Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 107 - 119, 01.04.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116567

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Accreditation Documents of Master of Management Program. (2012). Faculty of Economics and Business. University of Bengkulu.
  • Ajzen, I & Fishbein, M. (1985). From Intention to Action: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds). Action-control: from cognition to behavior (pp-11-39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. Vol. 50,179-211.
  • Aponte, G, L. (2011). A Grounded Theory to Studying Strategic Planning in Higher Education: A Qualitative Research Methodology Utilizing the Literature Review and Interview. Disseration of the University of Toledo, Ohio, The United States America.
  • Bruce, D, G. (2010). Exploring the Value of MBA Degrees: Student’s Experiences in Full Time, Part-Time, and Executive MBA Programs. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 85 (1), 38-44.
  • Cooper, D. R., & Schindler S. P. (2011). Business Research Methods, 11th ed. New York: Mac Graw Hill/Irwin.
  • Cornuel, E, T, H. (2011). Business School Futures; Evaluation and Perspectives. Journal of Management Development. Vol. 30 (5), 444-450.
  • Dillon, M., McCaskey, P., & Blazer, E. (2011). MBA Interenship: More Important Than Ever. Journal of Education For Business. Vol. 86 (1), 44-49.
  • Dharmmesta, B S. (2002). Trying to Act: an empirical study of investigating higher education consumers. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. Vol. 4. (1), 45-66.
  • Engel, James F., Black, Roger D., Dan Miniard., Paul W. (1994). Consumer Behavior, 6th ed. The Drydeen Press. Chicago.
  • Fisher, M, D., Kiang, M., & Fisher, A, S. (2007). A Value-Added Approach to Selecting the Best Master of Business Administration Program. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 83 (2), 72-76.
  • Gupta, B, P., Saunders, M, P., & Smith, J. (2007). Traditional Master of Business Administration (MBA) Versus the MBA With Specialization: A Disconnection Between What Business Schools Offer and What Employers Seek. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 82 (6), 307-312.
  • Hall, S. (2007). Geographies of Business Education: MBA Programmes, Reflextive Business Schools and the Cultural Circuit of Capital. Transaction of the Institute of British Geogrraphers. Vol. 33 (1), 27-41.
  • Homburg, C., & Furst, A. (2005). How Organizational Complaint Handling Drives Customers Loyalty: An Analysis of the Mechanistic and the Organic Approach. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 69 (3), 95-114.
  • Ingram, L, K., Cope, G, J., Harju, L, B., Wuensch, L, K. (2000). Applying to Graduate School: A Test of The Theory Planned Behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. Vol 15 (2), 215-225.
  • Kass, D., & Grandzol, C. (2012). Evaluating the Value-Added Impact of Outdoor Management Training for Leadership Development in an MBA Program. Journal of Experiental Education. Vol 35 (3), 429-446.
  • Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management, 11 th ed. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, Inc, New York.
  • Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2000). Organizational Behavior, Fifth Edition, Irwin McGraw Hill.
  • Kuipers, L, J. (2011). PhD and EdD Degrees for Mid-Career Professionals: Fielding Graduate University. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. Vol. 2011 (129), 63-73.
