Siber Zorbalik Tehlike Düzeyi Ölçeğinin Ortaokul ve Lise Formlarının Geliştirilmesi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2, 569 - 587, 15.03.2018

Melike Kavuk Kalender Şanser Bulu Hafize Keser

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.389857

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bu araştırmada, siber zorbalık olaylarına
mağdur, zorba veya tanık olarak dâhil olan öğrenciler açısından siber zorbalık
tehlike düzeyi ölçeğinin ortaokul ve lise formlarını geliştirilmek
amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada 304 ortaokul ve 296 lise öğrencisinden veri
toplanmıştır. Formlarla ilgili olarak kapsam geçerliği ve dil geçerliği uzman
görüşüyle; yapı geçerliği ise açımlayıcı faktör analizi yapılarak sağlanmıştır.
Ölçeklerin güvenirliğini test etmek için Cronbach Alfa iç tutarlılık katsayısı
kesaplanmış; madde güvenirliklerini test etmek için ise madde-toplam
korelasyonları hesaplanmıştır. İlk psikometrik bulgularının geçerli ve
güvenilir olduğu belirlenen ölçek formlarının her biri üç temel boyuttan
(mağduriyet, zorbalık ve tanıklık); her temel boyut ise üç alt boyut (sorunun
yaşanma sıklığı, algılanan ciddiyet düzeyi, hissedilen olumsuz etki düzeyi) ile
17 maddeden oluşmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

siber zorbalık, siber zorbalık tehlike düzeyi, ortaokul, lise, siber zorbalık ölçeği

Development of Secondary School and High School Forms of The Cyberbullying Threat Level Scale

Öz

The aim of this research is to develop the
secondary and high school forms of the cyberbullying threat level scale for
students who are cyberbullying victims, bullies or witnesses. Data were
collected from 304 middle school and 296 high school students. Content validity
and linguistic validity were established by expert review and; construct
validity was established by exploratory factor analysis. Cronbach Alpha
analysis was performed to test the internal consistency reliability coefficient
of the scales; Item-total correlations were calculated to test item
reliability. Each of the scales with three basic dimensions (victimization,
bullying and witnessing); three sub-dimensions (frequency of experiencing the
problem, level of perceived seriousness, level of negative effect felt) and 17
items found to be valid and reliable by the first psychometric findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

cyberbullying, cyberbullying threat level, middle school, high school, cyberbullying scale

Kaynakça

• Ayas, T. ve Horzum, M.B., (2011) Exploring the teachers’ cyber bullying perception in terms of various variables. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 619-640.
• Bauman, S. and Yoon, J. (2014). This issue: Theories of bullying and cyberbullying, Theory Into Practice, 53, 253–256.
• Burnukara, P. (2009). İlk ve orta ergenlikte geleneksel ve sanal akran zorbalığına ilişkin betimsel bir inceleme (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Veri analizi el kitabı.9.baskı. Ankara: Pegem akademi.
• Chen, L. M., Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., & Hsueh, C. W. (2015). The intersection between perceived severity and frequency of being bullied: A Rasch measurement approach. Educational Psychology, 35, 397–415.
• Chen, L.M. & Cheng, Y.Y. (2017). Perceived severity of cyberbullying behaviour: differences between genders, grades and participant roles. Educational Psychology, 37:5, 599-610.
• Cil, A. (2014). Faktör Analizi (İleri İstatistik Notları). 12.07.2016, http://abdulrezzakcil.blogspot.com.tr/2014/05/faktor-analizi-ileri-istatistik.html.
• DeSmet, A., Aelterman N., Bastiaensens, S., Cleemput, K. V., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H.,…Bourdeaudhuij, I.D. (2015). Sec-ondary school educators' perceptions and practices in handling cyberbullying among adolescents: A cluster analysis. Computers & Education 88, 192-201.
• Erdur- Baker, Ö. ve Kavşut, F. (2007). Akran Zorbalığının Yeni Yüzü: Siber Zorbalık. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 27, 31-42.
• Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of inter-net-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12(1), 109-125.
• Gáti, Á., Tényi, T., Túry, F. & Wildmann, M. (2002). Anorexia nervosa following sexual harassment on the Internet: A case report. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 474-477.
• Guzzo, G., Pace, U., Lo Cascio, V., Craparo, G., & Schimmenti, A. (2014). Bullying victimization, post-traumatic symptoms, and the mediating role of alexithymia. Child Indicators Research, 7, 141-153.
• Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying and suicide. Archives of SuicideResearch, 14 (3), 206-211.
• Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29, 129–156.
• Hinduja, S., and Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Kavuk, M. (2016). Ortaokul ve liselerin siber zorbalık farkındalık profillerinin oluşturulması ve okul paydaşlarına yönelik siber zorbalık farkındalık eğitimi etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Keser, H. ve Kavuk, M. (2015). Okulda siber zorbalık farkındalık anketinin geliştirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 17-30.
• Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N. and Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137.
• Kowalski, R., Limber, S. and Agatston, P. (2012). Cyber-bullying: Bullying in the digital age. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Mishna, F., Kassabri, M.K., Gadalla, T. and Daciuk, J. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 63–70.
• Mishna, F., MacFadden, R., Gadalla, T., Daciuk,J., Solomon,S. & Cook, C. (2006). Cyber Bullying Survey: School Summary Report. http://www.governmentevents.ca/ypo2008/presentations/634.pdf.
• Mishna, F., Saini, M., & Solomon, S. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth’s perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1222–1228.
• Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G. and Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602-611.
• Nixon, C. L. (2014). Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5, 143-158.
• Nocentini, A., Calmaestra, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Ortega, R., & Menesini, e. (2010). Cyberbullying: Labels, behaviours and defnition in three european countries. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 129–142
• Pabian, S. and Vandebosch, H. (2015). Short-term longitudinal relationships between adolescents’ (cyber)bullying perpetration and bonding to school and teachers. International Journal of Behavioral Development 1–11, Doi: 10.1177/0165025415573639.
• Peker, A. (2015). Analyzing the risk factors predicting the cyberbullying status of secondary school students. Education and Science 40 (181), 57-75.
• Raskauskas, J. and Stoltz, A. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564-575.
• Selkie, E.M., Fales, J.L. and Moreno, M.A. (2015). Cyberbullying Prevalence Among US Middle and High SchooleAged Adoles-cents: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment. Journal of Adolescent Health (basımda) 24.11.2015, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X15003821.
• Slonje, R., Smith, P. K. and Frisen, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–32.
• Spears, B., Campbell, M. A., Tangen, D. J., Slee, P. and Cross, D. (2015) Australian pre-service teachers’ Knowledge and under-standing of cyberbullying: Implications for school climate. Les Dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, 33, 109-130.
• Sticca, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 739–750.
• Tanrıkulu, T., Kınay, H., Arıcak, O.T. (2013). Siber Zorbalığa İlişkin Duyarlılık Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 38-47.
• Yılmaz, H. (2011). Cyber-bullying in Turkish middle schools: An exploratory study. School Psychology International, 32(6), 645-654.
• Yoon, J., Bauman, S., Choi, T. and Hutchinson, A.S. (2011). How South Korean teachers handle an incident of school bullying. School Psychology International 32(3), 312–329.