Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 1 - 14, 29.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.22596/erj2018.0301.1.14

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.
  • Bialystok, E (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency in Modern Language Journal, 65(2), 24-35
  • Chan, H. W. (2016). Popular Culture, English Out-of-class Activities, and Learner Autonomy among Highly Proficient Secondary Students in Hong Kong. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(8): 1918-1923.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Ekşi, G. & Aydın, H (2013). What are the students doing out there? An investigation of out-of-class language learning activities. AIBU Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 191-210.
  • Ferdous, T. (2013). Use of English beyond the classroom wall: A study of undergraduate students’ out-of-class English learning activities. Unpublished MA Thesis, Brac University, Dakka, Bangladesh.
  • Guo, S. (2011). Impact of an Out-of-class Activity on Studentsʼ English Awareness, Vocabulary, and Autonomy. Language Education in Asia, 2(2), 246-256.
  • Hyland, F.(2004). Learning autonomously: Contextualizing out-of-class English language learning. Language Awareness, 13(3), 180-202.
  • Intraprasert (2007), Out-of class language strategies and Thai university students learning English for Science and Technology, Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 1(1), 1-19.
  • Knight, T.L. (2007). Beyond the classroom walls: A study of out of class English use by adult community college ESL students. Unpublished MA Thesis, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Lai, C., and Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24 (4), 317-335.
  • Little, D. (1991) Learner autonomy. 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
  • Manfred, W. M. (2012). Beliefs and Out-of-class language learning of Chinese-speaking ESL learners in Hong Kong. New Horizons in Education, 60(1), 35-52.
  • Maros, M. & Saad, N. S. M. (2016). The out of class language learning strategies of international students in Malaysia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 6(8), 478-486.
  • Moncrief R., 2011. Out-of-classroom language learning: A case study of students of advanced English language courses at Helsinki University Language Centre. University of Helsinki Language Centre, 107-118.
  • Pearson, N. (2004). The idiosyncrasies of out-of-class language learning: A study of mainland Chinese students studying English at tertiary level in New Zealand. Paper presented at the meeting of The Independent Learning Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Sarıçoban, G. (2012). Foreign Language Education Policies in Turkey. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2012), 2643-2648.
  • Yap, S.L. (1998) Out-of-class use of English by secondary school students in a Hong Kong Anglo-Chinese school. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Hong Kong.

An Investigation of Out-of-Class Language Activities of Tertiary-Level EFL Learners

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 1 - 14, 29.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.22596/erj2018.0301.1.14

Öz




The area of language teaching and learning is
constantly changing due to emerging educational, technological and social trends
or innovations all around the world, so there is no universally correct way to
learn a language for everyone. That’s why it is not possible for a classroom
context to address everyone’s needs sufficiently during the class hour, so
learners must carry on their learning beyond the classroom as well. The present
study seeks to explore language activities that EFL learners are engaged
outside the class in order to support their language learning process and their
attitude towards out-of-class language learning. A total of 109 students who
had different proficiency levels and who were studying at the School of Foreign
Languages, Pamukkale University participated in the study. Data was collected
through a questionnaire. The results of the analysis revealed that learners
were mostly engaged in listening and watching activities which were considered
as the most helpful activities as well. While no significant differences with
respect to gender were found in learners’ out-of-class language learning attitudes,
the type of language education (compulsory or elective) and language
proficiency level were determined to be effective. In conclusion, it can be
recommended that out-of-class language activities carried out most frequently
and considered most helpful by learners are incorporated into curriculums of
language teaching institutions.




Kaynakça

  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.
  • Bialystok, E (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency in Modern Language Journal, 65(2), 24-35
  • Chan, H. W. (2016). Popular Culture, English Out-of-class Activities, and Learner Autonomy among Highly Proficient Secondary Students in Hong Kong. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(8): 1918-1923.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Ekşi, G. & Aydın, H (2013). What are the students doing out there? An investigation of out-of-class language learning activities. AIBU Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 191-210.
  • Ferdous, T. (2013). Use of English beyond the classroom wall: A study of undergraduate students’ out-of-class English learning activities. Unpublished MA Thesis, Brac University, Dakka, Bangladesh.
  • Guo, S. (2011). Impact of an Out-of-class Activity on Studentsʼ English Awareness, Vocabulary, and Autonomy. Language Education in Asia, 2(2), 246-256.
  • Hyland, F.(2004). Learning autonomously: Contextualizing out-of-class English language learning. Language Awareness, 13(3), 180-202.
  • Intraprasert (2007), Out-of class language strategies and Thai university students learning English for Science and Technology, Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 1(1), 1-19.
  • Knight, T.L. (2007). Beyond the classroom walls: A study of out of class English use by adult community college ESL students. Unpublished MA Thesis, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Lai, C., and Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24 (4), 317-335.
  • Little, D. (1991) Learner autonomy. 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
  • Manfred, W. M. (2012). Beliefs and Out-of-class language learning of Chinese-speaking ESL learners in Hong Kong. New Horizons in Education, 60(1), 35-52.
  • Maros, M. & Saad, N. S. M. (2016). The out of class language learning strategies of international students in Malaysia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 6(8), 478-486.
  • Moncrief R., 2011. Out-of-classroom language learning: A case study of students of advanced English language courses at Helsinki University Language Centre. University of Helsinki Language Centre, 107-118.
  • Pearson, N. (2004). The idiosyncrasies of out-of-class language learning: A study of mainland Chinese students studying English at tertiary level in New Zealand. Paper presented at the meeting of The Independent Learning Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Sarıçoban, G. (2012). Foreign Language Education Policies in Turkey. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2012), 2643-2648.
  • Yap, S.L. (1998) Out-of-class use of English by secondary school students in a Hong Kong Anglo-Chinese school. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Hong Kong.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yelda Orhon

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Temmuz 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Orhon, Y. (2018). An Investigation of Out-of-Class Language Activities of Tertiary-Level EFL Learners. Education Reform Journal, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22596/erj2018.0301.1.14