Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 372 - 383, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.714

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Braun, E. (2008). City marketing: Towards an integrated approach. PhD dissertation, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM).
  • Braun, E.; Kavaratzis, M; Zenker, S. (2010). My city – My brand: The role of residents in place branding. 50th European Regional Science Association Congress proceedings, Jönköping, Sweden, 19th – 23rd August.
  • Carrillo, F.J. (2004). Capital cities: A taxonomy of capital accounts for knowledge cities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), 28-46.
  • DeHoog, R.H.; Lowery, D.; Lyons, W.E. (1990). Citizen satisfaction with local government services: A test of individual, jurisdictional, and city specific explanations. Journal of Politics, 52, 807-837.
  • Dinnie, K. (2010). City branding: Theory and cases. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Evans, G. (2002). Living in a World Heritage City: stakeholders in the dialectic of the universal and particular. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 8(2), 117-135.
  • Embacher, J. and Buttle, F. (1989). A Repertory grid analysis of Austria’s image as a summer vacation destination. Journal of Travel Research, 27(3), 3-7.
  • Gallarza, M.G.; Saura, I.G. and Garcia, H.C. (2002). Destination image: Towards a conceptual framework. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1). 56-78.
  • Gustavson, E. and Elander, I. (2012). Cocky and climate smart? Climate change mitigation and place-branding in three Swedish towns. Local Environment, 17(8), 769-782.
  • Hall, C.M. (2008). Santa Claus, place branding and competition. Fennia, 186(1), 59-67.
  • Hankinson, G. (2004). The brand images of tourism destinations: a study of the saliency of organic images. Journal of Product&Brand Management, 13(1), 6-14.
  • Hankinson, (2001). Location branding: A study of the branding practices of 12 English cities. Brand Management, 9(2), 127-142.
  • Huang, C.; Oh, K.; Zhang, Q.; Choi, Y.J. (2013). Understanding the city brand in the regional tourism market among college students. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(7), 662-671.
  • Insch, A. and Florek, M. (2008). A great place to live, work and play: Conceptualising place satisfaction in the case of a city's residents. Journal of place management and Development, 1(2), 138-149.
  • Insch, A. (2010). Managing residents’ satisfaction with city life: Application of Importance – Satisfaction analysis. Journal of Town&City Management, 1(2), 164-174.
  • Jones, R. (2005). Finding sources of brand value: developing a stakeholder model of brand equity. Journal of Brand Management, 13(1), 1032.
  • Kazancoglu, İ. and Dirsehan, T. (2014). Exploring brand experience dimensions for cities and investigating their effects on loyalty to a city. Business and Economics Research Journal, 5(1), 17-37.
  • Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, January, 1-22.
  • Laaksonen, P; Laaksonen, M.; Borisov, P.; Halkoaho, J. (2006). Measuring image of a city: A qualitative approach with case example. Place branding, 2(3), 210-219.
  • Leisen, B. (2001). Image segmentation: the case of a tourism destination. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(1), 49-66.
  • Lim, Y. and Weaver, P.A. (2014). Customer-based brand equity for a destination: The effect of destination image on preference for products associated with a destination brand. International Journal of Tourism Research. 16(3), 223-231.
