KAMU HASTANELERİNDE MAL ALIM KARARLARININ BULANIK AHP YÖNTEMİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE GEDİZ DEVLET HASTANESİ UYGULAMASI

Yrd.doç.dr.kemal Vatansever

Kamu Hastanelerinde Mal Alım Kararlarının Bulanık AHP Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi ve Gediz Devlet Hastanesi Uygulaması

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 225 - 244, 01.09.2013

Öz

The decisions of product and service purchase for state instituions is extremely important to use government resources efficiently. Accordingly the most efficient and correct decision must be made while purchasing product and service. Public institutions have to make purchasing according to Public Procurement Law. The law which brings certain standards and conditions to product and service purchase for state instituions aims increasing efficiency and productive use of government resources. In the survey Fuzzy AHP is recommended which is one of the multi-criteria decision making techniques to the decision making process of adenotonsiliectomy, nose, laryngology and ear set purchase for ear-nose-throat operations. In the end of the study, a comparison is made between the decisions made according to public procurement law and Fuzzy AHP method

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

1. AYDIN, Özlem (2009), “Bulanık AHP ile Ankara İçin Hastane Yer Seçimi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 24, 2, s. 87-104
2. AYDIN, Özlem and Arslan, Güvenç (2010),“Optimal Hospital Location With Fuzzy AHP”,The Business Review Cambridge,15, s. 262-268
3. BOZBURA, Tunç F.;Beşkese, Ahmet and Kahraman, Cengiz (2007), “Priorization of Human Capital Measurement Indicators Using Fuzzy AHP”, Expert Systems with Application, 32, s. 1100-1112
4. BOZDAĞ, Cafer Erhan; Kahraman, Cengiz and Ruan, Da (2003), “Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Selection Among Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems”, Computers in Industry, 51, s. 13-29
5. BÜYÜKÖZKAN, Gülçin ve Çiftçi, Gizem (2012),“A Combined Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSİS Based Strategic Analysis of Electronic Service Quality in Healthcare Industry”,Expert Systems with Applications, 39, s. 2341-2354
6. BÜYÜKÖZKAN, Gülçin; Çiftçi, Gizem and Güleryüz, Sezin (2011),“Strategic Analysis of Healthcare Service Quality Using Fuzzy AHP Methodology”,Expert Systems with Applications, 38, s. 9407-9424
7. Calabrese, Armando; Costa, Roberta and Menichini, Tamara (2013), “Using Fuzzy AHP to Manage Intellectual Capital Assets: An Application to the ICT Service Industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, 40, s. 3747-3755
8. CHAMODRAKAS, I; Batis, D. and Martakos, D. (2010), “Supplier Selection in Electronic Market Places Using Satisficing and Fuzzy AHP”, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, s. 490-498
9. CHANG, D.Y. (1996),“Application of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP”,European Journal of Operational Research, 95, s. 649-655
10. CHANG, D.Y.;Zhu, Ke-Jun and Jing, Yu (1999), “A Discussion on Extent Analysis Method and Applications of Fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 2, s. 450-456
11. CHENG, Ching-Hsue (1996), “Evaluating Naval Tactical Missile Systems by Fuzzy AHP Based on the Grade Value of Membership Function”, European Journal of Operational Research, 96, s. 343-350
12. CHENG, Joe Z.;Chen, Peng, Ting and Yu, Hsiao-Chang D. (2005),“Establishing a Man Access Strategy for Future Broadband Service: A Fuzzy MCDM Analysis of SONET/SDH and Gigabit Ethernet”, Technovation, 25, s. 557-567
