Higher Education Administration, and Leadership: Current Assumptions, Responsibilities, and Considerations

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 61 - 84, 15.07.2016

Charles F. Webber

https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2016.1.3

Cited By: 6

Öz

Higher Education Administration, and Leadership: Current Assumptions, Responsibilities, and Considerations

Öz

This article profiles the evolving role of educational administrators and leaders in higher education. Four guiding assumptions for leaders are presented related to social impact, community engagement, labor market success, and institutional stability. Then, seven key administration and leadership responsibilities are described. They include planning, academic entrepreneurship, data-driven decision making, revenue generation, creating professional and academic pathways for learners, curriculum development, and business development and marketing. This is followed by a set of pragmatic considerations that higher education administrators and leaders may consider in their professional practices. The considerations provide a framework for interrogating leadership assumptions and responsibilities, a framework that can be applied to analyze additional responsibilities as they emerge in relation to the assumptions that accompany them. The considerations pose intended and unintended possibilities for leaders to use to inform decision making, maintain principled leadership practices, and to challenge unexamined beliefs and values.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Higher education, Administration, Leadership responsibilities, Change

Kaynakça

• Adamuti-Trache, M., & Schuetze, H.G. (2009). Demand for university continuing education in Canada: Who participates and why? Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 35(2), 87-108.
• Alstete, J. W. (2014). Revenue generation strategies: Leveraging higher education resources for increased income. ASHE Higher Education Report, 41(1), 1-138.
• Beaulieu, L.J. (2005). Breaking walls, building bridges: Expanding the presence and relevance of rural sociology. Rural Sociology, 70(1), 1-27.
• Black, A. (2010), Gen Y: Who they are and how they learn. Educational Horizons, 88(2), 92-101.
• Bobbitt-Zeher, D. (2007). The gender income gap in the role of education. Sociology of Education, 80, 1-22.
• Bottery, M. (2003). The leadership of learning communities in a culture of unhappiness. School Leadership and Management, 23(2), 187-207.
• Buchmann, M., & Malti, T. (2012). The future of young women’s economic role in the globalized economy: New opportunities, persisting constraints. New Directions for Youth Development, 135, 77-86.
• Cantaragu, R. (2012). Toward a conceptual delimitation of academic entrepreneurship. Management and Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 7(4), 683-700.
• Conrad, D. (2008). Revisiting the recognition of prior learning (RPL): A reflective inquiry into RPL practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 34(2), 89-110.
• Conway, J.M., & Andrews, D. (2016). A schoolwide approach to leading pedagogical enhancement: An Australian perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 115-139.
• Dennison, J.D., & Schuetze, H.G. (2004). Extending access, choice, and the reign of the market: Higher education reforms in British Columbia, 1989-2004. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 34(3), 13-38.
• Dhillon, P. (2011). The role of education in freedom from poverty as a human right.Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(3), 249-259.
• Eastman, J.A., (2006). Revenue generation and organizational change in higher education: Insights from Canada. Higher Education Management and Policy, 18(3), 55-81.
• Eubanks, D.L., Antes, A.L., Friedrich, T.L., Caughron, J.J., Blackwell, L.V., Bedell-Avers, K.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2010). Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leadership reactions and critical outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 365-388.
• Gunsalus, C.K. (2006). The college administrator’s survival guide. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
• Gunter, H.M., & Forrester, G. (2010). New labour and the logic of practice in educational reform. Critical Studies in Education, 51(1), 55-69.
• Hannum, K.M., Muhly, S.M., Shockley-Zalabak, P.S., & White, J.S. (2015). Women leaders within higher education in the United States: Supports, barriers, and experiences of being a senior leader. Advancing Women and Leadership, 35, 65-75.
• Hernandez, F., & Kose, F.W. (2012). The developmental model of intercultural sensitivity: A tool for understanding principals’ cultural competence. Education and Urban Society, 44(4), 512-530.
• Hinton, K.E. (2012). A practical guide to strategic planning in higher education. Ann Arbor MI: Society for College and University Planning. Available online: http://oira.cortland.edu/webpage/planningandassessmentresources/planningresources/SCPGuideonPlanning.pdf
• ICEF & Barton Carlyle. (2016). Beyond the horizon: The near future of International education. Available online: http://www.icef.com/en/beyondthehorizon/
• Kamenetz, A. (2010). DIY U: Edupunks, edupreneurs, and the coming transformation of higher education. White River Junction VT: Chelsea Green.
• Leiberman, A. (2005). The growth of educational change as a field of study: Understanding its roots and branches. In A. Leiberman (Ed.), The roots of educational change (pp. 1-8). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
• Leithwood, K. (2007). What we know about educational leadership. In Burger, J., Webber, C.F., & Klinck, P. (Eds), Intelligent leadership: Constructs for thinking education leaders (pp. 41-66). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
• Lester, D.L., & Parnell, J.A. (2006). The complete life cycle of a family business. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 3-22.
• Lin, W., Kopp, L., Hoffman, P., & Thurston, M. (2004). Changing risks in global equity portfolios. Financial Analysts Journal, 60(1), 87-99.
• Malachowski, A.R. (Ed.). (2010). The new pragmatism. Durham, England: Acumen.
• McLean, S. (2007). Expressing the purpose of University continuing education in Canada. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 33(2), 65-86.
• McRae, H. (2012). Reframing University continuing education’s role in community engagement. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 38(1), 1-10.
• Morris, L.V. (2016). The imperative for faculty: Understanding student success technologies and other analytics. Innovative Higher Education, 41, 1-3.
• Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 47(1), 461-524.
• Razik, T.A., & Swanson, A.D. (Eds.). (2010). Fundamental concepts of educational leadership and management. Boston MA: Pearson.
• Rowley, D.J., & Sherman, H. (2004). Academic planning: The heart and soul of the academic strategic plan. Lanham MD: University Press of America.
• Schuetze, H.G., & Bruneau, W. (2004). Less state, more market: University reform in Canada and abroad. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 34(3). 1-12.
• Scott, S., & Dixon, K.C. (Eds.). (2008). The globalized university: Trends and challenges in teaching and learning. Perth, Australia: Black Swan Press.
• Scott, S., & Webber, C.F. (2013). Entrepreneurialism for Canadian principals: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 8(1), 113-136.
• Siegel D.S. & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink. British Journal of Management, 26, 582-595.
• Twale, D.J., & De Luca, B.M. (2008). Faculty incivility: The rise of the academic bully culture and what to do about it. San Francisco CA: Jossey Bass.
• Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2004). The international role of the NCSL. Educational Management, Administration, and Leadership, 32(3), 269-287.
• Webber, C.F., & Scott, S. (2008). Entrepreneurship and educational leadership development: Canadian and Australian Perspectives. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 12(14). Available online: http://iejll.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ijll/article/view/558
• Webber, C. F. (2008). Leadership that supports positive educational change. In S. Scott & K. Dixon (Eds.), The globalised university: Trends and developments in teaching and learning (pp. 169-203). Perth, Western Australia: Black Swan Press.