Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 716 - 722, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.648

Öz

Different business models, products and services that are
introduced with the advances in digital technologies and Internet gave rise to
alternative modes of consumption. Along with this shift from ownership-based to
an access based consumption, a stream of scholarly research has focused on
different aspects of alternative modes of consumption such as sharing, gift
giving, collaborative consumption, etc. to explain the emerging phenomena.
Although several conceptualizations can be found in the literature, there is
still a gap in the academic knowledge about peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing and its
content. Products and services subject to sharing may vary from a car that is
shared for a ride by the owner with a passenger in return for an economic
benefit -so called ridesharing-, or a house that is owned by an individual and
made available for rental of other people -as in Airbnb-. As the notion of
exchange differs significantly between various business models based on access
based P2P exchanges, this creates new possibilities to redefine the concept.
This study compares access based P2P exchanges with market-mediated
access-based consumption (Bardhi and Eckhardt, 2012) and sharing (Belk, 2007),
and offers a typology based on the level of transfer of ownership and economic
nature of perceived value. Real life business models are presented based on
this typology and further research directions are suggested to better
understand the main motivations of consumers for choosing an access based P2P
model rather than conventional options available in the market.



 

Kaynakça

  • Albinsson, P. A., and Perera, B. Y. (2012). Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: Building community through sharing events. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(4), 303–315.
  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 32–39.
  • Bardhi, F., and Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.
  • Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), p.139.
  • Belk, R. (2007). Why Not Share Rather Than Own?. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), pp.126140.
  • Belk, R. W. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734.
  • Belk, R. (2013). Extended Self in a Digital World. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), pp.477-500.
  • Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), pp.15951600.
  • Botsman, R., and Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Catulli, M. (2012). What uncertainty?. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(6), pp.780-793.
  • Chen, Y. (2009). Possession and access: Consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 925– 940.
  • Euromonitor, (2016). The new consumerism: Redefining ownership, values and priorities. Passport.
  • Felson, M and Spaeth, J.L. (1978), “Community Structure and Collaborative Consumption,” American Behavioral Scientist, 21 (March–April), 614–24.
  • Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, p.201.
  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Henning, V. and Sattler, H. (2007). Consumer File Sharing of Motion Pictures. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), pp.1-18.
  • Kotler, P. (1972). A Generic Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36(2), p.46.
  • Kotler, P. and Levy, S. (1969). Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33(1), p.10.
  • Lovelock, C., and Gummesson, E. (2004). Whither services marketing?: In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 20–41.
  • Luck, D. (1969). Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Too Far. Journal of Marketing, 33(3), p.53.
  • Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), pp.193-207.
  • Ozanne, L. K., and Ballantine, P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption: An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485–498.
  • Philip, H., Ozanne, L. and Ballantine, P. (2015). Examining temporary disposition and acquisition in peer-to-peer renting. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(11-12), pp.1310-1332.
  • Plouffe, C. (2008). Examining “peer‐to‐peer” (P2P) systems as consumer‐to‐consumer (C2C) exchange. European Journal of Marketing, 42(11/12), pp.1179-1202.
  • Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago, IL: Aldine Atherton.

  • YouGov BrandIndex (2016), Marketing Week, [online] (Online). Available at: https://www.marketingweek.com/2016/12/16/airbnbstrongest-brand-advocates/ [Accessed 8 May 2017].
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 716 - 722, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.648

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Albinsson, P. A., and Perera, B. Y. (2012). Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: Building community through sharing events. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(4), 303–315.
  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 32–39.
  • Bardhi, F., and Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.
  • Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), p.139.
  • Belk, R. (2007). Why Not Share Rather Than Own?. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), pp.126140.
  • Belk, R. W. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734.
  • Belk, R. (2013). Extended Self in a Digital World. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), pp.477-500.
  • Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), pp.15951600.
  • Botsman, R., and Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Catulli, M. (2012). What uncertainty?. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(6), pp.780-793.
  • Chen, Y. (2009). Possession and access: Consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 925– 940.
  • Euromonitor, (2016). The new consumerism: Redefining ownership, values and priorities. Passport.
  • Felson, M and Spaeth, J.L. (1978), “Community Structure and Collaborative Consumption,” American Behavioral Scientist, 21 (March–April), 614–24.
  • Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, p.201.
  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Henning, V. and Sattler, H. (2007). Consumer File Sharing of Motion Pictures. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), pp.1-18.
  • Kotler, P. (1972). A Generic Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36(2), p.46.
  • Kotler, P. and Levy, S. (1969). Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33(1), p.10.
  • Lovelock, C., and Gummesson, E. (2004). Whither services marketing?: In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 20–41.
  • Luck, D. (1969). Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Too Far. Journal of Marketing, 33(3), p.53.
  • Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), pp.193-207.
  • Ozanne, L. K., and Ballantine, P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption: An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485–498.
  • Philip, H., Ozanne, L. and Ballantine, P. (2015). Examining temporary disposition and acquisition in peer-to-peer renting. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(11-12), pp.1310-1332.
  • Plouffe, C. (2008). Examining “peer‐to‐peer” (P2P) systems as consumer‐to‐consumer (C2C) exchange. European Journal of Marketing, 42(11/12), pp.1179-1202.
  • Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago, IL: Aldine Atherton.

  • YouGov BrandIndex (2016), Marketing Week, [online] (Online). Available at: https://www.marketingweek.com/2016/12/16/airbnbstrongest-brand-advocates/ [Accessed 8 May 2017].
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Can Ulker Bu kişi benim

Sebnem Burnaz

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ulker, C., & Burnaz, S. (2017). A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES. PressAcademia Procedia, 3(1), 716-722. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.648
AMA Ulker C, Burnaz S. A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES. PAP. Haziran 2017;3(1):716-722. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.648
Chicago Ulker, Can, ve Sebnem Burnaz. “A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES”. PressAcademia Procedia 3, sy. 1 (Haziran 2017): 716-22. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.648.
EndNote Ulker C, Burnaz S (01 Haziran 2017) A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES. PressAcademia Procedia 3 1 716–722.
IEEE C. Ulker ve S. Burnaz, “A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES”, PAP, c. 3, sy. 1, ss. 716–722, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.648.
ISNAD Ulker, Can - Burnaz, Sebnem. “A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES”. PressAcademia Procedia 3/1 (Haziran 2017), 716-722. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.648.
JAMA Ulker C, Burnaz S. A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES. PAP. 2017;3:716–722.
MLA Ulker, Can ve Sebnem Burnaz. “A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES”. PressAcademia Procedia, c. 3, sy. 1, 2017, ss. 716-22, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.648.
Vancouver Ulker C, Burnaz S. A TYPOLOGY FOR P2P ACCESS BASED EXCHANGES IN MARKETPLACES. PAP. 2017;3(1):716-22.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.