13. CHOU, Ying-Chyi; Sun, Chia-Chi and Yen, Hsin-Yi (2012),“Evaluating the Criteria for Human Resource for Science and Technology (HRST) Based on an Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach”,Applied Soft Computing, 12, s. 64-71
14. ÇAKIR, Ozan and Canbolat, Mustafa S. (2008), “A Web-Based Decision Support System for Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using Fuzzy AHP Methodology”, Expert Systems with Applications, 35, s.1367-1378
15. Dağdeviren, Metin; Akay, Diyar ve Kurt, Mustafa (2004), “İş Değerlendirme Sürecinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve Uygulaması”, Gazi Üniversitesi MMF Dergisi, 19, 2, s. 131-138
16. DAĞDEVİREN, Metin; Yavuz, Serkan and Kılınç, Nevzat (2009),“Weapon Selection Using the AHP and TOPSİS Methods Under Fuzzy Environment”,Expert Systems with Applications, 36, s. 8143-8151
17. DURAN, Orlando (2011), “Computer-Aided Maintenance Management Systems Selection Based on a Fuzzy AHP Approach”, Advances in Engineering Software, 45, s. 821-829
18. ENEA, Mario and Piazza, Tommaso (2004),“Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP”,Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3, s. 39-62
19. ERPOLAT, Semra (2011), “Ticari Firma Kredi Taleplerinin Değerlendirilmesinde AHY ile Farklı Bulanık Sıralama Yöntemlerinin Denendiği BAHY’nin İncelenmesi”, Öneri,9, 36, s. 213-235
20. GİRGİNER, Nuray (2008), “Ticari Kredi Taleplerinin Değerlendirilmesine Çok Kriterli Yaklaşım: Özel ve Devlet Bankası Karşılaştırması”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 37, s. 132-141
21. GÖKSU, Ali ve Güngör, İbrahim (2008), “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşik Proses ve Üniversite Tercih Sıralamasında Uygulanması”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 13, 3, s. 1-26
22. GÖNEN, Dinçer ve Işık, Hikmet (2006), Açıklamalı Kamu İhale Kanunu, Yetkin Basım, 2. Baskı, Ankara
23. GÜNER, Hacer ve Mutlu, Özcan (2005), “Bulanık AHP ile Tedarikçi Seçim Problemi ve Bir Uygulama”, V. Ulusal Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi, 25-27 Kasım, İstanbul, 473-477
24. GÜNGÖR, Zulal; Serhadlıoğlu, Gürkan and Kesen, Saadettin (2009),“A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Personnel Selection Problem”, Applied Soft Computing, 9, s. 641-646
25. HEO, Eunnyeong; Kim, Jinsoo and Boo, Kyung-Jin (2007),“Analysis of the Assessment Factors for Renewable Energy Dissemination Program Evaluation Using Fuzzy AHP”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, s. 2214-2220
26. JYOTI, Bonwet D.K and Deshmukh, S.G. (2008),“Evaluating Performance of National R&D Organizations Using Integrated DEAAHP Technique”, International Journal of Productivty and Performance Management, 57, s. 370-388
27. KAHRAMAN, Cengiz; Cebeci, Ufuk and Ruan, Da (2004), “MultiAttribute Comparison of Catering Service Companies Using Fuzzy AHP: The Case of Turkey”, International Journal of Production Economics, 87, s. 171-184
28. KAYA, Osman ve Özek, Ali(2009), Kamu İhale Mevzuatı Ders Notları, Güncel Mevzuat Yayınları, No.9, 5. Baskı, Ankara
29. KILINÇCI, Özcan and Önal, Sezen Aslı (2011),“Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection in a Washing Machine Company”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, s. 9656-9664
30. KINIK, Gökalp (2003), 4734 Sayılı Kamu İhale Kanunu ve İlgili Mevzuat, Denet Yayıncılık, İzmir
31. KRISHNENDU, Shaw; Shankar, Ravi; Yadav, Surendra S. and Thakur, Lakshman S. (2012),“Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Multi-Objective Linear Programming for Developing Low Carbon Supply Chain”,Expert Systems with Applications, 39, s. 8182-8192
