Türkiye’de HIV pozitif bireylerde yapılmış epidemiyolojik çalışmaların bibliyometrik incelemesi

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 1 - 25, 27.04.2017

Can Hüseyin Hekimoğlu Duygu Lüleci Ahmet Can Bilgin

https://doi.org/10.20518/tjph.326771

Cited By: 2

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de HIV pozitif bireylerde yapılmış epidemiyolojik çalışmaların
bibliyometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Türkiye’de HIV pozitif
bireylerde yapılmış çalışmalara 1 Kasım 2015 tarihinde Pubmed, Türk Medline, Ulakbim veri
tabanları ve Türk HIV/AIDS dergisi taranarak ulaşıldı. Bulgular: Ulaşılan 204 çalışmanın
%89.1’i gözlemsel tanımlayıcı çalışmaydı. En sık çalışma tipi olgu sunumuydu (%48.5). Analitik
çalışmalar en sık kesitsel tipteydi (%23.7). Makalelerin %67.2’si Türkçe, %32.8’i İngilizce
yayınlanmıştı. Çalışmaların %92.6’sı genel hasta grubunda yapılmıştı. Olgu sunumu/serisi
tipindeki çalışmaların konuları en sık fırsatçı enfeksiyonlar (%41.3) ve komplikasyonlar
(%16.3); diğer çalışmaların konuları en sık HIV/AIDS epidemiyolojisi (%18.1) ve tedaviydi
(%17.0). Çalışmaların %47.1’i tek uzmanlık alanı tarafından yürütülmüştü. İlk isim yazarların
%76.9’u Ankara, İstanbul veya İzmir’de; %55.4’ü üniversite hastanesinde, %37.3’ü eğitim ve
araştırma hastanesinde çalışmaktaydı. Uzmanlık alanları en sık enfeksiyon hastalıkları ve klinik
mikrobiyoloji (%47.1) ve tıbbi mikrobiyolojiydi (%22.1). Türkçe makalelerin %33.8’inde
”HIV'li/AIDS'li hasta/olgu, HIV enfeksiyonlu olgu/hasta’’ ifadeleri kullanılmıştı, ancak bu
ifadenin kullanımı zaman içinde azalma eğilimi göstermekteydi (p trend= 0.007). Sonuç:
Türkiye’de HIV pozitif bireylerde genel hasta grubu dışındaki bireyleri daha fazla ele alan,
analitik tipte, çok disiplinli, ulusal düzeyde ve görece az çalışılmış konularda çalışmalar
yürütülmelidir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

HIV, AIDS, Türkiye, epidemiyolojik çalışma

Bibliometric investigation of epidemiologic studies in HIV positive individuals in Turkey

Öz

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the bibliometrics of epidemiologic studies in HIV positive
individuals in Turkey. Methods: We reached the epidemiologic studies through Pubmed, Türk
Medline, Ulakbim databases and ”Türk HIV/AIDS” journal on November 1, 2015. Results:
Among 204 studies 89.1% were observational descriptive and the most frequent type was case
report (48.5%). Cross-sectional (23.7%) was the most common type among analytic studies.
Article’ were published in Turkish (67.2%) and English (32.8%). The great majority (92.6%) of
the studies were conducted in general patient population. The most studied topics were
opportunistic infections (41.3%) and complications (16.3%) among the case series/reports
types of studies; whereas HIV/AIDS epidemiology (18.1%) and treatment (17.0%) were more
common ones among the other studies. The proportion of the studies carried out by a single
specialty was 47.1%. First-name authors work in university hospitals (55.4%), teaching and
research hospitals (37.3%) and 76.9% were from Istanbul, Ankara, or Izmir. The frequent
specialties were infectious diseases (47.1%) and medical microbiology (22.1%). Researchers
used stigmatizing statements in 33.8% of the articles that were in Turkish referring to HIV
positive individuals, although this type of statements tended to decline over time (p trend =
0.007). Conclusion: Researchers should conduct analytic, multi-disciplinary and nationwide
studies on HIV positive individuals in Turkey, particularly in non-general patient groups and on
relatively less studied topics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

