BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Global Dinamikler Ve Öğretmen Kültürünün Dönüşümü

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, - 1, 01.01.2012

Öz

The purpose of this study was to examine the manifestations of curriculum change on organizational culture of a primary school, with a specific focus on the culture of teachers. In this study, phenomenological design was used to investigate what meanings teachers attached to the changing nature and structure of their work, through the examination of the organizational culture of one primary school located in Ankara. Data were collected through face-to-face semi-structured teacher interviews aiming to find out the meaning of curriculum change and its manifestations on teacher culture for them. Findings revealed that although teachers perceived the change as a threat at the initiation process due to their experiencing lack of choice, they later expressed approval of the values and beliefs of the constructivist curriculum. However, when their meanings and perceptions regarding implementation are examined, it seems that the constraints regarding implementation are more decisive than these values and beliefs. Besides, it was found that teachers mostly defined factors outside them as constraints to their implementation of the curriculum, such as physical limitations or insufficient in-service training. Finally, findings showed that the working lives of teachers outside the classroom manifested change especially in aspects like lesson planning and preparation, and cooperation among teachers.

Kaynakça

  • ALVESSON, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage.
  • APPLE, M. W. (2006). Educating the 'Right' Way: Markets, Standarts, God, and Inequality, Routledge, New York.
  • BOLMAN, L. G. and Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • BROOKS, J. G. and Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision Curriculum Development. and
  • BULACH, C. R. (2001). Reshaping school culture to impower its partners. Principal Leadership, 67(1), 48-51.
  • BURRELL, G. and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.
  • CHERRYHOLMES, C. H. (1987). A social project for curriculum: Post-structural perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 295-316.
  • ELLIOTT, R. (1996). Discourse analysis: Exploring action, function and conflict in social texts. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14(6), 65-68.
  • FULLAN, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. London: Routledge/Falmer.
  • FULLAN, M. and Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. In M. Fullan and A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 1-10). London: Falmer Press.
  • GEERTZ, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
  • HELSBY, G. (2000). Multiple truths and contested realities: The changing faces of teacher professionalism in England. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T.E. Hauge, Moller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers (pp. 91-106). London: Falmer Press. and J.
  • HOFSTEDE, G., Neuijen, B. , Ohayv, D. D., and Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35, 286-316.
  • HOY, W. K. (1990). Organizational climate and culture: A conceptual analysis of the School Workplace. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 149- 168.
  • INGLIS, F. (2004). Culture. Polity Press: Cambridge.
  • LICHTMAN, M. (2010). Understanding and evaluating qualitative educational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • MERRIAM, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • MOUSTAKAS, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage.
  • OCHES, B. (2001). Behind the scenes: A qualitative case study of a rural elementary school. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio University.
  • OUCHI, W. G. (1981). Theory Z. Reading, MA: Free Press, Addison-Wesley.
  • PUTNAM, L. L. and Fairhurst, G. T. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5-26.
  • SACHS, J. and Smith, R. (1988). Constructing teacher culture. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(4), 423-436.
  • SCHEIN, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • SMIRCICH, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358.
  • VAN den Berg, R. (2002). Teachers’ meanings regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 72(4), 577-625.
  • VAN Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. Ontario: SUNY Press.

Global Dinamikler Ve Öğretmen Kültürünün Dönüşümü

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, - 1, 01.01.2012

Öz

Bu çalışma, program değişikliğinin, bir ilköğretim okulunun örgütsel kültürü üzerindeki göstergelerini, öğretmen algıları çerçevesinde incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada, öğretmenlerin mesleklerinin değişen doğası ve yapısına ne gibi anlamlar yüklediklerini tespit etmek amacıyla Ankara'da bir ilköğretim okulunun örgütsel kültürü olgubilim deseni kullanılarak incelenmiştir Veriler, program değişikliğinin öğretmenler için ne anlama geldiğini anlamak ve bunun örgüt kültürü üzerindeki göstergelerini bulmak amacıyla gerçekleştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış yüz yüze öğretmen görüşmelerinden oluşmaktadır. İlk olarak, bulgular öğretmenlerin her ne kadar değişimi ilk aşamada bir tehdit olarak algılasalar da, daha sonraki aşamalarda program değişikliğini onayladıklarını ifade ettiklerini ve sonradan ona uygun değerler ve inançlar edinmiş olduklarını göstermiştir. Fakat uygulamayla ilgili anlam ve algılarına bakıldığında, uygulamanın önündeki engellerin bu değer ve inançlardan daha belirleyici olduğu ifade edilebilir. Öğretmenlerin değişen programları uygulamada, fiziki sınırlılıklar ve yetersiz hizmet içi eğitim gibi dışsal engellerle karşılaştıkları ortaya çıkmıştır. Son olarak, öğretmenlerin sınıf dışı meslek yaşamlarında da, özellikle ders planlaması ve hazırlığı ve öğretmenler arası işbirliği gibi konularda değişim yaşandığı ortaya çıkmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • ALVESSON, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage.
  • APPLE, M. W. (2006). Educating the 'Right' Way: Markets, Standarts, God, and Inequality, Routledge, New York.
  • BOLMAN, L. G. and Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • BROOKS, J. G. and Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision Curriculum Development. and
  • BULACH, C. R. (2001). Reshaping school culture to impower its partners. Principal Leadership, 67(1), 48-51.
  • BURRELL, G. and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.
  • CHERRYHOLMES, C. H. (1987). A social project for curriculum: Post-structural perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 295-316.
  • ELLIOTT, R. (1996). Discourse analysis: Exploring action, function and conflict in social texts. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14(6), 65-68.
  • FULLAN, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. London: Routledge/Falmer.
  • FULLAN, M. and Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. In M. Fullan and A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 1-10). London: Falmer Press.
  • GEERTZ, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
  • HELSBY, G. (2000). Multiple truths and contested realities: The changing faces of teacher professionalism in England. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T.E. Hauge, Moller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers (pp. 91-106). London: Falmer Press. and J.
  • HOFSTEDE, G., Neuijen, B. , Ohayv, D. D., and Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35, 286-316.
  • HOY, W. K. (1990). Organizational climate and culture: A conceptual analysis of the School Workplace. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 149- 168.
  • INGLIS, F. (2004). Culture. Polity Press: Cambridge.
  • LICHTMAN, M. (2010). Understanding and evaluating qualitative educational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • MERRIAM, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • MOUSTAKAS, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage.
  • OCHES, B. (2001). Behind the scenes: A qualitative case study of a rural elementary school. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio University.
  • OUCHI, W. G. (1981). Theory Z. Reading, MA: Free Press, Addison-Wesley.
  • PUTNAM, L. L. and Fairhurst, G. T. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5-26.
  • SACHS, J. and Smith, R. (1988). Constructing teacher culture. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(4), 423-436.
  • SCHEIN, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • SMIRCICH, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358.
  • VAN den Berg, R. (2002). Teachers’ meanings regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 72(4), 577-625.
  • VAN Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. Ontario: SUNY Press.
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Dr. Asu Altunoğlu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Altunoğlu, D. A. (2012). Global Dinamikler Ve Öğretmen Kültürünün Dönüşümü. Hak İş Uluslararası Emek Ve Toplum Dergisi, 1(1), 1.