Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Asendan Aort Replasmanıyla ile Birlikte veya İzole Aort Kapak İmplantasyonu İçin Parsiyel Üst Sternotomi

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 80 - 83, 03.08.2015

Öz











Giriş:
Kalp cerrahisi tekniklerindeki ilerlemelerle
birlikte, minimal invaziv yaklaşımlar cerrahlar tarafından gittikçe daha çok
tercih edilmektedir. Daha küçük bir insizyon yapılması belirli cerrahi
prosedürler sırasında cerrahın hareketlerine engel olmadan yeterli görünürlük
sağlayabilmektedir. Dahası sınırlı bir insizyon daha iyi kozmetik sonuçlar ve
daha iyi yaşam kalitesi sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma izole ve kombine aort kapak
operasyonları için sınırlı cilt insizyonuyla parsiyel üst sternotomi
kullanımına dair deneyimlerimizi sunmaktadır.



Hastalar
ve Yöntem:
Ocak 2013-Aralık 2014
tarihleri arasında toplam 34 hastaya parsiyel J-şeklinde üst sternotomi yoluyla
aort kapak cerrahisi uygulandı. On altı hastada (%47.0) izole aort kapak
replasmanı, 18 hastada (%53) modifiye Bentall prosedürü gerçekleştirildi.
Tanımlayıcı veriler olarak demografik ve klinik sonuç parametreleri bildirildi.



Bulgular:
Ortalama yaş 54 ± 14 yıldı (aralık 19 ila 82 yaş)
ve hastaların 11  (%32)’i kadındı.
Ortalama ameliyat süresi 6.8 ± 1.8 saatti (aralık 4 ila 10 saat). Erken
mortalite bir hastada meydana geldi. İki hasta yara yeri infeksiyonu nedeniyle
yara bakımı için rehospitalize edildi. 



Sonuç: Aort kapak cerrahisi için parsiyel
üst ministernotomi kullanımına dair ilk sonuçlarımız cesaret vericidir. Söz
konusu teknik aort kapak cerrahisi sırasında, proksimal asendan aorta dahil
yeterli ulaşılabilirlik sağlamaktadır. Tekniğin güvenilirliğinin ve
etkililiğinin sınanması için daha ileri düzeyde çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır. 

Kaynakça

  • 1. Liu J, Sidiropoulos A, Konertz W. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 199;16 (Suppl 2):S80-S3.
  • 2. Gilmanov D, Bevilacqua S, Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Gasbarri T, Kallushi E, et al. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: apropensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:837-43.
  • 3. Özer T, Yücel M, Mataracı İ, Hanedan MO, Sayar U, Emir İ. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery experiences in a district branch hospital. Koşuyolu Heart Journal 2014;17:110-3.
  • 4. Özer T, Hanedan MO, Sayar U, Demirbaş M, Emir İ, Yücel M, et al. Our minimally invasive cardiac surgery experiences. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; (Suppl 1):456.
  • 5. Arslan Ö, Akbulut M, Erden B, Ak A, Taş S, Çayhan B, et al. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of aortic pathologies (Mini-J-Sternotomy and innominate vein cannulation). Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;(Suppl 1):45.
  • 6. Yakut C. The Flanged Technique: A new modified procedure for reconstructed continuity of aortic valve and ascending aorta. Kosuyolu Heart J 1999;3:72-5.
  • 7. Khonsari S, Sintek CF. Cardiac Surgery: Safeguards and pitfalls in operative technique. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer Health, 2008.
  • 8. Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:670-9.
  • 9. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Cohn LH, Bolman RM III, Shekar PS, Chen FY, et al. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:537-41.
  • 10. Ceresa F, Sansone F, Patanè F. Aortic valve replacement through the upper minister-notomy: preliminary experience with modified technique. G Chir 2012;33:311-3.
  • 11. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Khalpey Z, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH, et al. Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal access cardiac surgery: reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:165-9.
  • 12. Byrne JG, Karavas AN, Adams DH, Aklog L, Aranki SF, Couper GS, et al. Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:282-6.
  • 13. Dell’Amore A, Del Giglio M, Calvi S, Pagliaro M, Fedeli C, Magnano D, et al. Mini resternotomy for aortic valve replacement in patients with patent coronary bypass grafts. Interact CardiovascThorac Surg 2009;9:94-7.
  • 14. Soppa G, Yates M, Viviano A, Smelt J, Valencia O, van Besouw JP, et al. Trainees can learn minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without compromising safety. Interact Cardio Vasc Thorac Surg 2015;20:458-62. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivu428.

