Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 90 - 100, 29.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.23884/mejs.2016.2.2.03

Öz

Kaynakça

  • [1] Deublein, D., Steinhauser, A., (2008). Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources, p.1-450.
  • [2] Anonim, 2006. Türkiye’nin Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları. Türkiye Çevre Vakfı, Yayın No:175, 368s, Ankara.
  • [3] Acaroglu, M., 2007. Renewable Energy Sources (Turkish). 2nd ed. Nobel Yayınevi, ISBN 978-605-395-047-9, 609, Ankara.
  • [4] Akova, İ., 2008. Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları. Nobel Yayın No: 1294, 224s, Ankara.
  • [5] Arkutman, F., 2003. “Atıksu Arıtımı ve Arıtma Teknikleri”, Bilim ve Teknik, 428:42- 52.
  • [6] Anonim, 2012. Technical Documentation. Vorwerk Thermomix Tm 31. User Manuel. Mixer, Vorwerk International Strecker & Co., Switzerland.
  • [7] AOAC.,1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.US.
  • [8] Fanchi, J. R., 2011. Energy in the 21st Century. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224.
  • [9] Heffrich, D., and Oechsner, H., 2003. Comparison of Different Lab¬oratory Techniques for the Digestion of Biomass, Landtechnik, 9, 27-30.
  • [10] Kapluhan, E., 2014. Enerji Coğrafyası Açısından Bir İnceleme: Biyokütle Enerjisinin Dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki Kullanım Durumu. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, (30):.97-25.
  • [11] Öztürk, H. H., 2008. Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları ve Kullanımı. Teknik Yayınevi, 367s, Ankara.
  • [12] TUİK, 2015. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Konularına Göre İstatistikler, Tarım.
  • https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul st (Erişim: 15.11 2016).
  • [13] URL., 2016. Meyve ve Sebze Atıklarının değerlendirilmesi. http://foodwaste-fruit.tripod.com/id1.html (Erişim: 15.11.2016)
  • [14] Lane, A., 1984. Laboratory Scale Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Solid Waste. Biomass, 5:245-59.
  • [15] Prema, V., Sumithra, S., Krishna, N., 1992. Anaerobic of Fruit and Vegetable Processing Wastes for Biogas Productıon. Bioresource Technology, 40:43-8.
  • [16] Mtz.-Viturtia A., Mata-Alverez J. and Cecchi F. 1995. Two-phase Continuous Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes, Resources. Conservation and Reycling, 13, 257-267.
  • [17] Bouallagui, H., Ben Cheikh, R., Marouani, L., Hamdi, M., 2003. Mesophilic Biogas Production From Fruit And Vegetable Waste İn Tubular Digester, Bioresour. Technol., 86, 85-90.
  • [18] Qiao, W., Yan, X., Ye,J., Sun, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, Z., 2011. Evaluation Of Biogas Production From Different Biomass Wastes With/Without Hydrothermal Pretreatment, Renewable Energy, 36, 3313-3318.
  • [19] Gül, A., 2014. Sebze ve Meyve Atıklarının Biyogaz Üretim Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Ensitütüsü, Çevre Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı.
  • [20] Hutnan, M., Spalkova V., Bodik I., Kolesarova N., Lazor M., 2009. Biogas Production from Maize and Maize Silage. Polish Journal of Evrironmental Studies, 19, 323-329.
  • [21] Frauke, H.K., Susanne, O., Ebenhard, H., 2015. Effect on The Biogas and Methane Productıon of Cattle Manure Treated with Urease İnhibition. Journal of Biomass and Bioenergy. ISBN 0961-9534, 75-82..

DETERMINATION OF BIOGAS VALUES FOR TOMATO WASTES USING HOHENHEIM BATCH TEST METHOD

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 90 - 100, 29.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.23884/mejs.2016.2.2.03

Öz


Nowadays, biogas technology applications are gradually increasing worldwide due to the economic and environmental benefits. Many researches and studies related to the determination of the biogas potential of waste organic materials have been carried out in the recent years. Studies to determine the specific methane potential of organic waste materials have a great importance for both design and economical operation of the biogas plants.Energy potential that will be recovered from organic wastes are substantial in our country.Thanks to biogas plants gathering vegetable-fruit wastes and other organic wastes are planned to produce significant amount of renewable energy in our country markets. Owing to the use of organic wastes, the disposal of waste as well as energy production, soil, water, air pollution in terms of environmental protection are also minimized. On the other hand, the organic wastes produced from plants can also be utilised as fertilizer in vegetable production. In this study, the cumulative biogas and methane productions of tomato wastes were experimentally determined with HBT (Hohenheim Batch Testing) method. Biogas and methane yields of tomato wastes were found as 0.687-0.695 Nm3/kg OKM and 0.364-0.374 Nm3/kg OKM respectively. Obtained results for biogas production has importance.


