BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A RESEARCH AIMED TO DETERMINE THE VALUES CONTAINING TACIT KNOWLEDGE IN ANTAKYA’S CULTURAL MARKET

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 87 - 96, 30.06.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016219937

Öz

With the effects of globalization that more and more has homogenized markets, consumers have begun to prefer to experiment events they perceive differently in social, cultural, geographic, technologic etc. areas. This leaning has made local and cultural factors preferential in particular in the tourism market. The cultural factors embodied in revealing the tacit knowledge behind these factors, that are the subject of the cultural market, have become the qualities of attraction sought in cultural tourism. In this context, the aim of this research is to determine the tacit knowledge factors behind the cultural market values of Antakya which is a city existing since the Paleolithic Period to the present time and, in this way, bring these factors to the global tourism market. This research conducted with the in-depth interview method has come to the conclusion that künefe (kunefah) making, silk weaving and laurel soap making is tacit knowledge original to the region while stone carving is tacit knowledge genuine to the individual.

Kaynakça

  • Boiral, O. 2002, “Tacit Knowledge AndEnvironmentalManagementing”, LongRange Planning, 35(3), pp. 291-317.
  • Bolat, S. 2009, “Örtülü Bilgi Kaynaklarının Keşfi ve Somutlaştırılması: Şirince Örneği”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(Temmuz-Aralık): s. 339-359. Dawson, P. 1997, “In At TheDeepEnd: ConductingProcessualResearch on OrganizationalChange”, ScandinavianJournal of Management, 13(4), pp. 389-405.
  • Demir, A. 1996, “Through TheAges Antakya”, İstanbul, Akbank CultureAnd Art Publications, Number:62.
  • Doğan, H. 2006, “Kültürel Pazarlarda Örtülü Bilginin Algılanması ve Beypazarı Örneği”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 11(2), s. 85-102.
  • Durna, U., Demirel, Y. 2008, “Bilgi Yönetiminde Bilgiyi Anlamak”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30 ( OcakHaziran), s. 129-156.
  • Giuliani, A. 2007, “DevelopingMarketsforAgrobiodiversity: SecuringLivelihoods in DrylandAreas”, London, Bioversity International. pp. 3133.
  • Guntern, Gottlieb. 2010, “TheSpirit of Creativity: Basic Mechanisms of Creative Achievements”, Maryland, Lanham. UniversityPress Of America. pp. 432.
  • İbicioğlu, H., Ak, B. 2005, “Aile İşletmelerinde Aile Değerlerinin Özyetenek Oluşturma Potansiyeli: Örtülü Bilgi Eksenli Bir Analiz”, Ç.Ü.Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(2) s. 315-324.
  • İbicioğlu, H., Doğan, H. 2006, İşletmelerde Örtülü Bilgi ve Önemi, Bursa, Ekin Yayınevi.
  • Johannessen, J.,Olaisen, J., Olsen, B. 2001, “Mismanagement of Tacit Knowledge: TheImportance of Tacit Knowledge, TheDanger of Information TechnologyandWhatTo Do AboutIt”, International Journal of Information Management, 21(1), pp. 3-20.
  • Johannessen, J.,Olsen, B.; Olaisen, J. 1999, “Aspects of InnovationTheoryBased on Knowledge Management”, International Journal of Information Management, 19(2), pp. 121-139.
  • Johnson, D. A. 2013, “LostChurches on theSilk Road”. New SinaiPress, pp. 13.
  • Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Resmi Web Sitesi, 2023 Turizm Stratejisi (http://www.kultur.gov.tr/Eklenti/906,ttstratejisi2023pdf.pdf?0 )
  • Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, GoTurkey, OfficialTourism Portal of Turkey: Hatay (http://85.159.68.66/~goturkey/tr/pages/content/2815 )
  • Lubit, R. 2001, “Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Management: TheKeysToSustainableCompetitiveAdvantages”, Organizaional Dynamics, 29(3), pp.164-178.
  • Malone, D. 2002, “Knowledge Management A Model ForOrganizational Learning”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3(2), pp. 111-123.
  • Roufs, T.,Roufs, K.S. 2014, “SweetTreatsaroundthe World: An Encyclopedia of FoodandCulture”. Santa Barbara, California, pp. 208.
  • Turgut, E.,Begenirbaş, M. 2014, “İlişkisel Sosyal Sermayenin Yenilikçi Davranışa Etkisinde Örtülü Bilgi Paylaşımı Davranışının Aracılık Rolü”, Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), s.146-160.
  • Underwood& underwood,1895-1900. "Expertpurchasing silk cocoons, forexportto France, Antioch,Syria" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Silkworm_Cocoon_purchasing_in_Antioch.jpg
  • Watson, J.,Lysonkski, S., Gillan, T., Raymore, L. 2002, “CulturalValuesandImportantPossessions: A Cultural Analysis”, Journal of Business Research, 55, pp. 923-31.
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 87 - 96, 30.06.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016219937