HIV, AIDS, Turkey, epidemiologic study

Kaynakça

• 1. Murray CJL, Ortblad KF, Guinovart C, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence and mortality for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria during 1990– 2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014;384(9947):1005-1070.
• 2. Gordis L. Epidemiology. Philadelphia:.Elsevier/Saunders, 2009.
• 3. Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellström T. Basic Epidemiology. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006.
• 4. Onyancha OB, Ocholla DN. A comparative study of the literature on HIV/AIDS in Kenya and Uganda: a bibliometric study. Libr Inform Sci Res 2004;26:434-447.
• 5. Patra SK, Chand P. HIV/AIDS research in India: a bibliometric study. Libr Inform Sci Res 2007;29:124-134.
• 6. Oleckno WA. Epidemiology: Concepts and Methods. Illinois: Waveland Press, 2008.
• 7. Wedi CO, Kirtley S, Hopewell S, Corrigan R, Kennedy SH, Hemelaar J. Perinatal outcomes associated with maternal HIV infection: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet HIV 2016;3(1):33-48.
• 8. White AB, Mirjahangir JF, Horvath H, Anglemyer A, Read JS. Antiretroviral interventions for preventing breast milk transmission of HIV. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(10):CD011323.
• 9. Bastard M, Poulet E, Nicolay N, Szumilin E, Balkan S, Pujades-Rodriguez M. Pediatric access and continuity of HIV care before the start of antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016. [Epub ahead of print]
• 10. Li Z, Hsieh E, Morano JP, Sheng Y. Exploring HIV-related stigma among HIV-infected men who have sex with men in Beijing, China: a correlation study. AIDS Care 2016;3:1-8.
• 11. Rezaei-Soufi L, Davoodi P, Jazaeri M, Niknami H. The comparison of root caries experience between HIV-positive patients and HIV-negative individuals in a selected Iranian population. Int J Dent Hyg 2011;9(4):261-265.
• 12. Adachi K, Klausner JD, Xu J, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae in HIV-infected pregnant women and adverse ınfant outcomes. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016;35(8):894-900.
• 13. Alpsar D, Agacfidan A, Lübke N, et al. Molecular epidemiology of HIV in a cohort of men having sex with men from Istanbul. Med Microbiol Immun 2013;202(3):251-255.
• 14. Yoldaş O, Ağaçfidan A, Lübke N, et al. Determination of drug resistance and virus typology in HIV-1-positive pediatric patients in Istanbul, Turkey. Intervirology 2014;57(5):297-299.
• 15. Marukutira T, Huprikar S, Azie N, Quan SP, Meier-Kriesche HU, Horn DL. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in 303 HIVinfected patients with invasive fungal infections: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy Alliance registry, a multicenter, observational study. HIV/AIDS (Auckland, NZ) 2014;6:39-47.
• 16. Gastaca M, Agüero F, Peter S, et al. Liver retransplantation in HIV-ınfected patients: A multicenter and multinational cohort study [abstract]. Am J Transplant 2013;13(suppl 5).
• 17. Fogel JM, Wang L, Parsons TL, et al. Undisclosed antiretroviral drug use in a multinational clinical trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052). J Infect Dis 2013;208(10):1624–1628.
• 18. Adeoye-Agboola DI, Evans H, Hewson D, Pappas Y. Factors influencing HIV disclosure among people living with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria: a systematic review using narrative synthesis and metaanalysis. Public Health 2016;136:13-28.
• 19. Mamotte N, Wassenaar D. Voluntariness of consent to HIV clinical research: A conceptual and empirical pilot study. J Health Psychol 2016. [Epub ahead of print]
• 20. Bynum SA, Wigfall LT, Brandt HM, Julious CH, Glover SH, Hébert JR. Social and structural determinants of cervical health among women engaged in HIV care. AIDS Behav 2016. [Epub ahead of print]
• 21. Logie C, Gadalla TM. Meta-analysis of health and demographic correlates of stigma towards people living with HIV. AIDS Care 2009;21(6):742-753.
• 22. Hekimoğlu CH, Kaptan F. Kronik hepatit B, kronik hepatit C ve insan immün yetmezlik virusu infeksiyonu olgularında stigmatizasyon algılarının karşılaştırılması. Klimik Derg 2014;27(2):69-72.
• 23. Sociological Association Vulnerability Assessment of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Turkey. United Nations Development Programme; Ankara. November 2007.
• 24. Kasapoğlu A, Kuş E. The role of gender in the stigmatization of people living with HIV/AIDS in Turkey, J Gender Stud 2008;17(4):359-368.
• 25. Kose S, Mandiracioglu A, Mermut G, Kaptan F, Ozbel Y. The social and health problems of people living with HIV/AIDS in Izmir, Turkey. Eurasian J Med 2012;44(1):32-39.
• 26. Avcikurt C, Koroglu O, Koroglu A, Avcikurt AS. HIV/AIDS awareness and attitudes of tour guides in Turkey. Cult Health Sex 2011;13(2):233-243.
• 27. Nur N. Turkish school teachers’ knowledge and attitudes toward HIV/AIDS. Croat Med J 2012;53(3):271- 277.
• 28. Akgun Kostak M, Unsar S, Kurt S, Erol O. Attitudes of Turkish midwives and nurses working at hospitals towards people living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Int J Nurs Pract 2012;18(5):437-444.
• 29. HIV/AIDS Sorular. http://pozitifyasam.org/tr/sss.html (Erişim tarihi: 20.05.2016)
• 30. Yegen C. Türk yazılı basınının HIV/AIDS haberlerindeki nefret söylemi: “Posta” gazetesi örneği. E-gifder 2014;2(3):317- 349.