Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 136 - 147, 31.12.2021

Ayfer Ergin

https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/2.136-147

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Altunlu, O., Elmas G. (2016). Container Inspection and Repair Standards. The Second Global Conference on Innovation in Marine Technology and the Future of Maritime Transportation, Bodrum, Muğla, Turkey.
  • Arslan, O., Er, ID. (2008). Swot Analysis for Safer Carriage of Bulk Liquid Chemicals in Tankers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154(1-3), 901-913.
  • Arslan, O., Turan, O. (2009). Analytical Investigation of Marine Casualties at the Strait of Istanbul with SWOT–AHP Method. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(2), 131-145.
  • Chang, DY. (1996). Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
  • Dağdeviren, M., Yüksel, İ. (2008). Developing A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Behavior-Based Safety Management. Information Sciences, 178(6), 1717-1733.
  • Erdal, M. (2021). Deniz Ticareti ve Konteyner Taşımaları, Satınalma Dergisi, 9, 106, https://satinalmadergisi.com/deniz-ticareti-ve-konteyner-tasimalari/.
  • Ergin, A., Eker, I. (2019). Application of Fuzzy Topsis Model for Container Port Selection Considering Environmental Factors. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 161(3), 293-302.
  • Ergin, A. (2021). A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Evaluating Differences Between Ocean Container Carriers and Their Customers. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 13(3-4), 402-421.
  • Ergin, A., Ergin, MF. (2021). The Role of Antifouling Coating in the Marine Industry. In Kalkancı, M. & Günday, A. (Eds.) Research & Reviews in Engineering. (pp.53-75), İstanbul: Gece Kitaplığı.
  • Görener, A., Toker, K., Ulucay, K. (2012). Application of Combined SWOT and AHP: A Case Study for a Manufacturing Firm. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1525-1534.
  • Görener, A. (2016). A SWOT-AHP Approach for Assessment of Medical Tourism Sector in Turkey. Alphanumeric Journal, 4(2), 159-170.
  • Hanbazazah, AS., Abril, L., Erkoc, M., Shaikh, N. (2019). Freight Consolidation with Divisible Shipments, Delivery Time Windows, and Piecewise Transportation Costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(1), 187-201.
  • Hoppin, D. (2006). How Much Does Port Congestion Cost? Logistics Today, 47(9), 1547-1438.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-Criteria Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382-394.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-Attribute Comparison of Catering Service Companies Using Fuzzy AHP: the Case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), 171-184.
  • Kahraman, C., Demirel, NÇ., Demirel, T. (2007). Prioritization of E-Government Strategies Using A SWOT-AHP Analysis: the Case of Turkey. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 284-298.
  • Kahraman, C., Demirel, NÇ., Demirel, T., Ateş, NY. (2008). A SWOT-AHP Application Using Fuzzy Concept: E-Government in Turkey. In: Kahraman C. (Eds.) Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making. (pp.85-117), Boston: Springer, Kajanus, M., Kangas, J., Kurttila, M. (2004). The Use of Value Focused Thinking and the A’wot Hybrid Method in Tourism Management. Tourism Management, 25(4), 499-506.
  • Kajanus, M., Leskinen, P., Kurttila, M., Kangas J. (2012). Making Use of MCDS Methods in SWOT Analysis—Lessons Learnt in Strategic Natural Resources Management. Forest Policy And Economics, 20, 1-9.
  • Kamal, B., Kara, G., Okşaş O. (2020). An Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Overcapacity Absorbing Methods in Container Shipping. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 162, 331-344.
  • Kangas, J., Pesonen, M., Kurttila, M., Kajanus, M. (2001, August 2-4). A'wot: Integrating The AHP with SWOT Analysis. ISAHP 2001, Berne, Switzerland.
  • Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M, Kangas, J, Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in SWOT Analysis—A Hybrid Method and its Application to a Forest-Certification Case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41-52.
  • Lee, S., Walsh, P. (2011). SWOT and AHP Hybrid Model for Sport Marketing Outsourcing Using A Case of Intercollegiate Sport. Sport Management Review, 14(4), 361-369.
  • Li, JA., Leung, SC., Wu, Y., Liu, K. (2007). Allocation of Empty Containers Between Multi-Ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 400-412.
  • Maxim, V. (2015). Less than a container load booking process, Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Business Administration International Business and Logistics Thesis 1-46.
  • Oreski, D. (2012). Strategy Development by Using SWOT-AHP. Tem Journal, 1(4), 283-291.
  • Qin, H., Zhang, Z., Qi, Z., Lim, A. (2014). The Freight Consolidation and Containerization Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(1), 37-48.
  • Shrestha, RK., Alavalapati, JR., Kalmbacher, RS. (2004). Exploring The Potential for Silvopasture Adoption in South-Central Florida: An Application of SWOT–AHP Method. Agricultural Systems, 81(3), 185-199.
  • Son, YJ. (2011). A Study on The Development Strategy of Gwangyang Port Using The SWOT/AHP Analysis. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 27(1), 247-262.
  • Şeker, Ş., Özgürler, M. (2012). Analysis of The Turkish Consumer Electronics Firm Using SWOT-AHP Method. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58(12), 1544-1554.
  • Tavana, M., Zareınejad, M., Di, Caprio, D., Kaviani, MA. (2016). An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP and SWOT Method for Outsourcing Reverse Logistics. Applied Soft Computing, 40, 544-557.
  • Tiwari S., Wee, HM., Zhou, Y., Tjoeng L. (2021). Freight Consolidation and Containerization Strategy Under Business As Usual Scenario & Carbon Tax Regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 1-12.
  • Tyan, JC., Wang, FK., Du, TC. (2003). An Evaluation of Freight Consolidation Policies in Global Third Party Logistics. Omega, 31(1), 55-62.
  • UNCTAD (2020). Review of Maritime Transport, Retrieved from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2020. 1-159, 2 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2020_en.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Wang, Y., Xu, L., Solangi, YA. (2020). Strategic Renewable Energy Resources Selection for Pakistan: Based on SWOT-Fuzzy AHP Approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101861.
  • Wickramasinghe, VSK., Takano, SE. (2009). Application of Combined SWOT and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Tourism Revival Strategic Marketing Planning. Proceedings of The Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies Vol. 7 (The 8th International Conference of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Eastern, Asia.
  • Yasa, H., Ergin, MF., Ergin, A., Alkan, G. (2016). Importance of Inert Gases for Chemical Transportation. The Second Global Conference on Innovation in Marine Technology and the Future of Maritime Transportation, Bodrum, Muğla, Turkey.
  • Yüksel, İ., Dagdeviren, M., (2007). Using The Analytic Network Process (ANP) in A SWOT Analysis–A Case Study for A Textile Firm. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3364-3382.
  • Zhu, KJ., Jing, Y., Chang, DY. (1999). A Discussion on Extent Analysis Method and Applications of Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), 450-456.

FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 136 - 147, 31.12.2021

Ayfer Ergin

https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/2.136-147

Öz

Parsiyel taşımacılık, tüm taşıma modalarında lojistik maliyetleri düşürmek adına dünyada yaygın olarak kullanılan bir taşıma şeklidir. Çalışmada Konya ilinde hizmet veren RSC Lojistik ve Dış Ticaret firmasının denizyolu parsiyel taşımacılık stratejisi SWOT (Güçlü Yönler, Zayıf Yönler, Fırsatlar ve Tehditler) analizi ile incelenmiştir. SWOT analizi, iç ve dış ortamları analiz etmek için kullanılan önemli bir tekniktir ve çoğunlukla çevresel faktörlerin yalnızca nitel incelemesini dikkate almaktadır. Bu eksikliklerin üstesinden gelmek adına, çalışmada SWOT analizi kriterler arasındaki göreceli önem ağırlıklarını belirleyebilmek için bulanık AHP (Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi) ile birlikte kullanılmıştır. SWOT- bulanık AHP entegrasyonu literatürde başvurulan bir yöntem olmasına rağmen, bu yöntemi freight forwarder firmalarının parsiyel taşımacılık stratejisine uygulayan ilk çalışmadır. Çalışma bu yönüyle literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular sonucunda en önemli önceliğin “konteyner eksikliği ve gemide yer sorunu” olduğu tespit edilirken en az önemli öncelik “karşı ödemeli yüklerin parsiyelde baskın olması” olarak bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Parsiyel Taşımacılık Konteyner Taşımacılığı SWOT Analizi Bulanık AHP (Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi)

