology in Finland,
Slovenia, Estonia and Iceland. The study was undertaken by the Helsinki
University, University of Ljubljana, University
of Tallinn and University of Iceland during years 2012-2015. A literature review was
completed, in order to examine and compare the curriculums of craft and
technology education in Finland, Slovenia, Estonia and Iceland. In addition, a quantitative
survey was subsequently distributed to 864 school students. It consisted of 14
questions, which aimed to ascertain students’ attitudes towards craft and
technology. The survey showed substantial differences in students’ attitudes
towards craft and technology education among the four countries. Estonian boys
had the most positive attitude towards technology, whereas the lowest attitude
was found among Slovenian girls. The difference between boys and girls was
definitely the smallest in Iceland. These differences may be explained by
differences in the national curriculums, the different pedagogical traditions
and cultural differences in the field of technology. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technology education, attitudes towards technology, curriculum

Kaynakça

• Ainevaldkond „Tehnoloogia“ [Subject field „Technology”]. (2011). RT I, 14.01.2011, 1. Retrieved from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/aktilisa/1200/9201/1009/VV1_lisa7.pdf. Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S. & van Keulen, H. (2012). Reconstructing the Pupils Attitude Towards Technology-Survey. PATT 26(1) Proceedings: Technology education in the 21st century (pp.22-31). Stockholm, Sweden - June 26-30, 2012. Arffman, I. & Brunell, V. (1983) Sukupuolten psykologisista eroavaisuuksista ja niiden syistä [Psychological gender differences and the reasons for them]. Jyväskylän yliopisto. Kasvatustieteiden tutkimuslaitoksen selosteita ja tiedotteita 283. Autio, O. (2013) Oppilaiden teknologiset valmiudet – vertailu vuoteen 1993. [Students’ technological abilities – a comparison to a year 1997] Kasvatus 44 (4), 367-380. Autio, O & Soobik, M. (2013). A Comparative Study of Craft and technology Education Curriculums and Students’ Attitudes towards Craft and Technology in Finnish and Estonian Schools. Techne series A, 20 (2), 17-33. Autio, O., Thorsteinsson, G. & Olafsson, B. (2012). A Comparative Study of Finnish and Icelandic Craft Education Curriculums and Students’ Attitudes towards Craft and Technology in Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 45 (2012), 114-124. Bjerrum Nielsen, H. & Rudberg, M. (1989). Historien om jenter og gutter. Kjonnsosialisering i ett utvecklingspsykoligisk perspektiv. Oslo: Universitetslaget Dyrenfruth, M. J. (1990). Technological Literacy: Characteristics and Competencies, Revealed and Detailed. In H. Szydlowski & R. Stryjski (Eds.) Technology and School: Report of the PATT Conference (pp. 26-50). Zielona Gora, Poland: Pedagogical University Press. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL, US: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. Eccles, J. (2007) Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In Ceci, S. & Williams, W. (Eds.) Why Aren’t more Women in Science. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC. Falkin (2011) Design and technology curriculum. Ministrstvo za šolstvo, znanost in šport. Ljubljana: Zavod RS za šolstvo. Framework Curriculum Guidelines (2004). Helsinki: Opetushallitus. Garmire, E. & Pearson, G. 2006. Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Research-Technology Management, 50, 69-69. Layton, D. (1994). A School Subject in the Making? The Search for Fundamentals. In D. Layton (Ed.) Innovations in Science and Technology Education (Vol.5). Paris: Unesco. Mammes, I. (2004). Promoting Girls’ Interest in Technology through Technology Education: A Research Study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14, 89-100. Olafsson, B. & Thorsteinsson, G. (2010). Examining Design and Craft Education in Iceland: Curriculum Development and Present Situation. FORMakadmisk, 3(2), 39-50. Raat, J. & de Vries, M. (1986). What do Girls and Boys think about Technology? Eindhoven, University of Technology. Shernoff, D.J., Csikszentmiahlyi, M., Schneider, B. & Shernoff, E.S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly 18, 207-231. Silverman, S. & Pritchard, A. (1996). Building Their Future: Girls and Technology Education in Connecticut, Journal of Technology Education 7 (2), 41-54. Sjøberg, S. (2002). Science and Technology Education: Current Challenges and Possible Solutions. In Jenkins, E. (ed.) Innovations in Science and Technology Education Vol VIII, Paris: UNESCO. van der Velde, J. (1992). Technology in Basic Education. In Kananoja, T. (Ed.) Technology Education Conference. Helsinki: The National Board of Education (151-170).