Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 385 - 391, 01.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450288

Öz

Flood and stream induced scour
occurring in bridge piers located on rivers is one of the mostly observed
failure reasons in bridges. Scour induced failure risk in bridges and
determination of the alterations in bridge safety under seismic effects has the
ultimate importance. Thus, for the determination of bridge safety under the
scour effects, the scour amount under bridge piers should be designated
realistically and updated with continuous monitoring. In this study, in order
to measure the amount of scour in bridge piers unmanned aerial system (UAS)
based measurement methods were implemented. UAS based measurement systems
provide new and practical approach and bring high precision and reliable
solutions considering recent measurement systems. For this purpose, the
reinforced concrete (RC) bridge that is located on Antalya Boğaçayı River,
Turkey and that failed in 2003 due to flood-induced scour was selected as the
case study. The amount of scour occurred in bridge piers was determined
realistically, and the behavior of bridge under scour effects was investigated.
In the light of the attained scour measurements and expected scour after a
probable flood event, the behavior of scour induced RC bridge was determined by
pushover analyses under seismic loadings. In the analyses, the load and
displacement capacity of bridge was observed to diminish significantly under
expected scour. Regarding the case study, UAS based and continuously updated
bridge performance evaluation system was developed that could be used for
bridges located on the riverbed.

Kaynakça

  • [1] Prendergast, L.J., Gavin, K., “A Review or Bridge Scour Monitoring Techniques” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Eng., 6: 138-149, (2014).
  • [2] Fisher, M., Chowdury, M.N., Khan, A.A., Atamtürktür, S., “An Evaluation of Scour Measurement Devices”, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 33: 55-67, (2013).
  • [3] DeFalco, F., Mele, R., “The Monitoring of Bridges for Scour by Sonar and Sedimetri”, NDT&E International, 35: 55-67, (2002).
  • [4] Burrell, J., Gurrola, H., Mickus, K., “Frequency Domain Electromanetic and Ground Penetrating Radar Investigation of Ephemeral Streams: Case Study near the Southern High Plains, Texas”, Environmental Geology, 55: 1169-1179, (2008).
  • [5] Prendergast, L.J., Hester, D., Gavin, K., O’Sullivan, J.J., “An Investigation of the Changes in Natural Frequency of a Pile Affected by Scour”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 332: 6685-6702, (2013).
  • [6] İbrahimy, M.I., Motakabber, S.M.A., “Bridge Scour Monitoring by Coupling Factor between Reader and Tag Antennas of RFID System”, International J. of Geomate, 8(16): 1328-1332, (2015).
  • [7] Tamminga, A.D., Eaton, B.C., Hugenholtz, C.H., “UAS Based Remote Sensing of Fluvial Change Following an Extreme Flood Event”, Earth Surface of Processes & Landforms, 40: 1464-1476, (2015).
  • [8] Jaud, M., “Potential for UAVs for Monitoring Mudflat Morphodynamics: Application to Seine Estuary, France”, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5: 50-55, (2016).
  • [9] Javernick, L., Brasington, J., Caruso, B., “Modeling the Topography of Shallow Braided Rivers using Structure - from - Motion Photogrammetry”, Geomorphology, 213: 166-182, (2014).
  • [10] Verhoeven, G., Doneus, M., Briese, C., Vermeulen, F., “Mapping by Matching: A Computer Vision-Based Approach to Fast and Accurate Georeferencing of Archeological Aerial Photographs”, J. of Archeological Sci., 39: 2060-2070, (2012).
  • [11] Westoby, M.J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N.F., Hambrey, M.J., Reynolds, J.M., “Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry: A Low Cost Effective Tool for Geoscience Applications”, Geomorphology, 179: 300-314, (2012).
  • [12] James, R.M., Robson, S., “Straightforward Reconstruction of 3D Surfaces and Topography with a Camera: Accuracy and Geoscience Application”, J. of Geophysical Research, 117: (2012).
  • [13] Obanawa, H., Hayakawa, Y., Saito, H., Gomez, C., “Comparisons of DSMs Derived from UAV-SfM Method and Terrestrial Laser Scanning”, Journal of the Japan Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53: 67-74, (2014).
  • [14] Fonstad, M.A., Dietrich, J.T., Courville, B.C. Jensen, J.L., Carbonneau, P.E., “Topographic Structure from Motion: A New Development in Photogrammetric Measurement”, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38: 421-430, (2013).
  • [15] Tonkin, T.N., Midgley, N.G., Graham, D.J., Labadz, J.C., “The Potential of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Structure-from-Motion for Topographic Surveys: A Test of Emerging Integrated Approaches for Cwm Idwal, North Wales”, Geomorphology, 225: 35-43, (2014).
  • [16] Turner, D., Lucieer, A., Watson, C., “An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultrahigh Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds”, Remote Sensing, 4: 1392-1410, (2012).
  • [17] Harwin, S., Lucieer, A., “Accessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Reduced via Multi-view Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery”, Remote Sensing, 4: 1573-1599, (2012).
  • [18] Lucieer, A., DeJong, S.M., Turner, D., “Mapping Landslide Displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and Image Correlation of Multi-Temporal UAV Photography”, Progress in Physical Geography, 38: 97-116, (2014).
  • [19] Quedraogo, M.M., Degre, A., Debouche, C., Lisein, J., “An Evaluation of Unmanned Aerial System based Photogrammetry and Terrestrial Laser Scanning to Generate DEMs of Agricultural Watersheds” Geomorphology, 214: 339-355, (2014).
  • [20] Clapuyt, F., “Reproducibility of UAV-based Earth Topography Reconstructions based on Structure from Motion Algorithms”, Geomorphology, 260: 4-15, (2016).
  • [21] Kaiser, A., Neugirg, F., Rock, G., Müller, C., Haas, F., Ries, J., Schmidt, J., “Small Scale Surface Reconstruction and Volume Calculation of Soil Erosion in Complex Moroccan Gully Morphology using SfM”, Remote Sensing, 6: 7050-7080, (2014).
  • [22] Flener, C., “Calibrating Deep Water Radiance in Shallow Water: Adapting Optical Bathymetry Modeling to Shallow River Environments”, Boreal Environmental Research, 18: 488-502, (2013).
  • [23] Lin, C., Bennett, C., Han, J., Parsons, R.L., “Scour Effects on the Response of Laterally Loaded Piles considering Stress History of Sand”, Computational Geotechnics, 37: 1008-1014, (2010).

Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 385 - 391, 01.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450288

Öz

Flood and stream induced scour
occurring in bridge piers located on rivers is one of the mostly observed
failure reasons in bridges. Scour induced failure risk in bridges and
determination of the alterations in bridge safety under seismic effects has the
ultimate importance. Thus, for the determination of bridge safety under the
scour effects, the scour amount under bridge piers should be designated
realistically and updated with continuous monitoring. In this study, in order
to measure the amount of scour in bridge piers unmanned aerial system (UAS)
based measurement methods were implemented. UAS based measurement systems
provide new and practical approach and bring high precision and reliable
solutions considering recent measurement systems. For this purpose, the
reinforced concrete (RC) bridge that is located on Antalya Boğaçayı River,
Turkey and that failed in 2003 due to flood-induced scour was selected as the
case study. The amount of scour occurred in bridge piers was determined
realistically, and the behavior of bridge under scour effects was investigated.
In the light of the attained scour measurements and expected scour after a
probable flood event, the behavior of scour induced RC bridge was determined by
pushover analyses under seismic loadings. In the analyses, the load and
displacement capacity of bridge was observed to diminish significantly under
expected scour. Regarding the case study, UAS based and continuously updated
bridge performance evaluation system was developed that could be used for
bridges located on the riverbed.

Kaynakça

  • [1] Prendergast, L.J., Gavin, K., “A Review or Bridge Scour Monitoring Techniques” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Eng., 6: 138-149, (2014).
  • [2] Fisher, M., Chowdury, M.N., Khan, A.A., Atamtürktür, S., “An Evaluation of Scour Measurement Devices”, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 33: 55-67, (2013).
  • [3] DeFalco, F., Mele, R., “The Monitoring of Bridges for Scour by Sonar and Sedimetri”, NDT&E International, 35: 55-67, (2002).
  • [4] Burrell, J., Gurrola, H., Mickus, K., “Frequency Domain Electromanetic and Ground Penetrating Radar Investigation of Ephemeral Streams: Case Study near the Southern High Plains, Texas”, Environmental Geology, 55: 1169-1179, (2008).
  • [5] Prendergast, L.J., Hester, D., Gavin, K., O’Sullivan, J.J., “An Investigation of the Changes in Natural Frequency of a Pile Affected by Scour”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 332: 6685-6702, (2013).
  • [6] İbrahimy, M.I., Motakabber, S.M.A., “Bridge Scour Monitoring by Coupling Factor between Reader and Tag Antennas of RFID System”, International J. of Geomate, 8(16): 1328-1332, (2015).
  • [7] Tamminga, A.D., Eaton, B.C., Hugenholtz, C.H., “UAS Based Remote Sensing of Fluvial Change Following an Extreme Flood Event”, Earth Surface of Processes & Landforms, 40: 1464-1476, (2015).
  • [8] Jaud, M., “Potential for UAVs for Monitoring Mudflat Morphodynamics: Application to Seine Estuary, France”, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5: 50-55, (2016).
  • [9] Javernick, L., Brasington, J., Caruso, B., “Modeling the Topography of Shallow Braided Rivers using Structure - from - Motion Photogrammetry”, Geomorphology, 213: 166-182, (2014).
  • [10] Verhoeven, G., Doneus, M., Briese, C., Vermeulen, F., “Mapping by Matching: A Computer Vision-Based Approach to Fast and Accurate Georeferencing of Archeological Aerial Photographs”, J. of Archeological Sci., 39: 2060-2070, (2012).
  • [11] Westoby, M.J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N.F., Hambrey, M.J., Reynolds, J.M., “Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry: A Low Cost Effective Tool for Geoscience Applications”, Geomorphology, 179: 300-314, (2012).
  • [12] James, R.M., Robson, S., “Straightforward Reconstruction of 3D Surfaces and Topography with a Camera: Accuracy and Geoscience Application”, J. of Geophysical Research, 117: (2012).