  • Merrilees, B.; Miller, D.; Herington, C. (2009). Antecedents of residents' city brand attitudes. Journal of Business Research, 62, 362-367.
  • Merrilees, B.; Miller, D.; Herington, C. (2012). Multiple stakeholders and multiple city brand meanings. European Journal of Marketing. 46(7/8), 1032-1047.
  • Morsing, M. and Kristensen, J. (2001). The question of coherency of corporate branding-over time and across stakeholders, Journal of Communication Management, 6(1), 24-40.
  • Polonsky, M.J. and Scott, D. (2005). An empirical examination of the stakeholder strategy matrix. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 1199-1215.
  • Ruzzier, M.K. and Petek, N. (2012). The importance of diverse stakeholders in place branding: The case of “I feel Slovenia”. Anatolia-an International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 23(1), 49-60.
  • Santos, L.D.; Martins, I.; Brito, P. (2007). Measuring Subjective Quality of Life: A Survey to Porto’s Residents. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2, 51-64.
  • Saraniemi, S. and Ahonen, M. (2008). Destination branding from corporate branding perspective. Proceedings of the Conference on Corporate Communication, June 6th-9th, England: Wroxton, 435-448.
  • Sevin, H.E. (2014). Understanding cities through city brands: City branding as a social and semantic network. Cities, 38, 47-56.
  • Sim, L.L.; Ong, S.E.; Agarwal, A.; Parsa, A.; Keivani, R. (2003). Singapore’s competitiveness as a global city: development strategy, institutions and business environment. Cities, 20(2), 115-127.
  • Swindell, D. and Kelly, J. (2005). Performance measurement versus city service satisfaction: Intra-city variations in quality? Social Science Quarterly, 86(3), 704-723.
  • TÜİK haber bülteni, (2014a). Sayı 16015, Retrieved Nov. 28, 2014 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=16015.
  • TÜİK haber bülteni (2014b). Sayı 15975, Retrieved Nov. 28, 2014 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/HbPrint.do?id=15975.
  • TÜİK haber bülteni (2014c). Sayı 16198, Retrieved Nov. 28, 2014 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=16198.
  • Van Ryzin, G.G., Muzzio, D., Gulick, L., Martinez, E. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: An application of the American customer satisfaction index model to New York city. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331-341.
  • Vela S.E.; Fernandez-Cavia, J.; Nogue, J.; Jimenez-Morales, M. (2013). Characteristics and functions for place brands based on a Delphi method. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, # 068, 656-675.
  • World Bank national accounts data, (2014). Retrieved Nov. 29, 2014 from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD.
  • Zenker, S. (2011). How to catch a city? The concept and measurement of place brands. Journal of Place Management and Development, 4(1), 40–52.
  • Zenker, S. and Beckmann, S. C. (2013). My place is not your place –different place brand knowledge by different target groups. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(1), 6-17.
  • Zenker, S.; Knubben, E.; Beckmann, S.C. (2010). Your City, My City, Their City, Our City – Different Perceptions of a Place Brand by Diverse Target Groups. Proceedings, 6th International Conference Thought Leaders in Brand Management, Lugano - Switzerland, April 18-20.
  • Zenker, S.; Petersen S.; Aholt, A. (2013). The Citizen Satisfaction Index (CSI): Evidence for a four basic factor model in a German sample. Cities, 31, 156-164.
  • Zenker, S. and Rutter, N. (2014). Is satisfaction the key? The role of citizen satisfaction, place attachment and place brand attitude on positive citizenship behavior. Cities, 38, 11-17.

THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 372 - 383, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.714

Öz

Purpose- This paper
investigates the perceptions of different target groups such as residents,
tourists, and students about a city brand by using five city brand attributes
such as urbanity&cultural activities, infrastructure,
nature&environment, economic conditions, and job opportunities&business
networks.

Methodology- A
quantitative survey was conducted in order to test hypotheses and linear
multiple regression was used to assess the predictive power of city brand
attributes.

Findings-
Urbanity&cultural activities and nature&environment affect the city
brand attitude as a living place for the samples of residents, students, and
tourists. Urbanity&cultural activities, infrastructure,
nature&environment, and economic conditions make significant contributions
to the attitudes as a studying place. City brand attitude as a visiting place
has been affected from urbanity&cultural activities,
nature&environment, and infrastructure. Economic conditions are the most
crucial element providing that the residents and tourists consider any city as
a liveable city, while job opportunities&business network is the most
important factor for students.







Conclusion-
Stakeholders' perceptions about a city vary according to their purpose of
existing in the city. This study makes theoretical contributions to the city
branding literature with covering views of residents, tourists and students for
a specific brand meaning as a living place, studying place, or visiting place. 

Kaynakça

  • Braun, E. (2008). City marketing: Towards an integrated approach. PhD dissertation, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM).
  • Braun, E.; Kavaratzis, M; Zenker, S. (2010). My city – My brand: The role of residents in place branding. 50th European Regional Science Association Congress proceedings, Jönköping, Sweden, 19th – 23rd August.
  • Carrillo, F.J. (2004). Capital cities: A taxonomy of capital accounts for knowledge cities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), 28-46.
  • DeHoog, R.H.; Lowery, D.; Lyons, W.E. (1990). Citizen satisfaction with local government services: A test of individual, jurisdictional, and city specific explanations. Journal of Politics, 52, 807-837.
  • Dinnie, K. (2010). City branding: Theory and cases. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Evans, G. (2002). Living in a World Heritage City: stakeholders in the dialectic of the universal and particular. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 8(2), 117-135.
  • Embacher, J. and Buttle, F. (1989). A Repertory grid analysis of Austria’s image as a summer vacation destination. Journal of Travel Research, 27(3), 3-7.
  • Gallarza, M.G.; Saura, I.G. and Garcia, H.C. (2002). Destination image: Towards a conceptual framework. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1). 56-78.
  • Gustavson, E. and Elander, I. (2012). Cocky and climate smart? Climate change mitigation and place-branding in three Swedish towns. Local Environment, 17(8), 769-782.
  • Hall, C.M. (2008). Santa Claus, place branding and competition. Fennia, 186(1), 59-67.
  • Hankinson, G. (2004). The brand images of tourism destinations: a study of the saliency of organic images. Journal of Product&Brand Management, 13(1), 6-14.
  • Hankinson, (2001). Location branding: A study of the branding practices of 12 English cities. Brand Management, 9(2), 127-142.
  • Huang, C.; Oh, K.; Zhang, Q.; Choi, Y.J. (2013). Understanding the city brand in the regional tourism market among college students. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(7), 662-671.
  • Insch, A. and Florek, M. (2008). A great place to live, work and play: Conceptualising place satisfaction in the case of a city's residents. Journal of place management and Development, 1(2), 138-149.
  • Insch, A. (2010). Managing residents’ satisfaction with city life: Application of Importance – Satisfaction analysis. Journal of Town&City Management, 1(2), 164-174.
  • Jones, R. (2005). Finding sources of brand value: developing a stakeholder model of brand equity. Journal of Brand Management, 13(1), 1032.
  • Kazancoglu, İ. and Dirsehan, T. (2014). Exploring brand experience dimensions for cities and investigating their effects on loyalty to a city. Business and Economics Research Journal, 5(1), 17-37.
  • Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, January, 1-22.
  • Laaksonen, P; Laaksonen, M.; Borisov, P.; Halkoaho, J. (2006). Measuring image of a city: A qualitative approach with case example. Place branding, 2(3), 210-219.
  • Leisen, B. (2001). Image segmentation: the case of a tourism destination. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(1), 49-66.
  • Lim, Y. and Weaver, P.A. (2014). Customer-based brand equity for a destination: The effect of destination image on preference for products associated with a destination brand. International Journal of Tourism Research. 16(3), 223-231.
  • Merrilees, B.; Miller, D.; Herington, C. (2009). Antecedents of residents' city brand attitudes. Journal of Business Research, 62, 362-367.
