THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 125 - 137, 30.03.2016

Faruk Kalay Gary S. Lynn

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116656

Öz

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect
of the two core components of organizational structure, centralization and
formalization, on management innovation. In order to do this, the data received
from 198 managers working in a public organization in Turkey has been analyzed.
The results of this analysis have demonstrated that centralization has a
significant negative impact on management innovation. However, the impact of
formalization on management innovation has not been determined.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Management innovation, innovation, organizational structure, centralization, formalization

Kaynakça

• Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5, 63-82.
• Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). An examination of the validity of two models of attitude. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16(3), 323-359.
• Bierly, P., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. (2009). The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 481–509.
• Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 825–845.
• Bolin, M., & Harenstam, A. (2008). An empirical study of bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic characteristics in 90 workplaces. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 29, 541-564.
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Bunderson, J. S., & Boumgarden, P. (2010). Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21(3), 609-624.
• Cardinal, L. B. (2001). Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12(1), 19-36.
• Caruana, A., Morris, M., & Vella, A. (1998). The effect of centralization and formalization on entrepreneurship in export firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 16-29.
• Cosh, A., Fu, X., & Hughes, A. (2012). Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments. Small Business Economics, 39, 301–317.
• Daft, R.L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210.
• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organisational innovation: A metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
• Damanpour, F. (2014). Footnotes to research on management innovation. Organization Studies, 35(9), 1265-1285.
• Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8, 423–454.
• Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “Organizational Lag”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409.
• Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 1-24.
• Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23, 269-291.
• Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types on organizational performance: A longitudinal study of public services. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 650–675.
• Daugherty, P.J., Chen, H., & Ferrin, B.G. (2011). Organizational structure and logistics service innovation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 22(1), 26-51.
• Delaney, J. T., Jarley, P., & Fiorito, J. (1996). Planning for change: Determinants of innovation in US national unions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 49(4), 597–614.
• Drucker, P. F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 72-76.
• Duncan, R.B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In Kilmann, R.H., Pondy and L.R., Slevin, D.P. (Eds.), The management of organizational Design: Strategy implementation (Vol. 1., pp. 167-188). New York: North-Holland.
• Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105– 123.
• Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O'Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30, 682-695.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
• Froehle, C. M., & Roth, A. V. (2004). New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology-mediated customer service experience. Journal of Operations Management, 22(1), 1–21.
• Germain, R. (1996). The role of context and structure in radical and incremental logistics innovation adoption. Journal of Business Research, 35(2), 117–127.
• Gopalakrishnan, S., & Damanpour, F. (1997). Innovation research in economics, sociology, and technology management. Omega, 25, 15-28.
• Gosselin, M. (1997). The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 105-122.
• Grover, V., Purvis, R. L., & Segars, A. H. (2007). Exploring ambidextrous innovation tendencies in the adoption of telecommunications technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(2), 268–285.
• Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(2), 72-92.
• Hage, R., & Dewar, R. (1973). Elite versus organizational structure inpreticting innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 279-290.
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Hashem, G., & Tann, J. (2007). The adoption of ISO standards within the Egyptian context: A diffusion of innovation approach. Total Quality Management, 18(6), 631–652.
• Hendricks, W. E., Gramm, C. L., & Fiorito, J. (1993). Centralization of bargaining decisions in American Unions. Industrial Relations, 32(3), 67-90.
• Herrmann, P., & Gordillo, M. (2001). Organizational innovation in developing countries: An empirical approach. International Journal of Organizational Theory and Behavior, 4(1-2), 33-55.
• Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C. H., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624–641.
• Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J. and Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
• Kalay, F., & Lynn, G.S. (2015). The Impact of Strategic Innovation Management Practices on Firm Innovation Performance. Research Journal of Business and Management, 2(3), 412-429.
• Kim, L. (1980). Organizational innovation and structure. Journal of Business Research, 8(2), 225-245.
• Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 679-713.
• Lai, V. S., & Guynes, J. L. (1997). An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: A discriminative approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(2), 146–157.
• Lewis, M. W., Welsh, M. A., Dehler, G. E., & Green, S. G. (2002). Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 546-64.
• Liao, Y. (2007). The effects of knowledge management strategy and organization structure on innovation. International Journal of Management, 24(1), 53–60.
• Menor, L. J., & Roth, A. V. (2007). New service development competence in retail banking: Construct development and measurement validation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 825-846.
• Miller, D. (1987). Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 7-32.
• Miller, D. and Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1-25.
• Mom, T. J. M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 812–828.
• Mumford, M. D., Bedell, K. E., & Hunter, S. T. (2008). Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective. In M. D. Mumford, S. T. Hunter and K. E. Bedell Research (Eds.), Multi-Level Issues, (Vol. 7, pp. 107–154). Oxford: Elsevier.
• Nahm, A., Vonderembse, M., & Koufteros, X. (2003). The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 281-306.
• Nieves, J., & Segarra-Cipres, M. (2015). Management innovation in the hotel industry. Tourism Management, 46, 51-58.
• Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.
• Nord, W.R., & Tucker, S. (1987). Implementing routine and radical innovations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
• O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., & Vokurka, R. J. (1998). The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 387–405.
• OECD. (2005). Oslo manual. Paris: OCED.
• Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., & Ruekert, R. W. 1995. Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 48-62.
• Pierce, J. L. and Delbecq, A. L. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 27–37.
• Prajogo, D., & McDermott, C.M. (2014). Antecedents of service innovation in SMEs: Comparing the effects of external and internal factors. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3), 521-540.
• Raub, S. (2007). Does bureaucracy kill individual initiative? The impact of structure on organizational citizenship behavior in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 179-186.
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
• Ruekert, R. W., Walker, O. C., & Roering, K. J. (1985). The organization of marketing activities: A contingency theory of structure and performance. Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 13-25.
• Russell, C. J., & Russell, R. D. (1992). An examination of the effects of organization norms, organization structure, and environmental uncertainty on entrepreneurial strategy. Journal of Management, 18(4), 639-657.
• Schultz, C., Salomo, S., de Brentani, U., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2013). How formal control influences decision-making clarity and innovation performance. Journa of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 430-447.
• Shepard, H. A. (1967). Innovation-resisting and innovation-producing organizations. The journal of Business, 40, 470-477.
• Sheremata, W. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 389–408.
• Souitaris, V. (2001). Strategic influences of technological innovations in Greece. British Journal of Management, 12(2), 131–147.
• Subramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631-647.
• Swanson, E.B. (1994). Information systems innovation among organizations. Management Science, 40(9), 1069-1092.
• Vaccaro, I. G., Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A.J., & Volberda, H. W. (2012). Management innovation and leadership: The moderating role of organizational size. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 28-51.
• Vickery, S., Droge, C., & Germain, R. (1999). The relationship between product customization and organizational structure. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 377-391.
• West, M. A. (2000). Creativity and innovation at work. In M. Vartiainen, F. Avallone and N. Anderson (Eds.), Innovative theories, tools and practices in work and organizational psychology. Canada: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
• Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090–1102.
• Zmud, R. W. (1982). Diffusion of modern software practices: Influence of centralization and formalization. Management Science, 28, 14211431.