Potential of biogas energy from animal waste in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4, 160 - 167, 31.12.2018

Zuhal Akyürek

https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.455325

Cited By: 18

Öz

Continuous growth in global energy demand,
depletion of fossil resources and climate change concerns associated with fossil
fuel combustion have increased the motivation on utilization of renewable
energy sources. Utilization of renewable sources is vital in Turkey as the
country highly depends on imported energy. Biogas is a renewable energy
resource produced from decomposing organic waste under anaerobic conditions.
Production of biogas from organic wastes such as animal manure is advantageous
to contribute renewable energy production and waste management strategies for
health and environmental protection. In this study, the animal manure based
biogas energy potential of the Mediterranean Region of Turkey is determined.
The region is composed of eight provinces including Antalya, Burdur, Isparta,
Mersin, Adana, Hatay, Osmaniye and Kahramanmaraş. The results revealed that
Mediterranean Region has 183 Mm3 annual biogas potential
corresponding to 0.08 MTOE/year energy generation capacity. Co-digestion of
agricultural residues can contribute to about 0.208 MTOE/year energy
generation. It is determined that biogas production can contribute reduction of
carbon footprint by 1.7 million tons of annual CO2 emissions. Mersin
Province has shown the highest biogas potential in the region.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biogas, Animal manure, Waste management, Renewable energy, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Mao, G., Huang, N., Wang, H. Research on biomass energy and environment from the past to the future: A bibliometric analysis. Science of The Total Environment 2018; 635: 1081-1090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.173
• Toklu, E., Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey. Renewable Energy 2017; 107: 235-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.008
• Bilgili, F., Bulut, Ü., Kuşkaya, S., Can biomass energy be an efficient policy tool for sustainable development? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 71: 830-845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.109
• Bhattacharya, S.C., Salam, P.A., Pham, H.L., Ravindranath, N.H.,Sustainable biomass production for energy in selected Asian countries, Biomass and Bioenergy 2003; 25: 471-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03) 00085-0.
• Hughes, E., Biomass cofiring: economics, policy and opportunities. Biomass and Bioenergy 2000; 19: 457-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00057-X
• Mao, C., Yongzhong, F., Xiaojiao, W., Guangxin, R., Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 45: 540-555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032
• Scheftelowitz, M., Thrän, D. Unlocking the energy potential of manure: an assessment of the biogas production potential at the farm level in Germany, Agriculture 2016; 6 (20); 2-13. DOI:10.3390/agriculture6020020
• Monteny, G.J., Bannink, A., Chadwick, D. Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategies for Animal Husbandry. Agriculture,I Ecosystem & Environment 2006, 112: 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.015
• Holm-Nielsen, J.B., Al Seadi, T., Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100: 5478-5484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046
• Ulukardeşler A.H., Atalay, F.S. Kinetic studies of biogas generation using chicken manure as feedstock, Journal of Polytechnic 2017: 1-7. DOI: 10.2339/politeknik.389622
• Yentekakis, I.V. and Grammatiki, G., Biogas Management: Advanced Utilization for Production of Renewable Energy and Added-value Chemical, Frontiers in Environmental Science 2017; 5, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00007
• Lyytimäki, J., Renewable energy in the news: Environmental, economic, policy and technology discussion of biogas. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2018; 15: 65-73.
• Samira, Z., Evaluation of biogas potential from livestock manures and rural wastes using GIS in Iran. Renewable Energy 2018; 118: 351-356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.026
• Batzias, F.A., Sidiras, D.K., Spyrou E.K., Evaluating livestock manures for biogas production: a GIS based method. Renewable Energy 2005; 30: 1161–1176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.10.001
• Hijazi, O., Munro, S., Zerhusen, B., Effenberger, M., Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016; 54: 1291–1300
• European Commission: 2030 Energy Strategy. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-strategy-and-energy-union/2030-energy-strategy (Accessed August 27, 2018)
• Meyer, A.K.P, Ehimen, E.A., Holm-Nielsen, J.B., Future European biogas: Animal manure, straw and grass potentials for a sustainable European biogas production. Biomass and Bioenergy 2018; 111: 154-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.05.013
• Republic of Turkey Intended Nationally Determined Contribution http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Turkey/1/The_INDC_of_TURKEY_v.15.19.30.pdf. (Accessed August 27, 2018).
• The Tenth Development Plan of Turkey: 2014-2018, http://www.mod.gov.tr/Lists/RecentPublications/Attachments/75/The%20Tenth%20Development%20Plan%20(2014-2018).pdf. (Accessed August 27, 2018).
• Avcioglu, O., Turker, U., Status and potential of biogas energy from animal wastes in Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012; 16: 1557-1561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.006
• Kaygusuz, K., Renewable and sustainable energy use in Turkey: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2002; 6: 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00007-7
• Ozyurt, O. Energy issues and renewables for sustainable development in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010; 14: 2976-2985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.08.002
• Kara, B., Emir, Z., Seker, T. Bahadir, A., Kaygusuz, K. Current state and future prospects of biomass energy in Turkey. Journal of Engineering Research and Applied Science 2017; 6: 522-529. ISSN 2147-3471
• General Directorate of Renewable Energy, BEPA Graphs 2018 http://www.yegm.gov.tr/ (Accessed August 27, 2018).
• Abdeshahian P., Lim J.S., Ho W.S., Hashim H., Lee C.T. Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews; 2016, 60: 714–723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.117
• Benito M., Ortiz I., Rodríguez L., Muñoz G. Ni–Co bimetallic catalyst for hydrogen production in sewage treatment plants: biogas reforming and tars removal. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015; 40:14456–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.163
• Possible agricultural use of digestate Kuusik A., Pachel K., Kuusik A., Loigu, E. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences; 2017, 66: 64-74. https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2017.1.10
• Macias-Corral, M., Samani, Z., Hanson, A., Smith, G., Funk, P., Yu, H., Longworth, J. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and agricultural waste and the effect of co-digestion with dairy cow manure. Bioresource Technology 2008; 99: 8288-8293. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.057
• Nzila, C., Njuguna, D., Madara, D., Githaiga, J., Muasya, R., Muumbo, A., Kiriamiti, H., Characterization of Agro-Residues for Biogas Production and Nutrient Recovery in Kenya. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences 2015;6: 327-334. ISSN: 2141-7016.
• Abo, B.O., Kalakodio, L., Bakayoko, M. Evaluation of the Biogas Production Potential by Anaerobic Digestion of Fermentable Agricultural Residues in Côte d’Ivoire. International Journal of Waste Resources 2017; 7: 1-6. DOI: 10.4172/2252-5211.1000317
• Lehtomäki, A., Huttunen, S., Rintala, J. Laboratory investigations on codigestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007; 51: 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.11.004
• Tiquia S.M., Tam N.F.Y., Hodgkiss I.J. Effects of composting on phytotoxicity of spent pig-manure sawdust litter. Environmental Pollution 1996, 93: 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(96)00052-8