Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 42 - 58, 01.04.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116544

Öz

Yaratıcı Sınıf Kuramı ekonomik gelişmenin öncüsü olarak işlerden, mesleklerden veya şirketlerden ziyade, kişileri ortaya koyan, iyi gelişmiş
insan sermayesini ekonomik büyümenin ana etkenlerinden biri olarak kabul eden modern bir anlayış üzerine kurulmuştur. Kuram, değişen
şehri ve şehir sakinlerini tanımlayarak farklı bir bakış açısı getirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, İstanbul’da yaşayan, lider, yönetici, girişimci, bilim
insanı ve sanatçılardan oluşan yaratıcı sınıfla yapılmış bir anketin verilerinden yola çıkılarak, gelişmiş işgücünün coğrafi alanda dağılımı ve
işyeri, yaşam yeri tercihlerini hangi etkenlere göre belirlediği araştırılmıştır. Sonuçlar yaratıcı sınıfın ağırlıklı olarak geniş iş imkanları
nedeniyle büyük şehirde ikamet etmeyi tercih ettiğini ve şehir içinde yerleşiminin oldukça dağınık olduğunu göstermektedir. İşyeri ve yaşam
yeri tercihleri ile ilgili olarak elde edilen bulgular kültürel çeşitlilik, sosyal olanaklar, konfor alanlarının varlığı gibi yumuşak etkenlerin tercih
yapmada rolünü ortaya koymakta ve Yaratıcı Sınıf Kuramını doğrulamaktadır. Ayrıca, sonuçlar çeşitli altgruplarda farklı etkenlerin etkili
olduğunu göstermektedir. Elde edilen bulguların şehir ve işgücü planlaması ile ilgili olarak gerek politik alanda gerek iş alanında yapılacak
uygulamalara yön vermesi hedeflenmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Agnew, J., Soja, E., Storper, M. (2001), Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, Oxford University Press.
  • Andersen, K.A., Lorenzen, M. (2012), Different Creative Cities: Exploring Danish Data To Adapt The Creative Class Argument To Small Welfare Economies, Creative Industries Journal, 4(2), p.123-136.
  • Bontje, M., Musterd, S.(2009), Creative Industries, Creative Class And Competitiveness: Expert Opinions Critically Appraised, Geoforum, 40, p. 843–852.
  • Brown, J., Męczyński, M. (2009), ‘Complexcities’: Locational Choices of Creative Knowledge Workers, Built Environment , p.238-252.
  • Davidson, M., Wyly, E. (2012), Classifying London, City: Analysis Of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 16(4), p. 395-421.
  • Gilli, F. (2009), Sprawl or Reagglomeration? The Dynamics of Employment Deconcentration and Industrial Transformation in Greater Paris , Urban Studies, 46(7),p. 1385- 1400.
  • Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  • Florida,R., Mellander, C., Stolarick, K. (2010), Talent, Technology and Tolerance in Canadian Regional Development, The Canadian Geographer, 54(3), p. 277-304.
  • Florida,R., Mellander C., Stolarick, K. (2008), Inside the Black Box of Regional Development, Human Capital , the creative class and tolerance', Journal of Economic Geography, 8,p.615-649.
  • Güran, M.C. , Seçilmiş, İ.E. (2013), Ankara Kültür Ekonomisi: Sektörel Büyüklüklerin Değerlendirilmesi, Kültür Mirası ve Kültür Ekonomisi Envanteri Projesi, http://www.envanter.gov.tr/files/kultur-ekonomisi/ake.pdf (16.02.2016)
  • Halbert, L. (2004), The Decentralization of Intrametropolitan Business Services In The Paris Region: Patterns, Interpretation, Consequences, Economic Geography, 80(4), p. 381-404.
  • Hansen, H.K., Niedomsyl, T. (2009), Migration of The Creative Class: Evidence From Sweden, Journal of Economic Geography,9, p. 191-206.
  • Hansen, H.K.(2014), Florida's Creative Class In A Swedish Context, C.Mellander, R.Florida, B.T. Asheim, M.Gertler (der.), The Creative Class Goes Global içinde, p.87-102.
  • Jacobs,J. (1961), The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Random House.
  • Lazzeretti, L., Capone F., Seçilmiş İ.E.(2014), Türkiye'de Yaratıcı ve Kültürel Sektörlerin Altyapısı, Maliye Dergisi , 166, p.195-216.
  • Lorenzen, M., Andersen, V. K. (2009), Centrality and Creativity: Does Richard Florida’s Creative Class Offer New Insights into Urban Hierarchy?, 85(4), p.363-390.
  • Marlet, G., van Woerkens, C.V. (2014), Tolerance, Aesthetics, Amenities Or Jobs? The Attraction of The Dutch City To The Creative Class, C.Mellander, R.Florida, B.T. Asheim, M.Gertler (der.), The Creative Class Goes Global içinde, p.138-163.
  • Murphy, E., Redmond, D. (2009), The Role Of ‘Hard’ And ‘Soft’ Factors For Accommodating Creative Knowledge: Insights From Dublin's ‘Creative Class, Irish Geography, 42(1),p.69-84.
  • Petrov, A.N. (2007), A Look beyond Metropolis: Exploring Creative Class in the Canadian Periphery ,Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 3,p. 451-474.
  • Reese, L.A., Faist, J.M., Sands G.(2010), Measuring The Creative Class: Do We Know It When We See It?, Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(3), p. 345–366.
  • Rich, M.A. (2012), From Coal To Cool: The Creative Class, Social Capital, and The Revitalization of Scranton, Journal Of Urban Affairs, 35(3) ,p. 365–384.
  • Scott, A.J.(2006), Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions, Journal of Urban Affairs, 28,p.1-17.
  • Seçilmiş, E. (2015), Türkiye’de Yaratıcı Endüstrilerin Kümelenmesi, Ege Akademik Bakış, 15(1), p.9-18.
  • Türksever, A.N., Atalık, G.(2001), Possibilities And Limitations For The Measurement of The Quality of Life In Urban Areas, Social Indicators Research, 53,p. 163-87.
  • Ülengin, B., Ülengin, F., Güvenç, Ü. (2001), A Multidimensional Approach To Urban Quality Life: The Case of İstanbul, European Journal of Operational Research, 130,p.361-374.
  • Van Aalst, I., Atzema, O., Boschma, R., Van Oort, F. (2014), The Creative Class, Related Variety and Economic Growth in Dutch City-regions, C.Mellander, R.Florida, B.T. Asheim, M.Gertler (der.), The Creative Class Goes Global içinde,p. 164-182.

