Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 108 - 125, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.306160

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Ağaoğulları, Mehmet Ali (2006) Kent Devletinden İmparatorluğa, Ankara: İmge Yayınları.
  • Brown, Eric (2009) “Politics and Society”, The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed.: James Warren, Cambridge Press.
  • Davies, William (2016) “The Age of Post-Truth Politics”, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/campaign-stops/the-age-of-post-truth-politics.html , 24.08.2016, Erişim: 10.04.2017.
  • De Witt, Norman W. (1954) Epicurus and His Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • Dunt, Ian (2016), “Post-truth politics is driving us mad”, http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2016/06/29/post-truth-politics-is-driving-us-mad , 29.06.2016, Erişim: 10.04.2017.
  • Eagleton, Terry (2016) Materialism, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • en.oxforddictionaries.com (2016) “Word of the Year 2016 is…”, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016, Erişim: 09.04.2017.
  • Erler, Michael (2011) “Autoditact and Student: On the Relationship of Authority and Autonomy in Epicurus and Epicurean Tradition”, Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, eds: Jeffrey Fish, Kirk R. Sanders, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fletcher, Richard (2012) “Epicurus’s Mistresses: Pleasure, Authority and the Gender in the Reception of Kuriai Doxai in the Second Sophistic”, Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism, Eds.: Brooke Holmes, W. H. Shearin, Oxford University Press, s. 52-89.
  • Gigandet, Alain (2012) “Epicurean Presences in Foucault’s the Hermeneutics of the Subject”, Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism, Eds.: Brooke Holmes, W. H. Shearin, Oxford University Press, s. 303-316.
  • Gökberk, Macit (1996) Felsefe Tarihi, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Hammer, Dean (2014) Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine, Cambridge University Press.
  • McClelland, J. S. (1996) A History of Western Political Thought, London: Routledge.
  • McGushin, Edward F. (2007) Foucault's Askesis: An Introduction to the Philosophical Life, Northwestern University Press.
  • Nelson, Brian (2015) Western Political Thought: From Socrates to the Age of Ideology, Waveland Press.
  • O’Keefe, Tim (2005) Epicurus on Freedom, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Keefe, Tim (2010) Epicureanism, New York: Routledge.
  • Rist, J. M. (1972) Epicurus: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press.
  • Russell, Bertrand (1969) Batı Felsefesi Tarihi, İstanbul: Kitaş Yayınları.
  • Sabine ,George (1966) Siyasal Düşünceler Tarihi Cilt 1, Sevinç Matbaası.
  • Schofield, Malcolm (2000) “Epicureanism”, The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, Eds.: Christopher Rowe, Malcolm Schofield, s. 437-439.
  • Sharma, Urmila; Sharma, S.K. (2006) Western Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publisher.
  • Smith, G. W. (1999) “Sinful Science? Marx’s Theory of Freedom from Thesis to Theses”, Karl Marx's Social and Political Thought-Critical Assessments, Eds.: Bob Jessop, Russell Wheatley, s. 392-410.
  • Wilson, Catherine (2015) Epicureanism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford Press.

Rethinking Happiness and Friendship Concepts of Epicurus at Post-Truth Era

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 108 - 125, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.306160

Öz

Epicurus would like to investigate the man and his Nature against the thought of
conventional Ancient World. It was an era of a transition which the cultures and
places has converged each other and collapsing the Ancient thought. The
searching of new world in Epicurean thought is based on the concepts like to be
free from the pain and to reach the pleasure and friendship as an end. The aim
was to protect and rethink the physical and mental situation of person in the
disturbing process of new political era. In order to this aim he had imagined to
make a new community based on friendship to reach the tranquility. The
politics which he refused is the traditional way of Ancient thought and also
established way of his era. In this context Epicurus give some clues to find an
exit of today’s unstable and disturbing post-truth discussions in rethinking the
individual, pleasure and friendship.

Kaynakça

  • Ağaoğulları, Mehmet Ali (2006) Kent Devletinden İmparatorluğa, Ankara: İmge Yayınları.
  • Brown, Eric (2009) “Politics and Society”, The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed.: James Warren, Cambridge Press.
  • Davies, William (2016) “The Age of Post-Truth Politics”, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/campaign-stops/the-age-of-post-truth-politics.html , 24.08.2016, Erişim: 10.04.2017.
  • De Witt, Norman W. (1954) Epicurus and His Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • Dunt, Ian (2016), “Post-truth politics is driving us mad”, http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2016/06/29/post-truth-politics-is-driving-us-mad , 29.06.2016, Erişim: 10.04.2017.
  • Eagleton, Terry (2016) Materialism, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • en.oxforddictionaries.com (2016) “Word of the Year 2016 is…”, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016, Erişim: 09.04.2017.
  • Erler, Michael (2011) “Autoditact and Student: On the Relationship of Authority and Autonomy in Epicurus and Epicurean Tradition”, Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, eds: Jeffrey Fish, Kirk R. Sanders, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fletcher, Richard (2012) “Epicurus’s Mistresses: Pleasure, Authority and the Gender in the Reception of Kuriai Doxai in the Second Sophistic”, Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism, Eds.: Brooke Holmes, W. H. Shearin, Oxford University Press, s. 52-89.
  • Gigandet, Alain (2012) “Epicurean Presences in Foucault’s the Hermeneutics of the Subject”, Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism, Eds.: Brooke Holmes, W. H. Shearin, Oxford University Press, s. 303-316.
  • Gökberk, Macit (1996) Felsefe Tarihi, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Hammer, Dean (2014) Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine, Cambridge University Press.
  • McClelland, J. S. (1996) A History of Western Political Thought, London: Routledge.
  • McGushin, Edward F. (2007) Foucault's Askesis: An Introduction to the Philosophical Life, Northwestern University Press.
  • Nelson, Brian (2015) Western Political Thought: From Socrates to the Age of Ideology, Waveland Press.
  • O’Keefe, Tim (2005) Epicurus on Freedom, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Keefe, Tim (2010) Epicureanism, New York: Routledge.
  • Rist, J. M. (1972) Epicurus: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press.
  • Russell, Bertrand (1969) Batı Felsefesi Tarihi, İstanbul: Kitaş Yayınları.
  • Sabine ,George (1966) Siyasal Düşünceler Tarihi Cilt 1, Sevinç Matbaası.
  • Schofield, Malcolm (2000) “Epicureanism”, The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, Eds.: Christopher Rowe, Malcolm Schofield, s. 437-439.
  • Sharma, Urmila; Sharma, S.K. (2006) Western Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publisher.
  • Smith, G. W. (1999) “Sinful Science? Marx’s Theory of Freedom from Thesis to Theses”, Karl Marx's Social and Political Thought-Critical Assessments, Eds.: Bob Jessop, Russell Wheatley, s. 392-410.
  • Wilson, Catherine (2015) Epicureanism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford Press.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yavuz Yıldırım

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Yıldırım, Y. (2017). Rethinking Happiness and Friendship Concepts of Epicurus at Post-Truth Era. Fiscaoeconomia, 1(3), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.306160

 Fiscaoeconomia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.