The Role of Agricultural Mechanization in Farming System in a Continental Climate

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 58 - 72, 15.05.2018

Sakine Özpınar Anıl Çay

Öz

As is known, the use
of mechanization for agriculture production have crucial importance for crop
quality and yield in unit area. The mechanization of agricultural production is
constantly renewing itself, depending on the time with the development of
technology. For this reason, it is necessary to make determinations
periodically for the current situation of the mechanization development in an
agricultural area. Therefore, a study was conducted for a local area named
Elbistan district, to put out agricultural potential and mechanization
facilities used. For this purpose, a questionnaire was applied to this area
including 5-village of 70 farms which were decided according to farmers
recording system. Results indicated that 81% of the farms had only one-tractor
while the rest of them had two-tractor which represent medium-sized tractors
with average 60 kW of power. Massey Ferguson was most used tractor followed by
Tümosan which were under economic life limit. It was also concluded that
tractors mainly used for soil tillage practices with 45% followed by sowing (16%),
transporters (14%), hoeing (9%), irrigation (8%), fertilizing (4%), spraying (2%),
and other operations (2%). The machinery per tractor was found 7 which were
completely performed in conventional farming system, especially in sugar beet,
maize and wheat growing under dry farming. On the other hand, farm size was
found very small mainly 5 decare by the rate of 44% which has similar to the
type of parcels in our country while followed by 5-10 hectare with %25.
Additionally, sugar beet was major popular crop and grown by 53% farmers
because of available processing unit in the region. Maize was second crop grown
by 27% while wheat was third one in this study area. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agricultural mechanization, tractor, farming system

Kaynakça

• Adekunle, A., 2015. Agricultural Mechanization. Feeding Africa, An Action Plan for African Agricultural Transformation. Abdou Diouf Interntional Conference Center. 21-23 October 2015. Dahar, Senegal.
• Anonymous, 2015. Elbistan District Food Agriculture and Livestock Directorate. http://kahramanmaras.tarim.gov.tr/iletisim.
• Anonymous, 2016. Turkish State Meteorological Service. Ankara. https://mgm.gov.tr/eng/forecast-cities.aspx.
• Aybek, A., Senel, H., 2009. Mechanization properties and users’ evaluations of farm tractors in Eastern Mediterranean Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Sci. 5 (1), 21-27.
• Fadavi, R., A. Keyhani and S.S. Mohtasebi, 2010. Estimation of a mechanization index in apple orchard in Iran Journal of Agricultural Science. 2(4), 180-185.
• FAO, 2014. A regional strategy for sustainable agricultural mechanization: sustainable mechanization across agri-food chains in Asia and the Pacific region. Mrema, G., Soni, P., Rolle, R. 2014. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Regional office for Asia and the Pacific. RAP Publication. 2014/24. 74 pp.
• Chen, P.C., M.M. Yu, C.C. Chang and S.H. Hsu, 2008. Total factor productivity growth in China’s agricultural sector. Journal of China Economic Review. 19. 580-593. Civelek, Ç. 2016. Turkey’s demand for agricultural tractors and machinery. Scholars J of Agriculture and Veterinary Sci., 3(1), 51-57.
• Clarke, L.J. 2000. Strategies for agricultural mechanization development The roles of the private sector and the government agricultural engineering branch, agricultural support systems division FAO, Rome, Italy, February.
• Isık, A. 1996. A research on determining agricultural structure and mechanization properties of the farms in Çukurova region. 6th International Congress on Agricultural Mechanization and Energy. Ankara.
• Nkakini, S.O., M.J. Ayotamuno, S.O.T. Ogaji and S.D. Probert, 2006. Farm mechanization leading to more effective energy-utilization for cassava and yam cultivation in Rivers State. Nigeria. Journal of Applied Energy. 83, 1317-1325.
• Ou, Y.G., D.T. Yang, P.X. Yu, Y. Wang, B.X. Xli and Y.L. Zhang, 2002. Experience and analysis on sugarcane mechanization at a state farm in China. 2002 ASAE Annual International Meeting/CIGRXVth World Congress.
• Singh, G. 2006. Estimation of mechanisation index and its impact on production and economic factors-a case study in India. Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 93, 99-106.
• Özpınar, S. 2001. Determination of the Characteristics of the Agricultural Mechanization in Marmara Region. 20th National Agricultural Mechanization Congress. 13-15 September, 2001, 41-46, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.
• Özpınar, S. 2002. A research on determination of agricultural structure and mechanisation characteristics of farms in Çanakkale Province. 8th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture. October 15-17, 436-441, Kusadası, Turkey.
• Sessiz, A., R. Esgici., A. K. Eliçin., S. Gürsoy. 2014.The level of agricultural mechanization in Turkey and GAP Region. 12th.International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture. 3-6 September, Capadocia, Turkiye.
• Van Den Berg, M.M., H. Hengsdijk, J. Wolf, M.K. Van Ittersum, W. Guanghuo, R.P. Roetter. 2007. The impact of increasing farm size and mechanization on rural income and rice production in Zhejiange province. China. Journal of Agricultural Systems. 94, 841-850.
• Zeren, Y. 1991. Structure and development of tractor, combine harvester and farm machineries manufacturing industry in Turkey. Çukurova University Agricultural Faculty, Department of Agricultural Mechanization, Adana, Turkey.
• Tezer, E., A. Sabancı, 1997. Agricultural mechanization. I. Çukurova University Agriculture Faculty General Publication. No:44, Adana.
• TÜİK, 2015a, Agriculture Structure and Production. T.C Başbakanlık, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Ankara. Available from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/tarimalet_ing.zul
• TÜİK, 2015b. Agricultural Equipment and Machinery Statistics, Ankara. Available from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/tarimalet_ing.zul