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Boiral, O. 2002, “Tacit Knowledge AndEnvironmentalManagementing”, LongRange Planning, 35(3), pp. 291-317.
  • Bolat, S. 2009, “Örtülü Bilgi Kaynaklarının Keşfi ve Somutlaştırılması: Şirince Örneği”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(Temmuz-Aralık): s. 339-359. Dawson, P. 1997, “In At TheDeepEnd: ConductingProcessualResearch on OrganizationalChange”, ScandinavianJournal of Management, 13(4), pp. 389-405.
  • Demir, A. 1996, “Through TheAges Antakya”, İstanbul, Akbank CultureAnd Art Publications, Number:62.
  • Doğan, H. 2006, “Kültürel Pazarlarda Örtülü Bilginin Algılanması ve Beypazarı Örneği”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 11(2), s. 85-102.
  • Durna, U., Demirel, Y. 2008, “Bilgi Yönetiminde Bilgiyi Anlamak”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30 ( OcakHaziran), s. 129-156.
  • Giuliani, A. 2007, “DevelopingMarketsforAgrobiodiversity: SecuringLivelihoods in DrylandAreas”, London, Bioversity International. pp. 3133.
  • Guntern, Gottlieb. 2010, “TheSpirit of Creativity: Basic Mechanisms of Creative Achievements”, Maryland, Lanham. UniversityPress Of America. pp. 432.
  • İbicioğlu, H., Ak, B. 2005, “Aile İşletmelerinde Aile Değerlerinin Özyetenek Oluşturma Potansiyeli: Örtülü Bilgi Eksenli Bir Analiz”, Ç.Ü.Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(2) s. 315-324.
  • İbicioğlu, H., Doğan, H. 2006, İşletmelerde Örtülü Bilgi ve Önemi, Bursa, Ekin Yayınevi.
  • Johannessen, J.,Olaisen, J., Olsen, B. 2001, “Mismanagement of Tacit Knowledge: TheImportance of Tacit Knowledge, TheDanger of Information TechnologyandWhatTo Do AboutIt”, International Journal of Information Management, 21(1), pp. 3-20.
  • Johannessen, J.,Olsen, B.; Olaisen, J. 1999, “Aspects of InnovationTheoryBased on Knowledge Management”, International Journal of Information Management, 19(2), pp. 121-139.
  • Johnson, D. A. 2013, “LostChurches on theSilk Road”. New SinaiPress, pp. 13.
  • Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Resmi Web Sitesi, 2023 Turizm Stratejisi (http://www.kultur.gov.tr/Eklenti/906,ttstratejisi2023pdf.pdf?0 )
  • Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, GoTurkey, OfficialTourism Portal of Turkey: Hatay (http://85.159.68.66/~goturkey/tr/pages/content/2815 )
  • Lubit, R. 2001, “Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Management: TheKeysToSustainableCompetitiveAdvantages”, Organizaional Dynamics, 29(3), pp.164-178.
  • Malone, D. 2002, “Knowledge Management A Model ForOrganizational Learning”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3(2), pp. 111-123.
  • Roufs, T.,Roufs, K.S. 2014, “SweetTreatsaroundthe World: An Encyclopedia of FoodandCulture”. Santa Barbara, California, pp. 208.
  • Turgut, E.,Begenirbaş, M. 2014, “İlişkisel Sosyal Sermayenin Yenilikçi Davranışa Etkisinde Örtülü Bilgi Paylaşımı Davranışının Aracılık Rolü”, Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), s.146-160.
  • Underwood& underwood,1895-1900. "Expertpurchasing silk cocoons, forexportto France, Antioch,Syria" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Silkworm_Cocoon_purchasing_in_Antioch.jpg
  • Watson, J.,Lysonkski, S., Gillan, T., Raymore, L. 2002, “CulturalValuesandImportantPossessions: A Cultural Analysis”, Journal of Business Research, 55, pp. 923-31.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Husniye Ors Bu kişi benim

Pelin Surmeli Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Ors, H., & Surmeli, P. (2016). A RESEARCH AIMED TO DETERMINE THE VALUES CONTAINING TACIT KNOWLEDGE IN ANTAKYA’S CULTURAL MARKET. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 3(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016219937

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.