Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE LINK BETWEEN FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY AND KEY FINANCIAL RATIOS: A CASE FROM TURKEY

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 321 - 327, 30.09.2018

Öz

Purpose- Since globalization movements in the capital markets change the information requirements expected from the financial statements to a great extent today, companies tend to provide more reliable, transparent and quality financial and non-financial information within the framework of corporate transparency. These trends also affect the financial reporting processes especially financial disclosures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate disclosures that are essential to an investor’s understanding and analysis of the economics underlying the information in financial reports. 

Methodology- It focuses on
relationship between financial transparency and key financial ratios. In order
to reach this aim financial transparency and disclosure checklist is
established and companies are classified according to their transparency
levels. Using a sample of publicly traded companies from BIST 100 (excluding
finance sector) for the year 2016, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) methodology
is applied for assessment of financial transparency and disclosure (T&D)
levels based on their annual reports and websites.

Findings- The
results reveal that transparency level has statistical differences among the
group means of some key financial ratios.
High
quality disclosure also
means more
accountable and transparent companies for investors.
  







Conclusion- The study also evaluates
the relationship between the firm-specific T&D scores and financial
performance of BIST 100
firms.  This paper sufficiently
contributes towards literature on financial disclosures
. High
quality disclosure has significant influence on investors and lenders who must
assess risks and returns and decide where to place their money best, strengthen
the efficiency of capital allocation as well as offer the benefit of reducing
the costs of capital.

Kaynakça

  • Achoki, I., Kule, J., Shukla, J. (2016). Effect of voluntary disclosure on the financial performance of commercial banks in Rwanda. A study on selected banks in Rwanda. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, September, Vol. 5, No. 6, p.167–184.
  • Adiloglu, B., Vuran, B. (2012). The relationship between the financial ratios and transparency levels of financial information disclosures within the scope of corporate governance: evidence from Turkey. The Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 28, no. 4, p. 543-554.
  • Akhigbe A., McNulty J. E., Stevenson B. A. (2017). Additional evidence on transparency and bank financial performance. Review of Financial Economics, 32, p. 1-6.
  • Aksu, M., Kösedağ, A. (2006). Transparency and disclosure scores and their determinants in the Istanbul Stock Exchange. Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol.14, no. 4, p. 277-296.
  • Arbatlı, E., Escolano, J. (2015). Fiscal transparency, fiscal performance and credit ratings. Fiscal Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 237–270
  • Haat, C., Rahman, A., Mahenthiran, S. (2008). Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 23 No. 8, p. 744-778
  • Hadi, A., Handajani, L., Putra, I. (2018). Financial disclosure based on Web-ICT determinants. International Research Journal Of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 5(1), p. 72-85.
  • Madhani, P. M. (2007). Role of voluntary disclosure and transparency in financial reporting. The Accounting World, vol. 7, no. 6, p. 63-66.
  • Patel, S., Dallas, G. (2002). Transparency and disclosure: overview of methodology and study results-United States. Working paper, Standard and Poor’s and SSRN.
  • OECD. (1998). Business Sector Advisory Group on Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance: Improving Competitiveness and Access to Capital in Global Markets.
  • Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, vol. 48, no. 1 p. 102-116.
  • Sharif, S. P., Ming Lai, M. M. (2015). The effects of corporate disclosure practices on firm performance, risk and dividend policy. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, vol. 12, no. 4 p. 311-326.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 6.th ed. Pearson Educat ion Limited, Essex.
  • Torchia, M., Calabrò, A. (2016). Board of directors and financial transparency and disclosure. Evidence from Italy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 16 Iss 3 p. 593-608.
  • Zulfikar, R., May, N., Suhardjanto, D., Agustiningsih, S. W. (2017). Independent commissioner against mandatory disclosure of financial performance as a moderating variable. Review of Integrative Busines Economics Research, vol. 6, no. 3, p.205-216.
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 321 - 327, 30.09.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Achoki, I., Kule, J., Shukla, J. (2016). Effect of voluntary disclosure on the financial performance of commercial banks in Rwanda. A study on selected banks in Rwanda. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, September, Vol. 5, No. 6, p.167–184.
  • Adiloglu, B., Vuran, B. (2012). The relationship between the financial ratios and transparency levels of financial information disclosures within the scope of corporate governance: evidence from Turkey. The Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 28, no. 4, p. 543-554.
  • Akhigbe A., McNulty J. E., Stevenson B. A. (2017). Additional evidence on transparency and bank financial performance. Review of Financial Economics, 32, p. 1-6.
  • Aksu, M., Kösedağ, A. (2006). Transparency and disclosure scores and their determinants in the Istanbul Stock Exchange. Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol.14, no. 4, p. 277-296.
  • Arbatlı, E., Escolano, J. (2015). Fiscal transparency, fiscal performance and credit ratings. Fiscal Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 237–270
  • Haat, C., Rahman, A., Mahenthiran, S. (2008). Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 23 No. 8, p. 744-778
  • Hadi, A., Handajani, L., Putra, I. (2018). Financial disclosure based on Web-ICT determinants. International Research Journal Of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 5(1), p. 72-85.
  • Madhani, P. M. (2007). Role of voluntary disclosure and transparency in financial reporting. The Accounting World, vol. 7, no. 6, p. 63-66.
  • Patel, S., Dallas, G. (2002). Transparency and disclosure: overview of methodology and study results-United States. Working paper, Standard and Poor’s and SSRN.
  • OECD. (1998). Business Sector Advisory Group on Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance: Improving Competitiveness and Access to Capital in Global Markets.
  • Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, vol. 48, no. 1 p. 102-116.
  • Sharif, S. P., Ming Lai, M. M. (2015). The effects of corporate disclosure practices on firm performance, risk and dividend policy. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, vol. 12, no. 4 p. 311-326.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 6.th ed. Pearson Educat ion Limited, Essex.
  • Torchia, M., Calabrò, A. (2016). Board of directors and financial transparency and disclosure. Evidence from Italy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 16 Iss 3 p. 593-608.
  • Zulfikar, R., May, N., Suhardjanto, D., Agustiningsih, S. W. (2017). Independent commissioner against mandatory disclosure of financial performance as a moderating variable. Review of Integrative Busines Economics Research, vol. 6, no. 3, p.205-216.
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Burcu Adiloglu 0000-0001-9680-1408

Nevzat Gungor 0000-0001-9883-1985

Goksel Yucel 0000-0003-1940-8789

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Adiloglu, B., Gungor, N., & Yucel, G. (2018). THE LINK BETWEEN FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY AND KEY FINANCIAL RATIOS: A CASE FROM TURKEY. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 5(3), 321-327.

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.