Kaynakça

  • Altunlu, O., Elmas G. (2016). Container Inspection and Repair Standards. The Second Global Conference on Innovation in Marine Technology and the Future of Maritime Transportation, Bodrum, Muğla, Turkey.
  • Arslan, O., Er, ID. (2008). Swot Analysis for Safer Carriage of Bulk Liquid Chemicals in Tankers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154(1-3), 901-913.
  • Arslan, O., Turan, O. (2009). Analytical Investigation of Marine Casualties at the Strait of Istanbul with SWOT–AHP Method. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(2), 131-145.
  • Chang, DY. (1996). Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
  • Dağdeviren, M., Yüksel, İ. (2008). Developing A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Behavior-Based Safety Management. Information Sciences, 178(6), 1717-1733.
  • Erdal, M. (2021). Deniz Ticareti ve Konteyner Taşımaları, Satınalma Dergisi, 9, 106, https://satinalmadergisi.com/deniz-ticareti-ve-konteyner-tasimalari/.
  • Ergin, A., Eker, I. (2019). Application of Fuzzy Topsis Model for Container Port Selection Considering Environmental Factors. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 161(3), 293-302.
  • Ergin, A. (2021). A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Evaluating Differences Between Ocean Container Carriers and Their Customers. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 13(3-4), 402-421.
  • Ergin, A., Ergin, MF. (2021). The Role of Antifouling Coating in the Marine Industry. In Kalkancı, M. & Günday, A. (Eds.) Research & Reviews in Engineering. (pp.53-75), İstanbul: Gece Kitaplığı.
  • Görener, A., Toker, K., Ulucay, K. (2012). Application of Combined SWOT and AHP: A Case Study for a Manufacturing Firm. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1525-1534.
  • Görener, A. (2016). A SWOT-AHP Approach for Assessment of Medical Tourism Sector in Turkey. Alphanumeric Journal, 4(2), 159-170.
  • Hanbazazah, AS., Abril, L., Erkoc, M., Shaikh, N. (2019). Freight Consolidation with Divisible Shipments, Delivery Time Windows, and Piecewise Transportation Costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(1), 187-201.
  • Hoppin, D. (2006). How Much Does Port Congestion Cost? Logistics Today, 47(9), 1547-1438.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-Criteria Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382-394.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-Attribute Comparison of Catering Service Companies Using Fuzzy AHP: the Case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), 171-184.
  • Kahraman, C., Demirel, NÇ., Demirel, T. (2007). Prioritization of E-Government Strategies Using A SWOT-AHP Analysis: the Case of Turkey. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 284-298.
  • Kahraman, C., Demirel, NÇ., Demirel, T., Ateş, NY. (2008). A SWOT-AHP Application Using Fuzzy Concept: E-Government in Turkey. In: Kahraman C. (Eds.) Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making. (pp.85-117), Boston: Springer, Kajanus, M., Kangas, J., Kurttila, M. (2004). The Use of Value Focused Thinking and the A’wot Hybrid Method in Tourism Management. Tourism Management, 25(4), 499-506.
  • Kajanus, M., Leskinen, P., Kurttila, M., Kangas J. (2012). Making Use of MCDS Methods in SWOT Analysis—Lessons Learnt in Strategic Natural Resources Management. Forest Policy And Economics, 20, 1-9.
  • Kamal, B., Kara, G., Okşaş O. (2020). An Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Overcapacity Absorbing Methods in Container Shipping. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 162, 331-344.
  • Kangas, J., Pesonen, M., Kurttila, M., Kajanus, M. (2001, August 2-4). A'wot: Integrating The AHP with SWOT Analysis. ISAHP 2001, Berne, Switzerland.
  • Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M, Kangas, J, Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in SWOT Analysis—A Hybrid Method and its Application to a Forest-Certification Case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41-52.
  • Lee, S., Walsh, P. (2011). SWOT and AHP Hybrid Model for Sport Marketing Outsourcing Using A Case of Intercollegiate Sport. Sport Management Review, 14(4), 361-369.
  • Li, JA., Leung, SC., Wu, Y., Liu, K. (2007). Allocation of Empty Containers Between Multi-Ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 400-412.
  • Maxim, V. (2015). Less than a container load booking process, Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Business Administration International Business and Logistics Thesis 1-46.
