BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 14, 65 - 80, 01.12.2014
https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481

Kaynakça

  • Ahmed, S., Wallace K.M., Blessing, LT. (2003), Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1-11.
  • Akın, Ö., Akın, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: analyzing the hyperacclamination (A-h-a ). Design Studies, (4), 341 -36’l
  • Akın Ö., Lin C. (1995). Design Protocol Data and Novel Design
  • Decisions. Design Studies, 16(2), 211-236. Atman, C.J, Chimka, J.R., Bursic, K. M., Nachtmann, H. L. (1999).
  • A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152. Card, S. K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A. (1980). Computer text-editing:
  • An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 32-74. Christiaans H., Dorst C. (1992). Cognitive Models in Industrial
  • Design Engineering: a protocol study, Design Theory and Methodology DTM 92 , D.L. Taylor ve D. A. Stauffer (Editörler), Amer Society of Mechanical, New York. Cutkosky, M.R., Tenenbaum, J.M. (1990). A Methodology and computational framework for concurrent product and process design.
  • Mechanism and Machine Theory, 25(3), 365-381. Deubel, P. (2003). An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional multimedia design. Journal of Educational
  • Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1): 63-90. Dorst, K., Dijkhuis, J., (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity . Design Studies, 16(2), 261 -274.
  • Dorst, K. (1995). Analyzing Design Activity: new direction in protocol analyze. Design Studies, 16(2), 139-142.
  • Dorst, K., Cross, N., (2001). Creativity in the design process: co- evolution of problem—solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
  • Eckersley, M. (1988). The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study. Design Studies, 9(2), 86-94.
  • Gero, J. S., Tang, H. (2001). The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process oriented aspects of the design process. Design Studies, 22(3), 283-295.
  • Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity
  • Research Journal, 4(2), 123-143. Göker, M. H. (1997). The Effects of Experience During Design
  • Problem Solving. Design Studies, 18(4), 405-426. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design procees: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human- Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344.
  • Kavaklı M., Scrivener S., Ball, L.J. (1999). Structure in Idea
  • Sketching Behavior. Design Studies, 19(4), 485-517. Kavaklı, M., Gero J.S. (2001). Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, 22(4), 347-364.
  • Kintsch, W, Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 257-274.
  • Lundberg, G. (1984). Protocol Analysis and Spatial Behavior. Human Geography, 66(2), 91-97.
  • Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., Scott, P. (1995). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?. Design Studies, 16(2), 237-259.
  • Mandler, M., Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed:
  • Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 11-151. Mc Neill, T., Gero J., Warren, J. (1998). Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design. 10(3), 129-140.
  • Önal Ketizmen, G. (2010). Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminde Öğrenciye
  • Ait Kültürel Şemanın Tasarım Sürecindeki Etkilerinin Araştırılmasında Kullanılacak Bir Yöntem, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, Türkiye: lstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Stauffer, L.A. , Ullman, D.G. (1991). Fundamental process of mechanical designers based on emprical data. Journal of Engineering Design, 2(2), 113-125.
  • Suwa, M. ,Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A Protocol Analysis. Design Studies, (4), 385-403.
  • Suwa, M. , Purcell, T., Gero, J. S. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19, 455—483.
  • Tang, J.C., Leifer, L.J. (1991). An observational methodology for studying group design activity. Research in Engineering Design, 2(4), 219.
  • Valkenburg, R. , Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249-271.
  • Wagner ,D.A, Scurrah M.J., Some characteristics of human problem-solving in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 1971:454-478.
  • Yao, S. (2007). Experimental Approaches for Understanding
  • Conceptual Design Activities, Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaCanada: Concordia University, USA. Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2006, 24-26 July). A new approach for protocol analysis on design activities using axiomatic theory of design modeling. rd CDEN/RCCI International Design Conference , Toronto, Canada.
  • Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2007). Preliminary Study of Cognitive Model of
  • Designer's Creativity by Using Formal Protocol Analysis. F.L.Krause (Editör). The Future of Prodcut Development: : Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference, Springer -Verlag Berlin, 5. 165-174. Internet Kaynakları: Internet: Cross, N. (1996). Design Cognition: Results From Protocol and Other Empirical Studies of Design Activity, Knowing and Learning to Design,
  • Web:http://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY201 3/cs7601_spring/ p apers/Cross-DesignCognition.pdf adresinden 12 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: Jiang, H. ,Yen, C. (2010). Protocol Analysis in Design Research: a review,
  • Web:https://www.academia.edu/5038270/Protocol_Analysis_in_
  • Design_Research_a_review adresinden 3 Mayıs 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: Engineering Design Center, Improving the Design Process, Web: https://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/ 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: Design Lab, Environment Based Design, Web:http://users.encs.concordia.ca/Hdesign/index.html 10 Kasım 'de alınmıştır. Internet: Stanford University, Center for Design Research, Web :http://me.stanford.edu/research/labs-and-centers/center-design- research 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Web:http://trove.nla.gov.au/people/1309186?c=people 10
  • Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
Toplam 42 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gökçe Ketizmen Önal Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Sayı: 14

Kaynak Göster

APA Önal, G. K. (2014). Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, 1(14), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481
AMA Önal GK. Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. Aralık 2014;1(14):65-80. doi:10.18603/std.24481
Chicago Önal, Gökçe Ketizmen. “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi 1, sy. 14 (Aralık 2014): 65-80. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481.
EndNote Önal GK (01 Aralık 2014) Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi 1 14 65–80.
IEEE G. K. Önal, “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”, Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, c. 1, sy. 14, ss. 65–80, 2014, doi: 10.18603/std.24481.
ISNAD Önal, Gökçe Ketizmen. “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi 1/14 (Aralık 2014), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481.
JAMA Önal GK. Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. 2014;1:65–80.
MLA Önal, Gökçe Ketizmen. “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, c. 1, sy. 14, 2014, ss. 65-80, doi:10.18603/std.24481.
Vancouver Önal GK. Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. 2014;1(14):65-80.