INTERNET USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES: UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS ABOUT COPYRIGHTS

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 105 - 121, 25.01.2017

Gökçe Akçayır Murat Akçayır

https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.288490

Cited By: 1

Öz

Internet has become available anytime and anywhere with the advent of mobile communications devices and 3G technology. Today’s university students are using internet actively for educational purposes. In Internet, widely used by students, it is very easy to copy and paste every kind of content and this gives rise to the question of “Is enough attention paid to copyright?” and this causes some concerns in educational circles. Therefore, in the present study, the state of Internet use by university students for educational purposes, their current opinions about the issue of copyright, how they perceive of copyrights and their suggestions to prevent copyright violations were investigated. The present study conducted with the participation of 223 university students employed both qualitative and quantitative data collection instruments. The findings of the study revealed that university students are using Internet extensively for educational purposes; yet, they can easily overlook copyright issues. It was determined that the most common reason for students to violate copyrights is their not encountering any sanctions.

Kaynakça

• Akbulut, Y., Uysal, Ö., Odabasi, H. F., & Kuzu, A. (2008). Influence of gender, program of study and PC experience on unethical computer using behaviors of Turkish undergraduate students. Computers & Education, 51(2), 485-492.
• Arnold, M., Schmucker, M., & Wolthusen, S. D. (2002). Techniques and applications of digital watermarking and content protection: Artech House.
• Austin, M. J., & Brown, L. D. (1999). Internet plagiarism: Developing strategies to curb student academic dishonesty. The Internet and higher education, 2(1), 21-33.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall.
• Ben-Jacob, M. G. (2005). Integrating computer ethics across the curriculum: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 198-204.
• Beycioglu, K. (2009). A cyberphilosophical issue in education: Unethical computer using behavior–The case of prospective teachers. Computers & Education, 53(2), 201-208.
• Blum, S. D. (2011). My word!: Plagiarism and college culture: Cornell University Press.
• Copyright (2014). The digital millennium copyright act of 1998. Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf
• Çelik, S., & Akcayir, M. (2012). Perceptions of Academic Staff toward Copyright of Educational Materials. World Journal on Educational Technology, 4(2), 68-80.
• DeFosse, E. B. (2012). Ask not what E-books do for People, but what people do with E-books: An exploration of the uses and gratifications theory in regards to E-book technology. (Unpublished master's thesis), USA.
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
• Frohmann, B. (2008). Subjectivity and information ethics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 267-277.
• Gibson, K. (2000). Excuses, excuses: Moral slippage in the workplace. Business Horizons, 43(6), 65-72.
• Heffernan, N., & Wang, S. (2008). Copyright and multimedia classroom material: a study from Japan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 167-180.
• Herrington, T. A. K. (2010). Intellectual Property on Campus: Students' Rights and Responsibilities: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Huang, J. P. (2010). The Ethical Lives of College Students in the Digital Age. (3436591 Ph.D.), The Claremont Graduate University, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/817401448?accountid=16369 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. An Occasional Paper on Digital
• Media and Learning. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
• Karim, N. S. A., Zamzuri, N. H. A., & Nor, Y. M. (2009). Exploring the relationship between Internet ethics in university students and the big five model of personality. Computers & Education, 53(1), 86-93.
• Kim, J. E., & Kim, J. (2012). Determinants of online problematic behavior among teen users: Data from South Korea. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://www.consumerinterests.org
• Koul, R. (2012). Multiple motivational goals, values, and willingness to
• cheat. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 1-9.
• Kuzu, A. (2009). Problems related to computer ethics: Origins of the problems and suggested solutions. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 91-110.
• Lan, J., & Dagley, D. (1999). Teaching via the Internet: A Brief Review of Copyright Law and Legal Issues. AACE Journal, 1(11), 25-30.
• Lau, W. W., & Yuen, A. H. (2014). Internet ethics of adolescents: Understanding demographic differences. Computers & Education, 72, 378-385.
• Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. K. (2005). Teen content creators and consumers: More than half of online teens have created content for the Internet; and most teen downloaders think that getting free music files is easy to do: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
• Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. (2012). Impact of internet literacy, internet addiction symptoms, and internet activities on academic performance. Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), 403-418.
• Liang, Z., & Yan, Z. (2005). Software piracy among college students: A comprehensive review of contributing factors, underlying processes, and tackling strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 115-140.
• Lin, H. (2007). The ethics of instructional technology: issues and coping strategies experienced by professional technologists in design and training situations in higher education. Educational technology research and development, 55(5), 411-437.
• Loggie, K. A., Barron, A. E., Gulitz, E., Hohlfeld, T. N., Kromrey, J. D., Venable, M., & Sweeney, P. (2006). An analysis of copyright policies for distance learning materials at major research universities. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), 224-241.
• Love, P. G., & Simmons, J. (1998). Factors influencing cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. College Student Journal, 32(4), 539-550.
• Mabry, C. K., & O'Driscoll, T. (2003). Lessons from adult education: Identifying and exploring emerging ethical issues in technologically enhanced performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16(4), 78-93.
• McCabe, D. L. (1997). Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(4), 433-445.
• McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 211-234.
• McGrail, J. P., & McGrail, E. (2009). What's wrong with copyright: Educator strategies for dealing with analog copyright law in a digital world. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(3), 1-6.
• Mir, N. (2014). Copyright for web content using invisible text watermarking. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 648-653.
• Moon, J. (1999). How to...stop students from cheating. Retrieved April 10, 2014, from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/how-tostop-students-from-cheating/147580.article
• OCWC (2014). OCWC global at a glance. Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.oeconsortium.org
• Renard, L. (1999). Cut and paste 101: Plagiarism and the net. Educational Leadership, 57(4), 38-42.
• Ross, K. A. (2005). Academic dishonesty and the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 29-31.
• Siponen, M. T., & Vartiainen, T. (2005). Attitudes to and factors affecting unauthorized copying of computer software in Finland. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(4), 249-257.
• Sisti, D. A. (2007). How do high school students justify internet plagiarism? Ethics & Behavior, 17(3), 215-231.
• Storch, E., & Storch, J. (2002). Fraternities, sororities, and academic dishonesty. College Student Journal, 36(2), 247-252.
• Sukrung, K. (2003). Making the grade. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://www.bangkokpost.com/education/site2003/ftmy2703.htm
• Szabo, A., & Underwood, J. (2004). Cybercheats is information and communication technology fuelling academic dishonesty? Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 180-199.
• Tang, G. H. (2010). Is administrative enforcement the answer? Copyright protection in the digital era. Computer Law & Security Review, 26(4), 406-417. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2010.05.006
• The Josephson Institute (2006). The ethics of American youth: 2006. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/2006/index.html
• Trautmann, S. T., van de Kuilen, G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2013). Social Class and (Un) Ethical Behavior A Framework, With Evidence From a Large Population Sample. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 487-497.
• TUBA (2014). Türkiye bilimler akademisi. Retrieved April 10, 2014, from http://www.tuba.gov.tr
• Twigg, C. A. (2000). Who owns online courses and course materials? Intellectual property policies for a new learning environment. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://www.center.rpi.edu/PewSym/mono2.html
• Underwood, J. D. (2003). Student attitudes towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices. British Journal of Psychology, 94(3), 319-337.
• Whitley, H. P., & Starr, J. (2010). Academic dishonesty among pharmacy students: does portable technology play a role? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 94-99.
• Underwood, J., & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic offences and e‐learning: Individual propensities in cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 467-477.