THE REFLECTIONS OF DIGITALIZATION AT ORGANIZATIONAL LEVEL: INDUSTRY 4.0 IN TURKEY

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 291 - 300, 30.09.2017

Ayse Nurefsan Yuksel Emine Sener

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.688

Öz

Purpose - Recent developments on internet and digitalization
have emerged the fourth industrial revolution named as Industry 4.0. While some
researches have been carried out on Industry 4.0, there has been no detailed
investigation on the impacts of Industry 4.0. This paper attempts to show the
effects of Industry 4.0 at organizational level.    

Methodology - Qualitative method is used in this study. The data
were collected through five open ended questions. Questions were asked to ten
executives from diverse organizations. Answers were analyzed by researchers by
applying content analysis method. 

Findings- At the end of analyses, the impacts of Industry 4.0
were categorized by two extensive scopes. First includes organizational level
impacts and individual level impacts, second includes positive impacts and
negative impacts.

Conclusion- The present study fills a gap in the Industry 4.0
literature by the contributions of its findings. More research is required to
do in this field over time depending on its increasing use at organizations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digitalization, fourth industrial revolution, industry 4.0, Turkey, organizational impacts

Kaynakça

• Accenture 2015, Accenture dijitalleşme endeksi Türkiye sonuçları, Türkiye’nin en dijital şirketleri 2015, pp. 1-44.
• Alçın, S. 2016, “Üretim için yeni bir izlek: Sanayi 4.0”, Journal of Life Economics, vo. 8, pp. 19-30.
• Banger, G. 2016, Endüstri 4.0 ve Akıllı İşletme, Ankara: Dorlion.
• Basl, J. 2016, “The pilot survey of the industry 4.0 principles penetration in the selected Czech and Polish companies”, Journal of Systems Integration, vol. 4, pp. 3-8.
• Creswell, J.W. 2013, Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Beş Yaklaşıma Göre Nitel Araştırma ve Araştırma Deseni, (Ed: Mesut Bütün, Selçuk Beşir Demir), Ankara: Siyasal.
• Bayraktar, Ö. 2017, Dijital İşletme Bilimi, İstanbul: Selis.
• Can, A. V. & Kıymaz, M. 2016, “Bilişim teknolojilerinin perakende mağazacılık sektörüne yansımaları: Muhasebe departmanlarında endüstri 4.0 etkisi”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, CİEP Özel Sayısı, pp. 107-117.
• EKOIQ 2014, “Endüstri 4.0 “Akıllı” Yeni Dünya: Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi”, EKOIQ Dergisi’nin Özel Eki, Aralık 2014, http://ekoiq.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/12/ekoiq-ek-d.pdf
• Ekonomik Forum Dergisi 2016, “Sanayi 4.0 ne kadar hazırız?”, TOBB Ekonomik Forum Dergisi, vol. 259, pp. 16-27, http://haber.tobb.org.tr/ekonomikforum/2016/259/016_027.pdf
• Gorecky, D., Schmitt, M., Loskyll, M. & Zühlke, D. 2014, “Human-Machine-Interaction in the industry 4.0 era”, IEEE, pp. 289-294.
• Jager, J., Schöllhammer, O., Lickefett, M. & Bauernhansl, T. 2016, “Advanced complexity management strategic recommendations of handlng the “Industrie 4.0” complexity for small and medium enterprises”, Procedia CIRP, vol. 57, pp. 116-121.
• Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W. & Helbig, J. 2013, “Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0”, Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, Frankfurt.
• Langfred, C. W. & Rockmann, K. W. 2016, “The push and pull of autonomy: The tension between individual autonomy and organizational control in knowledge work”, Group&Organization Management, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 629-657.
• Lasi, H., Kemper, H., Fettke, P., Feld, T. & Hoffmann, M. 2014, “Industry 4.0”, Business&Information Systems Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 239242.
• Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E.F.R. & Ramos, L.F.P. 2017, “Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 – a systematic literatüre review and research agenda proposal”, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3609-3629.
• Oesterreich, T. D. & Teuteberg, F. 2016, “Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda fort he construction industry”, Compters in Industry, vol. 83, pp. 121-139.
• Prinz, C., Kreimeier, D. & Kuhlenkötter B. 2017, “Implementation of a learning environment for an Industrie 4.0 assistance system to improve the overall equipment effectiveness”, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 9, pp. 159-166.
• Rennung, F., Luminosu, C. T. & Draghici, A. 2016, “Service provision in the framework of Industry 4.0”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 221, pp. 372-377.
• Reuter, M., Oberc, H., Wannöffel, M., Kreimeier, D., Klippert, J., Pawlicki, P. & Kuhlenkötter, B. 2017, “Learning factories ‘trainings as an enabler of proactive workers’ participation regarding Industrie 4.0”, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 9, pp. 354-360.
• Roblek, V., Mesko, M. & Krapez, A. 2016, “A complex view of Industry 4.0”, SAGE Open, April-June 2016, pp. 1-11.
• Schlapfer, R. C. & Koch, M. 2015, Industry 4.0 Challenges and solutions for the digital transformation and use of exponential technologies, Zurich: Deloitte.
• Schwab, K. 2016, Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi, Çev: Zülfü Dicleli, İstanbul: Optimist.
• Siemens 2016, Endüstri 4.0 Yolunda, İstanbul: Siemens.
• TÜBİTAK 2016, Yeni Sanayi Devrimi Akıllı Üretim Sistemleri Teknoloji Yol Haritası, Ankara: TÜBİTAK Bilim, Teknoloji ve Yenilik Politikaları Daire Başkanlığı.
• TÜSİAD 2016, Türkiye’nin Küresel Rekabetçiliği İçin Bir Gereklilik Olarak Sanayi 4.0: Gelişmekte Olan Ekonomi Perspektifi, İstanbul: TÜSİAD.