Sensitivity analysis for piezoelectric energy harvester and bluff body design toward underwater pipeline monitoring

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 10 - 20, 15.01.2017

Fassahat Ullah Qureshi Qureshi Ali Muhtaroğlu Kagan Tuncay

https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.328600

Cited By: 5

Öz

Monitoring of underwater pipelines through wireless sensor nodes (WSNs)
is an important area of research especially for locations such as underground
or underwater pipelines, where it is costly to replace batteries. In this
study, a finite element sensitivity and comparative analysis for piezoelectric
(PZT) energy harvester operating in a fluid flow is done to power underwater
in-pipe WSNs. Two types of bluff bodies D and I-shaped are used for comparison.
Finite element simulations results show that PZT energy harvester having
I-shaped bluff body produces 2.24 mW, while energy harvester having D-shaped
bluff body has the capacity to produce only 0.82 mW of power. I-shaped bluff
body have significant impact on the performance of pipe and it introduces 6 times
more head loss than D-shaped bluff body to maintain regular flow of pipe for
the same fluid domain. It is concluded from the analysis that 12 PZT
cantilevers in parallel arrangement are needed to maintain 4096 bits per second
(bps) transmission of 512-Byte data packet once per 5 minutes with the
piezoelectric harvester, using an integrated 7.1 J super capacitor that can fit
into the bluff body together with the power electronics and acoustic
transceiver.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Wireless Sensor Nodes, bluff body, piezoelectric energy harvester, underwater pipelines, performance impact

Kaynakça

• J. Heidemann, M. Stojanovic, M. Zorzi, Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges, Phil Trans R Soc A, 370(1958), 158–175, 2012.
• C.C. Elam, C.E. G. Padró, G. Sandrock, A. Luzzi, P. Lindblad, E.F. Hagen, Realizing the hydrogen future: the International Energy Agency’s efforts to advance hydrogen energy technologies, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 28(6), 601–607, 2003.
• A.K. Akella, R.P. Saini, M.P. Sharma, Social, economical and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems, Renewable Energy, 34, 390-396, 2009.
• O. Ercoskun, S. Karaaslan, Guidelines for ecological and technological built environment: a case study on Güdül-Ankara, Turkey, Gazi Univ. J. Sci., 24(3), 617–636, 2011.
• I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, E. Cayirci, Wireless sensor networks: a survey, Comput. Netw., 38(4), 393–422, 2002.
• F.U. Qureshi, A. Muhtaroglu, K. Tuncay, A method to integrate energy harvesters into wireless sensor nodes for embedded in-pipe monitoring applications, 5. Int. Conf. Energy Aware Computing Systems & Applications (ICEAC), 24-26 March 2015, 1–4.
• M. Lubieniecki, T. Uhl, Integration of thermal energy harvesting in semi-active piezoelectric shunt-damping systems, J. Electronic Materials, 44(1), 341-347, 2015.
• S. Firat, Application of efficient and renewable energy technologies in low cost buildings and construction, J. Polytech., 17(1), 1-2, 2014.
• R.N. Silva, L.M. Rato, J.M. Lemos, F. Coito, Cascade control of a distributed collector solar field, J. Process Control, 7(2), 111–117, 1997.
• M.A. Ahmad, Piezoelectric water drop energy harvesting, J. Electron. Mater., 43(2), 452–458, 2013. S. Pobering, N. Schwesinger, Power supply for wireless sensor systems, IEEE Sensors Conf., 685–688, Lecce (Italy), 26-29 Oct. 2008.
• J.F. Kazienko, I.G. Ribeiro, I.M. Moraes, C.V.N. Albuquerque, Practical evaluation of a secure key-distribution and storage scheme for wireless sensor networks using TinyOS, CLEI Electronic Journal, 14(1), paper 8, 2011.
• M. K. Stojcev, M. R. Kosanovic and L. R. Golubovic, Power management and energy harvesting techniques for wireless sensor nodes, 9. Int. Conf. Telecommunication in Modern Satellite, Cable, and Broadcasting Services, Nis (Serbia), 7-9 October 2009.
• H.D. Akaydin, N. Elvin, Y. Andreopoulos, Energy harvesting from highly unsteady fluid flows using piezoelectric materials, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 21(13), 1263–1278, 2010.
• J. Qiu, H. Jiang, H. Ji, K. Zhu, Comparison between four piezoelectric energy-harvesting circuits, Front. Mech. Eng. China, 4(2), 153–159, 2009.
• G.K. Ottman, H.F. Hofmann, A.C. Bhatt, G.A. Lesieutre, Adaptive piezoelectric energy harvesting circuit for wireless remote power supply, IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, 17(5), 2002.
• P. M. Glatz, L. B. Hörmann, C. Steger, and R. Weiss, Designing perpetual energy harvesting systems explained with rivermote: a wireless sensor network platform for river monitoring, Electronic J. Structural Engineering, 55–65, 2010.
• N. Mohamed, I. Jawhar, J. Al-Jaroodi, L. Zhang, Sensor network architectures for monitoring underwater pipelines”, Sensors, 11, 10738-10764, 2011, doi:10.3390/s111110738.
• H.A. Sodano, D.J. Inman, G. Park, Generation and storage of electricity from power harvesting devices, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 16(1), 67–75, 2005.
• Q. Wen, R. Schulze, P. Streit, D. Billep, T. Otto, T. Gessner, The design of vortex induced vibration fluid kinetic energy harvesters, Proceed. PowerMEMS, Atlanta (USA), 2-5 Dec 2012.
• E. Bischur, S. Pobering, M. Menacher, N. Schwesinger, Piezoelectric energy harvester operating in flowing water, Proceed. SPIE, 7643, 76432Z–8, 2010.
• M.S. Bhuyan, B.Y. Majlis, M. Othman, S.H.M. Ali, C. Kalaivani, S. Islam, Development of a fluid actuated piezoelectric micro energy harvester: finite element modeling simulation and analysis, Asian J. Sci. Res., 6(4), 691–702, 2013.
• M.S. Bhuyan, B.Y. Majlis, S.H.M. Ali, M. Othman, M.S. Islam, Modeling and finite element analysis of a micro energy harvester, Int. Conf. Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Technologies (IMPACT), 293–296, Aligarh, 23-25 Nov. 2013.
• D-A Wang, H-H. Ko, Piezoelectric energy harvesting from flow-induced vibration, J. Micromechanics Microengineering, 20(2), 25019, 2010.
• S. Pobering and N. Schwesinger, A novel hydropower-harvesting device, Proceed. Int. Conf. MEMS, NANO and Smart Systems (ICMENS), 480–485, 2004.