LIFE AND WORK PLACE CHOICES OF THE CREATIVE CLASS IN CITIES: THE CASE OF ISTANBUL

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 42 - 58, 01.04.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116544

Öz

The Creative Class Theory is founded on the idea of human capital being the main factor of growth in the economy, rather than jobs, occupations or firms. The theory brings a new understanding to the changing city and its residents. This study determines the living and working place factors of choice of the creative class and how the high skilled workforce is spread on the geographical place. The data is obtained from a survey conducted with leaders, managers, entrepreneurs, scientists, artists who live and work in İstanbul. The results suggest that new job opportunities that the big city offers are main factors for settlement and the creative class is widely spread within the city. Findings on the factors of choice reveal that, soft factors such as, cultural diversity, social opportunities, availability of comfort zones play a role which support the Creative Class Theory. Findings also show that different factors are effective for various sub categories. The findings are expected to help in developing political and managerial implementations in city and workforce planning.

Kaynakça

  • Agnew, J., Soja, E., Storper, M. (2001), Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, Oxford University Press.
  • Andersen, K.A., Lorenzen, M. (2012), Different Creative Cities: Exploring Danish Data To Adapt The Creative Class Argument To Small Welfare Economies, Creative Industries Journal, 4(2), p.123-136.
  • Bontje, M., Musterd, S.(2009), Creative Industries, Creative Class And Competitiveness: Expert Opinions Critically Appraised, Geoforum, 40, p. 843–852.
  • Brown, J., Męczyński, M. (2009), ‘Complexcities’: Locational Choices of Creative Knowledge Workers, Built Environment , p.238-252.
  • Davidson, M., Wyly, E. (2012), Classifying London, City: Analysis Of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 16(4), p. 395-421.
  • Gilli, F. (2009), Sprawl or Reagglomeration? The Dynamics of Employment Deconcentration and Industrial Transformation in Greater Paris , Urban Studies, 46(7),p. 1385- 1400.
  • Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  • Florida,R., Mellander, C., Stolarick, K. (2010), Talent, Technology and Tolerance in Canadian Regional Development, The Canadian Geographer, 54(3), p. 277-304.
  • Florida,R., Mellander C., Stolarick, K. (2008), Inside the Black Box of Regional Development, Human Capital , the creative class and tolerance', Journal of Economic Geography, 8,p.615-649.
  • Güran, M.C. , Seçilmiş, İ.E. (2013), Ankara Kültür Ekonomisi: Sektörel Büyüklüklerin Değerlendirilmesi, Kültür Mirası ve Kültür Ekonomisi Envanteri Projesi, http://www.envanter.gov.tr/files/kultur-ekonomisi/ake.pdf (16.02.2016)
  • Halbert, L. (2004), The Decentralization of Intrametropolitan Business Services In The Paris Region: Patterns, Interpretation, Consequences, Economic Geography, 80(4), p. 381-404.
  • Hansen, H.K., Niedomsyl, T. (2009), Migration of The Creative Class: Evidence From Sweden, Journal of Economic Geography,9, p. 191-206.
  • Hansen, H.K.(2014), Florida's Creative Class In A Swedish Context, C.Mellander, R.Florida, B.T. Asheim, M.Gertler (der.), The Creative Class Goes Global içinde, p.87-102.
  • Jacobs,J. (1961), The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Random House.
  • Lazzeretti, L., Capone F., Seçilmiş İ.E.(2014), Türkiye'de Yaratıcı ve Kültürel Sektörlerin Altyapısı, Maliye Dergisi , 166, p.195-216.