32. KWONG, C.K. and Bai, H. (2003), “Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with a Extent Analysis Approach”, IEE Transactions, 35, s. 619-626
33. LEE, Amy H.I. (2009),“A Fuzzy Supplier Selection Model With the Consideration of Benefits Opportunities, Costs and Risks”, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, s. 2879-2893
34. LI, Jie and Chen, Shouming (2009),“Evaluating the Architectural Design Services by Using Fuzzy AHP”,The Business Review Cambridge, 13, s. 129-137
35. MOHAGHAR, Ali; Fathi, Mohammad Reza; Zarchi, Mohammad Karini and Omidian, Asie (2012),“A Combined VİKOR-Fuzzy AHP Approach to Marketing Strategy Selection”,Business Management and Strategy, 3, s. 13-27
36. MOLLAHALILOĞLU, Salih; Başara, B. Bora ve Eryılmaz, Zehra(2011), Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2010, Kalkan Matbaacılık, Ankara
37. ÖZTÜRK, Burcu Avcı ve Başkaya, Zehra (2012), “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ile Bir Ekmek Fabrikasında Un Tedarikçisinin Seçimi”, Business and Economics Research Journal, 3,1, s. 131-159
38. PAN, Nang-Fei (2008), “Fuzzy AHP Approach for Selecting the Suitable Bridge Construction Method”, Automation in Construction, 17, s. 958-965
39. PERÇİN, Selçuk (2008),“Use of Fuzzy AHP for Evaluating the Benefits of Information Sharing Decisions in a Supply Chain”,Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21, s. 263-284 40. Resmi Gazete, 26/10/1994
41. SAATY, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (2000), Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of theAnalytic Hierarchy Process, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
42. SAGHAFIAN, Soroush and Hejazi, Reza (2005),“Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Using A Modified Fuzzy TOPSİS Procedure”, CIMCA-IAWTIC’05, IEEE
43. SUN, Chia-Chi (2010),“A Performance Evaluation Model by Integrating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSİS Methods”, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, s. 7745-7754
44. ŞEN, Ceyda Güngör ve Cenkçi, Doruk (2009), “An Integrated Approach to Determination and Evaluation of Production Planning Performance Criteria”, Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sigma, 27, s. 1- 19
45. TZENG, Gwo-Hshiung and Huang, Jih-Jeng (2011), Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, CRC Pres Taylor and Francis Group, A Chapman and Hall Book, Boca Raton
46. WECK, M.;Klocke, F.; Schell, H. and Rüenauver, E. (1997), “Evaluating Alternative Production Cycles Using the Extended Fuzzy AHP Method”, European Journal of Operational Research, 100, s. 351- 366
47. XIA, Weijun and Wu, Zhiming (2007),“Supplier Selection With Multiple Criteria in Volume Discount Environments”, Omega, 35, s. 494-504
48. YANG, Hao-Wei and Chang, Kuei-Feng (2012), “Combining MeansEnd Chain and Fuzzy ANP to Explore Customers’ Decision Process in Selecting Bundles”, International Journal of Information Management, 32, s. 381-395
49. YANG, Zhigang; Wang, Xueli and Fu, Yingchun (2012), “Study on Early Warning Model of Coal Mining Engineering with Fuzzy AHP”, Systems Engineering Procedia, 5, s. 113-118
50. ZADEH, L.A. (1965),“Fuzzy Sets”, Information and Control, 8, s. 338- 353
51. ZEYDAN, Mithat and Çolpan, Cüneyt (2009),“A New Decision Support System for Performance Measurement Using Combined Fuzzy TOPSİS/DEA Approach”,International Journal of Production Research, 47, s. 4327-4349
52. 4734 sayılı Kamu İhale Kanunu