  • Latham, P, G., & Brown, C, T. (2006). The Effect of Learning vs Outcome Goals on Self Efficacy, Satisfaction and Performance in an MBA Proogram. Applied Psychology: An International Review. Vol. 55 (4), 606 623.
  • Lawrence, J, J., & McCollough, A, M. (2001). A Conceptual Framework for Guaranteeing Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education. Vol 9 (3),139-152.
  • Lee, H, S., Lee, J., Liu, X., Bonk, J, C., Magjuka, J, R. (2009). A Review of Case-Based Learning Practices in An Online MBA Program: A Program-Level Case Study. Educational Technology & Society. Vol. 12 (3), 178-190.
  • Li, S., & Seale, C. (2007). Managing Critism in Ph.D. Supervision: A Qualitative Case Study. Study in Higher Education. Vol. 32 (4), 511-526.
  • Linden, J., Ohlin, M., & Brodin, M, E. (2013). Mentorships, Supervisio, and Learning Experience in PhD Education. Studies in Higher Education. Vol 38 (5), 639-662.
  • Lussier, R.N. (1997). Management: Concepts, Application and Skills Development. USA: International Thomson Publishing.
  • Madzar, S., & Citron, P. Differences in the Roles of Core Academic and Executive Faculty in MBA Programs: Time to Explore Assumptions. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 84 (3), 183-188.
  • Maslow, A, H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Phychological Review. Vol 50 (4), 370-396.
  • Neuman, R. (2005). Doctoral Differences: Professional Doctorate and PhDs Compared. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. Vol. 27 (2),173-188.
  • Ritz , J., & Martin, G. (2013). Perception of New Doctoral Graduates on the Future of the Profession. Journal of Technology Studies. Vol 39 (2), 65-78.
  • Robbins, Stephen P, & Judge, Timothy A. (2007). Organizational Behavior. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Sharabi, M. (2013). Managing and Improving Service Quality in Higher Education. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. Vol. 5 (3), 309-320.
  • Sihombing, S, O.(2003). Perluasan Theory of Planned Behavior: Aplikasi Pada Niat dan Perilaku memilih satu merek. Empirika, Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ekonomi Fakultas Ekonomi UMS, Surakarta.
  • Spencer, B, A. (1994). Models of Organization and Total Quality Management: A Comparison and Critical Evaluation. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 19. (3), 446-471.
  • Stahl, M, J., & Herrell, A, M. (1981). Modelling Effort Decision With Behavioral Decision Theory: Toward an Individual Differences Model of Expectancy Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Perfirmance. Vol. 27 (3), 303-325.
  • Thurau, H, T., Langer, M., & Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and Managing Student Loyalty. Journal of Service Research. Vol. 3 (4), 331-344.
  • Urchick, A, S. (2004). Perceived Service Satisfaction and Its Impact on Adults’ Persistence in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study of Female Adults Students From A Small Public niversity. Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University of Pensylvania, 1-223.
  • Wood, B., & Gordon, S. (2009). Linking MBA Learning and Leadership Coaching. International Coaching Psychological Society. Vol 4. (1), 87- 104.
  • Yeaple, N. R. (2010). Measuring the Economic Value of Pre-MBA Work Experience. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 85 (1), 13-20.
  • Yeo, K, R. (2008). Servicing Service Quality in Higher Education: Quest for Excellence. On the Horizon. Vol 16 (3), 152-161.

THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 107 - 119, 01.04.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116567

Öz

This research is officially intended to investigate the dynamic alteration relating to the knowledge of management fields, particularly in responding the unpredictable changes of either internal or external environments. Besides, we employ the quantitative and qualitative approaches in discovering the triggering factors cause the non-management students conducting their study in the graduate, and post graduate school of management. We use 80 respondents comprise of 30 students who study in Doctoral program and 50 students from Master program. This sample is meticulously selected by implementing judgement sampling method and involving students who have nonlinear background referring to management studies. Hereby, we note that there are various types of reasons from the respondents to commence their study in management program (Master and Doctoral). These all factors are regarding to students’ decisions, process, tuition fee, social economics background, motivation, facilities, references, reputations, and the products offered by the service provider. We inferred that the main factor which makes the management program become more interesting and remarkably growth than the other fields of study, is relating to its ability in responding the significant changes of internal or external needs of users. Also, the social science knowledge obviously performs the dynamics alteration in various perspectives, especially in terms of human resource management, operational and production, marketing, finance, information system, and service sector. Therefore, management program seems to be more interesting and shows promising progress with respect to the origin of social science.
Keywords: Management, decisions, quality, process, motivation, reputation.
JEL Classification: M10

Kaynakça

  • Accreditation Documents of Master of Management Program. (2012). Faculty of Economics and Business. University of Bengkulu.
  • Ajzen, I & Fishbein, M. (1985). From Intention to Action: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds). Action-control: from cognition to behavior (pp-11-39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. Vol. 50,179-211.
  • Aponte, G, L. (2011). A Grounded Theory to Studying Strategic Planning in Higher Education: A Qualitative Research Methodology Utilizing the Literature Review and Interview. Disseration of the University of Toledo, Ohio, The United States America.
  • Bruce, D, G. (2010). Exploring the Value of MBA Degrees: Student’s Experiences in Full Time, Part-Time, and Executive MBA Programs. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 85 (1), 38-44.
  • Cooper, D. R., & Schindler S. P. (2011). Business Research Methods, 11th ed. New York: Mac Graw Hill/Irwin.
  • Cornuel, E, T, H. (2011). Business School Futures; Evaluation and Perspectives. Journal of Management Development. Vol. 30 (5), 444-450.
  • Dillon, M., McCaskey, P., & Blazer, E. (2011). MBA Interenship: More Important Than Ever. Journal of Education For Business. Vol. 86 (1), 44-49.
  • Dharmmesta, B S. (2002). Trying to Act: an empirical study of investigating higher education consumers. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. Vol. 4. (1), 45-66.
  • Engel, James F., Black, Roger D., Dan Miniard., Paul W. (1994). Consumer Behavior, 6th ed. The Drydeen Press. Chicago.
  • Fisher, M, D., Kiang, M., & Fisher, A, S. (2007). A Value-Added Approach to Selecting the Best Master of Business Administration Program. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 83 (2), 72-76.
  • Gupta, B, P., Saunders, M, P., & Smith, J. (2007). Traditional Master of Business Administration (MBA) Versus the MBA With Specialization: A Disconnection Between What Business Schools Offer and What Employers Seek. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 82 (6), 307-312.
  • Hall, S. (2007). Geographies of Business Education: MBA Programmes, Reflextive Business Schools and the Cultural Circuit of Capital. Transaction of the Institute of British Geogrraphers. Vol. 33 (1), 27-41.
  • Homburg, C., & Furst, A. (2005). How Organizational Complaint Handling Drives Customers Loyalty: An Analysis of the Mechanistic and the Organic Approach. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 69 (3), 95-114.
  • Ingram, L, K., Cope, G, J., Harju, L, B., Wuensch, L, K. (2000). Applying to Graduate School: A Test of The Theory Planned Behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. Vol 15 (2), 215-225.
  • Kass, D., & Grandzol, C. (2012). Evaluating the Value-Added Impact of Outdoor Management Training for Leadership Development in an MBA Program. Journal of Experiental Education. Vol 35 (3), 429-446.
  • Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management, 11 th ed. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, Inc, New York.
  • Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2000). Organizational Behavior, Fifth Edition, Irwin McGraw Hill.
  • Kuipers, L, J. (2011). PhD and EdD Degrees for Mid-Career Professionals: Fielding Graduate University. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. Vol. 2011 (129), 63-73.