  • Lorenzen, M., Andersen, V. K. (2009), Centrality and Creativity: Does Richard Florida’s Creative Class Offer New Insights into Urban Hierarchy?, 85(4), p.363-390.
  • Marlet, G., van Woerkens, C.V. (2014), Tolerance, Aesthetics, Amenities Or Jobs? The Attraction of The Dutch City To The Creative Class, C.Mellander, R.Florida, B.T. Asheim, M.Gertler (der.), The Creative Class Goes Global içinde, p.138-163.
  • Murphy, E., Redmond, D. (2009), The Role Of ‘Hard’ And ‘Soft’ Factors For Accommodating Creative Knowledge: Insights From Dublin's ‘Creative Class, Irish Geography, 42(1),p.69-84.
  • Petrov, A.N. (2007), A Look beyond Metropolis: Exploring Creative Class in the Canadian Periphery ,Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 3,p. 451-474.
  • Reese, L.A., Faist, J.M., Sands G.(2010), Measuring The Creative Class: Do We Know It When We See It?, Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(3), p. 345–366.
  • Rich, M.A. (2012), From Coal To Cool: The Creative Class, Social Capital, and The Revitalization of Scranton, Journal Of Urban Affairs, 35(3) ,p. 365–384.
  • Scott, A.J.(2006), Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions, Journal of Urban Affairs, 28,p.1-17.
  • Seçilmiş, E. (2015), Türkiye’de Yaratıcı Endüstrilerin Kümelenmesi, Ege Akademik Bakış, 15(1), p.9-18.
  • Türksever, A.N., Atalık, G.(2001), Possibilities And Limitations For The Measurement of The Quality of Life In Urban Areas, Social Indicators Research, 53,p. 163-87.
  • Ülengin, B., Ülengin, F., Güvenç, Ü. (2001), A Multidimensional Approach To Urban Quality Life: The Case of İstanbul, European Journal of Operational Research, 130,p.361-374.
  • Van Aalst, I., Atzema, O., Boschma, R., Van Oort, F. (2014), The Creative Class, Related Variety and Economic Growth in Dutch City-regions, C.Mellander, R.Florida, B.T. Asheim, M.Gertler (der.), The Creative Class Goes Global içinde,p. 164-182.
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Pinar Falcioglu Bu kişi benim

Ali Kurtoglu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Falcioglu, P., & Kurtoglu, A. (2016). YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ. Research Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116544
AMA Falcioglu P, Kurtoglu A. YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ. RJBM. Nisan 2016;3(1):42-58. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116544
Chicago Falcioglu, Pinar, ve Ali Kurtoglu. “YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ”. Research Journal of Business and Management 3, sy. 1 (Nisan 2016): 42-58. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116544.
EndNote Falcioglu P, Kurtoglu A (01 Nisan 2016) YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ. Research Journal of Business and Management 3 1 42–58.
IEEE P. Falcioglu ve A. Kurtoglu, “YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ”, RJBM, c. 3, sy. 1, ss. 42–58, 2016, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116544.
ISNAD Falcioglu, Pinar - Kurtoglu, Ali. “YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ”. Research Journal of Business and Management 3/1 (Nisan 2016), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116544.
JAMA Falcioglu P, Kurtoglu A. YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ. RJBM. 2016;3:42–58.
MLA Falcioglu, Pinar ve Ali Kurtoglu. “YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ”. Research Journal of Business and Management, c. 3, sy. 1, 2016, ss. 42-58, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116544.
Vancouver Falcioglu P, Kurtoglu A. YARATICI SINIFIN ŞEHİRLERDE YAŞAM VE İŞ YERİ TERCİHLERİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ. RJBM. 2016;3(1):42-58.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.