KAMU HASTANELERİNDE MAL ALIM KARARLARININ BULANIK AHP YÖNTEMİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE GEDİZ DEVLET HASTANESİ UYGULAMASI

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 225 - 244, 01.09.2013

Yrd.doç.dr.kemal Vatansever

Öz

Kamu kurumlarında verilen mal ve hizmet alım kararları devlet kaynaklarının etkin ve verimli kullanımı açısından son derece önemlidir. Bu doğrultuda mal ve hizmet alımlarında en doğru ve en etkin kararın alınması gerekmektedir. Kamu kurumları Kamu İhale Kanunu’na göre satın alma yapmak zorundadır. Kamu kurumlarındaki mal ve hizmet alımlarını belirli standart ve koşullara bağlayan bu kanunun amacı kamudaki etkinliği artırmak ve kaynakların verimli kullanımını sağlamaktır. Çalışmada Gediz Devlet Hastanesi’nde yürütülen kulak burun boğaz ameliyatlarında kullanılmak üzere adenotonsillektomi, burun, laringoloji ve kulak seti alım kararına ilişkin çok kriterli karar verme tekniklerinden Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (BAHP) önerilmektedir. Çalışma sonunda Kamu İhale Kanunu ve BAHP yöntemine göre alınan karar karşılaştırılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kamu İhale Kanunu, Bulanık AHP, Genişletilmiş Analiz Yöntemi, Satın Alma Kararı