  • [13] Obanawa, H., Hayakawa, Y., Saito, H., Gomez, C., “Comparisons of DSMs Derived from UAV-SfM Method and Terrestrial Laser Scanning”, Journal of the Japan Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53: 67-74, (2014).
  • [14] Fonstad, M.A., Dietrich, J.T., Courville, B.C. Jensen, J.L., Carbonneau, P.E., “Topographic Structure from Motion: A New Development in Photogrammetric Measurement”, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38: 421-430, (2013).
  • [15] Tonkin, T.N., Midgley, N.G., Graham, D.J., Labadz, J.C., “The Potential of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Structure-from-Motion for Topographic Surveys: A Test of Emerging Integrated Approaches for Cwm Idwal, North Wales”, Geomorphology, 225: 35-43, (2014).
  • [16] Turner, D., Lucieer, A., Watson, C., “An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultrahigh Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds”, Remote Sensing, 4: 1392-1410, (2012).
  • [17] Harwin, S., Lucieer, A., “Accessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Reduced via Multi-view Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery”, Remote Sensing, 4: 1573-1599, (2012).
  • [18] Lucieer, A., DeJong, S.M., Turner, D., “Mapping Landslide Displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and Image Correlation of Multi-Temporal UAV Photography”, Progress in Physical Geography, 38: 97-116, (2014).
  • [19] Quedraogo, M.M., Degre, A., Debouche, C., Lisein, J., “An Evaluation of Unmanned Aerial System based Photogrammetry and Terrestrial Laser Scanning to Generate DEMs of Agricultural Watersheds” Geomorphology, 214: 339-355, (2014).
  • [20] Clapuyt, F., “Reproducibility of UAV-based Earth Topography Reconstructions based on Structure from Motion Algorithms”, Geomorphology, 260: 4-15, (2016).
  • [21] Kaiser, A., Neugirg, F., Rock, G., Müller, C., Haas, F., Ries, J., Schmidt, J., “Small Scale Surface Reconstruction and Volume Calculation of Soil Erosion in Complex Moroccan Gully Morphology using SfM”, Remote Sensing, 6: 7050-7080, (2014).
  • [22] Flener, C., “Calibrating Deep Water Radiance in Shallow Water: Adapting Optical Bathymetry Modeling to Shallow River Environments”, Boreal Environmental Research, 18: 488-502, (2013).
  • [23] Lin, C., Bennett, C., Han, J., Parsons, R.L., “Scour Effects on the Response of Laterally Loaded Piles considering Stress History of Sand”, Computational Geotechnics, 37: 1008-1014, (2010).
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Orkan Özcan

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 16 Ocak 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Özcan, O. (2019). Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements. Politeknik Dergisi, 22(2), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450288
AMA Özcan O. Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements. Politeknik Dergisi. Haziran 2019;22(2):385-391. doi:10.2339/politeknik.450288
Chicago Özcan, Orkan. “Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements”. Politeknik Dergisi 22, sy. 2 (Haziran 2019): 385-91. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450288.
EndNote Özcan O (01 Haziran 2019) Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements. Politeknik Dergisi 22 2 385–391.
IEEE O. Özcan, “Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements”, Politeknik Dergisi, c. 22, sy. 2, ss. 385–391, 2019, doi: 10.2339/politeknik.450288.
ISNAD Özcan, Orkan. “Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements”. Politeknik Dergisi 22/2 (Haziran 2019), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450288.
JAMA Özcan O. Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements. Politeknik Dergisi. 2019;22:385–391.
MLA Özcan, Orkan. “Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements”. Politeknik Dergisi, c. 22, sy. 2, 2019, ss. 385-91, doi:10.2339/politeknik.450288.
Vancouver Özcan O. Performance Evaluation of Bridges Under Scour by UAS Based Measurements. Politeknik Dergisi. 2019;22(2):385-91.
 
TARANDIĞIMIZ DİZİNLER (ABSTRACTING / INDEXING)
181341319013191 13189 13187 13188 18016

download Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası ile lisanslanmıştır.