Kaynakça

  • [1] Deublein, D., Steinhauser, A., (2008). Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources, p.1-450.
  • [2] Anonim, 2006. Türkiye’nin Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları. Türkiye Çevre Vakfı, Yayın No:175, 368s, Ankara.
  • [3] Acaroglu, M., 2007. Renewable Energy Sources (Turkish). 2nd ed. Nobel Yayınevi, ISBN 978-605-395-047-9, 609, Ankara.
  • [4] Akova, İ., 2008. Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları. Nobel Yayın No: 1294, 224s, Ankara.
  • [5] Arkutman, F., 2003. “Atıksu Arıtımı ve Arıtma Teknikleri”, Bilim ve Teknik, 428:42- 52.
  • [6] Anonim, 2012. Technical Documentation. Vorwerk Thermomix Tm 31. User Manuel. Mixer, Vorwerk International Strecker & Co., Switzerland.
  • [7] AOAC.,1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.US.
  • [8] Fanchi, J. R., 2011. Energy in the 21st Century. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224.
  • [9] Heffrich, D., and Oechsner, H., 2003. Comparison of Different Lab¬oratory Techniques for the Digestion of Biomass, Landtechnik, 9, 27-30.
  • [10] Kapluhan, E., 2014. Enerji Coğrafyası Açısından Bir İnceleme: Biyokütle Enerjisinin Dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki Kullanım Durumu. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, (30):.97-25.
  • [11] Öztürk, H. H., 2008. Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları ve Kullanımı. Teknik Yayınevi, 367s, Ankara.
  • [12] TUİK, 2015. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Konularına Göre İstatistikler, Tarım.
  • https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul st (Erişim: 15.11 2016).
  • [13] URL., 2016. Meyve ve Sebze Atıklarının değerlendirilmesi. http://foodwaste-fruit.tripod.com/id1.html (Erişim: 15.11.2016)
  • [14] Lane, A., 1984. Laboratory Scale Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Solid Waste. Biomass, 5:245-59.
  • [15] Prema, V., Sumithra, S., Krishna, N., 1992. Anaerobic of Fruit and Vegetable Processing Wastes for Biogas Productıon. Bioresource Technology, 40:43-8.
  • [16] Mtz.-Viturtia A., Mata-Alverez J. and Cecchi F. 1995. Two-phase Continuous Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes, Resources. Conservation and Reycling, 13, 257-267.
  • [17] Bouallagui, H., Ben Cheikh, R., Marouani, L., Hamdi, M., 2003. Mesophilic Biogas Production From Fruit And Vegetable Waste İn Tubular Digester, Bioresour. Technol., 86, 85-90.
  • [18] Qiao, W., Yan, X., Ye,J., Sun, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, Z., 2011. Evaluation Of Biogas Production From Different Biomass Wastes With/Without Hydrothermal Pretreatment, Renewable Energy, 36, 3313-3318.
  • [19] Gül, A., 2014. Sebze ve Meyve Atıklarının Biyogaz Üretim Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Ensitütüsü, Çevre Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı.
  • [20] Hutnan, M., Spalkova V., Bodik I., Kolesarova N., Lazor M., 2009. Biogas Production from Maize and Maize Silage. Polish Journal of Evrironmental Studies, 19, 323-329.
  • [21] Frauke, H.K., Susanne, O., Ebenhard, H., 2015. Effect on The Biogas and Methane Productıon of Cattle Manure Treated with Urease İnhibition. Journal of Biomass and Bioenergy. ISBN 0961-9534, 75-82..
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Konular Ziraat Mühendisliği
Bölüm Makale
Yazarlar

Serdar Üçok

Ali Aybek

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 9 Eylül 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

IEEE S. Üçok ve A. Aybek, “DETERMINATION OF BIOGAS VALUES FOR TOMATO WASTES USING HOHENHEIM BATCH TEST METHOD”, MEJS, c. 2, sy. 2, ss. 90–100, 2016, doi: 10.23884/mejs.2016.2.2.03.