Kaynakça

1. AYDIN, Özlem (2009), “Bulanık AHP ile Ankara İçin Hastane Yer Seçimi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 24, 2, s. 87-104
2. AYDIN, Özlem and Arslan, Güvenç (2010),“Optimal Hospital Location With Fuzzy AHP”,The Business Review Cambridge,15, s. 262-268
3. BOZBURA, Tunç F.;Beşkese, Ahmet and Kahraman, Cengiz (2007), “Priorization of Human Capital Measurement Indicators Using Fuzzy AHP”, Expert Systems with Application, 32, s. 1100-1112
4. BOZDAĞ, Cafer Erhan; Kahraman, Cengiz and Ruan, Da (2003), “Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Selection Among Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems”, Computers in Industry, 51, s. 13-29
5. BÜYÜKÖZKAN, Gülçin ve Çiftçi, Gizem (2012),“A Combined Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSİS Based Strategic Analysis of Electronic Service Quality in Healthcare Industry”,Expert Systems with Applications, 39, s. 2341-2354
6. BÜYÜKÖZKAN, Gülçin; Çiftçi, Gizem and Güleryüz, Sezin (2011),“Strategic Analysis of Healthcare Service Quality Using Fuzzy AHP Methodology”,Expert Systems with Applications, 38, s. 9407-9424
7. Calabrese, Armando; Costa, Roberta and Menichini, Tamara (2013), “Using Fuzzy AHP to Manage Intellectual Capital Assets: An Application to the ICT Service Industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, 40, s. 3747-3755
8. CHAMODRAKAS, I; Batis, D. and Martakos, D. (2010), “Supplier Selection in Electronic Market Places Using Satisficing and Fuzzy AHP”, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, s. 490-498
9. CHANG, D.Y. (1996),“Application of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP”,European Journal of Operational Research, 95, s. 649-655
10. CHANG, D.Y.;Zhu, Ke-Jun and Jing, Yu (1999), “A Discussion on Extent Analysis Method and Applications of Fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 2, s. 450-456
11. CHENG, Ching-Hsue (1996), “Evaluating Naval Tactical Missile Systems by Fuzzy AHP Based on the Grade Value of Membership Function”, European Journal of Operational Research, 96, s. 343-350
12. CHENG, Joe Z.;Chen, Peng, Ting and Yu, Hsiao-Chang D. (2005),“Establishing a Man Access Strategy for Future Broadband Service: A Fuzzy MCDM Analysis of SONET/SDH and Gigabit Ethernet”, Technovation, 25, s. 557-567
13. CHOU, Ying-Chyi; Sun, Chia-Chi and Yen, Hsin-Yi (2012),“Evaluating the Criteria for Human Resource for Science and Technology (HRST) Based on an Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach”,Applied Soft Computing, 12, s. 64-71
14. ÇAKIR, Ozan and Canbolat, Mustafa S. (2008), “A Web-Based Decision Support System for Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using Fuzzy AHP Methodology”, Expert Systems with Applications, 35, s.1367-1378
15. Dağdeviren, Metin; Akay, Diyar ve Kurt, Mustafa (2004), “İş Değerlendirme Sürecinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve Uygulaması”, Gazi Üniversitesi MMF Dergisi, 19, 2, s. 131-138
16. DAĞDEVİREN, Metin; Yavuz, Serkan and Kılınç, Nevzat (2009),“Weapon Selection Using the AHP and TOPSİS Methods Under Fuzzy Environment”,Expert Systems with Applications, 36, s. 8143-8151
17. DURAN, Orlando (2011), “Computer-Aided Maintenance Management Systems Selection Based on a Fuzzy AHP Approach”, Advances in Engineering Software, 45, s. 821-829
18. ENEA, Mario and Piazza, Tommaso (2004),“Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP”,Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3, s. 39-62
19. ERPOLAT, Semra (2011), “Ticari Firma Kredi Taleplerinin Değerlendirilmesinde AHY ile Farklı Bulanık Sıralama Yöntemlerinin Denendiği BAHY’nin İncelenmesi”, Öneri,9, 36, s. 213-235
20. GİRGİNER, Nuray (2008), “Ticari Kredi Taleplerinin Değerlendirilmesine Çok Kriterli Yaklaşım: Özel ve Devlet Bankası Karşılaştırması”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 37, s. 132-141
21. GÖKSU, Ali ve Güngör, İbrahim (2008), “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşik Proses ve Üniversite Tercih Sıralamasında Uygulanması”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 13, 3, s. 1-26
22. GÖNEN, Dinçer ve Işık, Hikmet (2006), Açıklamalı Kamu İhale Kanunu, Yetkin Basım, 2. Baskı, Ankara
23. GÜNER, Hacer ve Mutlu, Özcan (2005), “Bulanık AHP ile Tedarikçi Seçim Problemi ve Bir Uygulama”, V. Ulusal Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi, 25-27 Kasım, İstanbul, 473-477
24. GÜNGÖR, Zulal; Serhadlıoğlu, Gürkan and Kesen, Saadettin (2009),“A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Personnel Selection Problem”, Applied Soft Computing, 9, s. 641-646
25. HEO, Eunnyeong; Kim, Jinsoo and Boo, Kyung-Jin (2007),“Analysis of the Assessment Factors for Renewable Energy Dissemination Program Evaluation Using Fuzzy AHP”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, s. 2214-2220
26. JYOTI, Bonwet D.K and Deshmukh, S.G. (2008),“Evaluating Performance of National R&D Organizations Using Integrated DEAAHP Technique”, International Journal of Productivty and Performance Management, 57, s. 370-388
