BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2015, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 0 - 0, 29.09.2015

Öz

Kaynakça

  • • Akimova, I., and G. Schwödiauer. (2004), “Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance and Enterprise Performance: Empirical Results from Ukraine”, International Advances in Economic Research, 10(1), 28-42.
  • • Aitken, B., and A. Harrison. (1999), “Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela,” The American Economic Review, 89(3), 605-617.
  • • Aydın, N., M. Sayım, and A. Yalama. (2007), “Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 11, 103-110
  • • Azzama, I., J. Fouadb, and D. K. Ghosch. (2013), “Foreign Ownership and Financial Performance: Evidence from Egypt,” International Journal of Business, 18(3).
  • • Barbosa, N., and H. Louri. (2005), “Corporate Performance: Does Ownership Matter? Comparison of Foreign and Domestic owned Firms in Greece and Portugal”, Review of Industrial Organization, 27, 73-102.
  • • Blomström, M., and F. Sjöholm. (1999), “Technology Transfers and Spillovers: Does Local Participation with Multinationals Matter?”, European Economic Review, 43, 915-23.
  • • Bastı, E. and N. Bayyurt. (2008), “Efficiency Performance of Foreign-Owned Firms in Turkey”, Transformation in Business&Economics, Supplement C, Vol. 7.
  • • Bastı, E., N. Bayyurt, and A. Akın, 2011, “A Comparative Performance Analysis of Foreign and Domestic Manufacturing Companies in Turkey”, European Journal of Economics and Political Studies, (2).
  • • Chhibber, P.K., and S.K. Majumdar. (1999), “Foreign Ownership and Profitability: Property Rights, Control, and the Performance of firms in Indian Industry,” Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 209 - 238.
  • • Doms, M., and J.B. Jensen. (1995), “Comparing Wages, Skills, and Productivity between Domestically and Foreign-Owned Manufacturing Establishments in the United States,” in Robert E. Baldwin, Robert E. Lipsey, and J. David Richardson (eds.), Geography and Ownership as Bases for Economic Accounting, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • • Douma S., Rejie G., Rezaul K. (2006), “Foreign and Domestic Ownership, Business Groups, and Firm Performance: Evidence From a Large Emerging Market”Strategic ManagementJournal, 27, 637-657.
  • • Erdoğan, A. İ. (2011), “Foreign-Owned Firms and Domestically-Owned Firms In Turkey: An Analysis of the Differentiating Characteristics”, Journal of Money, Investment and Banking Issue 19.
  • • Greenway D., A. Guariglia, and Z. Yu. (2014), “The More the Better? Foreign Ownership and Corporate Performance in China”, The European Journal of Finance, (20): 681-702.
  • • Karatas, A. (2005), “Performance of Direct Foreign Investments in Turkey”, Ankara: Capital Markets Board of Turkey Publication, No: 185.
  • • Kimura, F. and K. Kiyota. (2007), “Foreign-Owned versus DomesticallyOwned Firms: Economic Performance in Japan,” Review of Development Economics 11:31-48.
  • • Taymaz, E. and S. Özler. (2007), “Foreign Ownership, Competition, and Survival Dynamics”, Review of Industrial Organization, (31): 23-42.

FOREIGN OWNERSHIP AND CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN TURKEY

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 0 - 0, 29.09.2015

Öz

This study examines the relationship between the degree of foreign ownership and performance of recipient firms and test whether different levels of foreign ownership have different effects on corporate performance, using a balanced panel of 270 Turkish firms over the period of 2008-2012. It is found that there is a positive and statistically significant relationship between foreign ownership and corporate performance. However, there does not exist a significant difference among firms with different degrees of freedom in terms of corporate performance, except for the major foreign capital and wholly foreign capital firms in profitability.

Kaynakça

  • • Akimova, I., and G. Schwödiauer. (2004), “Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance and Enterprise Performance: Empirical Results from Ukraine”, International Advances in Economic Research, 10(1), 28-42.
  • • Aitken, B., and A. Harrison. (1999), “Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela,” The American Economic Review, 89(3), 605-617.
  • • Aydın, N., M. Sayım, and A. Yalama. (2007), “Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 11, 103-110
  • • Azzama, I., J. Fouadb, and D. K. Ghosch. (2013), “Foreign Ownership and Financial Performance: Evidence from Egypt,” International Journal of Business, 18(3).
  • • Barbosa, N., and H. Louri. (2005), “Corporate Performance: Does Ownership Matter? Comparison of Foreign and Domestic owned Firms in Greece and Portugal”, Review of Industrial Organization, 27, 73-102.
  • • Blomström, M., and F. Sjöholm. (1999), “Technology Transfers and Spillovers: Does Local Participation with Multinationals Matter?”, European Economic Review, 43, 915-23.
  • • Bastı, E. and N. Bayyurt. (2008), “Efficiency Performance of Foreign-Owned Firms in Turkey”, Transformation in Business&Economics, Supplement C, Vol. 7.
  • • Bastı, E., N. Bayyurt, and A. Akın, 2011, “A Comparative Performance Analysis of Foreign and Domestic Manufacturing Companies in Turkey”, European Journal of Economics and Political Studies, (2).
  • • Chhibber, P.K., and S.K. Majumdar. (1999), “Foreign Ownership and Profitability: Property Rights, Control, and the Performance of firms in Indian Industry,” Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 209 - 238.
  • • Doms, M., and J.B. Jensen. (1995), “Comparing Wages, Skills, and Productivity between Domestically and Foreign-Owned Manufacturing Establishments in the United States,” in Robert E. Baldwin, Robert E. Lipsey, and J. David Richardson (eds.), Geography and Ownership as Bases for Economic Accounting, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • • Douma S., Rejie G., Rezaul K. (2006), “Foreign and Domestic Ownership, Business Groups, and Firm Performance: Evidence From a Large Emerging Market”Strategic ManagementJournal, 27, 637-657.
  • • Erdoğan, A. İ. (2011), “Foreign-Owned Firms and Domestically-Owned Firms In Turkey: An Analysis of the Differentiating Characteristics”, Journal of Money, Investment and Banking Issue 19.
  • • Greenway D., A. Guariglia, and Z. Yu. (2014), “The More the Better? Foreign Ownership and Corporate Performance in China”, The European Journal of Finance, (20): 681-702.
  • • Karatas, A. (2005), “Performance of Direct Foreign Investments in Turkey”, Ankara: Capital Markets Board of Turkey Publication, No: 185.
  • • Kimura, F. and K. Kiyota. (2007), “Foreign-Owned versus DomesticallyOwned Firms: Economic Performance in Japan,” Review of Development Economics 11:31-48.
  • • Taymaz, E. and S. Özler. (2007), “Foreign Ownership, Competition, and Survival Dynamics”, Review of Industrial Organization, (31): 23-42.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Ysegul Guner Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Eylül 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Guner, Y. (2015). FOREIGN OWNERSHIP AND CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN TURKEY. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313063

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.