Partial Upper Sternotomy for Concomitant with Ascendant Aorta Replacement or Isolated Aortic Valve Implantation

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 80 - 83, 03.08.2015

Öz











Introduction:
Less-invasive procedures have gained more
widespread adoption among cardiovascular surgeons as a result of continuous
advances in the field of cardiac surgical techniques. It has now become clear
that even smaller incisions may provide adequate exposure in certain cardiac
surgical procedures without compromising the surgeon’s view of the surgical field.
Furthermore, a limited incision offers the advantage of cosmetic outcomes,
hence an improved quality-of-life after the operation. Herein, we report our
experience regarding the use of partial upper sternotomy with limited skin
incision for isolated or combined aortic valve operations.



Patients
and Methods:
A total of 34 patients underwent aortic valve
surgery via partial J-shaped upper sternotomy in two separate centers between
January 2013 and December 2014. Sixteen patients (47%) underwent an isolated aortic
valve replacement, while 18 patients (53%) underwent a modified Bentall
procedure. Descriptive data included demographic and clinical outcome
parameters.



Results: Mean
age was 54 ± 14 years (range: 19 to 82 years) and there were 11 females (32%).
The average duration of surgery was 6.8 ± 1.8 hours, ranging from 4 to 10
hours. Early mortality occurred in 1 patient. Two patients had wound infection
and they were re-hospitalized for wound care.



Conclusion: Our preliminary result
regarding the use of partial upper ministernotomy is encouraging. The technique
allows adequate exposure during aortic valve surgery, even in procedures
involving the proximal ascending aorta. Further studies are warranted to test
the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Liu J, Sidiropoulos A, Konertz W. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 199;16 (Suppl 2):S80-S3.
  • 2. Gilmanov D, Bevilacqua S, Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Gasbarri T, Kallushi E, et al. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: apropensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:837-43.
  • 3. Özer T, Yücel M, Mataracı İ, Hanedan MO, Sayar U, Emir İ. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery experiences in a district branch hospital. Koşuyolu Heart Journal 2014;17:110-3.
  • 4. Özer T, Hanedan MO, Sayar U, Demirbaş M, Emir İ, Yücel M, et al. Our minimally invasive cardiac surgery experiences. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; (Suppl 1):456.
  • 5. Arslan Ö, Akbulut M, Erden B, Ak A, Taş S, Çayhan B, et al. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of aortic pathologies (Mini-J-Sternotomy and innominate vein cannulation). Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;(Suppl 1):45.
  • 6. Yakut C. The Flanged Technique: A new modified procedure for reconstructed continuity of aortic valve and ascending aorta. Kosuyolu Heart J 1999;3:72-5.
  • 7. Khonsari S, Sintek CF. Cardiac Surgery: Safeguards and pitfalls in operative technique. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer Health, 2008.
  • 8. Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:670-9.
  • 9. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Cohn LH, Bolman RM III, Shekar PS, Chen FY, et al. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:537-41.
  • 10. Ceresa F, Sansone F, Patanè F. Aortic valve replacement through the upper minister-notomy: preliminary experience with modified technique. G Chir 2012;33:311-3.
  • 11. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Khalpey Z, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH, et al. Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal access cardiac surgery: reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:165-9.
  • 12. Byrne JG, Karavas AN, Adams DH, Aklog L, Aranki SF, Couper GS, et al. Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:282-6.
  • 13. Dell’Amore A, Del Giglio M, Calvi S, Pagliaro M, Fedeli C, Magnano D, et al. Mini resternotomy for aortic valve replacement in patients with patent coronary bypass grafts. Interact CardiovascThorac Surg 2009;9:94-7.
  • 14. Soppa G, Yates M, Viviano A, Smelt J, Valencia O, van Besouw JP, et al. Trainees can learn minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without compromising safety. Interact Cardio Vasc Thorac Surg 2015;20:458-62. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivu428.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Klinik Tıp Bilimleri
Bölüm Orijinal Araştırmalar
Yazarlar

Tanıl Özer

Mustafa Akbulut Bu kişi benim

Ahmet Çağrı Aykan Bu kişi benim

İlker Mataracı Bu kişi benim

Eray Aksoy Bu kişi benim

Mehmet Altuğ Tuncer Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 3 Ağustos 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Özer T, Akbulut M, Aykan AÇ, Mataracı İ, Aksoy E, Tuncer MA. Partial Upper Sternotomy for Concomitant with Ascendant Aorta Replacement or Isolated Aortic Valve Implantation. Koşuyolu Heart Journal. 2015;18(2):80-3.