A comparative CFD analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4, 145 - 159, 31.12.2018

Mustafa Yılmaz Hasan Köten Erkan Çetinkaya Ziya Coşar

https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.454193

Cited By: 13

Öz

Wind energy has been seen as one of the most suitable
sources of renewable energy. Wind energy is low cost when compared the other sources.
Therefore, wind energy can gain an edge over the fossil-fired power plants. Aerodynamic
efficiency of the airfoil is very crucial for aerodynamic efficiency of the wind
turbine. The primary purpose of our study was to analyze the NACA0012 and NACA4412
airfoil at various attack angles with constant Reynolds number and to examine the
effects of the symmetrical and asymmetrical profiles of the airfoil. Analysis of
aerodynamic performance of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoil were performed with using
ANSYS Fluent program. Also, lift coefficients and drag coefficients were calculated
at various attack angles.  According to calculations,
optimum attack angles were found for each profile. Finally, NACA0012 and NACA4412
airfoils were discussed and reported in terms of their airfoil performances.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Airfoil, NACA, CFD, Ansys fluent, Lift and drag coefficient

Kaynakça

• Chandrala, M., Aerodynamic Analysis of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2012; (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622. Vol. 2, Issue6, pp.1244-1248.
• Patil, S., Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Wind Turbine Blade at Various Angles of Attack and Different Reynolds Number. International Conference on Computational Heat and Mass Transfer, Procesia Enginering. 2015; 127, pp.1363-1369.
• Dash, A., CFD Analysis of Wind Turbine Airfoil at Various Angles of Attack. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN: 2278-1684, p-ISSN: 2320-334X. Volume 13, Issue 4 Ver. II, pp.18-24.
• Reddy, A., A Brief Research, Study, Design and Analysis on Wind turbine. Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER), 2015; Vol. 5 Issue10.
• Rubel, R.I., Uddin, M.K. Islam, M.Z. and Rokunuzzaman, M., Comparison of Aerodynamics Characteristics of NACA 0015 & NACA 4415. Preprints 2016.
• Hossain, S., A Comparative Flow Analysis of Naca 6409 and Naca 4412 Aerofoil. IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2014; eISSN: 2319-1163 pISSN: 2321-7308. Volume 3, Issue 10.
• Najar, A., Blade Design and Performance Analysis of Wind Turbine. International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN, 2013; IJCRGG ISSN: 0974-4290. Vol.5, No.2, pp 1054-1061.
• Burton, T., Jenkins, N, Sharpe, D. and Bossanyi, E. Wind Energy Handbook. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2011; 65-67.
• Şahin, İ. and Acir, A., Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Lift and Drag Performances of NACA 0015 Wind Turbine Airfoil, International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, 2015; Vol. 3, No. 1.
• Coles, D. and Alan, J., Flying-Hot-wire Study of Flow Past an NACA 4412 Airfoil at Maximum Lift, AIAA Journal, 1979; Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 321-329.
• Alley, R.N., Warren, F.P. and Spall, R., Predicting Maximum Lift Coefficient for Twisted Wings Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Journal of Aircraft. 2007; 890-898.
• Sheldahl, R. E., and Klimas, P. C., Aerodynamic characteristics of seven symmetrical airfoil sections through 180-degree angle of attack for use in aerodynamic analysis of vertical axis wind turbines. United States: N. p., 1981.
• Panigrahi, D.C. and Mishra D.P., CFD Simulations for the Selection of an Appropriate Blade Profile for Improving Energy Efficiency in Axial Flow Mine Ventilation Fans”, Journal of Sustainable Mining, 2014; Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 15-21, ISSN 2300-3960.
• Chen, F., Zhang, L., Huai, X., Li, J., Zhang, H. and Liu, Z., Comprehensive performance comparison of airfoil fin PCHEs with NACA 00XX series airfoil, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2017; Volume 315, Pages 42-50.
• Cui, X., Guo, J., HuaF[i, X., Cheng, K., Zhang, H. and Xiang, M., "Numerical study on novel airfoil fins for printed circuit heat exchanger using supercritical CO2," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018; Volume 121, Pages 354-366.
• Christopher, J. and Krus, J., Lift Coefficient Predictions for Delta Wing Under Pitching Motions, 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Fluid Dynamics and Co-located Conferences. 24-26 June 2002, St. Louis, Missouri, 158-164.
• Alexander, W., Application of CFD to wake/aerofoil interaction noise - A flat plate validation case, 7th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Aeroacoustics Conferences, 28 - 30 May 2001, Maastricht, Netherlands, 50-61.
• Henry, G., Steven, H., and James, S., 23% Circulation Controlled Elliptical Airfoil Modeled Using CFD, 20th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Fluid Dynamics and Co-located Conferences, 27 - 30 June 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii, 221-229.