Databases and Criminal Procedures in Switzerland and Turkey with Regard to European Council’s Standards
Öz
Databases are increasingly used by law enforcement to effectively investigate and prosecute criminal offences. The growing tendency and need for law enforcement to use big data is particularly challenging when the data is stored abroad. As law enforcement authorities’ coercive powers are limited to their national territories, the path to enhanced judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation is of paramount importance.
With the increasing use of big data, personal data processing takes place when the concerned individuals whose data is actually being processed are absent. This raises issues related to data regulations and to the effectiveness of existing mechanisms of legal protection for data subjects.
This article deals with concerns relating to privacy protection in the context of data retention and judicial data exchange in Europe. To this end, a comparative analysis of Swiss and Turkish legal frameworks with regard to the European Court of Human Right’s case law provides a useful tool in identifying the legal standards that can help strike a fair balance between legitimate interests in database use and personal privacy protection. The specifics of the interplay between the right to privacy and the prevention and combatting of crime in Swiss and Turkish cultures also creates a fertile ground to discuss the flaws in existing regulations.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Databases Privacy Personal Data Cross-border investigations Judicial Cooperation Police Cooperation Criminal Procedure Law Enforcement Europol
Kaynakça
- Brüschweiler D. in Kommentar zur Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung, Donatsch A., Hansjakob T., Lieber V. Schulthess, 2014.
- Claes E., Duff A., Gutwirth S., Privacy and the Criminal Law, Intersentia, 2006.
- Hoven van Genderen R., Cybercrime investigation and the protection of personal data and privacy, Council of Europe Publications, 2008.
- Güntürk M. S., Türk Yüksek Mahkemeleri ve Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Kararları Işığında Özel Hayatın Gizliliğinin Korunması, Seçkin, 2012.
- Gisler F., La coopération policière internationale de la Suisse en matière de lutte contre la criminalité organisée, Schultess, 2009.
- Uttinger U., “Öffentliches Interesse an Polizeidaten höher als Interessen der betroffenen Person”, Commentaire de jurisprudence numérique publié le 15 août 2012.
Databases and Criminal Procedures in Switzerland and Turkey with Regard to European Council’s Standards
Öz
Databases are increasingly used by law enforcement to effectively investigate and prosecute criminal offences. The growing tendency and need for law enforcement to use big data is particularly challenging when the data is stored abroad. As law enforcement authorities’ coercive powers are limited to their national territories, the path to enhanced judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation is of paramount importance.
With the increasing use of big data, personal data processing takes place when the concerned individuals whose data is actually being processed are absent. This raises issues related to data regulations and to the effectiveness of existing mechanisms of legal protection for data subjects.
This article deals with concerns relating to privacy protection in the context of data retention and judicial data exchange in Europe. To this end, a comparative analysis of Swiss and Turkish legal frameworks with regard to the European Court of Human Right’s case law provides a useful tool in identifying the legal standards that can help strike a fair balance between legitimate interests in database use and personal privacy protection. The specifics of the interplay between the right to privacy and the prevention and combatting of crime in Swiss and Turkish cultures also creates a fertile ground to discuss the flaws in existing regulations.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Databases Privacy Personal Data Cross-border investigations Judicial Cooperation Police Cooperation Criminal Procedure Law Enforcement Europol
Kaynakça
- Brüschweiler D. in Kommentar zur Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung, Donatsch A., Hansjakob T., Lieber V. Schulthess, 2014.
- Claes E., Duff A., Gutwirth S., Privacy and the Criminal Law, Intersentia, 2006.
- Hoven van Genderen R., Cybercrime investigation and the protection of personal data and privacy, Council of Europe Publications, 2008.
- Güntürk M. S., Türk Yüksek Mahkemeleri ve Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Kararları Işığında Özel Hayatın Gizliliğinin Korunması, Seçkin, 2012.
- Gisler F., La coopération policière internationale de la Suisse en matière de lutte contre la criminalité organisée, Schultess, 2009.
- Uttinger U., “Öffentliches Interesse an Polizeidaten höher als Interessen der betroffenen Person”, Commentaire de jurisprudence numérique publié le 15 août 2012.
Ayrıntılar
| Konular | Hukuk |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Aralık 2017 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 21 Eylül 2017 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2017 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 |
