Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Evaluation Yield and Components Yield on Three Hybrids Maize in Hungary

Yıl 2018, Sayı: 3, 51 - 55, 01.12.2018

Öz

We evaluated on physiological traits on
3 hybrids on maize in Hungary. We used Loupiac, Sushi and Armagnac hybrids for
this experiment. Samples were taken in Debrecen. The Experimental Station is
situated on the Hajdúság Loess Ridge, and the soil is a lowland chernozem with
lime deposits and a deep humus layer, formed on loess. It has medium hard loam
texture. The daily precipitation sum was determined with local measurements,
while the daily radiation and temperature data were provided by the
Meteorological Observatory Debrecen the National Meteorological Service in
Budapest Samples were taken in location in Debrecen. In 2017 the total rainfall
from May until October was 314 mm in Debrecen, which was 236 mm for winter
period before sowing. Result showed genotype and traits and interaction trait
in Genotype was significant in one percent. In Path analysis on different
traits in grain yield, weight 1000 seeds in direct effect with grain yield of
0.95 indicate that this weight of 1000 seeds is very strong. GGE Bi-plot showed
that Loupiac hybrid is highest grain yield and Armagnac hybrid is least grain yield.

Kaynakça

  • Dehghani, H., Dvorak, J., and Sabaghnia, N. 2012. Biplot analysis of salinity related traits in beard wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Annals Biological Research 3:3723-3731. Erdal, S., Pamukcu, M., Ekiz, H., Soysal, M., Savur, O., and Toros, A. 2009. The determination of yield and quality traits of some candidate silage maize hybrids. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences 22(1):75-81. Fan, X.M., M.S. Kang, H.Y. Zhang, J. Tan and C. Xu, 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan, China. Agron. J., 99: 220-228. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0144 Kusvuran, A., Kaplan, M., Nazli, R.I., Saruhan, V., and Karadag, Y. 2015. Determination of possibilities to grow some corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars for silage production under Middle Kizilirmak Basin ecological conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University 32(1):57-67. Morris, C.F., K.G. Campbell, and G.E. King. 2004. Characterization of the end-use quality of soft wheat cultivars from the eastern and western U.S. germplasm ‘pools.’ Plant Genet. Res. 2:59–69. Sabaghnia, N., H. Dehghani and S.H. Sabaghpour, 2006. Nonparametric methods for interpreting Genotype × Environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Sci., 46: 1100-1106.http://crop.scijournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/46/3/110. Kang, M.S., V.D. Aggarwal and R.M. Chirwa, 2006. Adaptability and stability of bean cultivars as determined via yield stability statistic and GGE biplot analysis. J. Crop Improve., 15: 97-120. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content. Kaplan, M. Kokten, K. Akcura, M. 2017. Assessment of Genotype × Trait × Environment interactions of silage maize genotypes through GGE Biplot. CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 77(3) JULY-SEPTEMBER 2017. Samonte, S.O.P.B., L.T. Wilson, A.M. Mc Clung and J.C. Medley, 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Crop Sci., 45: 2414-2424. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0627. Setimela, P.S., B. Vivek, M. Banziger, J. Crossa and F. Maideni, 2007. Evaluation of early to medium maturing open pollinated maize varieties in SADC region using GGE biplot based on the SREG model. Field Crops Res., 103: 161-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.05.010. Simons, M., Saha, R., Guillard, L., Clément, G., Armengaud, P., Cañas, R.,et al. (2014). Nitrogen-use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.): from ‘omics’studies to metabolic modelling. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 5657–5671. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru227. V. Nataraj, J. P. Shahi, V. Agarwal. 2014. Correlation and Path Analysis in Certain Inbred Genotypes of Maize (Zea Mays L.) at Varanasi. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics, 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega- environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci., 40: 597-605.http://crop.scijournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/40/3/597. Yan, W., Tinker, N.A., Molnar, S., Fregeau-Reid, J., and McElroy, A. 2007. Associations among oat traits and their responses to the environment in North America. Journal of Crop Improvement 20:1-29. Yan, W., and I.R. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:11–20.
Yıl 2018, Sayı: 3, 51 - 55, 01.12.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Dehghani, H., Dvorak, J., and Sabaghnia, N. 2012. Biplot analysis of salinity related traits in beard wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Annals Biological Research 3:3723-3731. Erdal, S., Pamukcu, M., Ekiz, H., Soysal, M., Savur, O., and Toros, A. 2009. The determination of yield and quality traits of some candidate silage maize hybrids. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences 22(1):75-81. Fan, X.M., M.S. Kang, H.Y. Zhang, J. Tan and C. Xu, 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan, China. Agron. J., 99: 220-228. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0144 Kusvuran, A., Kaplan, M., Nazli, R.I., Saruhan, V., and Karadag, Y. 2015. Determination of possibilities to grow some corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars for silage production under Middle Kizilirmak Basin ecological conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University 32(1):57-67. Morris, C.F., K.G. Campbell, and G.E. King. 2004. Characterization of the end-use quality of soft wheat cultivars from the eastern and western U.S. germplasm ‘pools.’ Plant Genet. Res. 2:59–69. Sabaghnia, N., H. Dehghani and S.H. Sabaghpour, 2006. Nonparametric methods for interpreting Genotype × Environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Sci., 46: 1100-1106.http://crop.scijournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/46/3/110. Kang, M.S., V.D. Aggarwal and R.M. Chirwa, 2006. Adaptability and stability of bean cultivars as determined via yield stability statistic and GGE biplot analysis. J. Crop Improve., 15: 97-120. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content. Kaplan, M. Kokten, K. Akcura, M. 2017. Assessment of Genotype × Trait × Environment interactions of silage maize genotypes through GGE Biplot. CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 77(3) JULY-SEPTEMBER 2017. Samonte, S.O.P.B., L.T. Wilson, A.M. Mc Clung and J.C. Medley, 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Crop Sci., 45: 2414-2424. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0627. Setimela, P.S., B. Vivek, M. Banziger, J. Crossa and F. Maideni, 2007. Evaluation of early to medium maturing open pollinated maize varieties in SADC region using GGE biplot based on the SREG model. Field Crops Res., 103: 161-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.05.010. Simons, M., Saha, R., Guillard, L., Clément, G., Armengaud, P., Cañas, R.,et al. (2014). Nitrogen-use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.): from ‘omics’studies to metabolic modelling. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 5657–5671. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru227. V. Nataraj, J. P. Shahi, V. Agarwal. 2014. Correlation and Path Analysis in Certain Inbred Genotypes of Maize (Zea Mays L.) at Varanasi. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics, 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega- environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci., 40: 597-605.http://crop.scijournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/40/3/597. Yan, W., Tinker, N.A., Molnar, S., Fregeau-Reid, J., and McElroy, A. 2007. Associations among oat traits and their responses to the environment in North America. Journal of Crop Improvement 20:1-29. Yan, W., and I.R. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:11–20.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Seyed Mohammad Nasir Mousavı

Karina Bianka Bodnar

Janos Nagy

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Mousavı, S. M. N., Bodnar, K. B., & Nagy, J. (2018). Evaluation Yield and Components Yield on Three Hybrids Maize in Hungary. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics(3), 51-55.