MODERATOR EFFECT OF RDI ON FIRM FINANCE PERFORMANCE: TAIWAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 156 - 163, 15.07.2018

Tsung-chun Chen Hsiao-min Chen Shiann-ming Wu Xiao-xuan Chen

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.838

Öz

Purpose- Is the textile industry only pursuing high labor intensity, low value added products and moving factories to reduce production costs? Just only high tech industries alone emphasize research and development investment(R&D) and pursue high value added products?

Methodolog - This study examined the impact of R&D investment on the finance performance of the Taiwanese textile industry, for the period 2006-2016. A panel data model was used to empirically analyses the impact of R&D intensity (RDI), firm size on finance performance.

Finding - RDI of the textile industry has a positive impact on financial performance and lag periods. In regard to the resource based view, the resources owned by an enterprise are positively correlated with performance. However, this study also finds that RDI as moderator effect for firm's size on finance performance.

Conclusion- The effect of R&D on finance performance is not only limited to the high tech industry. This indicates that RDI affect firms' sustainable management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

R&D intensity、finance performance, knowledge absorptive capacity, firm Size, textile industry

Kaynakça

• Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of management, 27(6), 625-641.
• Becker, B., & Hall, S. G. (2013). Do R&D strategies in high tech sectors differ from those in low tech sectors? An alternative approach to testing the pooling assumption. Economic Change and Restructuring, 46(2), 183-202.
• Bogliacino, F., Pianta, M. (2013). Profits, R&D, and innovation-a model and a test. Industrial and Corporate Change 22 (3), pp. 649-678.
• Chang, C.-L., & Robin, S. (2012). Knowledge sourcing and firm performance in an industrializing economy: the case of Taiwan (1992–2003). Empirical Economics, 42(3), 947-986.
• Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010). Analyzing the nonlinear effects of firm size, profitability, and employee productivity on patent citations of the US pharmaceutical companies by using artificial neural network. Scientometrics, 82(1), 75-82.
• Chiao, T. C. (2013). The correlation between R&D activities and income rate in addition to gross profit rate of the enterprise operation. Advanced Materials Research 798, pp. 865-868.
• Ciftci, M., & Cready, W. M. (2011). Scale effects of R&D as reflected in earnings and returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 62-80.
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The economic journal, 99(397), 569-596.
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.
• De, P. K., & Nagaraj, P. (2014). Productivity and firm size in India. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 891-907.
• Falk, M. (2012). Quantile estimates of the impact of RDI on firm performance. Small Business Economics, 39(1), 19-37.
• Ferragina, A. M., & Mazzotta, F. (2014). FDI spillovers on firm survival in Italy: absorptive capacity matters! The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(6), 859-897.
• Gentry, R. J., & Shen, W. (2013). The impacts of performance relative to analyst forecasts and analyst coverage on firm R&D intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 121-130.
• Haberl, C. (2015). The textile industry. In R. Ayadi, M. Dabrowski, & L. De Wulf (Eds.), Economic and Social Development of the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean Countries (pp. 127-142). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11122-3_9
• Jacobs, B., Nahuis, R., & Tang, P. J. G. (2002). Sectoral productivity growth and R&D spillovers in the Netherlands. De Economist, 150(2), 181-210.
• Kim, M. (2015). Productivity spillovers from FDI and the role of domestic firm’s absorptive capacity in South Korean manufacturing industries. Empirical Economics, 48(2), 807-827.
• Kiran, R. (2017). IPR scenario and factors for promoting IPR culture: a post-TRIPS period analysis of selected pharmaceutical firms in North India. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 30(1), 873-891.
• Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—an intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290-300.
• Legros, D., & Galia, F. (2012). Are innovation and R&D the only sources of firms’ knowledge that increase productivity? An empirical investigation of French manufacturing firms. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(2), 167-181.
• Lejarraga, J., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2014). Size, R&D productivity and decision styles. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 643-662.
• Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & James Chu, C.-S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
• Li, X. (2011). Sources of external technology, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability in Chinese state-owned high tech enterprises. World Development, 39(7), 1240-1248.
• Lin, L. (2006) The influences of R&D expenditures on knowledge-based economy in Taiwan. Vol. 4253 LNAI - III. 10th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, KES 2006 (pp. 930-937). Bournemouth: Springer Verlag.
• Lu, Y., Karpova, E. (2012). An investigation of Chinese textile firms' R&D performance. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30 (3), pp. 217-231.
• Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631-652.
• Maliranta, M. (2005). R&D, international trade and creative destruction—empirical findings from Finnish manufacturing industries. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 5(1), 27-58.
• Naanaa, I. D., & Sellaouti, F. (2017). Technological diffusion and growth: case of the Tunisian manufacturing sector. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(1), 369-383.
• Poldahl, A. (2012). The two faces of R&D: does firm absorptive capacity matter? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 12(2), 221-237.
• Sokolov-Mladenović, S., Cvetanović, S., & Mladenović, I. (2016). R&D expenditure and economic growth: EU28 evidence for the period 2002–2012. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 1005-1020. doi:10.1080/1331677x.2016.1211948
• Truett, L. J., & Truett, D. B. (2014). A ray of hope? Another look at the Italian textile industry. Empirical Economics, 46(2), 525-542.
• Urata, S., & Kawai, H. (2002). Technological progress by small and medium enterprises in Japan. Small Business Economics, 18(1), 53-67.
• Vithessonthi, C., & Racela, O. C. (2016). Short- and long-run effects of internationalization and R&D intensity on firm performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 34, 28-45.
• Von Tunzelmann, N., & Acha, V. (2005). Innovation in ‘low tech’ industries. The Oxford handbook of innovation, 5, 13.
• Wang, N., & Hagedoorn, J. (2014). The lag structure of the relationship between patenting and internal R&D revisited. Research Policy, 43(8), 1275-1285.
• Xing M. (2018). The impact of spillovers on strategic R&D under uncertainty. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.31(1):428-39.