FİLMDE SUÇ VE ADALET: POSTYAPISALCI BİR OKUMA

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 9 - 28, 15.03.2015

Çoşkun Liktor

https://doi.org/10.32001/sinecine.540267

Öz

Bu makale, Richard Brooks’un In Cold Blood (Soğukkanlılıkla, 1967), Stanley Kubrick’in A Clockwork Orange (Otomatik Portakal, 1971) ve Orson Welles’in The Trial (Dava, 1962) filmlerine yoğunlaşarak, işledikleri –ya da işledikleri düşünülen– bir suç yüzünden kanun tarafından cezalandırılan karakterlere odaklanan bu üç film üzerinden suç, ceza ve adalet kavramlarını postyapısalcı açıdan incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu incelemede, ceza yöntemlerinin zaman içinde değişen güç ilişkilerine bağlı olarak değişikliğe uğradığını savunan Michel Foucault ve alışılageldik, özcü yasa ve adalet anlayışlarını yapısöküme uğratan Jacques Derrida’nın teorileri başta olmak üzere güç ve adalet hakkındaki postyapısalcı söylemler temel alınmıştır. Bu makalenin amacı, ele alınan filmlerin üçünün de, başkarakterlerin çarptırıldığı cezaların haklılığını sorgulamak suretiyle, toplumda baskın olan ceza yöntemlerini ve adalet tanımlarını eleştirerek, ceza yasalarının haklı bir zemine dayandırılmasının olanaksızlığını savunan postyapısalcı görüşü pekiştirdiğini göstermektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Suç, ceza, adalet, postyapısalcılık, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida

CRIME AND JUSTICE IN FILM: A POSTSTRUCTURALIST READING

Öz

This article explores the concepts of crime, punishment and justice from a poststructuralist perspective in three films, namely In Cold Blood (Richard Brooks, 1967), A Clockwork Orange (Stanley Kubrick, 1971), and The Trial (Orson Welles, 1962), all of which feature protagonists who are punished by law for a crime they have – or, in the case of the last film, are thought to have – committed. The films will be analysed through the lens of poststructuralist discourses on power and justice, in particular the theories of Michel Foucault, who argues that punitive practices vary depending on the changing power relations in society, and of Jacques Derrida, who sets out to deconstruct the conventional, essentialist understanding of law and justice. This article will attempt to demonstrate that these three films, which question the legitimacy of the punishment inflicted on the protagonists, present a critique of dominant punitive practices and established definitions of justice in such a way as to reinforce the poststructuralist stance that precludes the possibility that punitive laws can be grounded upon a legitimate basis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Crime, punishment, justice, poststructuralism, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida

Kaynakça

• Althusser, L. (2001). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. (B. Brewster, Trans.). In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 85- 126). New York: Monthly Review.
• Appelbaum, D. (2009). Jacques Derrida’s ghost: A conjuration. Albany: State University of New York.
• Brooks, R. (Producer/Director). (1967). In cold blood [Motion Picture]. USA: Columbia Pictures.
• Childs, P. (2000). Modernism. London & New York: Routledge. Choat, S. (2010). Marx through poststructuralism: Lyotard, Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze. London & New York: Continuum.
• Derrida J. (1992a). Force of law: The mystical foundation of authority (M. Quaintance, Trans.). In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. G. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3-67). New York & London: Routledge.
• Derrida, J. (1992b). Before the law (A. Ronell, Trans.). In D. Attridge (Ed.), Acts of literature (pp. 181-220). New York & London: Routledge.
• Drolet, M. (Ed.). (2004). Introduction. In The postmodernism reader (pp. 1-35). New York: Routledge.
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume I. (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
• Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
• Freud, S. (2001a). Criminals from a sense of guilt. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Volume XIV, pp.332-333). London: Vintage.
• Freud, S. (2001b). Civilization and its discontents. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Volume XXI, pp. 59-145). London: Vintage.
• Gutting, G. (2005). Foucault: A very short introduction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University.
• Hoffman, M. (2011). Disciplinary power. In D. Taylor (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Key concepts (pp. 27-39). Durham: Acumen.
• Kieslowski, K. (Director/Screenwriter). (1988). A Short lm about killing [Motion Picture]. Poland: Film Polski.
• Kolker, R. P. (2003). A clockwork orange ... ticking. In S. Y. McDougal (Ed.), Stanley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange (pp. 19-36). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University.
• Kubrick, S. (Director/Screenwriter). (1971). A Clockwork Orange [Motion picture]. UK: Warner Bros.
• Martel, J. (2011, March 11). Waiting for justice: Benjamin and Derrida on sovereignty and immanence. Republics of Letters, Volume 2, Issue 2. Retrieved from http://arcade.stanford.edu/ro /waiting-justice- benjamin-and-derrida-sovereignty-and-immanence.
• McDougal, S.Y. (2003). Introduction: “What’s it going to be then, eh?”: Questioning Kubrick’s Clockwork. In S. Y. McDougal (Ed.), Stanley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange (pp. 1-18). Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore & Sao Paulo: Cambridge University.
• McHoul, A. & Grace, W. (2002). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. London & New York: Routledge.
• Nietzsche, F. W. (2003). Thus spoke Zarathustra: A book for everyone and no one. (R.J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Hammondsworth, Middlesex, Eng.; New York: Penguin.
• Nomos. (n.d.). In Dictionary.com. Retrieved from http://dictionary. reference.com/browse/nomos.
• Phillips, J. (2001). Sade: The libertine novels. London: Pluto.
• Poster, M. (1985). Foucault, Marxism and history: Mode of productionversus mode of information. Cambridge: Polity.
• Ransom, J. S. (1997). Foucault’s discipline: The politics of subjectivity. Durham & London: Duke University.
• Reilly, P. (2010). Kafka. In H. Bloom (Ed.), Bloom’s modern critical views: Franz Kafka (pp. 171-196). New York: Bloom’s Literary Criticism.
• Ruggiero, V. (2003). Crime in Literature: Sociology of Deviance and Fiction. London & New York: Verso.
• Rycroft, C. (1995). Critical dictionary of psychoanalysis. London & New York: Penguin.
• Sade, M. de. (1962). Excerpt from Philosophy in the bedroom. (P. Dinnage, Trans.). In P. Dinnage (Ed.), The Marquis de Sade: An essay by Simone de Beauvoir with selections from his writings chosen by Paul Dinnage. London: John Calder.
• Sharpe, A. N. (2010). Foucault’s monsters and the challenge of law. New York: Routledge.
• Taylor, C. (2011). Biopower. In D. Taylor (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Key Concepts (pp. 41-54). Durham: Acumen.
• Thorlby, A. (2010). Kafka’s narrative: A matter of form. In H. Bloom (Ed.), Bloom’s modern critical views: Franz Kafka (pp. 23-36). New York: Bloom’s Literary Criticism.
• Welles, O. (Director/Screenwriter). (1962). The trial [Motion picture]. France, Italy & Germany: Paris-Europa Productions.
• Wortham, S. M. (2010). The Derrida dictionary. London & New York: Continuum.