  • Oreski, D. (2012). Strategy Development by Using SWOT-AHP. Tem Journal, 1(4), 283-291.
  • Qin, H., Zhang, Z., Qi, Z., Lim, A. (2014). The Freight Consolidation and Containerization Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(1), 37-48.
  • Shrestha, RK., Alavalapati, JR., Kalmbacher, RS. (2004). Exploring The Potential for Silvopasture Adoption in South-Central Florida: An Application of SWOT–AHP Method. Agricultural Systems, 81(3), 185-199.
  • Son, YJ. (2011). A Study on The Development Strategy of Gwangyang Port Using The SWOT/AHP Analysis. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 27(1), 247-262.
  • Şeker, Ş., Özgürler, M. (2012). Analysis of The Turkish Consumer Electronics Firm Using SWOT-AHP Method. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58(12), 1544-1554.
  • Tavana, M., Zareınejad, M., Di, Caprio, D., Kaviani, MA. (2016). An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP and SWOT Method for Outsourcing Reverse Logistics. Applied Soft Computing, 40, 544-557.
  • Tiwari S., Wee, HM., Zhou, Y., Tjoeng L. (2021). Freight Consolidation and Containerization Strategy Under Business As Usual Scenario & Carbon Tax Regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 1-12.
  • Tyan, JC., Wang, FK., Du, TC. (2003). An Evaluation of Freight Consolidation Policies in Global Third Party Logistics. Omega, 31(1), 55-62.
  • UNCTAD (2020). Review of Maritime Transport, Retrieved from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2020. 1-159, 2 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2020_en.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Wang, Y., Xu, L., Solangi, YA. (2020). Strategic Renewable Energy Resources Selection for Pakistan: Based on SWOT-Fuzzy AHP Approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101861.
  • Wickramasinghe, VSK., Takano, SE. (2009). Application of Combined SWOT and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Tourism Revival Strategic Marketing Planning. Proceedings of The Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies Vol. 7 (The 8th International Conference of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Eastern, Asia.
  • Yasa, H., Ergin, MF., Ergin, A., Alkan, G. (2016). Importance of Inert Gases for Chemical Transportation. The Second Global Conference on Innovation in Marine Technology and the Future of Maritime Transportation, Bodrum, Muğla, Turkey.
  • Yüksel, İ., Dagdeviren, M., (2007). Using The Analytic Network Process (ANP) in A SWOT Analysis–A Case Study for A Textile Firm. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3364-3382.
  • Zhu, KJ., Jing, Y., Chang, DY. (1999). A Discussion on Extent Analysis Method and Applications of Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), 450-456.
Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Ayfer Ergin 0000-0002-6276-4001

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 22 Mayıs 2021
Kabul Tarihi 7 Aralık 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Ergin, A. (2021). FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 9(2), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/2.136-147
AMA Ergin A. FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. Aralık 2021;9(2):136-147. doi:10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/2.136-147
Chicago Ergin, Ayfer. “FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 9, sy. 2 (Aralık 2021): 136-47. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/2.136-147.
EndNote Ergin A (01 Aralık 2021) FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 9 2 136–147.
IEEE A. Ergin, “FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI”, Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, c. 9, sy. 2, ss. 136–147, 2021, doi: 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/2.136-147.
ISNAD Ergin, Ayfer. “FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 9/2 (Aralık 2021), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/2.136-147.
JAMA Ergin A. FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2021;9:136–147.
MLA Ergin, Ayfer. “FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, c. 9, sy. 2, 2021, ss. 136-47, doi:10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/2.136-147.
Vancouver Ergin A. FREIGHT FORWARDER FİRMASI İÇİN DENİZYOLU PARSİYEL TAŞIMACILIK STRATEJİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: SWOT/BULANIK AHP UYGULAMASI. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2021;9(2):136-47.