  • Merrilees, B.; Miller, D.; Herington, C. (2012). Multiple stakeholders and multiple city brand meanings. European Journal of Marketing. 46(7/8), 1032-1047.
  • Morsing, M. and Kristensen, J. (2001). The question of coherency of corporate branding-over time and across stakeholders, Journal of Communication Management, 6(1), 24-40.
  • Polonsky, M.J. and Scott, D. (2005). An empirical examination of the stakeholder strategy matrix. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 1199-1215.
  • Ruzzier, M.K. and Petek, N. (2012). The importance of diverse stakeholders in place branding: The case of “I feel Slovenia”. Anatolia-an International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 23(1), 49-60.
  • Santos, L.D.; Martins, I.; Brito, P. (2007). Measuring Subjective Quality of Life: A Survey to Porto’s Residents. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2, 51-64.
  • Saraniemi, S. and Ahonen, M. (2008). Destination branding from corporate branding perspective. Proceedings of the Conference on Corporate Communication, June 6th-9th, England: Wroxton, 435-448.
  • Sevin, H.E. (2014). Understanding cities through city brands: City branding as a social and semantic network. Cities, 38, 47-56.
  • Sim, L.L.; Ong, S.E.; Agarwal, A.; Parsa, A.; Keivani, R. (2003). Singapore’s competitiveness as a global city: development strategy, institutions and business environment. Cities, 20(2), 115-127.
  • Swindell, D. and Kelly, J. (2005). Performance measurement versus city service satisfaction: Intra-city variations in quality? Social Science Quarterly, 86(3), 704-723.
  • TÜİK haber bülteni, (2014a). Sayı 16015, Retrieved Nov. 28, 2014 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=16015.
  • TÜİK haber bülteni (2014b). Sayı 15975, Retrieved Nov. 28, 2014 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/HbPrint.do?id=15975.
  • TÜİK haber bülteni (2014c). Sayı 16198, Retrieved Nov. 28, 2014 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=16198.
  • Van Ryzin, G.G., Muzzio, D., Gulick, L., Martinez, E. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: An application of the American customer satisfaction index model to New York city. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331-341.
  • Vela S.E.; Fernandez-Cavia, J.; Nogue, J.; Jimenez-Morales, M. (2013). Characteristics and functions for place brands based on a Delphi method. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, # 068, 656-675.
  • World Bank national accounts data, (2014). Retrieved Nov. 29, 2014 from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD.
  • Zenker, S. (2011). How to catch a city? The concept and measurement of place brands. Journal of Place Management and Development, 4(1), 40–52.
  • Zenker, S. and Beckmann, S. C. (2013). My place is not your place –different place brand knowledge by different target groups. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(1), 6-17.
  • Zenker, S.; Knubben, E.; Beckmann, S.C. (2010). Your City, My City, Their City, Our City – Different Perceptions of a Place Brand by Diverse Target Groups. Proceedings, 6th International Conference Thought Leaders in Brand Management, Lugano - Switzerland, April 18-20.
  • Zenker, S.; Petersen S.; Aholt, A. (2013). The Citizen Satisfaction Index (CSI): Evidence for a four basic factor model in a German sample. Cities, 31, 156-164.
  • Zenker, S. and Rutter, N. (2014). Is satisfaction the key? The role of citizen satisfaction, place attachment and place brand attitude on positive citizenship behavior. Cities, 38, 11-17.
Toplam 42 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Taner Sigindi

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Sigindi, T. (2017). THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS. Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 372-383. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.714
AMA Sigindi T. THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS. RJBM. Eylül 2017;4(3):372-383. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.714
Chicago Sigindi, Taner. “THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4, sy. 3 (Eylül 2017): 372-83. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.714.
EndNote Sigindi T (01 Eylül 2017) THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS. Research Journal of Business and Management 4 3 372–383.
IEEE T. Sigindi, “THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS”, RJBM, c. 4, sy. 3, ss. 372–383, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.714.
ISNAD Sigindi, Taner. “THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4/3 (Eylül 2017), 372-383. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.714.
JAMA Sigindi T. THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS. RJBM. 2017;4:372–383.
MLA Sigindi, Taner. “THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS”. Research Journal of Business and Management, c. 4, sy. 3, 2017, ss. 372-83, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.714.
Vancouver Sigindi T. THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS. RJBM. 2017;4(3):372-83.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.