27. KAHRAMAN, Cengiz; Cebeci, Ufuk and Ruan, Da (2004), “MultiAttribute Comparison of Catering Service Companies Using Fuzzy AHP: The Case of Turkey”, International Journal of Production Economics, 87, s. 171-184
28. KAYA, Osman ve Özek, Ali(2009), Kamu İhale Mevzuatı Ders Notları, Güncel Mevzuat Yayınları, No.9, 5. Baskı, Ankara
29. KILINÇCI, Özcan and Önal, Sezen Aslı (2011),“Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection in a Washing Machine Company”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, s. 9656-9664
30. KINIK, Gökalp (2003), 4734 Sayılı Kamu İhale Kanunu ve İlgili Mevzuat, Denet Yayıncılık, İzmir
31. KRISHNENDU, Shaw; Shankar, Ravi; Yadav, Surendra S. and Thakur, Lakshman S. (2012),“Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Multi-Objective Linear Programming for Developing Low Carbon Supply Chain”,Expert Systems with Applications, 39, s. 8182-8192
32. KWONG, C.K. and Bai, H. (2003), “Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with a Extent Analysis Approach”, IEE Transactions, 35, s. 619-626
33. LEE, Amy H.I. (2009),“A Fuzzy Supplier Selection Model With the Consideration of Benefits Opportunities, Costs and Risks”, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, s. 2879-2893
34. LI, Jie and Chen, Shouming (2009),“Evaluating the Architectural Design Services by Using Fuzzy AHP”,The Business Review Cambridge, 13, s. 129-137
35. MOHAGHAR, Ali; Fathi, Mohammad Reza; Zarchi, Mohammad Karini and Omidian, Asie (2012),“A Combined VİKOR-Fuzzy AHP Approach to Marketing Strategy Selection”,Business Management and Strategy, 3, s. 13-27
36. MOLLAHALILOĞLU, Salih; Başara, B. Bora ve Eryılmaz, Zehra(2011), Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2010, Kalkan Matbaacılık, Ankara
37. ÖZTÜRK, Burcu Avcı ve Başkaya, Zehra (2012), “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ile Bir Ekmek Fabrikasında Un Tedarikçisinin Seçimi”, Business and Economics Research Journal, 3,1, s. 131-159
38. PAN, Nang-Fei (2008), “Fuzzy AHP Approach for Selecting the Suitable Bridge Construction Method”, Automation in Construction, 17, s. 958-965
39. PERÇİN, Selçuk (2008),“Use of Fuzzy AHP for Evaluating the Benefits of Information Sharing Decisions in a Supply Chain”,Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21, s. 263-284 40. Resmi Gazete, 26/10/1994
41. SAATY, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (2000), Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of theAnalytic Hierarchy Process, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
42. SAGHAFIAN, Soroush and Hejazi, Reza (2005),“Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Using A Modified Fuzzy TOPSİS Procedure”, CIMCA-IAWTIC’05, IEEE
43. SUN, Chia-Chi (2010),“A Performance Evaluation Model by Integrating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSİS Methods”, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, s. 7745-7754
44. ŞEN, Ceyda Güngör ve Cenkçi, Doruk (2009), “An Integrated Approach to Determination and Evaluation of Production Planning Performance Criteria”, Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sigma, 27, s. 1- 19
45. TZENG, Gwo-Hshiung and Huang, Jih-Jeng (2011), Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, CRC Pres Taylor and Francis Group, A Chapman and Hall Book, Boca Raton
46. WECK, M.;Klocke, F.; Schell, H. and Rüenauver, E. (1997), “Evaluating Alternative Production Cycles Using the Extended Fuzzy AHP Method”, European Journal of Operational Research, 100, s. 351- 366
47. XIA, Weijun and Wu, Zhiming (2007),“Supplier Selection With Multiple Criteria in Volume Discount Environments”, Omega, 35, s. 494-504
48. YANG, Hao-Wei and Chang, Kuei-Feng (2012), “Combining MeansEnd Chain and Fuzzy ANP to Explore Customers’ Decision Process in Selecting Bundles”, International Journal of Information Management, 32, s. 381-395
49. YANG, Zhigang; Wang, Xueli and Fu, Yingchun (2012), “Study on Early Warning Model of Coal Mining Engineering with Fuzzy AHP”, Systems Engineering Procedia, 5, s. 113-118
50. ZADEH, L.A. (1965),“Fuzzy Sets”, Information and Control, 8, s. 338- 353
51. ZEYDAN, Mithat and Çolpan, Cüneyt (2009),“A New Decision Support System for Performance Measurement Using Combined Fuzzy TOPSİS/DEA Approach”,International Journal of Production Research, 47, s. 4327-4349
52. 4734 sayılı Kamu İhale Kanunu

Toplam 51 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	Türkçe
Bölüm	Makaleler
Yazarlar	Yrd.doç.dr.kemal Vatansever Bu kişi benim
Yayımlanma Tarihi	1 Eylül 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2013 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA	Vatansever, .Y. (2013). KAMU HASTANELERİNDE MAL ALIM KARARLARININ BULANIK AHP YÖNTEMİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE GEDİZ DEVLET HASTANESİ UYGULAMASI. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 225-244.

Makale Dosyaları

Tam Metin