  • Latham, P, G., & Brown, C, T. (2006). The Effect of Learning vs Outcome Goals on Self Efficacy, Satisfaction and Performance in an MBA Proogram. Applied Psychology: An International Review. Vol. 55 (4), 606 623.
  • Lawrence, J, J., & McCollough, A, M. (2001). A Conceptual Framework for Guaranteeing Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education. Vol 9 (3),139-152.
  • Lee, H, S., Lee, J., Liu, X., Bonk, J, C., Magjuka, J, R. (2009). A Review of Case-Based Learning Practices in An Online MBA Program: A Program-Level Case Study. Educational Technology & Society. Vol. 12 (3), 178-190.
  • Li, S., & Seale, C. (2007). Managing Critism in Ph.D. Supervision: A Qualitative Case Study. Study in Higher Education. Vol. 32 (4), 511-526.
  • Linden, J., Ohlin, M., & Brodin, M, E. (2013). Mentorships, Supervisio, and Learning Experience in PhD Education. Studies in Higher Education. Vol 38 (5), 639-662.
  • Lussier, R.N. (1997). Management: Concepts, Application and Skills Development. USA: International Thomson Publishing.
  • Madzar, S., & Citron, P. Differences in the Roles of Core Academic and Executive Faculty in MBA Programs: Time to Explore Assumptions. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 84 (3), 183-188.
  • Maslow, A, H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Phychological Review. Vol 50 (4), 370-396.
  • Neuman, R. (2005). Doctoral Differences: Professional Doctorate and PhDs Compared. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. Vol. 27 (2),173-188.
  • Ritz , J., & Martin, G. (2013). Perception of New Doctoral Graduates on the Future of the Profession. Journal of Technology Studies. Vol 39 (2), 65-78.
  • Robbins, Stephen P, & Judge, Timothy A. (2007). Organizational Behavior. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Sharabi, M. (2013). Managing and Improving Service Quality in Higher Education. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. Vol. 5 (3), 309-320.
  • Sihombing, S, O.(2003). Perluasan Theory of Planned Behavior: Aplikasi Pada Niat dan Perilaku memilih satu merek. Empirika, Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ekonomi Fakultas Ekonomi UMS, Surakarta.
  • Spencer, B, A. (1994). Models of Organization and Total Quality Management: A Comparison and Critical Evaluation. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 19. (3), 446-471.
  • Stahl, M, J., & Herrell, A, M. (1981). Modelling Effort Decision With Behavioral Decision Theory: Toward an Individual Differences Model of Expectancy Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Perfirmance. Vol. 27 (3), 303-325.
  • Thurau, H, T., Langer, M., & Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and Managing Student Loyalty. Journal of Service Research. Vol. 3 (4), 331-344.
  • Urchick, A, S. (2004). Perceived Service Satisfaction and Its Impact on Adults’ Persistence in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study of Female Adults Students From A Small Public niversity. Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University of Pensylvania, 1-223.
  • Wood, B., & Gordon, S. (2009). Linking MBA Learning and Leadership Coaching. International Coaching Psychological Society. Vol 4. (1), 87- 104.
  • Yeaple, N. R. (2010). Measuring the Economic Value of Pre-MBA Work Experience. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 85 (1), 13-20.
  • Yeo, K, R. (2008). Servicing Service Quality in Higher Education: Quest for Excellence. On the Horizon. Vol 16 (3), 152-161.
Toplam 39 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Kamaludin Kamaludin Bu kişi benim

Berto Usman Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Kamaludin, K., & Usman, B. (2016). THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT. Research Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116567
AMA Kamaludin K, Usman B. THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT. RJBM. Nisan 2016;3(1):107-119. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116567
Chicago Kamaludin, Kamaludin, ve Berto Usman. “THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT”. Research Journal of Business and Management 3, sy. 1 (Nisan 2016): 107-19. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116567.
EndNote Kamaludin K, Usman B (01 Nisan 2016) THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT. Research Journal of Business and Management 3 1 107–119.
IEEE K. Kamaludin ve B. Usman, “THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT”, RJBM, c. 3, sy. 1, ss. 107–119, 2016, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116567.
ISNAD Kamaludin, Kamaludin - Usman, Berto. “THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT”. Research Journal of Business and Management 3/1 (Nisan 2016), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116567.
JAMA Kamaludin K, Usman B. THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT. RJBM. 2016;3:107–119.
MLA Kamaludin, Kamaludin ve Berto Usman. “THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT”. Research Journal of Business and Management, c. 3, sy. 1, 2016, ss. 107-19, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116567.
Vancouver Kamaludin K, Usman B. THE DYNAMICS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING POST-GRADUATE STUDY IN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT. RJBM. 2016;3(1):107-19.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.