Knowledge Sharing and Dissemination among Academics in Nigerian Universities: Patterns and Trends

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 21 - 27, 30.05.2017

Kabiru Dahiru Abbas

Öz

The paper investigates the phenomenon of knowledge sharing among academic staff in the four Nigerian universities, namely Bayero University, Kano; University of Maiduguri; University of Ibadan; and University of Porthacourt. The quantitative approach was used in the study to randomly administer questionnaire on three hundred and sixty four (364) academic staff in the four universities. The study found the evidence of knowledge sharing among academics in the four universities through workshops, seminars and conferences, membership of professional associations/societies and readiness to share knowledge and other resources with colleagues. The study serves as springboard for Universities and their lecturers in Nigeria to re-evaluate and re-strategise the present scenario, particularly regarding use of modern technologies to increase awareness, communication and networking for improved research and teaching activities, since knowledge sharing is a critical factor in the survival of educational institutions across the globe.

Kaynakça

• Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social research. Oxford University Press: Cape Town.
• Boh, W. F. (2006). Mechanisms for sharing knowledge in project-based organizations. Information and Organization, 17(2007), 27–58.
• Creswell, J. W. & Plano, C. V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed method approaches. Sage Publishing: Thousand Oaks.
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
• Cross, R. & Baird, L. (2000). Technology is not enough: improving performance by building organizational memory. Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 69-78.
• Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998), Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard business school press: Boston.
• Davenport, T. H. (1997). Case studies: ten principles of knowledge management and four case
• Studies. Knowledge and Process Management, 4(3), 187-208.
• De Saa´-Pe´rez, P., & Garcı ´a-Falco´n, J. M. (2002). A resource-based view of human resource management and organizational capabilities development. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(1), 123-140.
• Duque, R. B. Ynalvez, M. Sooryamoorthy, R. Mbatia, P. Dzorgbo, D. B. & Shrum, W. (2005), “Collaboration paradox: scientific productivity, the internet, and problems of research in developing areas”. Available at: http://worldsci.net/ee/documents/paradox.pdf (accessed 19/10/2014
• Garfield, S. (2006). 10 reasons why people don’t share their knowledge. KM Review, 9(2), 10-11.
• Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1): 7-22.
• Hickins, M. (1999). Xerox shares its knowledge. Management Review, 88(8), 40-45.
• Hopkins, J. (2011). The role of learned societies in knowledge exchange and dissemination: the case of the Regional Studies Association, 1965-2005. History of Education, 40, 255-271.
• Israel, G. D. (2012). Determining sample size. Program evaluation and organizational development. University of Florida: IFAS, POED-6. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. (accessed 12/10/2014).
• Jeoung, Y. L., Young-Ryeol, P., Pervez, N. G. & Byung, P. (2014). Innovative knowledge transfer patterns of group-affiliated companies: the effects on the performance of foreign subsidiaries. Journal of International Management, 20, 107–123.
• Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational Psychological Measurement, (30), 607-610.
• Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: a competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 699–727.
• Lawal, W. O., Agboola, I. O., Aderibigbe N. A., Owolabi K. A., & Bakare, O. D. (2014). Knowledge sharing among academic staff in Nigerian university of agriculture: a survey. International Journal of Information, Library and Society, 3(1) 69-80.
• Mata, H., Latham, T. P. & Ransome, Y. (2010). Benefits of professional organization membership and participation in national conferences: Considerations for students and new professionals. Health Promotion Practice, 11, 450-453.
• Ocholla, D. N. & Ocholla, L. (2007). Research in library and information science in South Africa: an analysis of journal research output from 1993-2006. World Library and Information Congress: 73rd IFLA general conference and council. Durban, South Africa 19-23 August.
• Ridzuan, A. A., Sam, H. K. & Adanan, M. A. (2008). Knowledge management practices in higher learning institutions in Sarawak. Asian Journal of University Education, 4, 69-89.
• Riege, A. (2005). Three dozen knowledge-sharing barriers manager must consider. Journal of
• Knowledge Management, 9(3), 18-35.
• Sheppard, M. (2004). Appraising and using social research in the human services: an introduction for social work and health professionals. Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London.
• Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa. Scientometrics, 80, 419-439.
• Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). General typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13(1): 12-28.
• Uchenna, C. E., Gerald, G. G. G., Choon, Y. G. & Tiong, L. T. (2013). Perspectives of SMEs on knowledge sharing. VINE, 43(2), 210 – 236.
• Wilkesmann, U., Wilkesmann, M. & Virgilitto, A. (2009b). The absence of cooperation is not necessarily defection: structural and motivational constraints of knowledge transfer in a social dilemma situation. Organisation Studies, 30(10), 1141-1164.
• Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & Williams, M. A. (1994). Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 301–326.
• Yu-chu, Y., Yi-ling, Y. & Yu-Hua, C. (2012). From knowledge sharing to knowledge creation: a blended knowledge-management model for improving university students’ creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(2012), 245– 257.